/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.12949639]

Strap the fuck in LINK niggers.

https://twitter.com/fribeiro1/status/1103729346739617793

ORACLE
LINK
API MONETIZATION

[Anonymous No.12949654]

https://cloudexpo2019.sched.com/event/Kvuv

[Anonymous No.12949660]

>>12949639
the delusion continues

[Anonymous No.12949704]

>>12949639
Is this the fabled Favela Anon?

[Anonymous No.12949756]

>>12949639
WHAT THE FUCK

[Anonymous No.12949766]

wow another nothingburger by a literal who company that does nothing substantial

[Anonymous No.12949806]

>>12949766
this desu senpai

[Anonymous No.12949813]

>>12949766
>Oracle
>literal who
ok

[Anonymous No.12949819]

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY!
HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

[Anonymous No.12949841]

>>12949813
>>12949766

[Anonymous No.12949867]

[Anonymous No.12949869]

>>12949660
>>12949766

Hang yourself

[Anonymous No.12949899]

Nice try pajeets but no one is gonna go all in chainlink and restart a 2017 bull run off this nothing burger, brainwashed fools

[Anonymous No.12949948]

>>12949841
WTF? I thought it was some oraclize style shit oracle provider

[Anonymous No.12949970]

>>12949639
Wait, wtf? This is actual ORACLE the company...we aren't just talking about Oracles?

Someone mansplain this to me, im a grill teeheehee

[Anonymous No.12949979]

>>12949766
>Oracle
AHAHAHAHHA

[Anonymous No.12949994]

sirs.....sirs do the needful....buy link sirs....

OH NO NO NO linkies unironically have pajeets shilling their scam coin now. the absolute desperation

[Anonymous No.12949995]

Oh fuck oh fuck oh fuck.

[Anonymous No.12950003]

>>12949639
inb4 Oracle acquires CL to solve the oracle problem.

[Anonymous No.12950006]

fuck link

[Anonymous No.12950033]

This can't be real
Is this the same oraclize that was talking shit just a year ago?
Is meme magic real

[Anonymous No.12950050]

>>12950033
Oracle as in the giant tech company, not Oraclize.

[Anonymous No.12950058]

>>12950033
>Is meme magic real
those digits say yes

[Anonymous No.12950061]

>>12950033
As real as a Toilet Witch, sir.

[Anonymous No.12950100]

>>12949639
>Oracle
Wait, THE Oracle?

[Anonymous No.12950113]

>>12950100
Checked and yes, fren, we are all going to make it.

[Anonymous No.12950119]

Oracle oraclizing chainlink

holy shit, we made it.

[Anonymous No.12950127]

>>12950100
checked, and yes. That ORACLE, from S&P100

[Anonymous No.12950134]

Ive unironically never heard of this "oracle" company. furthermore, linkies are acting like its the ceo whos going to be going on some long winded tangent about chainshit. meanwhile in reality its some stinky pajeet from brazil who will briefly talk about it at some boring nerdfest "talk" that no one will attend or care about. the absolute state of you stinky linkies.

[Anonymous No.12950137]

>>12950113
>>12950127
That's it, I'm officially hyped.

[Anonymous No.12950148]

>>12949819
YOU ARE A MANIAC!

[Anonymous No.12950150]

>>12949639
Oracle AND Oraclize bends the knee to big Serg on the very same day hahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha is this even real life

[Anonymous No.12950158]

>>12950134
You have no reason to be on this board if you have never heard of one of the largest players in the tech space for last 20 years. Please fuck off back to whatever rock you've been under.

[Anonymous No.12950176]

>>12950158
absolutely seething. no one has ever cared or mentioned this literal who corporate-bloat company until one of their drone workers mentions link, then all of a sudden its a huge deal? Get real

[Anonymous No.12950179]

>>12950100
Fucking checked
We made it

[Anonymous No.12950180]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3v5PSkJUCVs&t=
This is what I'll listen to when the singularity hits

[Anonymous No.12950194]

>>12949639
its pamping hard rn

[Anonymous No.12950219]

>>12950180
and this is what we listen to the until then kek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jK-NcRmVcw

[Anonymous No.12950222]

>>12950194
might be, not not related to this news.... Pump group calling 500% until March 21.
>https://twitter.com/PalmVeniceBeach

[Anonymous No.12950229]

UNFFFFFFF yssss SERGEYYYY

[Anonymous No.12950264]

>>12950176
Hang yourself unironically

[Anonymous No.12950278]

>>12950222
>>https://twitter.com/PalmVeniceBeach
hahahahahahhahaahah pajeets spamming random shills on twitter

[Anonymous No.12950279]

>>12950134
holy fuck, are you a blue collar worker or something?

bet you don't know SAP to

[Anonymous No.12950336]

>>12949639
>hey guys, you know this rewards program we use that works just fine on our servers?
>let's fucking put it on blockchain for no reason

Fucking lol. Why the fuck would an airline A. move their data off their platform, or B. decide to try to trust data imported from outside their platform.

In this example, it's so much easier, cheaper, and more reliable to collect data through the company's existing services: corporate accounts.

This is a fantastic example of just trying to throw shit at the wall of blockchain and see what people are willing to bet sticks. Oracles don't exist and chainlink is worth little more than a customer retention campaign deployed at a midlevel department store franchise.

[Anonymous No.12950356]

>>12950336
This is the type of shit you post when you don't know what smart contracts are.

[Anonymous No.12950368]

I want to dance.
>We're gonna make it bois

[Anonymous No.12950370]

>>12949639
MODS! Is this a safe place for racists? Because he said the n-word and I'm literally having to take time off of work to recuperate, it's more than I can handle and I think it made my spleen twist wrong and I need to sue everyone I can.
At least delete his post and ban him, kthanx.

[Anonymous No.12950387]

>>12950356
Or... if you control your own platform, you could just write a script that executes when conditions are met.

Your NPC response is hilarious though.
>Y-you just don't understand! That airline already has all the data but they NEED to send it out to a decentralized network to be voted on and sent back to them! It's a new paradiiiiiigm!!!!!

[Anonymous No.12950390]

>>12950387
>you could just write a script that executes when conditions are met.
You mean a smart contract?

[Anonymous No.12950396]

>>12949766
>>12949899
>>12950134
>>12950176
go back to your Minecraft server please
oh wait, it runs on java
>by Oracle®

[Anonymous No.12950403]

>>12950390
That's all those are. A blockchain informed script.

So why is this airline sending their data out so that it can be sold back to them?

[None !xkYhOIw6wY No.12950405]

Interesting.

[Anonymous No.12950407]

>>12950390
Don't take his bait.

[Anonymous No.12950409]

>>12950396
How do I upvote this?

[Anonymous No.12950421]

>>12950407
His is not bait if he's in the process of falling for my bait.

[BizCloud !!MKITWvCY0Sy No.12950422]

>>12950405
your the guy from March 4th, I recognize your tripcode

[Anonymous No.12950427]

>>12950403
>That's all those are. A blockchain informed script.
Of course lol.

>So why is this airline sending their data out so that it can be sold back to them?
I'm not spoonfeeding you.
Do your own DYOR research.

[Anonymous No.12950439]

>>12950336
imbecile detected

[Anonymous No.12950459]

>>12949639
> tfw the Golden State Warriors wear Chainlink jerseys for “Oracle Celebration Day at Oracle Arena”

> yfw Steph Curry thanks Sergey in his Finals MVP speech

[Anonymous No.12950479]

>>12950405
Its him
Was this the semi large event/partnership?

[Anonymous No.12950484]

>>12950427
Good. Check this out:
>airline sells a flight
>airline sees it's for a business account
>airline gives a reward to the passenger

vs
>airline sells a flight
>airline provides flight sales data to an API feed
>fifteen link node operators pull from the same API feed
>all of them vote that the data is valid and pretend they're acting as an oracle
>the data gets put in a smart contract
>smart contract executes
>data results go back to the airline
>passenger gets a reward

oh gee, I wonder which one airlines will pick

[Anonymous No.12950486]

>>12949639
Holy fucking shit niggers we're gonna be rich

[Anonymous No.12950495]

>>12950484
see >>12950356

[Anonymous No.12950500]

To brianlets:
This tells us that Chainlink will be embraced as an option but will compete with Oracle's service. Now, that's not bad, collective autism has tested the chainlink concept enough, it will prevail in the long term. This doesn't state a collaboration though. Although, once Chainlink wins in security and oracle diversity the Oracle solution will be absorbed into the network like oraclize was. And like all these other smug shit projects like rhombus and maker are going to be absorbed.

[Anonymous No.12950501]

>>12949766
this
when mass suicide

[Anonymous No.12950504]

Wow it's fucking nothing

[Anonymous No.12950505]

>>12950439
Give me a reson you should put data on the blockchain in this example.

Otherwise your insult is hollow and meaningless.

[Anonymous No.12950519]

>>12950495
Right but look at this: >>12950484

[Anonymous No.12950544]

>>12950405
Hey again anon. You actually lurk here?

[Anonymous No.12950552]

>>12950519
Smart contracts made billions when all they could do was shit out tokens (ETH).
The next phase is about to take shape: actually useful smart contracts in real-world applications.

[Anonymous No.12950555]

>>12950486
nope

[Anonymous No.12950559]

>>12949639
Holy shit he said the "n-word" and MODS haven't deleted it yet. They DID delete my post complainng. So I'm timing this shit now in case it's actually causing anyone mental harm.
It's against the rules and against basic humanity... censor the racists, not the complainers, mods...

[Anonymous No.12950570]

>june
>still be considered a startup

it will go sideways until then, and you will miss all the gains on ETH, you have been warned

[Anonymous No.12950573]

>>12949948
how young are you if you have never heard of oracle?

[Anonymous No.12950574]

Nothing worth getting excited about.

[Anonymous No.12950585]

>>12950574

[Anonymous No.12950588]

>>12950486
GIVE LINK TO BLANKET NOW PLX MY PEPE IS COLD!

[Anonymous No.12950589]

>>12950573
I live in Nashville, Tn and work as a software architect/manager. I have to interview a lot of 22-25 year olds and literally this year I've heard from 3 of these kids that they had no idea what Oracle was...

[Anonymous No.12950594]

>>12949639
>>12949756
>>12949813
>>12949819
>>12949841
>>12949867
>>12949869
>>12949970
>>12949979
>>12949995
>>12950050
>>12950058
>>12950100
>>12950113
>>12950119
>>12950127
>and all other marines that responded
And then we win..

[None !xkYhOIw6wY No.12950596]

>>12950422
>>12950479
>>12950544
I browse from time-to-time.

[Anonymous No.12950598]

>>12950589
Nice, 615 represent

[Anonymous No.12950611]

>>12950505
My impression is that one of the big usecases is transmitting and confirming data between companies, not intra-company. IE: what are the underlying reasons why the airline company in your example would give rewards points? To collect data and incentivize customers to use your service

Say American Airlines wants to bolster their rewards program, they will need to know price ranges, target demographics, flight logistics etc... and they will need a way to efficiently collect and compare that data to their competitors.

I could be way fucking off but you’re thinking surface level here. Airlines don’t give out reward miles out of benevolence

[Anonymous No.12950620]

>>12950552
How are you going to put the real world on blockchain?

Chainlink is just reputation voting on data to add.
Which means that at best, you're only getting "popular" data.
Not real data.

[Anonymous No.12950623]

>>12950387
>>12950403
>>12950484

There is no way to get that data for those scripts without compromising all the network where you get the data from, when you use blockchain you can get the data with cryptography so you can release all kinds of data for automatization without wondering if you are creating holes for your network

you currently can automatize everything but no one wants to release real time data because they fear that there will be leakages, cloud tried to fix this in some way but the only true way is blockchain

I already spoonfeed way too much, you brainlet pajeets, fuck you

[Anonymous No.12950628]

>>12950620
>How are you going to put the real world on blockchain?
https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/07/22/ethereum-and-oracles/

[Anonymous No.12950635]

>>12950405
>>12950596
Wait, this was the big announcement, wasn't it? You cheeky fucker, I love you.

[Anonymous No.12950648]

>>12950596
Got any more juicy tidbits?

[Anonymous No.12950652]

>>12950635

yikes kys

[Anonymous No.12950659]

[Anonymous No.12950671]

>>12950598
What part of middle tn do you live in?

[Anonymous No.12950688]

>>12950671
Get out of here pervert, this isn't Craigslist Missed Encounters.

[Anonymous No.12950704]

>>12950611
They also don't give out data to competitors out of benevolence.

You're avoiding the scenario listed in OP's image. Why the everloving fuck would the airline send out data and collect the same data before distributing perks to corporate passengers?

You'd think the guy putting on the talk would be able to come up with a real scenario, not this clown world shit.

[None !xkYhOIw6wY No.12950713]

>>12950635
>>12950648
All will be revealed in due time.

[Anonymous No.12950717]

>>12950559
You get karma, you learned from your mistake and are now pointing out someone elses. We need to keep this sub free of hate.
>>12949639

[Anonymous No.12950725]

Big news.

[Anonymous No.12950726]

>>12950628
There's no such thing as oracles.

Voting on data or data sources isn't an oracle. These sources can lie.

[Anonymous No.12950733]

>>12949766
It's only the 6th largest software company in the world. Not even top 5! Fucking deluded linkies.

[Anonymous No.12950736]

>>12950726
>There's no such thing as oracles.
... cried the stable boy.

[Anonymous No.12950738]

this is a startup pitch event. ORACLE isn't using CL. learn to read you faggots.

[Anonymous No.12950744]

>>12950738
HERE COME THE COPE
GET YO BUCKETS THE TEARS ARE A COMIN

[Anonymous No.12950755]

>>12950405
Hi Fren, I'm assuming the semi large announcement you called was Oraclize? Really doubt you knew this random Oracle employee was gonna tweet this today. Having some insider knowledge about the Oraclize presentation seems reasonable tho.

[Anonymous No.12950772]

>>12950736
Oracles provide outside information.

Like a temperature sensor. Or an art expert.

The problem is that oracles can lie.

[Anonymous No.12950781]

>>12950772
>Oracles provide outside information.
Thanks for finally coming around.
Welcome to the Linkgang! (you and Steve from Skycoin)

[Anonymous No.12950797]

>>12950781
I'm glad we can agree on something.

Now, to the issue of Chainlink. It's not an oracle. It's decentralized reputation based voting. Kind of like how the United States votes for a presidential candidate.

[Anonymous No.12950800]

>>12950738
It's an Oracle employee presenting in an official capacity (says Oracle under his name) a working demo of Oracle's blockchain + Chainlink at a large expo.

It's huge no matter how you wanna try and fud it.

[Anonymous No.12950803]

>>12949639
P R I C E D I N

[Anonymous No.12950804]

>>12950797
>It's not an oracle.
... cried the stable boy.

[Anonymous No.12950805]

>>12950772
>The problem is that oracles can lie.
great, you've finally figured out part of the oracle problem and why chainlin

[Anonymous No.12950809]

>>12950671
I don't live in Tennessee anymore, but Brentwood

[Anonymous No.12950824]

>>12950804
>>12950805
How does chainlink prevent lying.

I hope you don't think it's because people with reputation vote on an answer. Sometimes the most popular answers are lies.

[Anonymous No.12950825]

>>12950713
Pls gibs anon

[Anonymous No.12950828]

>>12950505
Your example is a bad one

[Anonymous No.12950840]

>>12950824
>13 posts by this ID

[Anonymous No.12950841]

Close your eyes, try to clear any thoughts you are having
Take long, slow, deep breathes and put all your focus and attention onto your breathing
iiiiiiiinnnn.................... ooooooooooooouuuut

good. Do this for a few minutes, then -
VISUALIZE yourself becoming rich through your LINK investment
ANTICIPATE the things you will buy with your new found abundance of wealth
IMAGINE as though it is all happening now in the present moment, for the present moment is all that truly exists
MOST IMPORTANTLY
FEEL the way you will FEEL when that moment comes and you make it!
FEELING THE EMOTION IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN JUST VISUALIZING THE IMAGES!

Now open your eyes, look in a mirror, and recite these affirmations (use/add your own that is relevant to the reality you want to create once you make it)
I AM RICH
I AM WEALTHY
I AM A MILLIONAIRE
LINK HAS GIVEN ME INFINITE ABUNDANCE
It's important to do this when you wake up and before you go to bed, but do it as often as possible. Also hold the image and idea of us making it and LINK being worth $1,000 or more in your mind as you fall to sleep.

WHEN WE DO THIS COLLECTIVELY MY LINK BROTHERS, THE UNIVERSE WILL SEE TO IT THAT CERTAIN EVENTS, PEOPLE AND CIRCUMSTANCES WILL ALIGN AND BE ATTRACTED TO US - THAT WILL ALLOW OUR DESIRE TO MANIFEST INTO REALITY!
I love you all

[Anonymous No.12950844]

>>12950713
Based

Thank you Fernando, really

[Anonymous No.12950846]

this is all you incels have
you are worse than pajeet at this point

[Anonymous No.12950855]

>>12950828
You mean Fernando's example is bad? That's not good. He's supposed to be a builder of the clouds.

>>12949639

[Anonymous No.12950864]

>>12950840
I hope you don't think it takes much effort to type a sentence or two. Do you "hunt and peck" when you type?

[Anonymous No.12950866]

>>12950596
I fucking love you, you disgusting communityshaming tripfag

[Anonymous No.12950871]

>>12950134

[Anonymous No.12950877]

>>12950824
it prevents lying by:
-providing an incentive in the form of the LINK token for providing the correct answer
-giving the contract requester the choice of selecting specific nodes with a reputation or a completely random set of nodes for his job
-giving the contract requester the choice of enlisting as many nodes as he wants for his job. more nodes, more security.
If someone enlists for example 10 nodes for his contract and all of those nodes have a reputation and a real name registered behind them it is nigh impossible for someone to bribe 6 of those oracles to somehow provide the wrong answer, which would in itself be a hard thing to do because the nodes themselves can't see what they're working on because everything is being done in a secure enclave

[Anonymous No.12950882]

>>12950396
Java is Sun Microsystems, isn't it?

Does Sun own Oracle now? I've been out of tech since 2001.

[Anonymous No.12950883]

Lmao the fud at this point is just mindbogglingly pathetic

‘Never heard of oracle! Literally who’

Lmao k kids

If you dont have a small bag at least...got nothing to say to ya

[Anonymous No.12950896]

>>12950855
> implying your example is the same as the one in your picture

[Anonymous No.12950897]

>>12950877
Don't spoonfeed these guys, just let him figure it out when it's $25 or so...

[Anonymous No.12950901]

>>12950883
it goes both ways, you assume this adds a billion in value
its nothing but another coordinated discord pnd
get real faggots

[Anonymous No.12950905]

>>12950855
>You mean Fernando's example is bad?
No, just the way you frame it.

[Anonymous No.12950949]

Good Lord, we’re actually going to make it.

[Anonymous No.12950962]

>>12950877

[Anonymous No.12950970]

>>12950877
>-providing an incentive in the form of the LINK token for providing the correct answer
How? Financial incentive only provides the most likely, popular example that rewards with money. If you see that the highest-reputation node in an area is reporting inaccurate data, (e.g. reported temperature being consistently low) rather than not getting paid, the profit-minded are going to start reporting similarly flawed data for sake of payment.

>-giving the contract requester the choice of selecting specific nodes with a reputation or a completely random set of nodes for his job
Doesn't help when an entire group of nodes reporting a kind of data are all attempting to determine "popular" data based on who has the best reputation

>-giving the contract requester the choice of enlisting as many nodes as he wants for his job. more nodes, more security.
No, more nodes means more lowest common denominator "popular" data.

>If someone enlists for example 10 nodes for his contract and all of those nodes have a reputation and a real name registered behind them it is nigh impossible for someone to bribe 6 of those oracles to somehow provide the wrong answer, which would in itself be a hard thing to do because the nodes themselves can't see what they're working on because everything is being done in a secure enclave

Why do you need a blockchain to prevent bribing? Just hire analysis companies privately/independently. This provides the same masked security along with the benefits of being able to do things like verify expertise.

Chainlink offers reputation voting for popular answers and huge drawbacks when anonymizing data providers.

[Anonymous No.12950986]

>>12950970
holy shit this dude just btfo of sergey

[Anonymous No.12950990]

>>12950970
Imagine going to this effort

[Anonymous No.12950999]

>>12950896
But it is. Read them.

[Anonymous No.12951012]

>>12950905
Lol, how else is there to frame it.
>The rewards and data come from the airline. Lol, we're going to give them back their data and tell them what to do with it.

[Anonymous No.12951023]

>>12950970

>Why do you need a blockchain to prevent bribing? Just hire analysis companies privately/independently. This provides the same masked security along with the benefits of being able to do things like verify expertise.

can you imagine turn of the industrial revolution someone going hey I need to hire more people instead of modernizing my manufactering processes lmfao fucking brainlet

[Anonymous No.12951029]

>>12950990
Writing a few sentences isn't hard. Realizing oracles don't exist is probably harder though. you'll get there.

[Anonymous No.12951036]

>>12950882
The other way around fren, Oracle acquired Sun

[Anonymous No.12951041]

>>12950713
Since it's pretty obvious at this point that you're the real deal and have access to the Chainlink team, could you possibly ask Sergey to rename the Oracle Arena to the Stinky Linky Arena by Oracle?

Also if you're Sergey himself please know that I love you.

[Anonymous No.12951046]

>>12950970
The absolute state of fudders

[Anonymous No.12951049]

Is chainlink actually real

[Anonymous No.12951070]

>>12951029
>19 posts
>incoherent fud
Bullish AF

[Anonymous No.12951086]

>>12951023
You can automate things with quality data still.

Tell me how you're going to valuate and add oil painting spot prices to chainlink automatically.

Tell me how you're going to accurately report temperature, even, lol.

[Anonymous No.12951108]

>>12950713
Hey anon, I'm dealing with depression since I can remember. Will 10k linkies be enough to kms by fucking too many pornstars?

[Anonymous No.12951106]

>>12951046
>>12951070

[Anonymous No.12951128]

*yawn* build something op, why dont you

[Anonymous No.12951145]

It’s $300 to attend.....what’s his true intentions....

[Anonymous No.12951148]

>>12951106
Literally stop posting. You're the only one still fudding ITT. Give it a rest and celebrate once in a while marine

[Anonymous No.12951162]

>>12951145
He needs more fiat to pour into link, obviously

[Anonymous No.12951163]

>>12951145
Why he spamming...maybe this isn’t that important after all

[Anonymous No.12951172]

>>12951148
Lol, no. One of your shills brought the topic up in a Skycoin group and now here I am.

I've never seen such a following of users that don't understand the tech they support.
>but... but it's oracle! you make lots posts! oraaaaacles are truth!

[Anonymous No.12951179]

>>12951012
It's ok bro, whichever way you want to cope.

[Anonymous No.12951194]

>>12951172
Are you saying the guy who created Solidity doesn't understand oracles?
https://github.com/ethereumbook/ethereumbook/blob/38643cf987ffbbccf35dc50920b6ad084b8c987c/oracles.asciidoc

[Anonymous No.12951206]

>>12950970
This isn't 2017 faggot, this kind of discussions are in warosu, not here

[Anonymous No.12951259]

>>12951194
>solidity
hahahahahahahahah
Barely works, if at all. The list of bugs and bugs yet to be discovered is extensive. Don't even get me started on performance.

Being able to engineer things doesn't make you wise. This man is not wise if he thinks his extensive experience makes his efforts any less futile against an unsolvable problem.

>>12951206
One step forward, now it's time for two steps back.

[Anonymous No.12951261]

>>12951172
>still babbling

It's time fren, to stop. Rest those weary hands bud.

[Anonymous No.12951281]

>>12951206
This. But why’d he spam.

[Anonymous No.12951287]

>>12951259
>hahahahahahahahah
>Barely works, if at all.
... cried the stable boy.

[Anonymous No.12951305]

>>12951261
Nope, can't rest. This board was kind enough to lead me to Skycoin. The least I can do is spare a few keystrokes to show people that promising people "oracle" is disingenuous.

It's not a solution to the oracle problem and it's not even a good attempt.

[Anonymous No.12951326]

>>12951305
.....

[Anonymous No.12951337]

>>12951287
It really doesn't. Can't even run cat games, leading to massive network congestion.

By comparison, Skycoin's deterministic language, CX can handle smart contract functions along with actual things like applications, all hooked in to blockchain.

Really, if you want to get closer to actual "oracle" data, capturing user input directly to the a Skycoin Fiber blockchain will be much closer to true data than anything chainlink will be able to provide, given that they don't have any solutions to handle 'last mile' data import.

[Anonymous No.12951339]

wow look at that price guys, up 6%, and on such important news too! you're definitely going to get rich buying link!

[Anonymous No.12951348]

>>12951281
idk bruh, everyone just started replying to me so I replied back

[Anonymous No.12951349]

>>12951337
Oh, a game written in golang. Cute.

[Anonymous No.12951362]

>>12951337
I really don't care how you feel about Solidity.
Its merits speak volumes.

Answer the question though; do you think the guy who created Solidity doesn't understand oracles?

[Anonymous No.12951377]

>>12951362
His toy language isn't a smart contract language. No need to get emotional.

[Anonymous No.12951400]

>>12951349
CX is based on golang, sharing some syntax, but really isn't the same thing.

The important thing is that the application code can be validated via blockchain and also interact with the blockchain. Meaning much less cheating in games, and better quality data for something like a temperature sensor

Skycoin would actually perform Chainlink's services better than chainlink would. If users plug in temperature sensors in to Skywire nodes and are rewarded based on the bandwidth requested for updates, the collective average of data would be much more based in reality and truth, given that one faulty sensor wouldn't throw off the average.

[Anonymous No.12951408]

>>12951377
Did you reply to the wrong post?

[Anonymous No.12951410]

>>12951362
Obviously not, otherwise he wouldn't try to over-engineer a non-solution to an unsolvable problem.

[Anonymous No.12951424]

>>12951410
>otherwise he wouldn't try to over-engineer a non-solution to an unsolvable problem.
Are you saying Gavin Wood is working on Chainlink or something?
Fucking lmao

[Anonymous No.12951425]

>>12950800
Checked & Sergeypilled

[Anonymous No.12951436]

>>12951400
Fuck off idiot

[Anonymous No.12951462]

>>12951436
hahaha, so mad you can't even reply

[Anonymous No.12951479]

>>12951424
All these midlevel developers are a blur after a while. Skycoin's developers have me spoiled.

My point is the same regardless if he is or isn't.

[Anonymous No.12951510]

>>12951479
It's ok fren, not like we're holding you to any standards as high as knowing whether Gavin Wood actively working on Chainlink or not.

Good luck with your Skycoin project btw.

[Anonymous No.12951528]

>>12950713
You’re one cheeky cunt m8

[Anonymous No.12951545]

>>12949639
holy fucking shit anons, this is the first time I've actually felt optimistic. time to start fudding on reddit

[Anonymous No.12951562]

>>12951510
Ahuh, regardless of whatever he is or isn't doing, if he thinks that the oracle problem is solvable he's a fool and it probably has something to do with Ethereum being on the slow death spiral that it's in now.

[Anonymous No.12951579]

>>12951041
>Stinky Linky Arena
>Golden Bull Warriors

The golden bull gave us much cum today

[Anonymous No.12951586]

>>12951348
Are you ribeiro?

[Anonymous No.12951594]

>>12950589
>>12950598
My based Nashville brothers. We are going to make it.

[Anonymous No.12951644]

>>12949639
Holy fuk

[Anonymous No.12951891]

>>12950003
Seriously underrated

[Anonymous No.12952093]

>>12951172
Everyone that can explain link succinctly on a technical level left this place many moons ago.

[Anonymous No.12952107]

>>12952093
>succinctly
stop making up sexually sounding words

[Anonymous No.12952109]

[Anonymous No.12952120]

>>12952107
Never

[Anonymous No.12952135]

collect and aggregate oracle answers for the service agreement epic was just accepted.

[Anonymous No.12952136]

>>12949639

Why the fuck is that even important to be able to do? Fucking pajeet marketing trash

[Anonymous No.12952148]

>>12952135
Screen cap it Anon, report back

[Anonymous No.12952154]

>>12949813

>Oracle "problem"
>just store the data offchain signed with a shared public key with a hash onchain to validate it

Not that hard

[Anonymous No.12952157]

>>12952093
Can entirely believe this. I'm going to start putting my money in the dumbest coins I can find.

I honestly believe that because people can't determine what an oracle is or is not, they buy in to this worthless stint of a project.

[Anonymous No.12952167]

>>12952148
Reporting back

[Anonymous No.12952204]

>>12952167
>Comfy, good eye fren we've made it already just haven't relized the gains.

[Anonymous No.12952208]

>>12950596
hi tom, Delphi loves you

[Anonymous No.12952212]

>>12952157
If I could debate you, I would. But I can't. This project has been through the ringer though. A full year of having it picked apart meticulously.

[Anonymous No.12952434]

>>12952204
Literally just bought more. Feeling comfy going to read Moby Dick now

[Anonymous No.12952508]

>>12952157
>I honestly believe that because people can't determine what an oracle is or is not, they buy in to this worthless stint of a project.

Here's Vitalik explaining how oracles are meant to be decentralized by design:
https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/07/22/ethereum-and-oracles/
>The approach is still low-trust, as no single oracle has the ability to unilaterally withdraw the funds

Here's the creator of Solidity praising decentralized oracles:
https://github.com/ethereumbook/ethereumbook/blob/38643cf987ffbbccf35dc50920b6ad084b8c987c/oracles.asciidoc

You're a retard.

[Anonymous No.12952532]

>>12949639
Adding the big boy on LinkedIn

Trips decide my first message if he accepts me

[Anonymous No.12952600]

>>12950825
>>12950713

>>/biz/thread/S12923987#p12924281

[Anonymous No.12952622]

>>12952532
If trips you leave him the fuck alone

[Anonymous No.12952635]

>>12952532
I work for this company. [e-mail]

Do your worst muahahhaha

[Anonymous No.12952704]

>>12952622
Sorry friend only dubs there

>>12952635
this is 100x worse than what i was going to do lol. At least he can just not accept my request

[Anonymous No.12952726]

>>12952704
Don’t be a little bitch say u got it off the internet and wanted to ask about the chain link thing

[Anonymous No.12952733]

>>12952704
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.12952757]

>>12950134
Hey go back to work wagie. Stay poor

[Anonymous No.12952815]

>>12952733
2 dubs in a row, tfw no trips

>>12952726
I'm hoping someone hits trips for this desu, but ill take whatever

[Anonymous No.12952865]

>>12952815
TWO DUBS IN A ROW GOTTA BE GOOD ENOUGH, LEAVE THE MAN ALONE

[Anonymous No.12952889]

>>12952865
Once he accepts ill make a thread for everyone.
I might just make it a legit convo and try and suss out his involvement

[Anonymous No.12952968]

>>12952889
should i slack this fucker to find out @bout m@inet

[Anonymous No.12953135]

>>12952968
fuck mainnet, find out about what level of integration Oracle will have with Chainlink

[Anonymous No.12953164]

>Oracle gets 80% of its revenue from the Fortune 2000 companies and various government agencies. They do sell to thousands (or hundreds of thousands) of customers but the key list is relatively small:

>Some of their key customers include:
1. US Federal Government and its agencies like the DOD
2. Mineral Technologies
3. Apollo Group
4. Apple Inc
5. BT
6. Verizon
7. P & G
8. National Instruments
9. Hyundai
10. Airbus

[Anonymous No.12953177]

>>12953164
>US Federal Government
Link $1M EOY

[Anonymous No.12953182]

My money can't come in fast enough to buy in my ducks aren't in a row fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck

[Anonymous No.12953192]

>>12950003
You mean CL acquires Oracle to solve the oracle problem.

[Anonymous No.12953228]

Thanks just sold 100k

[Anonymous No.12953249]

>>12953182
Don't worry, you have around 3 more months.

[Anonymous No.12953374]

>>12950405
Hi Fernando and thanks fren

[Anonymous No.12953480]

>>12952968
Bump

[Anonymous No.12953522]

>>12953480
its 9 pm lol

[Anonymous No.12953528]

WE PAMPIN

[Anonymous No.12953746]

Is 3.5k enough?

[Anonymous No.12953764]

>>12952532
Just leave him alone

[Anonymous No.12953872]

>>12953746
probably not, but there's still time to accumulate. I have a small stack as well.

[Anonymous No.12954296]

>>12953872
You'll be good breh with iron hands.
I'm 2.5k.
T

[Anonymous No.12954734]

>>12950403
>flaunting your room temp IQ
lmao oh no no no

[Anonymous No.12955276]

>>12950134
>boring nerd fest talk
>in Silicon Valley
I’m sorry, anon, y-you’re... you’re never gonna make it

[Anonymous No.12955542]

>>12950733
Right?! They only did like 30 billion in revenue last year... for reference, Target did about 70 billion. Fucking Target!

[Anonymous No.12955557]

>>12955542
3rd largest software company in 2018. Not even #1 or 2 like Microsoft or alphabet

[Anonymous No.12955590]

>>12953528
Dude, never say 'pampin' again. You sound extremely retarded saying such a word that doesn't even fucking exist nimrod

[Anonymous No.12955604]

>>12950134
1 - you’re a retard. 2 - a pajeet from Brazil is something you just made up. Go eat a dick you absolute faggot

[Anonymous No.12955623]

>>12955557
This, literally who...
Chainlink will acquire Oracle just because of the name!

[Anonymous No.12955625]

>>12950134
>this 'oracle' company
>pajeet from Brazil

This is some nicely crafted bait

[Anonymous No.12955695]

>>12952532
BBBBBBBBBRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPsnnnnniiiiiiffffffffffff...oh yes my dear....sssnnnnnnnnnnnniiiiiiiiffffffff....quite pungent indeed...is that....dare I say....sssssssnniff...eggs I smell?......sniff sniff....hmmm...yes...quite so my darling....sniff....quite pungent eggs yes very much so .....ssssssssssssssnnnnnnnnnnnnnnniiiiiiiffffff....ah yes...and also....a hint of....sniff....cheese.....quite wet my dear....sniff...but of yes...this will do nicely....sniff.....please my dear....another if you please....nice a big now....BBBBBBRRRRRRRAAAAAAAPPPPPPPFFFFFFFFLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPPPPFFFFFF Oh yes...very good!....very sloppy and wet my dear....hmmmmm...is that a drop of nugget I see on the rim?...hmmmm.....let me.....let me just have a little taste before the sniff my darling.......hmmmmm....hmm..yes....that is a delicate bit of chocolate my dear....ah yes....let me guess...curry for dinner?....oh quite right I am....aren't I?....ok....time for sniff.....sssssnnnnnnniiiiiiiiffffffff.....hmmm...hhhmmmmm I see...yes....yes indeed as well curry......hmmm....that fragrance is quite noticeable....yes.....onion and garlic chutney I take it my dear?.....hmmmmm....yes quite.....BBBBBBRRRRRRRRPPPPPPFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFTTTTTTTTTTT Oh I was not expecting that…that little gust my dear….you caught me off guard…yes…so gentle it was though…hmmmm…let me taste this little one…just one small sniff…..sniff…ah….ssssssnnnnnniiiiiffffffffffff…and yet…so strong…yes…the odor….sniff sniff…hmmm….is that….sniff….hmmm….I can almost taste it my dear…..yes….just…sniff….a little whiff more if you please…..ssssssnnnnnniiiiiffffffffff…ah yes I have it now….yes quite….hhhhmmmm…delectable my dear…..quite exquisite yes…..I dare say…sniff….the most pungent one yet my dear….ssssnnnnniiiifffffffffffffffffffffff….yes….

[Anonymous No.12956090]

>>12950871
In 10 years there will be Chainlink(tm) arenas

[Anonymous No.12956105]

>>12953177
checked
new timeline

[Anonymous No.12956122]

I've never invested in coin before, but I've never had money. Now that I have several thousand to mess with, should I dump some in link? I've never done this, so I don't really know what I'm doing.

[Anonymous No.12956213]

>mfw bought at 2400 sats on July 24 2018

[Anonymous No.12956291]

>>12949766
10/10 very nicely done anon

[Anonymous No.12956299]

>>12956291
but he's right you know

[Anonymous No.12956310]

https://twitter.com/firstlastframes/status/1103742361308409857?s=19

Translation:
"Is integration between Oracle and Chainlink already in place?"

"Just a demonstration in my work"

[Anonymous No.12956395]

>>12956122
Don’t

[Anonymous No.12956450]

>>12954734
So uh, you can't refute the argument then.

How's it feel to surrender to a brainlet?

[Anonymous No.12956454]

>>12952508
Eth is a failed project currently in a death spiral for the next two or three years until it finally implodes, of course they believe in oracles.

[Anonymous No.12956464]

>>12952212
>picked apart meticulously

No, just shilled ad infinitum and anyone that voices dissent is just called a dum dum.

[Anonymous No.12956486]

>>12956464
>Chainlink
>not picked apart meticulously
Take your meds.

[Anonymous No.12956499]

>>12956464
Nope, this is incorrect. You're either disingenuous or were not around for the threads.

[Anonymous No.12956500]

>>12956486
>i-it's already been discussed! no need to discuss it! really guys!

Oracles don't exist and chainlink's reputation based voting system is not a substitute.

[Anonymous No.12956508]

>>12956500
>Oracles don't exist
So you're W91wdH1J, the Skycoin shill.
How come you switched IDs?

Also, see >>12952508
Are you saying you know more about Oracles than Vitalik and Gavin Wood (creator of Solidity)?

[Anonymous No.12956514]

>>12956508
Because I was on my phone earlier. Now I'm at home.

>>12956508
Apparently so. Looks like thinking that they can solve things like the oracle problem is why their platform has so many flaws and generally doesn't function. Good luck getting sharding in 2222.

[Anonymous No.12956519]

>>12956500
>Oracles don't exist
>something that clearly exists doesn't exist
Literally literal delusion. Peak schizophrenia.

[Anonymous No.12956521]

Check it out, I found a video example of reputation based node voting finding the "popular" answer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNzN3q-VgwI

[Anonymous No.12956526]

>>12956464
>projecting the treatment SKY gets onto link
sky is a literal scam. deal with it.

[Anonymous No.12956529]

>>12956514
>random anon who admitted to living in a Skycoin echo chamber knows more about oracles than Vitalik and the guy who invented Solidity

Like I said, take your meds.
Unironically.

[Anonymous No.12956542]

>>12956526
How can Skycoin, the best coin, be a scam?

It has better devs and better fundamentals than eth, at least.

[Anonymous No.12956552]

>>12956514
This guy is legit mentally ill.

[Anonymous No.12956553]

>>12956529
>appeal to authority, attempting to claim that the creators of Eth can give blessing on the validity of oracles or pseudo-oracles
>can't handle rejection of said authority

Think for yourself please.

[Anonymous No.12956560]

>>12956552

[Anonymous No.12956568]

>>12956122
Do it

[Anonymous No.12956569]

>>12956553
>appeal to authority
Not really, the write-ups by Vitalik and Gavin Wood I linked to explain exactly why you're wrong.
And they pretty much created the world in which oracles live. So what they say matters most.

[Anonymous No.12956577]

>>12956569
>oracles live
What oracles?

[Anonymous No.12956583]

>>12956577
Your meds anon.
They should be around you somewhere.

[Anonymous No.12956587]

>>12950864
>32 posts by ID
Wew

[Anonymous No.12956593]

>>12956587
Plus 10 more under his new ID: >>12956577

[Anonymous No.12956594]

>>12956583
Don't worry, my supplement stack is exquisite.

[Anonymous No.12956601]

>>12956587
>>12956593
You'd think that will all these opportunities you guys would pose more than one or two decent arguments.

[Anonymous No.12956678]

>>12956569

I have actually read their work. Their solutions to the oracle problem are indeed solutions to some extent, but they're not real oracles in all honesty.

[Anonymous No.12956682]

>>12956601
>thinking I owe you any argument
WEW

[Anonymous No.12956695]

>>12956678
>not real oracles
>using basic fallacies so shamelessly
Schizophrenic as fuck

[Anonymous No.12956697]

>>12956678
>Their solutions to the oracle problem
Neither Vitalik nor Gavin Wood describe their solutions to the oracle problem.
Vitalik simply describes the conceptual basics of what oracles are, and Gavin Wood simply describes Chainlink as a decentralized oracle (and the advantages of centralized oracles).

Try again.

[Anonymous No.12956700]

>>12956601
You've yet to give one yourself

[Anonymous No.12956702]

>>12950486
Holy shit I need that comfy link blanket. Did you just do a custom order?
Imagine snuggling up in that on the eve of mainnet watching the price pump and shitposting on biz

[Anonymous No.12956704]

>>12955590
why are you comparing him to a great hunter?

[Anonymous No.12956713]

Sergey really must want to learn how to create an oracle

[Anonymous No.12956714]

>>12956678
>Their solutions to the oracle problem
Neither Vitalik nor Gavin Wood describe their solutions to the oracle problem.
Vitalik simply describes the conceptual basics of what oracles are, and Gavin Wood simply describes the advantages of DEcentralized oracles over centralized ones, with Chainlink as his prime example of decentralized oracles.

Try again.

[Anonymous No.12956732]

>>12950486

[Anonymous No.12956750]

>>12956702
Anon site is called contrado. You can make custom blankets and it's like 2 for 30$

[Anonymous No.12957007]

>>12953177
Witnessed and linkpilled

[Anonymous No.12957103]

>>12951400
>Skycoin would actually perform Chainlink's services better than chainlink would.
HAHAHAHA, ok cool story bro

[Anonymous No.12957286]

>>12953177
Checked the 7s

[Anonymous No.12957361]

>>12956750
Awesome, thanks

[Anonymous No.12957795]

>>12956700
Sure I have: decentralized reputation voting is not a solution to the oracle problem.

[Anonymous No.12957816]

>>12957103
The average of 1000 temperature sensors connected to Skywire nodes would be more accurate than ten link autists voting on temperature.

Depends on what data you're going for, of course, but Skywire creates some unique opportunities.

[Anonymous No.12957820]

>>12957795
Oracles are oracles because they achieve consensus among themselves off-chain.
If you want to call that "voting", then so is Bitcoin's consensus mechanism.

[Anonymous No.12957848]

>>12956714
So hypothetical masturbation then.

That he points to chainlink as an example shows his clear ability to misstep as an intelligent but not necessarily wise person.

[Anonymous No.12957869]

>>12956682
That's fine. I'm content to be in this thread unopposed while talking about how oracles aren't real and how link is a non-solution and how even the "experts" talking about link can't give useful examples.

[Anonymous No.12957894]

>>12957816
You seem to not understand the concept of 'consensus'. Not surprising, coming from a sky enthusiast.
pic very relevant

[Anonymous No.12957907]

>>12957848
>So hypothetical masturbation then.
How's obelisks 5 years of development going?

[Anonymous No.12957918]

>>12957869
>jealous that experts actually use link to build shit instead of his non-functional pseudo network.
Skycoin doesn't exist. It's mere hypothetical masturbation.

[Anonymous No.12957930]

>>12950148
dude so are YOU

[Anonymous No.12958020]

>>12950623
based and lp'd

[Anonymous No.12958120]

>>12957894
I never doubted consensus. Skycoin's Obelisk uses a similar node reputation system.

The problem is that the data you're consensing on isn't necessarily true or controlled, only popular. Not an oracle.

[Anonymous No.12958138]

>>12958120
>Skycoin's Obelisk uses a similar node reputation system.
Obelisk doesn't exist. The paper it was supposed to be based on was withdrawn by the author for being fucking shit. There is no architecture, no code. Not even a fucking outline. Pure, unfiltered vaporware.

[Anonymous No.12958205]

>>12957907
Pretty decent. Probably ready for release this year. Above average quality control is key.

[Anonymous No.12958230]

>>12958138
>The paper it was supposed to be based on was withdrawn by the author for being fucking shit.
So true

[Anonymous No.12958238]

>>12957918
Oh, but it does my friend. https://skycoin.github.io/skywire/

[Anonymous No.12958263]

I am a developer and don't understand what it is and why I should work with it.

It connects the blockchain to real world data or something, great, now what do I do with it?

[Anonymous No.12958323]

>>12958230
Was actually so they could get the way it works patented, interestingly enough. Once this method is out there and proven to work, the imitators will flock to it.

[Anonymous No.12958346]

>>12958263
For something like temperature data, You'd use it in a weather app.

The issue is that if you could choose to get your data from amateurs voting on the data vs two or three trusted experts providing the data, which would you choose?

[Anonymous No.12958359]

>>12958138
Sure it does. There's architecture and code and it's tested.

It's just easier for general Skycoin development to not release it until needed. That'll be later this year.

[Anonymous No.12958368]

>>12958323
>standard vapor-spouting in action
That's not how patents work

[Anonymous No.12958410]

>>12950623
>There is no way to get that data for those scripts without compromising all the network

Lol, what? They distribute the reward, they collect the sales, they organize the business accounts.

Do you actually know how these things work? Like when you use your discount membership card at a department store, it helps keep you on their data platform. Airlines don't have this problem since you ID yourself for every flight.

[Anonymous No.12958431]

>>12958346
Well, looking at "ask the audience" vs "phone a friend" I'd say the crowd-sourced opinion is usually more often correct. Though perhaps I should ask an expert? lol

[Anonymous No.12958456]

>>12956521
From the title, I can tell they aren't sourcing data from any API providers.

[Anonymous No.12958484]

>>12949639
how to sell your api:
1 publish your public key
2 sign api results with your key
3 charge for api calls
where does chainlink come in? it doesn't.

[Anonymous No.12958501]

>>12958431
Agreed. Or a few experts if you want higher assurance.

The problem with chainlink is when it "asks the audience" about the temperature, it's pretty likely that they just do the equivalent of turning on their TV and get the temperature from the weather station, which can have quite a few flaws.

[Anonymous No.12958513]

>>12958456
Sure they are, each of those humans are an API provider.

While we're on the topic, why would you need a middleman for API feeds? Just use the API.

[Anonymous No.12958540]

>>12958346
I'd get the data from the three experts through a network of amateurs who vote to ensure that the data I get is untampered.

[Anonymous No.12958545]

>>12949660
What do you mean, LINKonnect is for real man!

Seriously, so much shilling is a red flag.

They would probably obtain better results with discreet, sophisticated shilling.

[Anonymous No.12958555]

>>12958501
I could think of several applications relying on polling lots of people. Weather isn't really one I would do.

I guess I just don't understand how it works, which makes it difficult for me to want to develop with Chainlink. I know what ETH does and how to work with it after a minute of reading about Solidity. I don't get chainlink and the documentation isn't really helping.

[Anonymous No.12958562]

>>12958540
Ahuh, sounds cost effective.

[Anonymous No.12958564]

>>12958484
How does the API call get into the blockchain? Fucking dumb nigger either way you need an oracle and LINK is the best choice

[Anonymous No.12958572]

>>12958564
it's send in a transaction by whoever is paying.

[Anonymous No.12958579]

>>12958555
It's kind of an IQ test. People give up and just buy in to it because it sounds cool.

Unfortunately for link, developers such as you or I don't operate that way by nature.

[Anonymous No.12958585]

>>12958545
sold 100k

[Anonymous No.12958590]

>>12958564
Why does it need to go to blockchain? Trusted off-chain systems can perform actions on the blockchain.

[Anonymous No.12958616]

>>12958562
Prolly as cost effective as bitcoin is energy efficient

[Anonymous No.12958620]

>>12958263
I was an engineer and I understand what it is and why I would love to jump on it. It allows smartcontracts to be useful. "IF X, then Y" that's the name of the game. Think of a function or deal or whatever and you can make a smartcontract out of it.

> If the Patriots win next year's superbowl, I'll pay you $10K

Put it in an escrow and code up the smartcontract, no need for a 3rd person party to ensure you pay up when they cheat and win again

> If the temperatures hit a threshold below a certain point and the snowfall is above a certain amount, send a blast text informing the community that all schools are closed

self explanatory

> IP control - specify how your creations can be used and monetized to greater detail

For instance, if you compose a song, you can monetize it such that general youtube videos are free to use, but usage in commercials or being used in trailers or movie OSTs requires a fee.

The way that Chainlink plays into this is that it links data API providers (the entity that has the information on the events) to smartcontracts (the entity that execute functions based on events) in a secure and trustless manner, it's the internet of the blockchain.

[Anonymous No.12958624]

>>12958572
>I'll manually perform the transaction
Look up what smart contracts are.

>>12958590
No blockchain, no smart contract.

[Anonymous No.12958628]

>>12958585
Oh they pay you directly in LINK?

[Anonymous No.12958650]

>>12958359
>Sure it does. There's architecture and code and it's tested.
Bullshit. Straight up lies.

[Anonymous No.12958653]

>>12958579
Well I'm a serial launcher. I have 8 launches and two that I'll have finished up here in a week. I'm always looking for open markets to develop in because that's where the money is and LINK seems like a great opportunity I just can't find good resources to explain it properly from a development standpoint.

[Anonymous No.12958696]

>>12958513
>Sure they are, each of those humans are an API provider.

Then that's the problem with the API providers, not with the node operators. It's not Chainlink's problem if the API providers are shit to begin with.
For the vetted API providers, Chainlink's a big deal since it guarantees their information won't get tampered when delivered to the destination on the blockchain.

[Anonymous No.12958706]

>>12958650
You don't have to believe me, but I've seen it and you haven't. You'll see sometime this year likely.

[Anonymous No.12958707]

>>12958620
Perfect explanation. Thank you.

[Anonymous No.12958763]

>>12958706
>You'll see sometime this year likely.
I won't. They have no money and no serious devs. The chance that they release a revolutionary consensus algo is 0%.

[Anonymous No.12958797]

>>12958620
>when they cheat and win again
it saddens me that some linkies are such faggots.

[Anonymous No.12958811]

>>12958620
>"IF X, then Y"
yes, good.
>>12958263
fulfillment of conditional statements

[Anonymous No.12958828]

>>12958620
>>12958263
Lol, you guys should be less obvious about a 1-2 shill setup.

We aren't discussing smart contracts, we're discussing the validity of trying to put the real world on blockchain, which is called the oracle problem. Chainlink does not solve the oracle problem.

>sports betting
>ESPN accidentally posted the wrong winner for the superbowl and a majority of our nodes validated the result, sorry, you can't get your $10,000 back.

>snow days
>whoops, looks like all this snow dumped at 1am and mostly melted by sunrise, looks like school was canceled for no reason
This one is especially funny, how much money is there to be made in the lucrative market of schools deciding when to call for a snow day? Idiotic.

>ip control
This one doesn't even have anything to do with what chainlink proposes.

You can't automatically put the real world on blockchain. You can't automatically ensure that data sources don't lie. Voting to do so is not trustworthy and by definition, does not meet the standards of what an oracle is.

Chainlink does not solve the oracle problem.

[Anonymous No.12958830]

>>12958620
I know what I would like to do now, but how would you confirm purchases through a smart contract before LINK?

If I ran an escrow service for purchasing items, how would the smart contract know that the item was delivered if you couldn't use APIs before?

[Anonymous No.12958837]

>>12958616
Lol, what a terrible thing to compare link to.

[Anonymous No.12958843]

>>12958828
Hmm, well I thought of an idea for content creator sponsorships that would payout tiered amounts depending on the amount of people you send to a link, or how many views they have on the sponsored content.

Seems real-world enough for me.

[Anonymous No.12958849]

>>12958696
Why does anyone need chainlink if they're responsible for validating their own API providers to begin with?

[Anonymous No.12958977]

>>12958828
I think those possible errors you came up with would be a result of poor contract writing. There would most definitely have to be error handling incorporated, so ultimately it’s on the contract writers hands to properly handle that.

[Anonymous No.12959002]

>>12949766
based and checked. Big nothingburger here. I feel sleepy. I'll just sell my link stack before going to bed.

[Anonymous No.12959011]

>>12958977
If they're going to all this trouble, why even use chainlink? They can just run their own script that automates api actions rather than outsourcing this work that they have to do extra work to control for varying factors.

Closed, controlled systems connected to validated APIs in this context is cheaper, more reliable, and less prone to manipulation in these contexts.

[Anonymous No.12959051]

What about a trusted sources method.

Say you had initial public votes in different areas, like who wins different sports games. The top 5% that area correct the most would become the trusted sources for that area. next 15% would be moderately trusted. Rest would be untrusted or used as bulk verification and to help find new trusted sources. The trusted sources would be the ones used to verify data is correct. If any of the 5% become incorrect then they are replaced by the highest in order from the moderately trusted pool of 15%. Prevents centralization. Problem comes with different areas, like weather. One correct reading might be 32 degrees, while another correct reading down the road might be 33. You could have trusted sources falling into moderately trusted and moderately trusted into untrusted.

I can think of problems with this but it'd be an interesting experiment.

[Anonymous No.12959533]

>>12959051
See, the problem with that is I'm a fudder looking for yous. For example:

1. This first point is where I demonstrate how much I don't know about the subject I'm talking about, I pretend to be concerned about your idea, but using a surface-level understanding of the subject, it's clear whatever idea you are putting forth just won't work, sorry.

And 2: This is where I shill an inferior alternative I want to promote in an unrelated thread, I pretend to be genuinely concerned about your investment, but, reiterating my surface level knowledge, you should really go with something like (product I'm supporting). This is a surefire way to influence investment in my project!

As you can see, using verbal slight of hand tricks, the project I'm supporting is really where it's at. In addition, if you check my id you will see that I've posted around 50 times in this thread alone, because I care about your money and want you to succeed.

[Anonymous No.12959596]

>>12958624
>Look up what smart contracts are.
It's obvious you have no idea how it all works. Smart contracts are executed in transactions, they don't run like programs on a server.

[Anonymous No.12959609]

>>12959596
>Smart contracts are executed in transactions
Yes, and the entire point is not having to (or getting to) do the transactions manually.

You're talking gibberish in hopes of confusing based newfrens.