/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.11846792]

>he still isn't buying the next 10000x
If you don't understand the potential of this coin you should just kys now.

[Anonymous No.11846804]

>>11846792
Please go away your coin is Le Failure.

[Anonymous No.11846807]

Le poo poo poo pee pee wee wee RLC

[Anonymous No.11846810]

Sorry but I just bought HOLO instead

[Anonymous No.11846813]

>>11846792
You think I'd doubt these bobbleheads?

[Anonymous No.11846841]

I'll let you in on what your turbocancer coin has in store for all you fine autists.

There has been a HUGE partnership with IBM. As you can see here (https://ibm-pool.iex.ec/d/Home/ibm-worker-pool)) IBM has sponsored one (in numbers: 1) 8-core 4GHz computer with 16GB of RAM.

That's insane investment and trust shown by IBM. Just check how much a machine like that costs. https://www.amazon.com/Dell-Inspiron-3668-Desktop-i7-7700/dp/B079H6BPJZ/ref=sr_1_6?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1542849201&sr=1-6&refinements=p_n_feature_four_browse-bin%3A2289792011

You see right. That's $785. Seven hundred and eighty five dollars.

You better get onto this rocket before this INSANE cloud computing partnership sweeps amazon's shitty AWS right off its feet.

[Anonymous No.11846867]

START PUMPING FAGGOT I WANT TO SELL IEXEC FOR LINK

[Anonymous No.11846873]

>>11846804
>>11846807
>>11846810
>>11846841
>>11846867
screenshotted for 2020

[Anonymous No.11846892]

I don't buy any coin listed on Bittrex as they simply don't moon. Those coins majorly has heavy manipulation that guarantees nobody ever makes money. The ponzi is heavy with RLC and a lot of other Bittrex coins.

[Anonymous No.11846912]

>>11846892
screenshotted

[Anonymous No.11846927]

>>11846912
You're supposed to make money, not screenshots

[Anonymous No.11846935]

>>11846927
It will make me tons of money. The screenshots are for later when you faggots are grumbling in the dirt still waiting for your shitcoins to moon.

[Anonymous No.11846951]

>>11846935
Price prediction?

[Anonymous No.11846955]

>>11846912
Don't worry Jean-Paul, I save all of your shilling. Reminder: when this coin goes to zero I will be locating French tourists to rob of their cash until all of my funds are recouped.

[Anonymous No.11846961]

>>11846951
4b MC within 3 years.

[Anonymous No.11846962]

>>11846792

It’s got potential for real adoption but adoption isn’t what makes coins pump. Rabid hype, leading to speculation and FOMO makes them pump. RLC doesn’t do hype. This coin is already dumping on the IBM announcement, since IBM “partners” with half the projects in this space now.

[Anonymous No.11846971]

>>11846962
Just donating the computer I'm sitting at now would put give me more skin in RLC than IBM has. Let that sink in.

[Anonymous No.11846974]

so why does this project need a token?

[Anonymous No.11846978]

>>11846962
>It’s got potential for real adoption
>RLC doesn’t do hype
>but adoption isn’t what makes coins pump
Do you even think before you put a sentence together?

[Anonymous No.11846987]

>>11846974
Proof of Contribution algo.

[Anonymous No.11846997]

>>11846987
go on

[Anonymous No.11847008]

>>11846997
DYOR. Your question has been answered 1000x over.

[Anonymous No.11847014]

>>11847008
welp I'm certainly convinced, just bought 100k, thanks!

[Anonymous No.11847021]

>>11847014
I'm not here to convince you. I'm here to warn you.

[Anonymous No.11847022]

>>11846997
TL;DR: No. Everything this company does can be done via the traditional banking system and there is no reason for token economics beyond raising capital through an ICO

[Anonymous No.11847033]

>>11847022
>trying this hard

[Anonymous No.11847040]

>>11846961
lmao. capped.

[Anonymous No.11847048]

>>11847033
you are more than welcome to tell me why a token is necessary to pay people when there's a perfectly fine fiat economy that doesn't put you at risk of having finance market watchdogs at your door

[Anonymous No.11847051]

>>11847048
>do my research for me
kek, yes you are smarter than the iExec team. Hahahaha

[Anonymous No.11847058]

>>11847051
implying that everyone is wrong but then deflecting when asked to explain why doesn't make you sound smart, you know

[Anonymous No.11847068]

>>11847058
Wow, so hard to google.
They are used to buy&sell computing power on the iexec market and are required as staking deposits for computation providers.

https://medium.com/iex-ec/poco-series-2-on-the-use-of-staking-to-prevent-attacks-2a5c700558bd

So staking with RLC will essentially make it unprofitable for bad actors to try and make a profit by attacking the network. Simply buying with ether or some other currency would allow anyone the ability to act as a worker and take profits without legitimate work. This makes a lot of sense and gives me more faith in the need of the actual RLC token.

There ya go fudfag. Now leave.

[Anonymous No.11847091]

>>11847068
>workers may produce invalid calculation
u wot? That's literally not how computation works. If that were the case the cloud computing business wouldn't be a fucking trillion dollar industry lmao

[Anonymous No.11847113]

>>11847091
>didn't read the medium link
>thinks decentralized cloud computing works the same as traditional cloud computing
l o l

[Anonymous No.11847180]

>>11847022
I didn't think so.
When I ask in link threads why tokens are needed, it's very easy to explain.
I asked constantly on all the possible valid FUD there could be and they were addressed each time
then I go into an RLC thread and its like lol no dyor

ok what the fuck was the point of the thread then?

[Anonymous No.11847194]

>>11847180
>ok what the fuck was the point of the thread then?
to get screenshots for disbelievers when it 200xs within 3 years

[Anonymous No.11847196]

>>11847194
epic

[Anonymous No.11847218]

>>11847113
Ok so the central selling point of this shitcoin is the intel SGX "partnership". SGX is an enclave solution that makes the jobs run on a machine transparent to the owner - e.g. you run a job on my machine and I cannot determine what you are doing.

But then I need to stake some shitty token to make sure that I have no economic interest in producing... fake output?

>decentralized cloud computing works the same as traditional cloud computing
well, yes it fucking does. Why else would this shitshow (https://dapps.iex.ec/)) list 95% regular fucking software

[Anonymous No.11847269]

>>11847218
>still thinks decen. computing works the same as traditional
Retard fudder spotted. Why you trying to fud so hard? Want the price to drop lower so you can get more?

The central selling point isn't SGX, but it's definitely a good thing for the token/security.

Each application execution comes with a confidence threshold which determines the minimum level of confidence required for a result to be validated.
Before performing any computation, the workers have to commit a security deposit (stake).
Workers (randomly designated by the scheduler) perform the computation and provide a (signed) hash of the result they computed.
The contribution of each worker has a confidence level which depends on the worker’s reputation and stake.
When multiple workers provide the same result, their confidences are aggregated to compute this result’s confidence.
The task is duplicated until one of the proposed results confidence exceeds the confidence threshold. At this point, we have achieved a consensus on the application result:
- Workers who computed an erroneous result will lose their stake
- Workers who computed the validated result will share a reward composed of the application payments (from the user) and the stake lost by workers who published an erroneous result.
Workers reputation is adjusted.

[Anonymous No.11847292]

>>11847269
ok and now try to talk yourself into a reason why this needs a token and can't be implemented on dollars

[Anonymous No.11847311]

>>11847292
>WHY DO CRYPTO NOT USE DOLLAR?
literal kys

[Anonymous No.11847326]

>>11847311
guess you couldn't pull a stupid reason out of your ass to defend this project using a volatile asset over money for its business.

That's fine anon. Nobody really expected you to anyway

[Anonymous No.11847341]

>>11847326
You are wondering why a crypto based technology doesn't just use the dollar.

Do you understand how stupid you sound? I already told you why it needs a token.

[Anonymous No.11847349]

>>11846792
Throughly educate me on this coin with links, tell me the pros and cons, etc. and I will put 25 BTC into it.

[Anonymous No.11847355]

>>11847341
You told me it needs economic protection against something that supposedly is already protected by hardware technology.

And I'm asking you why the fuck this would have to be a crypto. The answer can't be "DUH it needs a cryptocurrency because its a cryptocurrency"

[Anonymous No.11847364]

>>11846873
D E L U D E D

[Anonymous No.11847410]

>>11847349
>pros: if it takes 1% of the cloud computing industry in 2019 it will 181x
>price per computation will drive AWS and other centralized competitors out of the space (or iexec will compete healthily)
>iExec will eventually be the #1 spot for dApps
>Some mining dApps are already being made, imagine a marketplace where you can buy mining power for whatever shitcoin you want without putting up money upfront for hardware
>It's going to cause an energy arbitrage war within the whole mining scene due to the computation market.
>It's been hailed as "the airbnb of cloud computing, but without the airbnb"
>biz has a hard time fudding it
>intel and ibm showing interest
>oversold AF

cons: their marketing is bland(slowly getting better), it dumps hard sometimes, and it's french.

[Anonymous No.11847418]

>>11847355
retard logic kys

[Anonymous No.11847426]

>>11846912
>>11846873
Serious question, what would possess you to hold this over chainlink?

[Anonymous No.11847443]

>>11847426
I think the mid-long term gains will be higher.

[Anonymous No.11847457]

>>11847443
You said yourself that RLC might 180-200x, almost everyone thinks Link will do more. Sell now for link or stay poor I guess.

[Anonymous No.11847463]

>>11847418
still waiting for that reasoning why they're not doing their book keeping in dollars. Go on.

[Anonymous No.11847466]

>>11847349
oh yea sorry i forgot links
i'll give you one...i forgot about RSK-iexec bitcoin smartcontracts.

https://medium.com/iex-ec/rsk-and-iexec-collaborate-together-to-provide-off-chain-computing-to-bitcoin-applications-46f0aedbe87a

[Anonymous No.11847475]

>>11847457
200x short-mid term. Good luck getting 1000x with link in short term when it has a massively higher MC and lower potential use cases.
>hurr durr my coin connects to the outside world!
>also hurr durr cryptocurrency will phase out traditional payment systems!
Do you see what's wrong there?

[Anonymous No.11847488]

>>11847475
>200x short-mid term
>2021

[Anonymous No.11847497]

>>11847488
>he doesn't know
You're in for a long 3 years bud.

[Anonymous No.11847510]

>>11847488
Short term is 2-3 years for me
mid term is 3-5
long is 6-10+
You need to understand your perspective is not my perspective.

[Anonymous No.11847518]

>>11847510
>You need to understand your perspective is not my perspective
Yeah I already gathered that from you believing this to be a sound investment

[Anonymous No.11847539]

>>11847518
Good. Don't buy any then. :)
For someone interested you sure try so hard to not be interested with your trash fud LOOOOOOOL

[Anonymous No.11847571]

>>11847539
I'm always open for interesting technology, especially distributed ones. I'm unironically studying in that field.

A fucking shame that even if this project had any legs to stand on, you'd be absolutely horrible at selling it.

[Anonymous No.11847604]

>>11847571
I don't want to sell it.
I'm here to inform people that they are going to miss out and not realize it, and I'm collecting screenshots in the process for the montage.

Thank you for your fud efforts, I will buy all the way down.

[Anonymous No.11847636]

Friendly reminder: LINK will moon first, then iExec

Anyone who don't sell iExec for LINK is stupid. iExec will take many years to grow, but LINK will moon within months, evidence is their pivotal tracker that shows main net is imminent. Sell iExec for LINK now, can buy at least 10 times the number of iExec token after LINK moon.

[Anonymous No.11847654]

>>11847636
iexec will moon harder and/or before link, at least from this point in time.

[Anonymous No.11847683]

Absolute shit coin lmao get out of here we know the routine news id hyped and instead oF a pump it DUMMMPPPPSSS

[Anonymous No.11847691]

>>11847604
>I will buy all the way down
Yeah, I'm afraid you will. Good luck anon.

[Anonymous No.11847699]

>>11847691
Thank you
I'll make you the centerpiece of the montage

[Anonymous No.11847703]

>>11847699
See you 2021 then lmao

[Anonymous No.11847712]

>>11847654
2019 private infrastructure (admin said Q4 2019)
2020 high speed decentralized computing
2021 edge/cloud computing

Iexec is the slowest project.

[Anonymous No.11847724]

>>11847703
2020*

[Anonymous No.11847736]

>>11847712
You ever have a slow cooked meal?
Doesn't seem like it.
Flavor takes time, anon.

[Anonymous No.11847737]

>>11846961

[Anonymous No.11847748]

>>11846792
is this some sort of ultra ancap thread?

[Anonymous No.11847836]

>>11847748
sure...

[Anonymous No.11848945]

>>11847736
he's saying it will moon "slow cooked"
which is why he's saying to buy LINK first and use LINK-moon money to buy iExec

[Anonymous No.11849035]

>>11846792

RLC's got the best fundamentals of any sub-$22mm crypto that I'm aware of, but the tokenomics of their past worker drops really turned me off. It was confusing as fuck and wasn't nearly worth the time and effort it took anyone to actually provide the computing power.

[Anonymous No.11849157]

>>11848945
LINK will never moon.

[Ano No.11849231]

>>11849035
Meeeh this were the very first tests, how can you imagine it is perfect the first time you launch product in beta test ahah
Love this thread just keep all screenshot

[Anonymous No.11849556]

>>11846792
>10000x
I hold some of this, with the assumption that the project will succeed, in which case it is currently severely undervalued. But instead of discussing its technology, you make a post about getting rich quick. Makes me consider selling.

[Anonymous No.11849560]

>>11849556
Sell please. I want to buy your bags.

[Anonymous No.11849596]

>>11847180
To steal lunch money from 12 year olds who don't think to ask reasonable questions.

[Anonymous No.11849607]

>>11849560
>make thread to pump up price with hype
>use childish language
>get mad when people come in to ask questions

[Ano No.11849728]

>>11849607
in fact he answered a lot of questions
Always the same questions.
> why token instead of $

People here are smarter Than all Iexec team and smarter than IBM Intel Ubisoft Rsk and all other actors seeing the potential and working with iExec

[Anonymous No.11849747]

>>11849607
>implying i'm using childish language
>implying you aren't a butthurt faggot
>implying I want to sell anyone here anything
just here to laugh at faggots
>>11849728
this

[Anonymous No.11849888]

>>11847475
>and lower potential use cases.
confirmed retard

[Anonymous No.11850074]

>>11849888
Please elaborate.
They way i see it LINK is just fucking oracles, iexec can provide computations for all kinds of dapps, including the dapps that specialises in oracles making link obsolete.

[Anonymous No.11850560]

This shit is going to zero, just like REQ.

[Ano No.11850727]

>>11850560
This is all you have ? Always the same shit written by a no name ? Pathetic

[Anonymous No.11851442]

>>11850074
this

[Ano No.11852409]

>>11851442
DO NOT CRITICIZE THIS PROJECT HERE. ARE YOU CRAZY ?
Litterally 80 % of chanfags are in love with it

[Anonymous No.11852537]

I just need this project to hit a couple bucks in a bull market and I’ll be pretty much set for a long. Gonna hold to 10+/a few years because the team is amazing and they’ve accomplished all target goals with ease and ahead of time. Actually they go above their own milestones and do a little extra to legitimize rlc as a future blue chip crypto. Case in point, rsk bitcoin smart contracts and multiple partnerships with Ubisoft, intel and full on collab with IBM. If that isn’t a top 50-100 project idk what is

[Anonymous No.11852599]

For those reasons I mentioned above, I still don’t know why this doesn’t have a bigger following. For those of you saying it does, this project has only 3k reddit followers while other projects have 20k+. The same can be said about twitter followers and bitcointalk users interested in this. Well whatever the reason this is a future surefire moonshot. It might take a little more time but I’ll be hodling

[Anonymous No.11852625]

>>11852599
May next year is already the next version release, isn't it

[Anonymous No.11852684]

>>11846792
>investing in french cunts
>ever

also, this is probably the project with the longest shilling time right after link. ive seen this garbage get shilled constantly for more than a year now and it just keeps tanking. at least REQfags accepted that they got mozzarella'd and moved on

[Anonymous No.11852704]

>>11852684
Well actually after the shilling chainlinked mooned like a motherfuker. Went from like 18 cents to 54 cents ina down of a couple months while most other projects have lost over half their valuation in that time. So the shilling did work and eventually it’ll work for rlc

[Anonymous No.11852752]

>>11852704
>he actually thinks it was the shilling that pumped link
almost as deluded as /pol/ thinking they were responsible for the election of trump

[Anonymous No.11852775]

>>11846892
verge and neo mooned hard though

[Anonymous No.11852778]

Shill this shit some more!! Need to get rid of my bags...

[Anonyme No.11853115]

https://www.zdnet.com/google-amp/article/amazon-web-service-suffers-network-failure-in-korea/?__twitter_impression=true
> and during this time AWS.
Reason why businesses need iExec

[Anonymous No.11853165]

>>11852752
We were.

[Anonymous No.11853462]

Nice idea but I checked their website and the actual token is completely useless..

[Anonyme No.11853593]

>>11853462
https://twitter.com/wasbend/status/1065632130431102977?s=21

[Anonymous No.11853705]

>>11853593
Jesus Christ these guys don’t fail to deliver (which I mentioned above) I’ll invite u guys on my yacht in 5 years

[Anonyme No.11854105]

>>11853705
you will be able to moor your boat on my island