Coinbase: BCHABC is the real BCH

[Anonymous No.11838259]

>Since the Bitcoin Cash fork on November 15, 2018, Coinbase has been closely monitoring the BCH network. We have observed consensus in the community that the BCH ABC chain will retain the designation of Bitcoin Cash (BCH). Coinbase will also adopt this designation for BCH. Coinbase has made this decision based on a number of factors including the fact that ABC has a higher hashrate and a longer proof of-work chain.

https://blog.coinbase.com/what-to-expect-during-the-bitcoin-cash-hard-fork-f15fd03687db

[Anonymous No.11838300]

faketoshi BTFO

[Anonymous No.11838381]

>>11838259
coinbase has no word over it. sorry. knows scammers should go to jail.

insiderminds.onion

[Anonymous No.11838585]

bought 50 BCSV at 200$
now 50$
my money when?

[Anonymous No.11838873]

>>11838585
If you fell for Fake Satoshi's obvious bullshit, you deserve to be down. Both BTC (Core/Blockstream) and BSV (CSW/Alphabet Agencies) are trying to sabotage the only currency that actually is making headway in adoption.
>Next upgrade hopefully will have Merklix ready and extension block header, what means we won't have poisoned blocks and will likely be able to ACTUALLY sustain more than 128 MB.
>With the extension block header we can encode the size of the block in a quick merkle proof and link it to Pow (among other things). That means miners will need to inform precise block sizes, predictability will increase significantly.
>This also can help a bit with graphene and things like that, one more parameter for block reconstruction without the need to actually relay the whole block. Altogether we will be able to pass 128 MB, I believe 256 MB could be on the table. In either case I'm sure 32 MB won't last after the next upgrade.
>Multisig malleability fix is something that I also hope will come next, we don't need LN to scale but that doesn't mean we shouldn't allow the deployment of layer 2 on top of BCH. To this date a certain individual didn't manage to give a single case for malleability, so it is only rational having non-malleable tx and increase our competitiveness against other coins.
>Just so we don't forget, the actual author of LN whitepaper, Poon, let it clear that it would need at least 130MB blocks, in the very whitepaper. Even btc's lifeboat will be better off in Bitcoin BCH.
>Hope we all see the benefits and can agree to a minimal package to be deployed for the next upgrade as soon as possible.
Problems with scaling are largely client related. BTC lied and BSV's trying to reinforce the lie by "showing that its true".
It's not.

[Anonymous No.11838896]

>>11838873
>node subsidies
>block limits
>malleability fix
>arbitrary centralized block validation every 10 blocks
>WHC
ABC another blockstream company

[Anonymous No.11839011]

Stupid drunken Australian