DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION HURR DURR

[Anonymous No.12818664]

"In other words, we don't hire on merit. We hire everyone on an equal measure....unless you're a straight white male, then you can get fucked."

[Anonymous No.12818668]

FUCK WHITE PEOPLE

[Anonymous No.12818708]

>>12818668
FUCK DROOMPHF!!!!

[Anonymous No.12818869]

>>12818664
Just put down biracial on your application, anon. What are they going to do, check?

[Anonymous No.12818898]

>>12818869
>I'm white but my penis is black, and I'm male but my penis is female

[Anonymous No.12818943]

>>12818869
I like how weak white teenagers see phrases like "we respect diversity" and just assume that it means that they hate white people.

[Anonymous No.12818986]

>>12818943
Imagine being this retarded. Must be hard

[Anonymous No.12819002]

>>12818664
Also lol at unironically wanting to work for Oracle.

[Anonymous No.12819017]

>>12818898
>my mom is from puerto rico

works every time

[Anonymous No.12819021]

>>12818943
Look at it from trom the teenagers' perspective.
Are the kids wrong about their assumption of the company disliking white people for hiring?

If so, why?

[Anonymous No.12819055]

>>12818943
Fuck off kike

[Anonymous No.12819077]

>>12819017

My great great grandma was filipino, and I have a cousin who lives in PH. My dad is like 5% native. I check all the diversity boxes, fuck em they cant prove shit

[Anonymous No.12819132]

Why does almost every tech company promote how diverse they are? It almost seems like a cult. What business purpose does it serve?

[Anonymous No.12819394]

>>12818664
work for a megacorp in finance, basically all the positions that pay less than ~$75k/yr are filled by minorities current year, which is most jobs at the company, but 6-figure positions have to be earned on merit still.

zoomers are fucked. luckily I was born at the right time.

[Anonymous No.12819426]

>>12819055
Dalai Llama actually said he didn't think the flood of refugees to Europe is a good thing or that it should be supported.

[Anonymous No.12819446]

>>12818664
There is literally a straight white male in the exact middle of the group.

If you think he's gay, the gay one is clearly the brown guy with piercings.

[Anonymous No.12819462]

>>12819132
it's a virtue signal. tech skills are easy to buy in india and the philippines so the company can board swaths of overseas resources or pay for visas to bring them over temporarily. so the company wins because their workforce costs a fraction of what it would if they hired americans, and they can also claim an extreme diversity ratio. the important positions which are few are still filled with competent employees, american or not. white and asian males at tech companies, and the occasional brogrammer pajeet who likes to lift and crack jokes.

[Anonymous No.12819529]

>>12819446
He looks hapa desu

[Anonymous No.12819531]

>>12819132
>work at successful tech start up (in later stages so actual working product and turning profit)
>all white dudes at tech and dev positions
>one frizzy haired mulatto HR chick
>look at job applicants inbox a few months ago
>about 50 applicants
>90% have names like Mohammad, Adil, Farid, Rakesh, Pradeep etc
>Only white people got hired since then
Guess our hiring manager is pretty based. Also my country doesn't have diversity quotas (yet) so that helps

[Anonymous No.12819549]

>>12819446
>5 people in pic
>80% are nonwhite
>in a white country
Hmmmm

[Anonymous No.12819793]

>>12818664
do crackers ever stop complaining?? Seriously, so much privilege and its never enough.

[Anonymous No.12819825]

I work in HR in the silicon valley.

Honest advice for non blacks: it doesn't matter what your race is, on your job application form either identify yourself as "black" or do not identify yourself at all.

You'll be at a HUGE hiring advantage if you identify as black, and in my 20 years in HR, we have never checked a person's race/genetic history to verify if their race. There are just way too many pitfalls for lawsuits down that path, so we essentially just take their word.

IMO, everyone should self identify as "black." It's the only way to even the playing field in racist & race obsessed Silicon Valley.

[Anonymous No.12819855]

>be Russian
>2/3rd of country located in Asia
>select Asian

Ni Hao Mr Alexandrovich

[Anonymous No.12819863]

>>12819549
The future is brown white boi. That's why it's progressive to add diversity to your team.

[Anonymous No.12819880]

>>12819825
Desu What do you recommend for an autist shitskin aka Mexican/Hispanic in SV?

[Anonymous No.12819882]

>>12819855
>>select Asian

The last thing you want to put on your job application is "asian" especially at tech companies. You'll be massively discriminated against, have to pass harder tests, & need to be more qualified.

Again, for american companies, always identify yourself as "black."

Keep in mind Elizabeth Warren is the whitest cracker in the history of whiteness and she got into Harvard because she claimed she's "Indian" when she has zero DNA.

As I said, almost all HR don't check or validate your race. Your self identification is good enough.

[Anonymous No.12819890]

>>12819880
>What do you recommend for an autist shitskin aka Mexican/Hispanic in SV?

Definitely identify as black. Mestizos are impossible to verify. You'll get about 20% higher interview rates than if you identify as "latino."

[Anonymous No.12819896]

>>12818664
It just means
Fostering a non white workforce

[Anonymous No.12819956]

>>12819882
She claimed Native American which is true

[Anonymous No.12819970]

>>12819077
do u put hispanic or asian?

[Anonymous No.12819985]

>>12819956
>%0.1
>true
It's bullshit

[Anonymous No.12819991]

"Diversity" will inevitably lead to civil war.

[Anonymous No.12819997]

>>12819426
based Llama

[Anonymous No.12820003]

>>12819956
>She claimed Native American which is true

She had less native american DNA than your average white and she was not recognized by any Indian tribal authorities.

But again, it just shows you that we literally don't do any background checks for candidates that self identify as the "priveliged" minorities. There are way too many legal ramifications.

[Anonymous No.12820052]

>>12819890
>mfw whites have to tick hispanic and hispanics have to tick black
The jew plays us all desu

[Anonymous No.12820086]

>>12820052
>>mfw whites have to tick hispanic

Unfortunately, you're not going to get much benefit. I don't know of any companies with a "latino" hiring quota, while almost all the companies here has some directive or quota for hiring more blacks. Sorry, latinos just aren't seen as one of the priveliged minorities.

[Anonymous No.12820227]

>>12819132
orcl is getting sued for hiring white men for years then switching to asians. The doj is salty because the workforce wasn't 50 percent basketball americans.

[Anonymous No.12820322]

>>12819882
this is awful advice clearly coming from people who do not work in corporate america

do not identify as black... literally no one wants you... blacks and latinos in corporate america are nearly non-existant

this diversity crap is just that crap... its a pretend we are doing our best to be diverse bullshit... the only diverse people they hire are indians and asians

jesus fuck most of this thread is filled with NEETs and retards

[Anonymous No.12820338]

>>12820322
Checked.

I’m changing my name to John Hardfork.

[Anonymous No.12820352]

>>12820322
PS im not talking about back office jobs

[Favelan0n No.12820364]

>>12819793
niggers in current year are the most pampered and privileged race in the history of the planet.
jews can't get enough of you, but only until whites are gone then you'll be discarded like the trash that you are.

[Anonymous No.12820395]

>>12819793
What privilege, specifically, are you talking about? I would like an exact answer.

[Anonymous No.12820410]

>>12820322
> being this proud of your ignorance

Yeah, you have no idea what you're talking about. Nearly all of the companies around here in the bay area have race based quotas that massively favor black candidates over every other race. It's not a secret or hidden, it's pretty public information.

[Anonymous No.12820442]

>>12820395
>What privilege, specifically, are you talking about? I would like an exact answer.

Race based hiring quotas: companies like mine will automatically favor a black candidate over a candidate of a different race simply because we have "directives" and quotas to fill. Often, we will overlook a more qualified asian or Indian candidate to fill the role with a black person. It's literally what our management tells us to do.

And then there's Affirmative Action, where less qualified black kids get priority in school admissions over asian, indian, and white candidates simply because of the black kids skin color.

There are many, many more examples of Institutionalized Racism like this in America, and it's getting worse, not better.

[Anonymous No.12820446]

>>12820410
in NYC this is absolutely not the case

back office is filled with scum and rejects
front office client side (sales, client help, project management) is filled with white people
technical (data science, BI, analytics) side is asians and indians
marketing/design is filled with women

this has been true of every company i have ever worked for or seen

[Anonymous No.12820483]

>>12820446
Again, you're using anecdotal evidence to support your case when I'm telling you that there are institutionalized policies that are based on skin color which massively favor blacks. And this exists in most of corporate america, not to mention it's much, much worse in the public sector.

Now... just because they're favored, doesn't mean they're handed free jobs. You still have to have SOME qualifications, and that skills gap is why you see such discrepancies between races at the office. This might sound harsh, but it's true.

[Anonymous No.12820522]

>>12818664
The time or meritocracy is over, the time of mediocrity is up on us.

[Anonymous No.12820550]

[Anonymous No.12820552]

>>12820483
find me these policies you speak of - if they're policies, they are in writing

I have friends in HR and not once has this been the case - making shit up to push retarded agendas is beyond dumb

[Anonymous No.12820587]

>>12820552
> find me these policies you speak of

Ok. It's obvious you're being willfully ignorant or trolling for info now.

[Anonymous No.12820592]

>>12820442
>baited

[Anonymous No.12820616]

>>12820587
no ur just trying to use buzzwords like "institutionalized policies" to make it seem like you have an idea what you are talking about - which you do not in the slightest bit

also trying to take advantage of complete morons on this board

[Anonymous No.12820698]

>>12820616
https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/ofccp/ofccp20170118-0

[Anonymous No.12820709]

The whole diversity agenda is based on false conclusions never challenged. If you ask seniors why their organisation should be diverse they’ll say that diverse backgrounds lead to diverse opinions and diverse opinions beget good product. No one seems to consider the fact that racial diversity does not indicate diversity of thought. In fact, most private schools here are more racially diverse than state schools but the students these schools produce have largely the same opinions.

[Anonymous No.12820741]

>>12820698
Dont get it. Nigs, spicks, and chinks were getting paid less than whitie... so...?

[Anonymous No.12820744]

>>12818668
Until white people start fucking back then you scream for a century about nazis.

[Anonymous No.12820758]

>>12820709
If you honestly believe that "diversity" is being pushed as a means to get diverse opinions, I have a diverse bridge to sell you

[Anonymous No.12820770]

>>12820550
holy fuck what a great filename. Hasn't got me since pic related.

[Anonymous No.12820778]

>>12819446
are you an amerimutt? he's hapa/mixed, this is obvious to real white people

[Anonymous No.12820803]

>>12820758
Nobody honestly believes that except maybe the room temperature fucktards that end up in HR. Management has to parrot it or they get hell. On a side note I'm finding some decent webms I forgot I had.

[Anonymous No.12820817]

>>12820709
we actually have 100+ years of science challenging these assumptions. including recent research, but gets buried immediately. ask yourself why and if diverse opinions are really the goal here

[Anonymous No.12820853]

>>12820803
holy shit. did that person die? that's fucking gnarly.

[Anonymous No.12820922]

>>12820853
He's double-disabled now.

[Anonymous No.12820965]

>>12820922
kek

[Anonymous No.12821129]

>>12819825
I am visually white as a kite, is there anything stopping me from putting black on applications? I would be lying seeing as I am 100% polish. Can I make up some story about how a great grandfather emigrated from North Africa to Poland and my great grandma fell in love and got Blacked Raw?

[Anonymous No.12821431]

>>12820442
That's not exactly white privilege though. Check the post that I was responding to.

[Anonymous No.12821484]

>>12820410

get out of the bay area. I work in a 10% white city and nearly all professionals are white or white spics.

[Anonymous No.12821551]

>>12818664
different points of view = different points of IQ