[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 169 KB, 1056x1320, 05335658-91AE-42A1-9208-3B4CE755019C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11937830 No.11937830 [Reply] [Original]

39:35 mentions chainlink.
https://youtu.be/Wpdi47V5Kn0
Amazon AWS official YouTube channel.

>> No.11937842

>>11937830
HOLY SHIT

>> No.11937863
File: 956 KB, 1003x1024, 236830659023212.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11937863

$1000 EOY wasnt meme after all

>> No.11937866

OMG

AAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

MY WIRE DOESNT COME FOR 3 days

>> No.11937878

>>11937830
HAHAHAHAHAH NO LINKERS DO U UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS MEANS???? YOU THINK THIS IS SOME MEME COIN? ITS FUCKING AMAZON

>> No.11937914

I now realized i’m set for life and can soon embrace neetdom. 77k linkmarine

>> No.11937916

You just win

>> No.11937928

>>11937878

It's some undergrad doing a shitty presentation in some meetup sponsored by amazon

it's nothing

>> No.11937937

>>11937928
>meetup
>reinvent conference
just shut the fuck up poorfag

>> No.11937938

THIS IS YUGE.
WE NEVER GET TIRED OF WINNING.

>> No.11937952
File: 69 KB, 1000x563, amazon-jeff-bezos.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11937952

>>11936643
>>11936643
>>11936643
>>11936643
DUMP YOUR LINK AND HOLD ETH
DUMP YOUR LINK AND HOLD ETH
DUMP YOUR LINK AND HOLD ETH
DUMP YOUR LINK AND HOLD ETH
DUMP YOUR LINK AND HOLD ETH
DUMP YOUR LINK AND HOLD ETH

>> No.11937962

>>11937830
Retards, that's just some Kaleido fag talking about ways they've used AWS services.

>> No.11937991

>>11937952
lol no, dumb your shitcoin and buy chainlink

>> No.11938021
File: 51 KB, 536x699, 4d6ed235.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11938021

>>11937962

>> No.11938059

>>11937916
we will win and we will win and we will win

>> No.11938085

>>11937962
It's the co-founder of Kaleido actually

>> No.11938097
File: 13 KB, 286x395, 1485785880907.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11938097

>>11938059

>> No.11938106

>>11937866
Quit bitching. I won't have any fiat before 11th

>> No.11938113

>>11937830
Its fucking real
We will talk about that later. When?

>> No.11938123

>>11938113
In the Amazon CEO private offices where the big money is.

>> No.11938125

$1000 eoy was just FUD :^)

This is cookoo bananas!

>> No.11938130

>>11937830
DELETE

>> No.11938140

>>11937866
>>11938106
stop FOMOing you'll just end up buying the top

>> No.11938147

>>11937952
I dont doubt ETH will be worth something, but as Chainlink's database.

>> No.11938148
File: 151 KB, 445x447, 1509926435177.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11938148

>>11937830
$1000
$1000
$1000
CONFIRMED CONFIRMED CONFIRMED

>> No.11938161

>>11938113
couple of mins after

>> No.11938213

>>11937952
Yeah no. This Amazon actually supporting both Hyperledger AND Eth, so Chainlink will probably be used for both. LINK is the better bet imo.

>> No.11938236

>>11938140
I know, I know, but this is the second time this year I'm totally broke when LINK is down

>> No.11938246

>>11938213
There’s no maybe about it. Eth is a has-been, destined to hover around $100 forever. Link is the future.

>> No.11938265

>>11938236
>>11937866

You stupid fuck, if you look at the pivotal tracker of chainlink you will see they still have bugs to fix, it's literally coming next year and normies are nowhere near the project so it won't get hyped anyway, not above $1 usd by the end of the year probably (which will unironically be dumped to 0.25 cents again by whales lmfao)

>> No.11938284

>>11937952
lol no... hoard LINK. AWS using Hyperledger and Ethereum.. both will be slaves to the ChainLink network. LINK $100k eoy 2020

>> No.11938352

>>11938085
he's still a fag

>> No.11938456

>>11937830
>249 views
>muh enterprise

>> No.11938484

>>11937878

Kaleido is a service on the AWS. No one even uses it right now. Chainlink is also just one of many options in the kaliedo program.

Fucking lol

>> No.11938985

>>11937830
Downplay this all you want, this is a BIG fucking deal Fudder.

>> No.11939298

>>11938484
Lame lame fud

>> No.11939369

>>11938484
Look at the other "many options in Kaleido program." Guess what? They also use Chainlink.

>> No.11939390

>Dude we got briefly mentioned in some boring video with 200 views

>OMG 100 EOY OMG OMG 1000

Ye linkies are this delusional

>> No.11939407
File: 142 KB, 750x1189, 1543177843149.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11939407

sʇuɐd ƃuiɹɐǝʍ<

>> No.11939439

Holy shit, I only have 13k but I'm seriously thinking about maxing out my credit card so I can buy 6k extra. 20k would settle me for life.

>> No.11939450

>>11939390
218k subscribers on that channel

>> No.11939508

>>11939450
yeah and their average views are like 100

stupid linkie

>> No.11939516
File: 521 KB, 589x583, 1515144631197.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11939516

>>11939439
Do it faggot.

>> No.11939539
File: 8 KB, 234x215, download (13).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11939539

should I sell my entire net worth right now to buy Chainlink? I unironically feel like it wouldnt be a bad move.

-t. only 10k linker

>> No.11939544

>>11939390
Swing trading brainlets strike again.

>> No.11939565

>>11938484
If this smart contract thing ever takes off what do you think will happen brainlet?

>> No.11939568

>>11939539
Don't fomo my friend. It's a good coin but not work risking entire portfolio over

>> No.11939575

Should I sell my house, car, even my physical body itself (non-essential organs) to acquire more link?

>> No.11939598

>>11939575
lmao

>> No.11939642

>>11939575
yes, you can buy back some younger and healthier ones in a few years

>> No.11939661

>>11939407
How did you get the b backwards?

>> No.11939918

>>11938246
honestly retarded

>> No.11941007
File: 431 KB, 1280x720, Screenshot_20181128-185957.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11941007

He doesn't just say chainlink is an option around 39:??.

He says it allows you get data into your smart contracts to run.

Anyone looked at the full list of partner services? If chainlink is the only one that gets data into smart contracts then holy shit, it's likely to be used for most of their clients (pic related, screenshot from video).

>> No.11941037
File: 20 KB, 301x299, 1537592756838.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11941037

>>11937830
Hundreds of teams

>> No.11941060

delete now

>> No.11941098

41:40ish

He says KALEIDO IS NOW OUT OF BETA!!!!?

HOW THE FUCK DOES IT WORK WITHOUT CHAINLINK

IS MAINNET OUT?

>> No.11941150

Bump

>> No.11941165

>>11939407
looks like the bees in my country lol

>> No.11941172

>>11941150
bump

>> No.11941256

>>11941098
Good point

>> No.11941408

If mainnet is out why no moon

WHY NO MOON

MOON SOON?

>> No.11941438

>>11941098
are you sure it needs link to work?

>> No.11941496

>>11941438
No

But with all their clients, at least one has got to be using ChainLink, right?

Maybe not of it is ready yet, and the partners using ChainLink will just have to wait longer till they can run their systems in a non-testing environment.

>> No.11941537

Im from the UK how do i purchase link on Binance?

>> No.11941558

>>11941537
Make a limit order

>> No.11941562

>>11941537
Buy btc on coinbase
Send btc to binance
Buy link with btc on Binance

>> No.11941578

>>11941562
Could you post the web links?

>> No.11941640

>>11941496
i signed up at kaleido.io

maybe it's because i'm using the free "starter" billing setup, but i can only connect my private blockchain nodes to the rinkeby testnet.

in any case, i got this interesting notification when accessing a chainlink service that i set up:
To be fully functional, Chainlink requires that you fund account 0x.... with ether from your private Ethereum Blockchain that you setup on Kaleido.
Use the Kaleido Ether Pool service on the Environment dashboard.
Remember: Never fund addresses that you are using in your private chain with public main-net ETH or LINK tokens.

they also give you a link and username and password to sign into the chainlink operator ui for the chainlink node that they run for you. looks like you can create jobs and bridges for your chainlink node.

i wonder how you would get paid for this, running essentially your own chainlink node for your own consortium that pulls data from your chosen source and sends it onto your private chain

you wouldnt charge yourself link tokens, right?

it seems from the warning that node operators have their own private, not-really-ethereum ETH on their own private blockchains, if im reading the warning correctly. as the chainlink nodes asks for some of this seemingly-worthless eth, i wonder if each consortium here will *also* be using their private, not-really-link LINK tokens?

just as chainlink can be on the testing networks, it would be trivial to copy it onto any of these hundreds of private networks.

if the future of 90% enterprise blockchains is running your own private, permissioned, consortium link nodes to service your own private, permissioned, consortium blockchain, im a little less bullish for link, but maybe public chains will be like SaaS and cloud computing, where there was initial resistance but now companies use them all the time

>> No.11941656

>>11941640
>Remember: Never fund addresses that you are using in your private chain with public main-net ETH or LINK tokens.

never fund your private chain addresses with public link tokens

so private chains will have private link tokens to go with their private eth

interesting

>> No.11941693

>>11941656
also, if there are private link tokens, i wonder if there are private versions of a simplified mainnet currently in use?

this is sounding spookily like the shadowlink meme

we wont have a literal shadowlink token - but it looks like we're already seeing that some consortia will have private forks of chainlink running on their private blockchains. probably with private reputation, aggregation logic.

>> No.11941733

is everyone here fucking asleep?

im not trying to fud on purpose but this looks like actual legitimate reason to worry

what if chainlink saves a shitload of money for these companies but none of it goes to public token holders because similar to ETH, enterprises don't want to touch a public token when they can set up a private blockchain with fake ETH / LINK and delude themselves into thinking it's anything other than an inefficient shared database?

>> No.11941742

is kaleido's long-term view that enterprises will want public blockchains or do they expect to set up private ones forever?

>> No.11941750

>>11941733
shut the fuck up faggot no one cares about your bullshit review

>> No.11941820

>>11941750
they would if they understood it
let me put it in retard words you can understand:

SHADOWLINK IS NOT JUST A MEME

>> No.11941906

Bump

>> No.11941907

>>11941656
>>11941640
>>11941733

You're just memeing being this retarded, right?

>> No.11941908

>>11941640
Clever FUD. 7/10

>> No.11941955

If you disagree, why?

What makes you think a company is going to demand a higher degree of decentralization and tamper-resistance in their input/output systems than in their infrastructure that executes their smart contracts?

If a company is willing to use a consortium chain, they're probably willing to use a consortium oracle.

If you have ten companies contributing their own nodes to a private ethereum chain, what makes you think they won't also contribute their own chainlink nodes to that chain?

They trust a majority of the other members to execute contracts correctly but not to fetch data correctly?

>> No.11941997

Sergey made the point that being able to trust your smart contract execution is worthless if you can't trust the input and output.

It also goes the other way:
The extra guarantees from your input/output being widely decentralized are wasted if you're just using private smart contract logic on a private blockchain.

A chain is only as strong as it's weakest link.

Having private blockchain defeats the purpose of public oracles.

>> No.11942019

>>11937830
Holy crap doubling down

>> No.11942066

>>11941907
>>11941908
Not fudding, I am happy with my link stack

I am getting worried, though

I realized a bet on link is not just a bet on the tech being useful

It is a bet that enterprises will soon stop deluding themselves into thinking private blockchains are reasonable things to use.

I don't want to wait ten years or even five years for public blockchains to be accepted the same way it took forever for software as a service to be accepted.

If we really need web3 to happen before link moons then FML

I want to moon in a few months, I'm almost thirty. I want to become rich af in my twenties, not in my thirties

>> No.11942085

Wait wtf it's real

>> No.11942088

You
Just
Win

>> No.11942271

except it's literally dumping right now. next target 1000 sats.

>> No.11942356

>>11942066
holy shit dude just stop. any brainlet here knows theres a difference between mainnet eth and the eth you use for testing on rinkeby. one of them you get for free, the other you sells for about $120 which would be why kaleido says not to fund their rinkeby testing environment with
>Remember: Never fund addresses that you are using in your private chain with public main-net ETH or LINK tokens.

>> No.11942367

>>11942066
>>11942356
same goes for link for fucking worthless fudder

>> No.11942382

>>11942356
>any brainlet here knows theres a difference between mainnet eth and the eth you use for testing on rinkeby. one of them you get for free, the other you sells for about $120 which would be why kaleido says not to fund their rinkeby testing environment with
>>Remember: Never fund addresses that you are using in your private chain with public main-net ETH or LINK tokens.
Rinkeby is not a private chain you dumb fuck

If they meant rinkbey or a testing chain, they'd say that

Instead, they said "private chain"

It's not fud you dumb fuck it's a valid concern

>> No.11942432

>>11942382
kek if anyone falls for this they do not deserve to make it. go build something.

>> No.11942464

>>11942382
Jesus christ retard. I don't even care if you're fudding,there's literally no need to anymore.

You can't use a private chain for ETH and LINK you fucking retard. Only for testing. The entire fucking point of using distributed blockchains is the fact that they're fucking DISTRIBUTED. DO YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS YOU FUCKING INBRED?

>> No.11942561

>>11942464
what makes private chains not distributed you mongoloid?

>> No.11942580

>>11942561
same thing that makes public chains distributed

>> No.11942604

>>11942580
Holy fuck you're retarded.
Distributed = multiple machines working as a single system.

>> No.11942610

>>11942561
The 105 IQer, everybody. Give him a round of applause.

>> No.11942635

>>11937830
I would normally be excited about this but holochain is going to kick AMazon web services ass.

>> No.11942672

>>11939439
No it won’t. It’s never enough lol. You have 20k pull just want 25-30k

>> No.11942744

>>11942604
what is decentralization

>> No.11942763

>>11942604
Distribution is done to ensure there is a trustless network. Distributing the nodes inside a company doesn't give you that.

>> No.11942845
File: 130 KB, 720x1280, Screenshot_20181128-223016.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11942845

>>11942763
And it looks like they'll be distributing nodes inside multiple companies.

>>11942464
>You can't use a private chain for ETH and LINK you fucking retard.
What the fuck do you think quorum is? Fucking idiot.

>> No.11942857

>>11942635
Only a brainlet neet with no understanding of how ubiquitous aws is would even suggest such a retarded thing

>> No.11942898

Hint: quorum is built by jp Morgan for companies that fell for the "blockchain is revolutionary but crypto is a scam" meme, failing to realize that removing crypto and adding permissions to give themselves more control defeats the whole purpose by removing the incentive to contribute to the network honestly and increasing the capability for one of the permissions actors to act dishonesty.

We won't see a quorum-like fork of chainlink because chainlink is already easy to set up like quorum for deluded permissioned usecases.

>> No.11942940

>>11942845
I know what Quorum is. I'm not arguing with you because you're either playing a retard, or you're actually a retard.

Why hold BTC when JP Morgan can just fork all of your buttcorns? checkmate

>> No.11943002

>>11942940
>Why hold BTC when JP Morgan can just fork all of your buttcorns? checkmate

The real question is "why hold btc for the next ten years when jp Morgan is stupid enough to think they can fork your buttcorns and will try to do so, so you won't moon for ten more years?"

Because btc doesn't need jp Morgan to use it to increase in value. It remains cash and a store of value regardless.

ChainLink's token value proposition requires enterprises to use it. Nobody is going to use it as cash or a store of value unless it gets enterprise adoption first.

If it takes up Morgan and others ten years to wake up the fuck up and stop puttering around with their retard fork then the singularity won't be here for a while.

>> No.11943169

>>11937830
Why is this news? Kaliedo already announced months ago.