The stock market is essentially gambling.

[Anonymous No.12943677]

There are tens of thousands of research analysts for big companies that know better than you how a stock should perform. What's the point of even trying to beat them?
Theoretically, anything you'd be able to know is priced in.
So you're just betting if it goes up or down.
Red or Black. Gambling.

[Anonymous No.12943704]

What's the matter OP? You lose your lunch money?

[Anonymous No.12943715]

>>12943677
Only if you're trying to trade

Buy and hold strategy has made more millionaires than wagecucking ever did

[Anonymous No.12943718]

>>12943677
no shit

[Anonymous No.12943724]

“Number one rule of Wall Street. Nobody... and I don't care if you're Warren Buffet or if you're Jimmy Buffet. Nobody knows if a stock is gonna go up, down, sideways or in fucking circles. Least of all, stockbrokers, right?”
-Matthew mcconaugheys character in wolf of wallstreet

[Anonymous No.12943727]

>>12943677
>What's the point of even trying to beat them?
it's not a zero sum game unless you're very short term. just DCA into an index fund you stupid faggot.

[Anonymous No.12943768]

>>12943677
>Dollar-cost averaging into an index fund is just like gambling

[Anonymous No.12943785]

>>12943677
>Gambling
Really hard to tell what this chart will do over the next 10-20 years amirite? How do you fucking low IQ people survive?

[Anonymous No.12943814]

>>12943785
Really makes you think...

[Anonymous No.12943827]

>>12943677
You do understand that the stock market is expected to go up over time, right? You don't have to try to beat them to win in stocks. For most retail investors the best strategy is to just buy and hold.

[Anonymous No.12943835]

>>12943814
>currency is the same as equity in productive companies

[Anonymous No.12943840]

>>12943785

B-but I saw a guy wearing a suit on the news say the stock market is about to crash

[Anonymous No.12943862]

>>12943835
>t. Mugabe school of economics graduate

[Anonymous No.12943900]

>>12943862
debt to gdp ratio next time

[Anonymous No.12943911]

>>12943900
You sure you want to do this?

[Anonymous No.12943921]

>>12943677
You'd be surprised how much you're overestimating the ability of "professional investors"

t. buyside

[Anonymous No.12943931]

>>12943862
>linear scale

Fucking retard

[Anonymous No.12943975]

>>12943931
>If I use log scale it will not look scary
And this is why neoliberalism is failing.

[Anonymous No.12943990]

>>12943975
idiot goldbug

[Anonymous No.12944003]

After reading thousands of articles by Stock analysts and banks I can easily say I know more than them

[Anonymous No.12944008]

generally the only real edge wall st has over you is with insider trading
its too eeasy for a single moderatly wealthy individual to push a stock whereever he wants

[Anonymous No.12944028]

>>12943975
how fucking stupid are you to understand the massive difference in going from 0 to 1 trillion vs 1 trillion to 2?

[Anonymous No.12944033]

>>12944028
NOT understand*

[Anonymous No.12944129]

>>12944028
>cope

[Anonymous No.12944147]

>>12944129
>retard

[Anonymous No.12944195]

>>12944147
Excellent argument.

[Anonymous No.12944232]

>>12944195
t. retard who uses a graph that portrays the jump from 0 to 1 trillion as the same magnitude of change as from 1tn to 2tn, and 2tn to 3tn

[Anonymous No.12944261]

>>12944232
#BASED

[Anonymous No.12944331]

>>12944003
The ones writing the articles are not the ones with the good info. If you have good info are you going to tell everyone else or keep accumulating?

[Anonymous No.12944339]

>>12943715

this.

i made a whole 28 dollars trading last year, woop de fucking do. it's just for fun.