LOL. BSV is getting spam attacked

[Anonymous No.13175398]

Guess they regret the push for unlimited blocks now. How long untill the chain collaps?

[Anonymous No.13175601]

HAHA it don't seem to be slowing down. kek.

What I don't understand is how could they not see this would happen?

I mean, even a 6 year old could tell them this would lead to poison blocks and heavy bloating. Get rekt!

[Anonymous No.13175699]

Piece of shit blockchain lmao

[Anonymous No.13175859]

how exactly does the attack work?

[Anonymous No.13175906]

>>13175859
Someone is spamming the chain with useless data to bloat the blocks. People have warned about this for a long time, but the curry coders Sanjey's Vision are too stupid to understand

[Anonymous No.13175917]

>>13175398
Bloatchain technology.

They are just showing off they can mine 128mb block to have something to write on their desert Twitter, it's literally free for them to spam transactions, basically CSW and Ayre control the entire supply and they are the only miners collecting back the transaction fees.

[Anonymous No.13175918]

>>13175906
So what does this actually do to the chain? Just slow response time or can it "break"?

[Anonymous No.13175930]

>>13175918
It only makes the chain stronger. People don't understand what's happening. Craig is litterly giving it energy.

[Anonymous No.13175941]

>>13175918
it wastes gigabytes of space on every machine running a full node

[Anonymous No.13175943]

>>13175906

don't worry, i'm sure satoj has a patent for this, and will sue the spammer for copyright violation

[Anonymous No.13176010]

>>13175941
This can go on for weeks and months. The SV chain could end up being multiple PETABYTES. At which point the average person couldn't run it. It will become a centralised database. Which is the exact opposite of the core Bitcoin idea.

Nice one you Aussie retard.

[Anonymous No.13176058]

>>13175398
don't worry, he'll file a patent before it becomes a problem

[Anonymous No.13176063]

>>13175906
>Someone
It's not attackers, it's CSW, no fucking one would spend transaction fees for this bullshit.
CSW/Ayre own most of the hashrate, so they get back transaction fees and it's literally free for them to do this kind of demo.

>>13175930
>It only makes the chain stronger.
No it only makes the chain bloated and centralised.

Daily reminder that BSV is not cash but an illegal storage token.
No one would ever even think to store legal data on a blockchain, since it's expensive, slow to fetch, and in one word, retarded.
To store data you can use cheaper services, dropbox, google drive, mega, all the amazon shits and they are infinitely superior in term of usability, speed and features. They have versioning, autosync and all the perks.

[Anonymous No.13176066]

>>13176010
kek

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13176102]

>>13175930
no blocksize deosn't make any chain stronger hashrate does. and sv hashrate is like under the saddest frogs ass.

[Anonymous No.13176143]

it looks like the attackers unironically managed to breake the chain. 40 min since last block now. Guess propagation is not possible with bloated blocks. Who would have thought? lol

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13176210]

>>13176143
the saddest thing about sv is it has one or two digit transaction count unless someone is spamming it.

[Anonymous No.13176239]

>>13176063
I'm listening to Tales from the Crypt right now and they're talking about how someone should attack BSV. I unironically think a listener of this show who has some money to blow said fuck it and is messing with the chain

[Anonymous No.13176272]

>know theres CP on your chain
>flood it with petabytes of data so realistically nobody can download the entire thing
heh

[Anonymous No.13176274]

>>13175398
>>13175601
you fags dont even know

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13176286]

>>13176272
well actually any full node can just trim the fuck out of it and filter out and keep the content not publicly available via indexing services.

[Anonymous No.13176290]

>>13176143

BTC went six hours the other day.

>>13176210

I've made thousands of TX on BSV. You can do a lot of cool stuff with it.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13176310]

>>13176290
>I've made thousands of TX on BSV
so the user count is actually lower than 3... i see.

[Anonymous No.13176325]

EVERYBODY POST TO BISTAGRAM LETS CRASH THIS CHAIN WITH NO SURVIVORS

[Anonymous No.13176336]

SOMEBODY UPLOAD THE NEW ZEALAND VIDEO

[Anonymous No.13176350]

>>13176290
People are clueless

[Anonymous No.13176351]

>>13176286
>indexing services
so why not using a simple relational db?
you want to delete cp?
delete query and it's gone forever
tell me what is the point of storing data in a blockchain?
this is seriously retarded

[Anonymous No.13176356]

>>13176310
epic pun, haha. you should have your own comedy show or something!

[Anonymous No.13176364]

>>13176058
actually he has patented spam years ago and is right now suing the spammer

[Anonymous No.13176395]

LISTEN EVERYONE

you can go to memo.sv and make a few posts for free even if you dont have any sanjays vision. and get this EVERY POST GOES ONTO THE BLOCK CHAIN FOREVER

if enough anons spam a bunch of posts we can bury this chain for ever

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13176411]

>>13176351
>tell me what is the point of storing data in a blockchain?
dunno man, it's an anathema to how the internet is. for some stuff like transactions it makes sense sort of. but for general data meh... but the sv cucks think this is the future. it reminds me of mongodb... mongodb took a hundred step backwards and one to the side and it's the "future".

[Anonymous No.13176447]

>>13175398
>>13175601
>>13175699
>>13175906
>>13175941
>>13176010
>>13176143
Imagine being so retarded you think the miners making more money at market rates is a bad thing for a coin and then imagine being so obsessed you circle-jerk about your lack of fundamental understanding on /biz/.

[Anonymous No.13176450]

>>13176356
>The Bitcoin SV blockchain is not a place for
>criminal activity – and if you use it for illegal
>purposes, you will leave a digitally signed
>evidence trail that cannot be erased. We stand
>ready to work with global law enforcement
>authorities to stamp out this and any other illegal
>misuse of Bitcoin.

I mean, even CSW has a lot of irony.
You provide the perfect tool to upload cp, and then you troll the authorities because they cannot enforce anything since BSV is a fork of BTC and BTC is:

pure

expensive

ANARCHY.

[Anonymous No.13176472]

>>13176336
Only really good use for huge blocks is to store banned and wrongthink material. otherwise it's retarded though

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13176517]

>>13176450
not only that but creg wrote a 10 page cringe pleading essay on how ownership of a private key is no proof of identity nor proof of past ownership when it was about him signing with the genesis keys.

[Anonymous No.13176550]

>>13176472
>banned and wrongthink material
so basically CP

[BSV will win No.13176593]

>>13175398
>>13175601
>>13175906
>>etc
calling it an attack doesn't make it an attack

[Anonymous No.13176596]

>>13176593
saying an attack isn't an attack doesn't stop it from being an attack

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13176643]

>>13176472
>Only really good use for huge blocks is to store banned and wrongthink material
i'm all down for bashing sv but i don't think there is a connection there big blocks does not necessarily equate to storing random shit on a blockchain. it's just specifically sv and a few other retardcoins that are like that.

[BSV will win No.13176658]

>>13176596
>user: "hey can i pay you to put this in a block?"
>miner: "ok"
>you: "wow look at that attack"
with constant 100 MB blocks the chain would grow at 14 GB per day. an "attacker" would need to pay miners 140 BSV per day to keep that up.
yeah this "attack" won't last for long.

[Anonymous No.13176719]

>>13176658
some btc whales have literally tens of thousands of free sanjays they got from the fork. yes, this can go on for a very long time.

[BSV will win No.13176770]

>>13176719
key word is can. it won't. even if it did all it will accomplish is show the world that BSV can do what it promises.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13176794]

>>13176770
i'm with this cuck on this specific subject spamming the sv chain is only an advertisement to their retarded ways. and it is probably a publicity stunt and also an attempt to distract people from >>13176210

[BSV will win No.13176820]

>>13176794
hey now, words hurt you know.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13176831]

>>13176820

[Anonymous No.13176870]

>>13175398
Muh vishun

[Anonymous No.13177050]

>>13176658
How much would it cost an attacker if he was also a miner?

[Anonymous No.13177075]

>>13176658
but it's "over" after like 10GB, isn't it.

[Anonymous No.13177177]

>>13175398

[Anonymous No.13177197]

WHY IS THIS FUCKING BLOCKCHAIN STILL RUNNING REEEEEEE

YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO SPAM IT TO DEATH YOU FAGGOTS

[Anonymous No.13177229]

>>13176447
Except BCH and BSV have been more profitable to mine before, and not once did this cause them to gain majority hashrate. Network effect is strong, friend.

[Anonymous No.13177915]

>>13177050
Nothing outside of lost block fees to competitors

[Anonymous No.13178152]

>>13176447
Imagine quoting so many people to make an empty point about something that's not even the core argument, imagine, the utter retarded Dunning Kruger effect going on in such an individuals mind.

I hope you're adding a 6th HDD to your RAID array by next weekend, you're going to need it.

[Anonymous No.13178210]

>blockchain audited only by (((Datacenters)))
what could go wrong

[Anonymous No.13178360]

>>13175906
>>13175917
Except that it happens to Bitcoin too.

>>13176063
>It's not attackers, it's CSW, no fucking one would spend transaction fees for this bullshit.

When it happens to Bitcoin, Bitcoin maximalists blame it on bad actors. When it happens to alts, Bitcoin maximalists blame it on self-sabotage. Fucking schizos.