/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.11876613]

Frens, I just spent some time making this analysis for you. This is of interest to Link Marines in particular, but also anyone interested in market cycles and identifying trends in emerging technology.

I conclude that smart contracts and oracles are in stealth mode and soon will shift into the awareness phase, in preparation for the next bubble, which will mirror the cryptocurrency meme bubble of 2017. How long this will take, I am not sure. How long did the cryptocurrency meme take to lift-off? Years?

Please take a look and tell me what you think.

[Anonymous No.11876643]

>>11876613
>Link Marines
>Link
>Chainlink

[Anonymous No.11876672]

>>11876643
Google searches for chainlink as a gay sex position have not been factored into my analysis since they probably represent less than 0.001% of searches.
Chainlink fencing is more of a barrier to analysis than homosexual acts, but thanks for your input.

[Anonymous No.11876759]

I found your infographic interesting op, thanks

[Anonymous No.11876790]

>>11876613
good job fren

[Anonymous No.11876821]

Thank you frend

[Anonymous No.11876834]

I read the picture before the comment and found it very interesting.

Until I read the 5th graph and realized that it was about chainlink, then I giggled.

I'm not going to say that chainlink is bound to fail, but it's not going to be part of a new bubble in 19/20.

[Anonymous No.11876844]

I have an inner respect for autism

[Anonymous No.11876847]

>>11876613
Great research. Chainlink in 2018 is Eth in 2015 is Bitcoin in 2013.

[Anonymous No.11876860]

>>11876613
link is a meme and ICO scam lol
draw some memelines to go with this analysis

[Anonymous No.11876873]

>>11876613
Nice one OP

[Anonymous No.11876879]

>>11876613
stinkies getting excited because normies search for replacement chainlinks for their broken necklaces and bracelets or fences
and confusing smart contract searches for chainstink hype instead of eth hype
>mfw they will end up poor and holding whales bags when they dump on mainnet

[Anonymous No.11876884]

>>11876613
Tell us more OP

[Anonymous No.11876887]

LINK peaked during the goldrush and has been struggling to break $.60 ever since

every single time something link related happens linkies claim "this is the news that will make link moon!"
"I have inside info, and link is in for some big partnerships to be announced NOW!"
"Link will be $50 by the end of this quarter and $1k EOY 2017/Q2 2018/EOY 2018!!!!"

and every single time it is a dumb nothingburger that barely registers

[Anonymous No.11876926]

>>11876613
Thank you fren. We will make it. See you in rio or in Thailand

[Anonymous No.11876929]

>>11876613
based

[Anonymous No.11877011]

>>11876613
Fucking hell CoinBase send me my fucking verification email already so I can buy some fucking linkies
no more nocoins for me

[Anonymous No.11877034]

>>11876887
We still have the gay forced prophecy which WILL go unfulfilled by the year end
I wonder what linkies will do then

[Anonymous No.11877063]

>>11876613
OH lmao we're so ahead of the curve on this one wtf. We routinely talk about porting the old financial system into smartcontracts for decentralized lending, trading of derivatives (solution to 2008 crisis), bringing the unbanked good financial services. I mean, when everything peaked in late 2017/early 2018, my friends who knew I was trading crypto only asked how much bitcoin I own, even though I'm more of an ethereum guy. It all makes sense now. Yeah kek once the public realizes what the fuck is going on, we'll already have BIG bags the best projects that represent the future this industry is building.

ZRX, OMG, LINK, and REP literally cover most of the function of this industry.

(If you are wondering why I said OMG, It's because the OMG network will settle all tokens, so all you need is to spend OMG or ETH and the merchant will automatically receive their currency of choice, which is handled using something like ZRX and LINK for the backend)

Kek if we hold for another 3 years max, we'll be so fucking rich!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.11877070]

>>11876613
Also OP if you want to fix some of the typos before this analysis gets spread around:
In the second to last paragraph you write 'like' twice
>cannot be confused with something like, like chainlink fencing
And in the paragraph above that you write
>'have barely took off'
instead of 'have barely taken off'

[Anonymous No.11877071]

>>11877063
wow I sound like a redditor. But seriously

[Anonymous No.11877089]

>>11876834
so you thought it was interesting
but then you realized it was about chainlink and your internal bias took over
and you, as a supposedly sapient person, don't find this alarming? that you should change your thinking?
are you a woman?

[Anonymous No.11877211]

Very beautiful work, OP. Very confident that we are going to make it.

[Anonymous No.11877770]

>>11876613
Great analysis.

Smartcontracts are gonna be the talk of 2019 and usher in a massive amounts of money though Oracles chainlink.

Cryptocurrencies had their bull run
Smartcontract platforms had their bull run
Oracles are gonna have their bull run in 2019. and with oracles, the tide will rise all boats.

[Anonymous No.11877857]

>>11876613
ty fren. my analysis is that you're based and redpilled, as well as being a gentleman and a scholar

[Anonymous No.11878065]

and still link is dumping

[Anonymous No.11878117]

>>11878065
Nice

[Anonymous No.11878148]

The best part is that even if investor sentiment is rock bottom when main net launches, the amount of activity that it will stimulate will inevitably draw attention to the project. Chainlink will simply have too many adopters to go under the radar.

[Anonymous No.11878170]

>>11878065
Seems to have found a floor how I see it. Now, whether it completes the month long head an shoulders pattern that is emerging, or smashes through 10k sats remains to be seen.

[Anonymous No.11878185]

>>11877770
Way too early for that. Normies still barely can fathom what is a bitcoin. We are still in the cryptocurrencies era. Smart contract platforms (and Ethereum which enables smart contracts) will become slowly relevant in 2019-2022

After that Oracles and decentralized nodes (which chainlink represents) will become the most relevant question somewhere circa 2021-2025

Seriously, if Chainlink were solving THE MOST relevant question at the moment: we would see a lot more competition.

How many other projects there are that are trying to do the same? 2 or 3 (including Chainlink)?

You know Chainlink´s time has come when the market is flooded with tens, or even hundreds of new tokens and technologies, all trying to have a piece of the decentralized oracle network to provide data for smart contracts.

That is when Chainlink has achieved relevancy.

[Anonymous No.11878334]

Objectively looking at Chainlink I understand the reasoning and speculation that it may be the catalyst for the next era of crypto. The tech, partnerships, lack of scammy marketing, all incredibly great things. However the thing that gets me is that if Chainlink actually is what biz thinks it is, then all is biztards will be filthy rich. The part of the puzzle I can’t understand is how this degenerate corner of the internet is so aware and early to this that we all make it. I truly cannot look past the amount of retardation here to accept that result as a realistic possibility. Am I missing something here? I’m fairly new to biz (little over a year) was this how it was with Bitcoin or Ethereum back in the day?

[Anonymous No.11878354]

Objectively looking at Chainlink I understand the reasoning and speculation that it may be the catalyst for the next era of crypto. The tech, partnerships, lack of scammy marketing, all incredibly great things. However the thing that gets me is that if Chainlink actually is what biz thinks it is, then all is biztards will be filthy rich. The part of the puzzle I can’t understand is how this degenerate corner of the internet is so aware and early to this that we all make it. I truly cannot look past the amount of retardation here to accept that result as a realistic possibility. Am I missing something here? I’m fairly new to biz (little over a year) was this how it was with Bitcoin or Ethereum back in the day?

[Anonymous No.11878381]

Objectively looking at Chainlink I understand the reasoning and speculation that it may be the catalyst for the next era of crypto. The tech, partnerships, lack of scammy marketing, all incredibly great things. However the thing that gets me is that if Chainlink actually is what biz thinks it is, then all is biztards will be filthy rich. The part of the puzzle I can’t understand is how this degenerate corner of the internet is so aware and early to this that we all make it. I truly cannot look past the amount of retardation here to accept that result as a realistic possibility. Am I missing something here? I’m fairly new to biz (little over a year) was this how it was with Bitcoin or Ethereum back in the day?

[Anonymous No.11878402]

Objectively looking at Chainlink I understand the reasoning and speculation that it may be the catalyst for the next era of crypto. The tech, partnerships, lack of scammy marketing, all incredibly great things. However the thing that gets me is that if Chainlink actually is what biz thinks it is, then all is biztards will be filthy rich. The part of the puzzle I can’t understand is how this degenerate corner of the internet is so aware and early to this that we all make it. I truly cannot look past the amount of retardation here to accept that result as a realistic possibility. Am I missing something here? I’m fairly new to biz (little over a year) was this how it was with Bitcoin or Ethereum back in the day?

[Anonymous No.11878447]

Objectively looking at Chainlink I understand the reasoning and speculation that it may be the catalyst for the next era of crypto. The tech, partnerships, lack of scammy marketing, all incredibly great things. However the thing that gets me is that if Chainlink actually is what biz thinks it is, then all is biztards will be filthy rich. The part of the puzzle I can’t understand is how this degenerate corner of the internet is so aware and early to this that we all make it. I truly cannot look past the amount of retardation here to accept that result as a realistic possibility. Am I missing something here? I’m fairly new to biz (little over a year) was this how it was with Bitcoin or Ethereum back in the day?

[Anonymous No.11878503]

>>11876613
doing the needful
thx fren

[Anonymous No.11878512]

>>11878447
Check the archives. The people who got rich off btc and eth were also degenerates.

[Anonymous No.11878545]

>>11878148
You just win.

[Anonymous No.11878554]

>>11878185
I agree that it will take time.
But you forget that Sergey literally said they are working with “hundreds of teams”. He wouldn’t say that to hype shit up in a scammy way - it’s surely true.
So once mainnet launches chainlink really will become relevant. The “first sell off” on the meme bubble chart will probably be people taking profits after mainnet launch. Then we will see speculative mania after the value of the network and actual adoption becomes apparent. The price of the token will then peak. This is when linkies should sell - OR - hold and continue staking, waiting for extreme mass adoption by big players, and token price will then follow the “crypto j curve” meme.

[Anonymous No.11878578]

>>11878185
>That is when Chainlink has achieved relevancy.
Ohhhhh you follow the classic buy high and sell low strategy hmm?

[Anonymous No.11878602]

>>11876613
This analysis doesn't mean we are in stealth phase. I agree with you about smart contracts being in stealth phase. The uptrend in oracle searches coincides with the ico of chainlink and blockchain mania in general. Since chainlink had there ico the topic of oracles hasn't gained any search volume. It has pretty much just stayed concistent. I would need to see more upward momentum on the oracle related search terms before i would actually believe we're in stealth phase.

[Anonymous No.11878693]

>>11878602
>topic of oracles hasn't gained any search volume. It has pretty much just stayed concistent.
Organic growth. What do you think is going to happen when mainnet launches?

[Anonymous No.11878782]

>fudders crawling out of their discord holes
we're close

[Anonymous No.11878875]

>>11878334
Go onto warosu and pick a date range and just start browsing threads. It's pretty interesting seeing people fudding BTC at $200 or ETH at $1.

[Anonymous No.11878910]

>>11877063
delusion: the post

[Anonymous No.11878916]

>>11876613

Not bad, OP.

[Anonymous No.11879556]

>>11876613
Very nice job good work

[Anonymous No.11879585]

Would a portfolio consisting of btc, eth, and link be ideal

[Anonymous No.11879624]

>>11879585
remove btc and eth and you've got it

[Anonymous No.11879651]

>>11879624
Meh...there is a chance link could flop...btc and eth are on sale right now and will most likely be around 10 years from now.

[Anonymous No.11879653]

>>11879624
>TUUVUVVv
What did they mean by this?

[Anonymous No.11879731]

>>11879651
BTC won't let you make it unless it goes up to $1m per BTC or something astronomical like that. ETH is useless with no use case without LINK's decentralized oracles, which would mean going in LINK instead of eth will yield better returns

>>11879653
ID confirms I'm giving goood advice

[Anonymous No.11879768]

>>11879731
I already have 50k linkies, but I am thinking of investing in btc and eth as a hedge in case link flops.

[Anonymous No.11879809]

>>11876672
Chain linking with tarps isn't gay. Tarps aren't gay!

[Anonymous No.11879830]

>>11879768
you should keep your funds in FIAT or buy gold instead of getting btc or eth

[Anonymous No.11880006]

my dude it only lifted off because people were buying shit and actually looking at the tech to see if it sounded good to them. once they started losing money they stopped researching. i wouldn't really call this a smart contracts chart. don't believe it's that meta for this specific approach

[Anonymous No.11880261]

>>11878185
When eth made its run to 300, what smart contract platforms were there? ANS had just come out and there was nothing else excepting, sort of, xrp and xlm

[Anonymous No.11880393]

>>11878875
>>11878447
Lol they read exactly like Chainlink threads today

[Anonymous No.11880441]

>>11878447
>>11878381
>>11880393
These were when ETH was $4

[Anonymous No.11880461]

Objectively looking at Chainlink I understand the reasoning and speculation that it may be the catalyst for the next era of crypto. The tech, partnerships, lack of scammy marketing, all incredibly great things. However the thing that gets me is that if Chainlink actually is what biz thinks it is, then all is biztards will be filthy rich. The part of the puzzle I can’t understand is how this degenerate corner of the internet is so aware and early to this that we all make it. I truly cannot look past the amount of retardation here to accept that result as a realistic possibility. Am I missing something here? I’m fairly new to biz (little over a year) was this how it was with Bitcoin or Ethereum back in the day?

[Anonymous No.11880956]

>>11878602
No you’re wrong. Look at the chart for “blockchain oracles”. It increased in 2017 and it’s stayed higher than before. Chainlink has a peak during its ICO but if you look at the chart you see that the interest in chainlink is now higher than the pre-ico spike.
I’m not sure if we are still in stealth more or have moved to awareness. But interest in oracles has definitely increased and stayed higher than before. Smart contracts have also not seen anywhere near as much attention as they deserve yet, either, compared with the charts for eth and bitcoin.