is LINK on same level with ETH?

[Anonymous No.12833221]

in terms on /biz shilling of ETH back in 2016 vs. current /biz fascination with LINK?
any /biz ETH millionaire here?

[Anonymous No.12833226]

>hes not buy $148 eth

[Anonymous No.12833243]

>>12833221
The same question has been made several times and the answer is no, it wasn't as hyped as link but there was fud about ETH. That's based on previous threads like this one, I wasn't here in 2016 here personally

[Anonymous No.12833262]

>>12833243
was there an ETH "Assblaster" or other "insiders" posting back then?

[Anonymous No.12833277]

The only thing that was discussed as much and in as much detail as link was Trump the entire year leading up to the election.

>t. been browsing 4channel for 5 years

[Anonymous No.12833287]

>>12833277
Verified obviously by the dub 7s... KEK IS HERE.

[Anonymous No.12833328]

>>12833287


>>6566666

[Anonymous No.12833358]

>>12833287
Fuck off incel virgin

[Anonymous No.12833364]

Tbqh OP even the people who believed in ETH never saw 2017 happening the way it did.

[Anonymous No.12833721]

>>12833328
?
>>12833358
ok

[Anonymous No.12833751]

[Anonymous No.12833758]

>>12833221
No. Ethereum was inescapable anywhere technical on the internet. Link is LITERALLY just biz. Even the twitter and discord trannies are all biztards. LINK is also not nearly as ambitious a project. They don't have half the scope, devs, marketing etc etc. The more exotic applications of the protocol that linkies like to daydream about, such as heavy computation, *will* be muscled by other protocols. There are other teams attacking these areas, if Sergey is smart he will stay in his lane (oracles).

[Anonymous No.12833760]

>>12833751

[Anonymous No.12833932]

>>12833262
Assblaster is probably an early eth adopter also.

[Anonymous No.12833943]

/biz/ shilling is much more intense with link but tech is FAR less exciting.

[Anonymous No.12833958]

>>12833760
Hilarious

[Anonymous No.12833964]

>>12833758
This is actually bullish. It means link is even more undervalued.

Most tech autists don’t understand the importance of a network like Link since they have no intuition for economics or finance. Eth is much more up their lane

[Anonymous No.12834253]

you tell me.

[Anonymous No.12834590]

>>12834253
Explain more about this.

[Anonymous No.12834612]

>>12834590
It’s some Saudi who works in IT, he has no money.
His LinkedIn shows he isn’t bringing anything to the table.

[Anonymous No.12834615]

>>12834590
Chainlink is Halal

[Anonymous No.12834630]

>>12834612
False. The saudis aren’t the only ones hoping to use blockchain to cut costs either.

[Anonymous No.12834639]

>>12834590
https://twitter.com/hbinabbas/status/1097573926790676482?s=19

He knows Chainlink. Soon his Oil rich friends will buy

[Anonymous No.12834654]

FUCK link

t. oldfag

[Anonymous No.12834912]

>>12834654
>FUCK link
>t. oldfag
I see why you're still here

[Anonymous No.12835073]

>>12834253
I see you're also on the front lines of the zerp war

[Anonymous No.12835080]

>>12833277
So you're saying LINK will be a terrible disappointment that will serve as a tool of the Jews?

[Anonymous No.12835106]

>>12835080
W E W
E
W

[Anonymous No.12835124]

>>12833221
The ETH threads were much more 'organic' as most of us saw the huge influx of developers and boilerplate projects coming up. Vitalik also has a charisma of an autist savant who can actually bring changes on a global level.

LINK threads are lots of samefagging, forced but bland memes, and GET's.
Also, despite his tryhard clinging to minimalism Nazarov acts like a condescending upstart who talks alot, but rarely says something of substance.

[Anonymous No.12835132]

>>12833277
Checked

[Anonymous No.12835147]

>>12833277
based maga get, check