iExec RLC

[Anonymous No.12528692]

I've searched and read and studied....countless hours of nit picking and analysis of the white paper and all online resources I can get my hands on...
my soul is weary, my eyes are weak, my mind is tarnished

But...this...this shit..... its UNFUDDABLE, there is NOTHING wrong with this project and decentralised off chain computing is going to be ESSENTIAL for the blockchain industry.....hell even the team is made up of literal geniuses

I'm literally shaking

[Anonymous No.12528717]

>>12528692
tokeneconomics is the only fud but not even real fud.

its weird this hasn't gotten more attention with all the big partners they have.

[Anonymous No.12528725]

>>12528692

I mean its literally squeaky clean, how did we not see this shit before it started to get memed and shilled on biz?

[Anonymous No.12528736]

>>12528717
Being unfuddable doesn't provide good fodder to incite discussion.
The only real FUD might be that Chainlink will do what IExec will, but as a side effect of what it is.

[Anonymous No.12528793]

>>12528736

to be really honest from a SENSIBLE investment point of view I don't think link and rlc can even compare.

Iexec has a sizeable, very intelligent and credible team, chainlink doesn't.

iExec keeps the community updated constantly on slack and there is amazing communication, chainlink doesn't.

rlc has market fundamentals primed for investing at this point (less than 100 million supply and low market cap compared to a billion supply for chainlink, larger market cap and a huge proportion of coins locked up with the team). If iExec captures just 1% of the $500 billion centralised cloud computing market that means around $50 per RLC ($5 billion) market cap, which is a X250 investment from this point in time.

iExec works closely with intel, ibm, Alibaba, Huawei, discussing ways that decentralised cloud computing can flourish in the near future.

Look I'm not saying link is a shitcoin (I do actually hold SOME link), however is it just MEMED and SHILLED senselessly on biz with no real substance or backing to such high levels of hype (yet), I think it will do well in the future and their GitHub shows they do get some shit done, but from an analysis point of view with my cash in hand, I would rather invest more cash into RLC right now.

[Anonymous No.12528794]

>>12528692
>>12528717
>unfuddable
What's their competitive advantage? What stops a better funded team from eating their dinner?

[Anonymous No.12528806]

>>12528794
they have the best team.
golem is their only competition and they are being left behind hard.


there wont be any better funded team they have millions to build this.

[Anonymous No.12528810]

>>12528793

Credibility gone

[Anonymous No.12528825]

>>12528793
If you'd look at Chainlink staffing decisions you'd see they only take prime talent.
The fact that IExec has great community management and still remains in stealth mode isn't a positive.
The number of tokens in total doesn't matter. the tokens in circulation do matter and it's a point against chainlink that's true.

[Anonymous No.12528844]

>>12528806
>they have the best team.
What have their team achieved in industry? What have they achieved in the blockchain space?
I see a bunch of European academics, and not particularly distinguished ones. For example the lead has just a few hundred citations, mostly to do with "xtremweb", and the CTO (described as a senior researcher) doesn't seem to have *any* citations!

[Anonymous No.12528865]

>>12528692
Shit tokenomics, there is your fud. Everybody knows by now btw

[Anonymous No.12529201]

>>12528844
One thing: CERN

[Anonymous No.12529245]

>>12528692

No one is buying your bags nigger that shit is going straight to 0

[Anonymous No.12529258]

>>12528793
>Iexec has a sizeable, very intelligent and credible team, chainlink doesn't.
You're talking about the team that swung a PoC presentation with Swift, has major users lined up before mainnet is even out (Accord, Consensys, Kaleido, …), and incorporated Town Crier (including Ari Juels).

[Anonymous No.12530538]

bump