Some considerations on the last 2 bull runs we had

[Anonymous No.13090758]

the 2011 was the first all was new, no one cared about. 2013 was the first normie intrusion, and thanks to the darkweb le meme many normies got into bitcoin, I clearly remember it was also shilled by local chad in my city...
2017 was also a new thing, and people who missed 2011 and 2013 tought ''No this time I won't miss it again''
This led to irrational fomo and hype, and this led to irrational x100 and x1000s.
It's all psicology in the end.. now what is the sentiment?
They got in and got burnt, now they are more souspicious, will never hodls, they are going to sell even a x2
Your ''golden hyped bull run'' needs NEW INNOCENT MONEY
And where comes it from? From the people that now they are in school, and between 6 - 8 years will finish college and they will get a white collar job and money to invest in this

I should kill myself because I don't trade coins all day, but I have different ideas to make money?

Shitcoins were an easy thing in 2017 bruda , face the reality: you are in the late adopter phase now, and you gotta go trought minimum other 5 years of bear, letting the today zoomers to became to boomers of tomorrow who will buy the coins you bought now (if any survivor)
People have not forgotten the bitconnect suicide cases, for them the criptosphere is hype and scam.
We can talk about it again when this shared database will be able to scale, only then media will shill it again and normie will buy later once again

[Anonymous No.13090799]

>>13090758
Ah classic, you have no knowledge on anything, so you decide to rationalize a reason based on literally nothing

[Anonymous No.13090802]

Why five years? IMO It’s gonna take fewer than that.

[Anonymous No.13090856]

>>13090758
>letting the today zoomers to became to boomers of tomorrow who will buy the coins you bought now
agreed. I see a lot of zoomers in twitch chats that are interested in crypto but too young to buy it. when they finally get bank accounts we will make it

[Anonymous No.13091257]

>>13090802
>Why five years? IMO It’s gonna take fewer than that.

you have to wait for the teenger in IV high school to finish college, and to put money in this

>>13090799
>you have no knowledge on anything, so you decide to rationalize a reason based on literally nothing

You have to rationalize a phenomen to understand it. (Beatlemania for example)
You can't be a brainlet ''HODL meme''
You must be ahead of the curve to dump on them
Bitcoin and crypto are not complicated, there are big whales waiting for a catalist to pump.

In 2017 the catalist was Ethereum, a new 2017 like it's very difficult because you would need innocent money, not people who already got burnt

[Anonymous No.13091749]

>>13091257
You are assuming crypto is and forever will be a "ponzi" which people use to get rich quick since it hasn't any use cases. If crypto starts to have use cases beyond your comprehension then we won't need to wait for zoomers and their innocent money. Also we would need to wait way more than 5 years, more like 10 to 15 years when zoomers finally have good paying jobs. They won't pump this market with their student loans.

[Anonymous No.13091764]

>>13091749
>You are assuming crypto is and forever will be a "ponzi" which people use to get rich quick since it hasn't any use cases
And this is an unreasonable assumption... because?

[Anonymous No.13091990]

>>13091257
The problem is that, you THINK you know what you are talking about

[Anonymous No.13092065]

>>13091990
on that chart where do you put those who write things that are sometimes right and sometimes wrong just to observe reactions and make conclusions to be either corrected or not confronted, to further strengthen deep details and knowledge and be closer to the truth, accounting for said kruger effect, assuming competence of others is close to none 99% of the time?

[Anonymous No.13092157]

>>13092065
If I understood correctly, I’d imagine that kind of person would be at the trough, decent competence with low confidence