/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.13115432]

Why we pumping?

[Anonymous No.13115442]

This thread and the massive autistic delusional behavior you can witness from retards or pajeets on /biz/ constitute a real goldmine if you want to understand why there is so many FUD surrounding Chainlink. Just look at the desperate posts coming from Linkies bagholders who are mostly reaching for hope with their supposed partnerships or project implementations. It turns out the aforementioned companies only talked about smart contracts globally, but the hopeful brainlets automatically associated the term with their pitiful ERC20 overvalued token. I'm not joking, they are unable to provide actual evidence or big names.The rare times when Chainlink's name was actually dropped were insignificant, "what if" possibilities by literal who companies with no weight nor presence in the technology industry. Meaning that the massive adoption of their json parser will never happen - there is a plethora of projects who are actually trying to address and come up with a solution for the oracle problem with dedicated and more competent teams than the two man job we have with Chainlink. At least, I can salute the marketing effort and the memes who are really great and entertaining if you want to have a laugh. Sadly, it's the only value Link will ever have for most people who actually understand the current state of the crypto market.

The only way to arguably make it left in the crypto market is the BTC halvening happening in one year. And even that is not guaranteed, normies won't fall for the trap twice. Still, if you believe, you have approximately two years left to accumulate as much as BTC as possible for what may be the biggest bull run that will be coming.

But yeah, keep believing in your stinky linkies, your double or triple digits, and it will surely happen happen. Link will moon, guaranteed. It's only a matter of time. "Do not underestimate the power of collective thought... $1000 EOY!" soon™

[Anonymous No.13115467]

Yes, Sir

[Anonymous No.13115490]

2% is pump?

[Anonymous No.13115507]

>>13115490
do you really think it will stop at a mere 2%?
dont go to sleep today fren

[derogold.com No.13115509]

>>13115442
how old is this pasta?

[Anonymous No.13115522]

>>13115507
What’s happening? Am I missing something

[Anonymous No.13115534]

>>13115509
Exactly 11 days old. It first appeared in
>>13021812

[Anonymous No.13115546]

>>13115442
But the even more depressing or ridicule thing, depending on what your take on Chainlink is, is that you're mostly under the impression that there is a lot of people who invested into this scam. I guess you're only browsing /biz/ and don't look around in other online communities. You'd be awfully surprised on how fucking NON-EXISTENT Chainlink is outside of 4chan. Reminds me of that part of the FUD pasta where it says:
>a bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/
Because it's actually the case. Chainlink is only discussed and revered on 4chan. There is no one outside of the 4chan 'community' considering Chainlink seriously. The rare posts you may see outside of here like on Reddit are mostly coming from anons pitifully trying to create the impression that hype is spreading, or rare and gullible people who actually fell for the scam and are worried.
May I have to remind you that after two years, there is still not a single worth partnership announcement, no sign of MAINNET or any implementation? To the Marines reading this who got caught in that trap, think carefully. THINK. Are you really willing to bet your hard earned money into memes? Finances aren't about the lulz. It's not like politics in first-world countries who only matter on a surface level. Money and wealth are real matters which can FUCK YOU UP if you're not careful. I'm not being a salty seething nolinker here. I'm not trying to FUD in order to lower the price and accumulate more bags. I'm showing genuine concern for people who are about to face a great amount of disappointment because they let this site and its memes take over their minds. Don't end up wasting your life like Brenton Tarrant did by acting upon meme magic. Sure, people will laugh and rejoice, myself included as well. But you will be on the receiving end of that collective laughter.

Take care anons and always manage your risk if you truly wish to make it.

[Anonymous No.13115547]

>>13115509
I've never seen it before. It must be very new or he just typed it out. Kek.

[Anonymous No.13115552]

>>13115442
This. Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth. Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons. Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story. The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes. In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team