/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.12140637]

Who's in the right here?

[Anonymous No.12140660]

D

[Anonymous No.12140665]

>disguising marxian economics with antisemitism to appeal to rightwingers
/leftypol/ is doing some 300 iq /pol/ outreach

[Anonymous No.12140668]

If B agreed in advance that D would retain ownership of the final product than D should own it. You fucking commie.

[Anonymous No.12140696]

>>12140637
so if B gets the flue, he got to use the techniques invented by Child D for free, use his factory for free, and get PAID by him for absolutely no exchange of anything whatsoever.

the answer is obviously D, i don't think the maker of this is even anti-semitic, it's just a satire

[Anonymous No.12140749]

>>12140665

True, but it's a good point to discuss since it looks like they're here to stay. Of course, it also ignores what happens in AnCap world, where Child B owns her own labour & the property to produce instruments, since Child D lacks the coercive power of the State to enforce monopoly creation. Child B has the flute, and Child A (as a musician who also owns their own labour) purchases it as an investment using their earnings. Now Child A is better able to produce future earnings, and Child B can expand production, meaning both are richer. Child C has free time to learn either music or instrument making from the others, and both Child A & B are more than free to simply help Child C out (therefore increasing their markets). Child D doesn't matter, AnCaps shot him in self defence years ago when he tried to enforce his state-granted monopoly at gun point, depriving the others of the natural ownership of their labour & right to trade it as they saw fit.

[Anonymous No.12140773]

>>12140660
Nope. The clue is in "patent", which in the current system is just a bludgeon to prevent the free market from operating correctly. Child D probably didn't even invent it, they copied an open source product & bought some politicians to guarantee patent law would say they owned it.

[Anonymous No.12140796]

Child A, although none of them can truly own the flute. In fact no one "owns" anything because it is impossible to do so. Eventually you will die and your perceived ownership of things will disappear with you. The more you try to own the less you will get out of life.

[Anonymous No.12140808]

>>12140637
OP plays the skin flute
sage

[Anonymous No.12140810]

>>12140637
The options are represented by children. Children are not afforded property rights by society, and the reason for including them in the question is to confuse participants. Many answerers will choose a different answer for this than they would if they perceived each option as being an adult.

The people being given this question are plebs, they are not afforded true property rights by our designs, for true property rights would threaten our dominion over them. They are confused, thinking that they actually own even the blood and organs inside their own bodies, and self-satisfied that their claim to such rights are held so far above that of mere children.

[Anonymous No.12140814]

>>12140796
so then why would anyone put effort into producing a flute (or in the real world - producing anything great) instead of just living life? for some people living life means owning more. if you don't let them own more they won't produce (see communist systems) and everyone just ends up 'living less'

[Anonymous No.12140821]

>>12140749

And over in commie world, Child D saw how dissatisfied Child B was and backed a fake "workers revolution" that just removed a few competitors, joined the Party and retained ownership of the factory, only now with 100% guarantee of monopoly & a literal power of life and death over the workers. Child C is sent to a gulag as a lazy subversive (since 100% employment is guaranteed, the Party needs to hide the fact they've failed to attain it). Child A joins them in the gulag since the production of all art not of benefit to the Party is banned (and is a reflection of bourgeoisie sentiment). Child B lives a miserable life where she works harder than she did under even pseudo-Capitalism, only now doesn't even have shiny toys to compensate. So Child A & C die of dysentery in a salt mine, Child B suicides through extreme alcohol consumption & Child D lives like a king. Yay communism.

[Anonymous No.12140824]

>>12140749
>ancap
lmfao

[Anonymous No.12140828]

>>12140637
D. Work is a contractual agreement, if you don't like the terms don't agree to it.

[Anonymous No.12140844]

>>12140637
Unquestionably D

[Anonymous No.12140848]

>>12140828

Not when the contracts are created under duress Rabbi. In a genuine free market you'd be right, under the current system you can blow that right out your ass.

[Anonymous No.12140867]

>>12140637
Chop it into 4ths.
-C gets 40% of the flute.
-A gets 0.02% of the flute, but can deduct 30% off of her taxes next year.
-B gets 5% of the flute.
-D gets everything else.

[Anonymous No.12140933]

>>12140637
>A communist
>B libertarian
>C socialist
>D capitalist

btw D will always be the one that reach the highest % of non protesting individuals, until energy becomes infinite like in star trek where A will be the norm

[Anonymous No.12140959]

>>12140637
I dunno yet, I feel like the jew needs to be gassed before I can think clearly.

[Anonymous No.12140965]

>>12140665
/pol/ was always socialist. National Socialist.

[Anonymous No.12140994]

The strongest child will get the flute.

[Anonymous No.12140998]

>>12140994
This, let them fight each other to the death.

[Anonymous No.12141032]

>>12140994
smart > wealthy > strong > poor > weak > stupid

[Anonymous No.12141049]

>>12140773
>provided tools
>provided payment
Even without the patent your argument is absolutely retarded. We're not communists. If child B wants to keep the flute then she needs to get her own tools and to not get paid to make it (but potentially sell it on her own)

[Anonymous No.12141126]

>>12140637
D gets the flute and sells it to A, the wages B makes creating the flute allows B to create their own flute

Unfortunately for B, while their flute is the exact same quality as D's flute A has already bought a flute from D and so B has no market to sell to. Even if there dud, all brand recognition goes to D and D is easily able to undercut B in pricing

B goes bankrupt and is bought by D, who then forces B to mass produce cheap shitty flutes for C until B loses all love of flutemaking and blows their brains out against a wall

[Anonymous No.12141180]

>>12140637
Of course D, you cretin. Not even a goy, but A,B and C are not entitled in the slightest to it

[Anonymous No.12141193]

>>12141126
Meanwhile, A and C are kept poor by spending all their spare income on the latest flutes while D rolls in money

Basically, capitalism ruins everything for A, B and C (the proletariat) while enriching D (the boursigise). We have nothing to lose but our chains

[Anonymous No.12141252]

>>12141049

Nah, they're baiting you into defending a strawman. Yeah, in the specific example, under the current system D keeps it. But then they'll try to argue that their system of cancer is the only alternative.

[Anonymous No.12141529]

>>12140665
It's starting to work on me. Did you know the USSR heavily oppressed the manufacturing and distribution of (((porn)))?

I like that stab at (((degeneracy))).

[Anonymous No.12141937]

>>12141126
Hahahahaha

[Anonymous No.12142104]

>>12140637
this would be much easier to solve if one of the children were black or gay.

[Anonymous No.12142140]

>>12142104

[Anonymous No.12142230]

>>12142140
epic!

[Anonymous No.12142298]

>>12142140

The left one should say gimme dat o' you racist.

[Anonymous No.12142322]

>>12140637
Kill all the kids and stick the flute up my butt so I can play it with my farts

[Anonymous No.12142333]

>>12142140
oh my god dude i lost it never change 4chan srsly tripfag that id so u can brag about this to ur grandchildren

[Anonymous No.12142377]

D

[Anonymous No.12142402]

>>12140637
Option d has nothing to do with men in beards. Every corporation in every country works that way.

[Anonymous No.12142426]

>>12142402
who do you think owns the corporations?

[Anonymous No.12142427]

>>12141529

Did you know the USSR killed millions of white Christians who were opposed to that shit anyway and then created the soulless atheistic mess which gave rise to that degeneracy anyways? Did you even research (((who))) was being the USSR? Are you retarded or just pretending?

[Anonymous No.12142440]

>take flute away from b
>b doesn't make flutes anymore
>now no one gets a flute

[Anonymous No.12142453]

>>12142427
>Did you know the USSR killed millions of white Christians
First of all nazis aren't Christians and second Stalin promoted the church.

[Anonymous No.12142455]

>>12142440
>the one flute that B made is heralded as a master piece
>very quickly becomes a priceless artifact
>the state auctions it off for millions of $

[Anonymous No.12142463]

>>12140637
child D

[Anonymous No.12142477]

>>12142426
90% fully clean shaven men with degrees in suits from brooks brothers

[Anonymous No.12142854]

>>12140668
This. And if not B should own it, c can buy a ticket to watch a play it from d who will buy it for a and charge for tickets to watch them perform a rousing rendition of "twinkle twinkle little nigger, how I itch to pull the trigger" to turn a labor free profit and engage in cultural subversion.
Everybody gets to fulfill their destiny.

[Anonymous No.12142896]

>>12142453
you can't be serious, this is bait r-right ?

[Anonymous No.12143043]

>>12140637
It doesn't make much sense that the girl would provide the materials and not have any stake of ownership in the product
This is not like some wagecuck job

Once again you marxists brainlets show your less than desirable IQs

[Anonymous No.12143059]

A is the right answer, of course. B and C are Marxist/Christian forms of ressentiment.

[Anonymous No.12143065]

>>12140637
Unironically D

[Anonymous No.12143196]

it's kind of a strange image, desu. if there is some kind of implication of child C profiting off child A playing the flute, since surely, if they are social like that, child C listening to child A's music would also be free.

but then, in reality, the most poor child would probably be part of the production of the flute (it would work together with child B). and child A would be as poor as child C. because if child A is so rich, it probably already has a flute. moreso if it's so good at playing the flute and doing so is essentially its job. unless the skill difference is entirely negligable. in which case... why the fuck are they wasting my fucking time with their fucking menial problem?

is child A already rich? if so, why doesn't it already have a flute? so there is the problem of child A not being poor itself. but child C has no real use for it. and child B, in this scenario of child A not being poor, had child A buy a flute from it beforehand. so it's a silly question, because the image itself is already based on the premise of today's capitalist system = there is poverty but also the implication of communism/socialism. there's no rational answer.

[Anonymous No.12143243]

>>12143196
"there is poverty and there are classes, but there are also implications of a communist system being in place."

this image is paradoxical.

[Anonymous No.12143986]

>>12140665
It's just /pol/tards replacing capitalism with evil individuals such as "da joos" so they don't have to deal with the realization that this system is inherently flawed and their worldview is inherently retarded

[Anonymous No.12144100]

>>12140637
Because B sold her materials, time and effort to D, it's D>A>B>C.

[Anonymous No.12144141]

>>12140637
Missing Child E, the government kid, will take the flute by force, cut it into 10 pieces, give one piece to each child and burn the rest.

[Anonymous No.12144184]

>>12142427
On the average white russians are the better people than the fake western people. Muh humanity, muh poor shitskin, sandnigger, mudslime rapefugee terrorists. STFU

[Anonymous No.12144192]

>>12140637
I would propose B to loan the flute to A then take a fee for making the deal and enforcing conditions of the agreement.
C can go fuck himself though.

[Anonymous No.12144221]

>>12140637
B gets the flute, and her first name is "Ziklon".

[Anonymous No.12144233]

fucking communist pic, just produce 4 flutes and give everyone each

[Anonymous No.12144844]

>>12142896
no, unfortunately the retarded people sometimes leak out of their containment board. /pol/ needs to be pruned from existence

[Anonymous No.12144914]

>>12142140
Kekimus maximus
>>12140637
Children A and C can go fuck themselves. Children B and D both have a claim to the flute depending on the contract between them governing the flute production. However since possession is 9/10 of the law and I m currently holding the flute, then can all fuck off and I'm selling to the highest bidder

[Anonymous No.12145600]

>>12140637
D or you're an anti-semite.

[Anonymous No.12145647]

am i doing this right

[Anonymous No.12145683]

>>12140637
If someone ever tells you they pick C stab them.

[Anonymous No.12145901]

>>12144914
>Children A and C can go fuck themselves. Children B and D both have a claim to the flute depending on the contract between them governing the flute production.

This and only this.

[Anonymous No.12145918]

>>12140637
>I provided the materials
>I own the factory
Wut. If she worked in a factory, then why did she bring materials from home?

[Anonymous No.12145973]

>>12140994
Is this the ultimate redpill?

[Anonymous No.12146277]

>>12140637
A, B, or C determined by a random number generator. D is excluded of course (he’s a jew)

[Anonymous No.12146311]

How about option e? Government takes an initial tax to create a business which will eventually be paid back to the taxpayers. This business is not founded for the sole purpose of profit for its owners, its profit is more evenly distribututed among workets so that they do not become wage slave and owners get what they deserve, witch is a high pay check but not TOO high. Profits can also be put back in the company to make it more competitive and for better research and development. Another thing if this company can offer is loyalty rewards for hard working employees, making them partial owners of a company or open small businesses to expand the company.

[Anonymous No.12146319]

>>12142333
checked

[Anonymous No.12147227]

>>12140637
B.

[Anonymous No.12147277]

>>12140749
Based and redpilled my fellow superior IQ austrian economist we are gonna make it

[Anonymous No.12147491]

>>12143986
If you think /pol/ defends the system, then you're as much of a brainlet as they are.