/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.12886708]

What's the big fucking deal about just saying straight out what happens to the 650 million tokens? We never get a precise answer while it should be of the highest priority for speculators and people interested in active participation in the network (running nodes, building adapters, etc) what the exact roadmap for the other tokens currently not in circulation is. We're talking about sums that can make or break the whole project depending on how they spent or not.

>inb4 team and advisors and """"incentivising"""" node operators
All of this stuff is always maybes and could be's. Why is it so hard to say what happens with these millions or potentially billions worth of tokens?

[Anonymous No.12886729]

90% of the market is middlemen, and if you don't pay them up front you will pay in blood later on

[Anonymous No.12886754]

>>12886729
And do you have a source on this? Isn't this legally relevant stuff? Don't get me wrong, I have trust in the project based on the effort already put into it, they wouldn't exit scam or dump everything at once and put everything at jeopardy. And I know very well how good it is to bribe (((middlemen))) in business for easy work down the line. But this shit has to be written down somewhere, am I crazy for asking for this?

[Anonymous No.12886773]

>>12886754
Read the white paper

[Anonymous No.12886794]

>>12886754
White paper dude

[Anonymous No.12886802]

>>12886773
Give me the page and line because I read it.

[Anonymous No.12886823]

Which one of you was this?

https://twitter.com/berryhorse29/status/1100206181606293505

17:25

[Anonymous No.12886843]

Except it’s literally dumping

[Anonymous No.12886895]

>>12886708
Initial supply restriction was the worst decision possible for this shitcoin. It's gonna tank like shit

[Anonymous No.12886908]

>>12886708
Wouldn't it just be fucking absurd if Chainlink actually hit $1K in the foreseeable future and thousands of tards became members of the 1% and started attending booshie parties rubbing shoulders with the likes of Warren Buffett? Imagine the looks on the faces of all those truly wealthy people who worked hard for it when twice as many tards show up and turn their networking events into a zoo, throwing feces at each other. Imagine the smell.

[Anonymous No.12886980]

>>12886895
That's what I'm fearing. Not sure what will outweigh as an influence, adoption and speculation and fomo or the inevitable increase of the supply by fucking 300%. But if we hit 10$ or so and drop to 2$ because of the supply shit who gives a fuck we bought at 30 cents.

[Anonymous No.12887081]

>>12886980
>350m to 1bn
>300%

[Anonymous No.12887166]

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY! HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

[Anonymous No.12887234]

>>12887081
He made an approximation, sure, but do you not know how percentages work?

[Anonymous No.12887302]

>>12887234
It's not even a 200% increase you retard

[Anonymous No.12887469]

>>12887302
nice arguing semantics instead of the argument.. of course it's an increase of 200% and a total of 300% relative to the initial circulating supply. doesn't change the argument

[Anonymous No.12887612]

>>12887469
OK dickbreath
How else would you propose to incentivise node operation before adoption picks up?

[Anonymous No.12888162]

>>12887612
Why would you need to incentivise it through a centralized payout? Isn't the whole point of the network letting game theory incentives take over and incentivise node operators to do a good job?

[Anonymous No.12888355]

>>12888162
Chicken/Egg

[Anonymous No.12888969]

>>12886908

Grug like party