[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 45 KB, 562x280, holy shit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12442493 No.12442493 [Reply] [Original]

Libertarians and conservatives in my country are campaigning for removing all taxes on inheritance since it's "already been taxed once".

But why would libertarians advocate for the removal of inheritance taxation?

I thought libertarians believed in "the self made man". What's self made about inheriting?

>> No.12442506

>>12442493
If you own your money, you own how it is to be distributed at your death. Libertarians are for people owning the money that they make

>> No.12442550

>>12442493
Not to go all /pol/, but when family business get passed down, then they have to pay taxes for the value of that business.
Meaning if you family own a farm worth 5 million $, and you inherit it, then you are gonna owe the government around 500K$.. Which you probably don't have, so you are gonna sell your families farm to pay for the tax, or you sell part of the farm.

>> No.12442585

Because most people aren't completely selfish and want to "make it" so their descendants are better off and can build on their success.

>> No.12442591

You clearly don't understand libertarianism at all

>> No.12442634

>>12442550
The children still gets the lion-share of the inheritance, but it is the idea that you have to sell your families business, which your family may have been running for generations. To pay for some tax - which doesn't really net the government that much.. in the grand scheme of things then it is peanuts for the government.

>> No.12442975

Inheritance is unearned income. Rewards retards.
Lottery winnings were also taxed at some point. No need to tax them again while someone won the pool.

>> No.12443004

libertarians are against any tax whatsoever.

>> No.12443015

>>12442493
>gib money plox
inheritards = niggers. Parents creating niggers out of their children = failures.

>> No.12443018

I'm pretty torn on this. On one hand, the inheritors don't deserve the money. On the other, neither does the government. Is there a way to keep to inheritance tax, but instead of the money going to the government it's distributed to various charities?

>> No.12443029
File: 4 KB, 249x203, 154632502185.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12443029

>>12442493
>why would libertarians advocate for the removal of inheritance taxation?

>> No.12443045

>>12442493
Because starving the state of funds is more important. Idk where you got this self made man idea, sure many romanticise the subject but it's not actually a part of either political philosophy as a rule

>> No.12443057

>>12443018
What gives you the right to steal another man's property just because he's dead?

Estate tax is just sour grapes, pure and simple.

>> No.12443063

>>12443018
Why don't the the inheritors "deserve" it. It's given to them by the predessor owner who has the right to decide what happens to it.

Let go of that serf programming from public school anon

>> No.12443074
File: 259 KB, 1200x1200, proxy.duckduckgo.com.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12443074

>>12442493
>gief money because freeedooom
99% of inheritards are insufferable dumbasses with power that comes with money. Like giving a rifle to a monkey

>> No.12443098

>>12443063
meritocracy or bust

>> No.12443111
File: 290 KB, 2594x1344, chadSelfMadeManVsVirgin.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12443111

>>12442493

>> No.12443115

>>12443074
That's a parenting problem not an financial problem

>> No.12443140

>>12443115
The problem is curbed by shitcanning inheritance.

>> No.12443556

Not only should inheritance not be taxed, but parents should be required by law to set up a trust fund for each child so that they never become a burden to the state. If they can't afford it the kids go straight to government-run foster care and the parents get hit with the bill, no welfare for you.

>> No.12443920

>>12442591
It's literally just b8. Some of these threads are from actual democratic socialists trying to trap and proselytize youngfags with their superior reasoning and straw-manning, but this ain't one of them.

>> No.12443981

>>12442591
I've seen variations on this thread about a dozen times on here. Its either one guy who switches between three or four IPs in the thread or a few people working together.

It always boils down to them just calling everyone inheritcucks and shouting about meritocracy and socialism but the fervor with which it is shouted makes it clear the motive is just jealousy and greed rather than an actual devotion to an ideology. I remember in one of the threads he went on a rant about how they aren't better than he is and they don't' deserve to be richer than he is just because of their parents.

The person or persons behind this are legit ass crazy.

>> No.12443992

Lolbertardians still exist? Seriously?

>> No.12444038

>>12442493
I'm pretty libertarian but this is one of the few taxes I actually support. I know too many trust fund babies that are complete pieces of shit. It should be a progressive tax with a minimum cap of like $5M tho.

>> No.12444101

>>12443556
i'm with you on the first point, but govt. run foster care is almost universally terrible

>> No.12444122

>>12442506
fpbp

>> No.12444145
File: 15 KB, 319x331, 1547082141237.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12444145

The tax does not work anyway. The rich will just invoice themselves from overseas tax haven shell companies that their children own. Good luck trying to stop the regular Joe from buying crypto and giving the private keys to their children. Moralfagging about the ethics of the tax is just a waste of time when you know people can get around it effortlessly.

t. Ancap

>> No.12444166

>>12444101
>but govt. run foster care is almost universally terrible
that's the point, to discourage useless people from breeding. if they can't support their own children they're obviously too dumb to raise them properly too.

but I guess private foster care would work even better. the kids could be put to work for local businesses and taught valuable life lessons like how not to be stupid poorfags.

>> No.12444394

>>12442591

/thread

The core of liberatatianism is minimal government and minimal laws. Just enough to keep the country safe, clean, and protected from foreign influence. Everything else is left to personal choice.

Pretty great fantasy, but it only works without lazy people and there's a shitload in America.

>> No.12444421
File: 236 KB, 678x422, you're pretty good.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12444421

>You're not taxed on anything worth less than $3 million
>You can get around even that with something called a Dynasty Trust
>You can use also Master's Limited Partnerships to dodge massive amounts of taxes on the event of death
>There are numerous other tricks and loopholes
>If you don't use any of them you're still taxed only a portion of the money
>OMG they want to tax my tens of millions of dollars REEEEE

You know what the saddest shit is? The majority of people upset about this will never be affected by it.

>> No.12444441

>>12444421
It isn’t your money faggot. That is the bottom line. Now stop samefagging.

>> No.12444463

>>12444421
>The majority of people upset about this will never be affected by it.
They will be affected by it--their schools and infrastructure will be underfunded :-]

>> No.12444500

>>12444441

Nibba you stupid. Lots of people disagree with you.

>>12444463

Fair enough. They are literally arguing against their own interests.

>> No.12444519

>>12444500
>Lots
No faggot it is just you astroturfing. I remember the last two threads you made that went exactly like this. A dozen or two one posts by this ID chiming in once and then vanishing.

You are a dishonest piece of human shit.

>> No.12444584

>>12444421
Inheritance tax is the biggest fucking crime on earth.

>lol it only effects rich people don't mind it

Fuck off.