He actually believes Chainlink will ever get past $1

[Anonymous No.12422305]

Do you morons think companies would want Chainlink to be listed on normie Coinbase for the price to be bid up? Any token that Fortune 500's would use, they'd want the price to remain low and stable for optimal results.

Docusign would want $0.38 link forever to keep costs of ownership down. Most big corporations would want a low cost token so that the interchangeable aspect is kept grounded. Stop falling for memes and think with a business mindset

[Anonymous No.12422314]

>>12422305
>what are fractions

[Anonymous No.12422330]

>>12422305
Those fortune 500s have 350m LINK waiting to be given to them for free
they want the price of the token to go up to infinity if it can cause it will benefit them and fuck their smaller competitors in the ass
you idiot

[Anonymous No.12422376]

>>12422330
That makes zero sense. That would force most of the total supply to be released before any price action, to which it's still locked up. Fat boy owns the supply. It's a joke to think he is sitting on valuable gold that will be given away to corporations for free. It's not decentralized at that point.

[Anonymous No.12422416]

>>12422376
It's on blockchain, it's decentralized.

[Anonymous No.12422423]

>>12422305
Zoom out, chainlink has already been past $1, retard.

[Anonymous No.12422440]

>>12422305
hahahah imagine

[Anonymous No.12422541]

>>12422423
During a bubble. Next

>>12422416
Not if you can't mine the token and one party owns 66% of the total supply. Next!

[Anonymous No.12422684]

Thanks just sold

[Anonymous No.12422708]

>>12422684
you got it boss

[Anonymous No.12422796]

>>12422305
This is probably the best way I can explain it.
Bitcoin is kind of like a tree, right? It has rings and stuff which can't be changed and you can open it up and look at the history and agree where all the rings are. And ethereum is kind of like the leaves. They're scattered around the branches off of the tree and have veins and shit on them for writing things on. But when you write on one, it copies over to all the other leaves. Which is good because if you look at 1 leaf you'll know that it is legit if it says the same things as the rest of the leaves.
So this is where Chainlink comes in. Chainlink is like a nigger jerking off on to the soil at the base of the tree. His cum is kind of like the external data which your bitcoin tree feeds to the ethereum leaves. So basically feeds the tree with stuff that it needs to give to the leaves which are asking for nutrients and stuff.
Hope this helps.

[Anonymous No.12422820]

>He actually posts Chainlink fud on /biz/ just to get (You)s because he's honestly that lonely

[Anonymous No.12422821]

Sergey will give for free between 50 to 150 MM to some hueg Co's to use his network.
He won't give shares of his Co, he will give tokens instead.
Now here is the catch for you idiots:
Users of the CL network do not have to pay with those tokens, they'll pay in USDollars for their calls, transactions, access to the platform, while hodling their link stacks.
Those payments will go from USD to Link through market buying which will be the start of the singularity.
So with each Dollar the huge holders of Link will feed in the market for buying Link, they will gain 1MM Dollars for their Link stack.
The network usage will grow slowly, but the value of tokens will skyrocket.
Hodler Co's will be able to put their Link stacks as collateral for huge loans or sell otc.
Also node ops will freeze as collateral big portions.

[Anonymous No.12422856]

This, i think they will eventualy switch to some stable coin, who the hell would stake and hold in network backed by volatile asset that is doing 20% up and down daily...

[Anonymous No.12422906]

>>12422305
>Any token that Fortune 500's would use, they'd want the price to remain low and stable for optimal results.

1) LINK outperformed all coins in 2018.

2) The reason it’s associated with /biz/ is exactly so normies won’t touch it with a 10 foot pole, allowing the price to remain in consolidation under a dollar for this last year while retards hodled every shitcoin that has followed the king shit trend known as BTC.

>All the big corporations will want to buy cheap LINK for a long time.
That’s literally what they’ve been doing this past year.

Besides, Sergey could always sell them cheep LINK without going through an exchange.

[Anonymous No.12422981]

>>12422305
What an ignorant post, what are 16 decimals for, as adoption sets in token value increases and fewer Link are required per transaction. Duh.

[Anonymous No.12423007]

Cute FUD. I’ll join in.
> 2 developers
Look mom I reposted FUD!

[Anonymous No.12423042]

>>12422981
Be potential huge stake investor
Invest $1mil and buy 10.000 LINK - $100 per coin
4chan autist whales coordinate and dump their ICO bags at $100
Link is priced at $80
Late link investor lost $200k in couple of hours and could bought later and have 20% more link for higher collateral.
Huge investor is dissapointed, news are spread, network is dying because of fucking volatile and manipulated crypto shit.

Chainlink will never work with this "free" manipulated volatile crypto market, network would be better with stable coin and late staking investors would rather buy 1:1 coin than some speculative shit.

[Anonymous No.12423072]

>>12423042
Accept an API request demanding $10.000 worth of link as a collateral
4chan autist whales coordinate and dump their ICO bags dropping the price by 20%
Your collateral is worth only $8.000
You provide bad API
Bad API fucks the whole smartcontract
Oracle requester gets LINKs worth of only $8.000

Nice decentralized oracles you have there

[Anonymous No.12423085]

>>12423072
watch bagholders sending me to discord and reddit instead of providing inteligent discussion on this "FUD FUD FUD"

[Anonymous No.12423093]

>>12423042
>>12423072
OK cool, man. Pretty simple answer then. Don't buy any. Put LINK filters up. Forget LINK existed. Was nice to see you figured it out though!

[Anonymous No.12423109]

>>12423093
Getting mad ? no need to be mad and sending me away i just want to discuss your investment anon :)

Run a broken API
Request oracle to that API
It's broken so they don't respond
Pocket the collateral

[Anonymous No.12423118]

>>12422305
>Docusign would want $0.38 link forever to keep costs of ownership down.
what?
Docusign would want high priced link because they will have a larger stake in the network

[Anonymous No.12423133]

>>12422305
Link and Sony. Sony nigga. Sony is buying Nike. Nike is perfecting solar. Solar nigga. Like the fucking future. But there's more.. Domino's. Domino's nigga. Blockchain pizza and crypto wings. Chickun nigga chicken. Taco bell is buying Uber. Sergey made uber while eating taco bell. DYOR. . .

[Anonymous No.12423155]

>>12422305
>everyone wants a low cost
>this creates a demand for low cost
>as supply of low cost link decreases
you guessed it
>price goes up

Your logic is like saying "price of ether won't go up, institutions want the price low so it's cheaper for them".

I'm not even a linker, I flipped it once and I might get another stack around .28-.30.

[Anonymous No.12423156]

>>12423109
You’re so smart anon! Literally no one has ever thought of this before! What’s your secret?

[Anonymous No.12423169]

>>12423118
>Docusign would want high priced link because they will have a larger stake in the network.

Because they bought early

Late stake investors would like to have stable price because crypto is one big manipulated volatile shit and noone is going to bet their money on that chainlink wont be worth less than during acquision. And i am talking about investors dropping $1mil. and more, not neets with their lunch money.

[Anonymous No.12423178]

>>12422305
Question: Why use a blockchain when a mysql server could do everything 1000x faster and still be secure?

[Anonymous No.12423187]

>>12423156
>What’s your secret?

No secrets !! Just basic view onto something i didnt invest my lifesavings and sperging about for almost year and a half

[Anonymous No.12423200]

>>12423178
Question: Why use "free market" traded volatile token if you could run this network with 1:1 token, providing better confidence and trust to your late stake investors ?

[Anonymous No.12423210]

>>12423169
Except they expect the price to increase as adoption sets in and demand inreases against the same supply. Supply vs demand. Price of Link will consistently increase, not drop.

[Anonymous No.12423241]

>people still try to FUD a network that's been in development for over 5 years because of a token

Yikes. RETARD alert

[Anonymous No.12423249]

>>12423178
You know what decentralized means? Dumb anime poster.

>>12423200
Token will find stability with use. Supply and demand is all that matters. If it's unrealiable then it is not worth investing at the end of the day. Simple stuff.

[Anonymous No.12423252]

>>12423241
Is it true that the chainlink network has been development for over 5 years? What is your source?

[Anonymous No.12423281]

>>12423252
https://youtu.be/XYiEPFRHV9A

He says it himself at the 36:00 mark, start watching frrom 35:00. The entire video is worth watching.

[Anonymous No.12423293]

>>12423252
Sergey acquired Smartcontracts.com domain in 2014. It began then if not before.

[Anonymous No.12423392]

>>12423252
This famous video is from back in 2014
you can see he was thinkin bout smart contracts and stuff way back then

[Anonymous No.12423540]

>>12423281
best link video easily

[Anonymous No.12423608]

Newsflash people don't control the entire market like you think. "big companies" are like anyone else, they buy and hold. Manipulation is by exchanges themselves. Big companies can't "keep it low" if demand is there.

[Anonymous No.12423996]

>>12422305
Great thread very compelling case just sold 100 K

[Anonymous No.12424048]

>>12422314
this..../thread lol. How many times does it have to be noted LINK will be collateral for billions of dollars worth of value in contracts. It will will have a hefty price if it sees adoption.

[Anonymous No.12424068]

It is an investment of money
There is an expectation of profits from the investment
The investment of money is in a common enterprise
Any profit comes from the efforts of a promoter or third party

Howey test + chainlink + coinbase = security for goys. Custody though.. will be interesting

[Anonymous No.12424069]

>>12423133
wut

>>12423118
Not how that works, not how any of that works. Companies are not counting on some volatile shitcoin retard

>>12423608
No demand because companies don't want a volatile token, imagine Capital One and Tesla looking at a token that was $34 one day and $88 the next. What's the point of valuing the token to so many decimals if their stack decreases when utilizing the token, $100 token price would be a disaster for them

There is zero chance this gets taken seriously, ever.

[Anonymous No.12424173]

>>12424068
That would require Coinbase to actually list the token which I believe doesn't satisfy the requirements, mainly how much of the supply Sergey holds

[Anonymous No.12424517]

>>12423133
I never bought any of that "size matters" crap until my junior year in college where I met Sergey Nazarov. I lived in the dorms with two roommates, Ari and Sergey. Ari was a pretty ordinary looking guy, kinda quiet - but Sergey was handsome, bloatmaxxed with a massive belly and (according to him anyway) was hung like a bull. He used to joke about it a lot - even around my girlfriend, Amy. Amy was a sophomore and was petite, shy and somewhat quiet. I didn't like it when Sergey would make his "big dick" comments and jokes around Amy, but she told me she didn't pay any attention to him and truth be told, she really couldn't stand Sergey.

I have a 5.5" dick and with Amy being so petite, it always seemed to do the trick. I was only the third guy she'd ever been with and only her second boyfriend - maybe my guard was just down but who knows.

Anyway, one Friday night, Amy and I were hanging out in my dorm room drinking, smoking some weed and watching TV. Ari and Sergey had both gone home for the weekend - or so we thought. At about 1am (Amy and I were pretty toasted by then), Sergey walked in. He'd ended up hanging out with some of his friends off campus and had decided to just drive home in the morning since his parents only lived about an hour and a half away.

He could see that Amy and I were both pretty hammered. He grabbed a beer and sat down and we smoked some more weed with him. Amy was pretty drunk and started giving Sergey shit. Sergey seemed to get a kick out of it and I could see him kinda flirting with Amy. Then I noticed (and hoped that Amy wouldn't) that Sergey wasn't wearing any underwear.
1/4

[Anonymous No.12424518]

>>12424173
Source on that claim? I bet not.
They listed link as one of the tokens they’re planning to add.

[Anonymous No.12424528]

>>12424517
But Amy started massaging my dick through my jeans and being so fucked up, I just laid my head back and enjoyed it - I couldn't believe she was doing that right in front of Sergey! I heard Sergey get up to pass Amy the joint we were smoking and I heard her gasp, long and deep and she suddenly stopped stroking my dick. I opened my eyes and saw Sergey standing right in front of Amy with a HUGE fucking bulge in his pants - just inches from her face. The room was so quiet you could have heard a pin drop.

He just stood there and I could feel her hand tremble and hear her breathing quicken. when she slowly looked up at him, almost in awe and respect, I could feel my heart start to pound in my chest. Then she softly whispered "ohhhhhhhhhhh" as she gingerly reached up to brush her finger tips across that massive knot in his pants. When she touched it, it throbbed - FUCK I could see it throb thorugh his pants - Amy just gasped again and looked up at him.

"What?" Sergey asked her and just kinda laughed. Amy did NOT laugh. Instead, she softly asked "can i see it?" Sergey stopped laughing, looked at her very seriously and told her to take it out. Amy never even hesitated - or looked back at me for an "OK" - just just obeyed him and began to open his jeans. I could see her nipples rock hard under her t-shirt and I could tell she was practically panting.
2/4

[Anonymous No.12424538]

>>12424528
She opened his jeans and his big thick dick just fell out...and he had NOT been kidding. That cock was strong, heavy and muscular. The head was a purple mushroom that sat on top of the thickest shaft i'd ever seen. He was semi-hard and was HUGE compared to me. Amy just gasped and kept whispering "ohmygodohmygodohmygod". When she wrapped her hand around it, her brow just knotted in disbelief and she almost laughed at how thick he was - her fingers couldn't even touch.

Sergey just stood there watching my girlfriend worship his magnificent cock. Slowly shaking her head in disbelief, she two-fisted him - one hand next to the other...and there was STILL a few inches left - and he was getting rock hard, too.

Amy smiled and patted the couch next to her and Sergey sat down, his cock standing straight up. Honestly he had to be almost 10" (judging from the size of Amy's hand). I opened my pants and took my own cock out. Amy took my cock in her left hand and Sergey's in her right - but there was little doubt whose cock was getting more attention. She couldn't take her eyes off his cock and her hand only occasionally stroked my dick...but Sergey's she pumped with long, purposeful strokes until she finally couldn't help herself any longer and knelt in front of him, kissing his cock and rubbing it against her soft pale skin.

She sucked his dick until SHE came - just from sucking him! I stroked the whole time until he pulled her toward him, peeled off her pants (she didnt even make the slightest attempt to stop him) and sat her on his lap, her back to his chest - the two of them right next to me. She just rolled her head back to kiss him as he squeezed her tits through her shirt. Her hands went down and pushed that big cock against her pussy and she groaned so loud when it touched her that I thought people outside would hear.
3/4

[Anonymous No.12424547]

>>12424538
Sergey's dick was so fucking big that he easily penetrated her from behind with her sitting on his lap. She arched up so she could take as much of it as she could and they started to fuck right there next to me. It shocked me how easily her petite little body accomodated that horse cock of his. Sergey pounded her in positions that i physically CANNOT do for over an hour - I have no idea how many times she came - she was even in tears a few times (though she never once told him to stop).

He asked her if she was on the pill and when she said she was on the patch, he told her that he was going to cum inside of her to mark her - which only made her cum again! when he finally came, he had Amy on her back, her legs shaking violently as they both came together - and true to his word, Sergey dumped his seed deep up inside my girlfriend's pussy right in front of me. But fuck - he didn't even lose his damn hard on! They fucked for about another 40 minutes and he came twice more. Amy was a wreck by the time we all went to bed.

I will never forget the look on her face - like she was afraid of him and in love with him all at once - the whole time they fucked. She later told me that there were no words to describe it - it was incredible but even that didn't seem enough. To my knowledge they never fucked again and Amy and I dated for about another year before we finally broke up. I always wondered if she ended up with him or some other big dick guy.

But one thing I know for sure - she NEVER fucked me like she did Sergey and the things she said about Sergey - the way she looked at him - and the way she was around him after that night (almost shy and meek) convinced me that a big dick makes a difference.

Amy told me that she "HAD to respect him" even if she didn't like him...and that she almost felt like he "had a right to her". So there ya go.
4/4

[Anonymous No.12424550]

>>12424069
What a complete dumbfuck, companies pay in Fiat, node operators are rewarded in Link. Go read some and learn so you aren't a clueless moron before you post.

[Anonymous No.12424573]

>>12424528

>sergey has couchsurfing

just sold all my links

[Anonymous No.12424609]

>>12424547
Bravo

[Anonymous No.12425087]

>>12422856

It doesn't seem like you understand the significance of a token whose value is related explicitly to the value of (usage of, demand for) the network. Disregarding the question of what a stablecoin is tied to, which is possibly problematic and at worst tied to fiat, the whole point is that the token used to run and stake on a network is tied to the value of its network rather than, say, using Ethereum, whose value is tied up in all these other considerations as a larger platform with many other applications and different strengths. The value of tokens is in being able to focus on the micro economies they power so their value is proportional to and determined by those local economies, creating a more stable system if people like and use the services that make up those economies. It is actually a bad thing and would destabilize the economies of these services like decentralized oracles if they were powered by tokens tied to and completely unrelated to that economy.

The asset is volatile because its value is all speculative and there is no network functionality/adoption/value. Once the network is active and crypto hype has died down, it will be a much more stable asset.

[Anonymous No.12425110]

You fucked up with that filename again oldfag. Im getting very close, keep fucking up

[Anonymous No.12425144]

>>12423042

>believing that selling 10000 LINK (.001% of the total supply) would drop the supply by 20%

even if a thousand holders dumped at that point and sold 1% of the total supply I don't think it would have your imagined effect. You are also assuming that intelligent investors are going to sell rather than stake their coins, which is a much sounder strategy in the long run. Even if all the 4chan hodlers dumped, eventually there would be no more myopic speculative traders left holding these coins and the vast majority of holders would be people actually staking the coins, effectively removing them from circulation, and making money that way.

[Anonymous No.12425164]

>>12425110
I have been on this board for a while, good guess. Not sure how that is a fuck up

[Anonymous No.12425859]

>>12423187
>I'm smarter than academic institutions and professionals with careers in financial cryptography / networks / security creating a new business model that already has connections to billion dollar companies.
>probably doesn't even know how to login to github, let alone use it.
>"No one has ever thought about what I am saying! I am the first!"
Wew lad, this level of retardation is quite something.

[Anonymous No.12425880]

>>12422305
they want the value to be high for collateral on nodes for higher value contracts, you fucking idiot.

[Anonymous No.12425999]

>>12424547
He might have fucked my well, but this is still nothing to he mark Sergey left on our psyche.

[Anonymous No.12426457]

>>12422416
Just no.