/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.11806131]

Turns out the Chainlink LARP was for real?

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612443/blockchain-smart-contracts-can-finally-have-a-real-world-impact/

[Anonymous No.11806166]

OOOOHHH SSHHHHEEEETTTT NIIIIIGGGAAAA!!!

[Anonymous No.11806180]

>>11806131

DELETE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.11806194]

feels good being a stinky since ico

[Anonymous No.11806213]

>>11806131
ITS FUCKING REAL HOLY SHITTTT
MIT

[Anonymous No.11806217]

very smelly stinky coin, $0 EOY!

[Anonymous No.11806228]

LARP said a partnership would be announced. This is not that. It’s just “we’ve solved the oracle problem”...

[Anonymous No.11806236]

>>11806131
Welcome to the new heckpoint

[Anonymous No.11806260]

>>11806236

don't forget to buy at the top

[Anonymous No.11806268]

>>11806228
True, but this is big news. MIT technology review is the premiere academic tech journal in the U.S.

[Anonymous No.11806274]

>>11806228
Not even
>“I don’t know if anyone has fully solved the ‘oracle problem,’” says OpenLaw cofounder Aaron Wright. But he says ChainLink and Town Crier are a “good first attempt.”
WTF is that. Is this a high school science project? Is Chainlink just the guinea pig for whoever comes in and figures out a full product?

[Anonymous No.11806280]

Delete this I’m still accumulating

[Anonymous No.11806281]

>>11806131
This isn't an announcement. This is just an article about the project.

[Anonymous No.11806298]

>>11806236
This looks ... correct!

[Anonymous No.11806332]

>>11806274
yes. its a band-aid solution.

[Anonymous No.11806339]

Ctrl f chainlink... 8 results, Ctrl F Town Crier 6 results... we gon make it

[Anonymous No.11806340]

>>11806274
Good thing that Chainlink is an open source project that can be changed and updated to better meet the future needs.

[Anonymous No.11806355]

Hahahah it's literally a student gazette!! Lmao

[Anonymous No.11806362]

>>11806274
He seems like a faggot desu. Most people don’t understand chainlink but we know it’s the most genius oracle out there right now.

[Anonymous No.11806368]

>>11806355
>student gazette
>mit review
pls kill urself

[Anonymous No.11806379]

>>11806274
No.

Chainlink can iterate and should whoever figures this out open source their product, Chainlink can converge on it and carry its existing network forward. Hell, if they go along the current trend of tech giants, they'll buy out and absorb competition instead of being disrupted.

[Anonymous No.11806382]

[Anonymous No.11806397]

>>11806340
So was btc, so was eth

[Anonymous No.11806405]

>>11806131
>ctrl F
>"Chainlink"
>8 results
Oh shit nigger ids ackchualy habbenin

[Anonymous No.11806431]

>>11806368
Lmao read that last quote it basically amounts to 'nice try'

[Anonymous No.11806435]

LARP.io

[Anonymous No.11806511]

>>11806431
no it amounts to "I run a massive company on the cutting edge of a bleeding edge technology and were about to fucking murder legacy systems across all sectors so I need to use Press Release type noncommittal language at all times, and especially in this case because this super key oracle technology is hawkishly watched by an army of autistic neets who will make memes of me gassing kikes if I say anything definitive about chainlink"

[Anonymous No.11806536]

“I don’t know if anyone has fully solved the ‘oracle problem,’” says OpenLaw cofounder Aaron Wright. But he says ChainLink and Town Crier are a “good first attempt.”

> good first attempt

KEK

[Anonymous No.11806537]

>>11806511
This. Based, redpilled, and checked

[Anonymous No.11806546]

>>11806131
delete this thread
NOW

[Anonymous No.11806584]

ITT: Desperate linkies suffering from Magical Thinking syndrome feign as much excitement as possible over this literal nothingburger. What a sad state of affairs.
https://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/psychpedia/magical-thinking

[Anonymous No.11806591]

>>11806511
high quality take. Based

[Anonymous No.11806594]

>>11806584
Cope

[Anonymous No.11806599]

>>11806584
you're right, this is actually bearish for link

[Anonymous No.11806611]

>>11806131
Paid Fiverr Article

[Anonymous No.11806746]

>>11806131
DELETE THIS IDIOT

[Anonymous No.11806787]

Article is on the website homepage actually.

[Anonymous No.11806804]

>>11806228

[Anonymous No.11806807]

>>11806599
checked. and its literally dumping right now target 1 sat

[Anonymous No.11806812]

More meaningless shit

[Anonymous No.11806839]

[Anonymous No.11806845]

>>11806807
I'm gonna buy myself 1 billion links at that price

[Anonymous No.11806849]

MIT, literally who? Lmao desperate stinkers

[Anonymous No.11806883]

>>11806839
Over five fucking million monthly visitors
https://www.similarweb.com/website/technologyreview.com

[Anonymous No.11806890]

>>11806274
Just like Ethereum

[Anonymous No.11806898]

>>11806883
Nearly a million Twitter followers... Fug once they Tweet the article it's ogre

[Anonymous No.11806927]

>>11806807
Im buying all the network if it hits 1 sat.

[Anonymous No.11806931]

>>11806883
lel my boyfriends gluten-free keto blog gets more hits than that. chainlink is a scam crypto is a scam.

[Anonymous No.11806963]

>>11806927
that is precisely what will drive it from 1 sat to 0 sats. when one person owns the entire network it is no longer decentralized and therefore worthless. all the whales have already started accumulating the schlop fork in anticipation of this event.

[Anonymous No.11806967]

>>11806931
why even bother with this retardation, filter out stinky threads if you don't want to see the fourth industrial revolution from the front row

[Anonymous No.11806985]

This is actually a pretty cool article. Congrats on your success stinky linkies. It looks as though you will all make it. This project/start up is definitely going to subsist this crash. It is indeed one of the most important projects in the space.

[Anonymous No.11807002]

>That means smart contracts lack reliable access to real-world data. Without that, they are “like a city with no electricity,” saysAri Juels

[Anonymous No.11807055]

>>11806787

[Anonymous No.11807075]

>>11806787
>$0.43

[Anonymous No.11807116]

I don't even know who's Jewing whom

[Anonymous No.11807153]

Front page, first story. Damn it feels good to be a linky.
www.technologyreview.com

[Anonymous No.11807171]

>>11806131
pls delete this

[Anonymous No.11807194]

This means absolutely nothing, you retarded fags.
Let this thread fucking die, for fucks sake.
I went to school with Sergey, he was always a lazy fat pig, everyone who invests in him must be braindead.
You are deluded beyond repair.
If I were you I would sell this shitcoin before it goes to zero, we are in a bear market anyways.

[Anonymous No.11807697]

we're gonna actually fucking make it wtf

[Anonymous No.11807721]

i can't believe it, it's right there on the front page

[Anonymous No.11807820]

>>11806131
DELETE TIHS NWO!

[Anonymous No.11807856]

>>11807721
There's going to be alot more front page features for chainlink. It'll be like that screencap, surreal. We're all going to make it.

[Anonymous No.11807865]

>>11807697
Based Stallman poster speaks the truth

[Anonymous No.11807916]

>it's actually a giant featured article right in the center of the front page
Why did that fucking larping retard Craig have to crash the market now of all fucking times?

[Anonymous No.11807950]

>good first attempt

[Anonymous No.11807971]

i need one more month REEE!!!

[Anonymous No.11808073]

>>11806131
That's a paid article. Most articles that look like that are. They are not paid directly, the interested party pays the PR agency and they have their own arrangements.

It's not good, because it means chainlink is trying to pump its token price. Which means they don't believe in the long term value and want to sell some amount soon.
Smart contract oracles itself are so niche they don't need or gain anything from a marketing of this type. It would be different if they were doing something that benefits from broad appeal, like a game I guess.

Almost an entire year of bear market after an ICO boom full of tricks like that, and anons here think this article is good news. Holy shit.

[Anonymous No.11808074]

fugging binance, it's already got 4 confirmations on blockcypher, fugging confirm deposit before redditfags learn about this :DDDDDDDD

[Anonymous No.11808103]

>>11808073
>That's a paid article. Most articles that look like that are. They are not paid directly, the interested party pays the PR agency and they have their own arrangements.

[Anonymous No.11808117]

>>11808073
Is this cope? This looks like cope

[Anonymous No.11808138]

>>11808073
What would it take to convince you that this is not a paid article.

[Anonymous No.11808272]

>>11806236
>I'm smart money according to this image
I feel like LINK is never going to take off purely because the universe won't let me get rich

[Anonymous No.11808322]

>>11808272
>it's too good to be true therefore it can't be
Listen fag, optimists see the glass half full and pessimists like you see the glass half empty. Well with chainlink the glass is full to the very top but you see it as empty. Sort yourself out.

[Anonymous No.11808367]

>>11807194
So this is what the fud has devolved to.

[Anonymous No.11808384]

so, is this still a good time to buy more?

[Anonymous No.11808393]

>>11808073
so they don't market, you complain. Now they market, and you complain some mo.

[Anonymous No.11808402]

>>11808393
I'm going to complain till $1000

[Anonymous No.11808403]

>>11808384
wait for bitcoin to become cheaper

[Anonymous No.11808407]

>>11808322
This
We are gonna make it boys

[Anonymous No.11808423]

>>11808384

same dilemma, if you are using fiat, i think it's better to see the bitcoin falling down to 2k before entering

[Anonymous No.11808426]

>>11807194
tell me more about Sergey
why does he wear a mask?

[Anonymous No.11808428]

>>11808272
I couldnt believe it myself but Im a 100% pessimist. I think this is it unironically.

[Anonymous No.11808495]

>>11808322
Maybe all the bad stuff until now was just to prepare me for the windfall that is LINK. That's how I like to look at it

>still only have 4k stinkers

[Anonymous No.11808523]

I love you guys.
We gonna make it.
Link 1k usd eoy.

[Anonymous No.11808548]

Reminder that everything is already priced in.

[Anonymous No.11808574]

>>11808495
>Maybe all the bad stuff until now was just to prepare me for the windfall that is LINK.

This nearly broke me.

[Anonymous No.11808620]

The article itself seems like a paid linkie Shilling link to normalfags.
The medium article an anon made some months ago was more thorough than this.
This tries to give Chainlink exposure and its more likely an attempt of the team to attract high end users and tech savvy people before mainnet.
Normalfags will see all the article and only see jargon. Unless a Treyvon James like appears for Chainlink normalfags won't touch Chainlink with a ten foot pole. And guess what? They won't. Only potential clients and us are really aware of Chainlinks potential.
We are all gonna make it.

[Anonymous No.11808625]

>>11808138
Nothing. I recognize the pattern. Note there's zero word about competitors.
A genuine article would at the very least write something about oraclize, even if they called it centralized, as it's probably the oldest oracle provider.
It's not directly written by chainlink, because that would legally require a 'sponsored content' disclosure, but it's written in cooperation with chainlink.

Direct digital ads are almost dead because almost everyone is using adblock, and even if they don't, people have learned to mentally filter ads out. "Native ads", disguised or not, are becoming the major way to advertise.
Honest journalist is dead. If what you read, anywhere, has a clear beneficiary (either commercial or political) it's virtually certain it's paid.

Imagine the article was about, I don't know, IOTA? Replace the OpenLaw mention with Fujitsu or Bosch. The paid nature would be bloody obvious.

[Anonymous No.11808666]

>>11806131
The chainlink larp was the larp, it was to keep reddit out.

[Anonymous No.11808682]

guys we all gonna make it.
i love all of you (linkies)

[Anonymous No.11808699]

>>11808666
Checked and redpilled

[Anonymous No.11808704]

>>11808625
The fact remains that the team is trying to give link exposure. For us that only means that mainnet is near and they are confident enough to make Chainlink public.

[Anonymous No.11808740]

>>11808625
so wait, you're just ASSUMING it's a paid article and you know you're right because you know you're right?
do you know what circular logic is?

[Anonymous No.11808741]

https://twitter.com/techreview/status/1064608279547052032
On twitter now. don't care if paid shill or not. 850K+ follwers

[Anonymous No.11808755]

>>11808741
pump tomorrow confirmed? why wouldnt it pump now

[Anonymous No.11808764]

>>11808741
Holy shit, posted 2 minutes ago

[Anonymous No.11808876]

>>11808741
it's happening

[Anonymous No.11808912]

MIT shills ETH-based oracles since august.
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/611757/this-new-ethereum-based-assassination-market-platform-could-cause-napster-size-legal/

[Anonymous No.11808936]

>>11808741
based

[Anonymous No.11808947]

if you niggers care so much about chainlink, why nobody has hired some pajeet programmer to revise the code in the github to see if it makes sense or if it's just a debug platform with no substance whatsoever

[Anonymous No.11808995]

>>11806236
Would this not be “media attention”?

[Anonymous No.11809025]

>>11808741
Is this on the same scale as Forbes reporting that other story, or bigger?

[Anonymous No.11809027]

>>11808741
lol

[Anonymous No.11809074]

>>11808740
>do you know what circular logic is?
It's not a logical problem with a binary answer, it's a probabilistic pattern matching problem. I have seen this in action from the other side and the result looked very similar.
>>11808741
>https://twitter.com/techreview/status/1064608279547052032
Now that's just blatant.

A good presentation about native advertising, although it concentrates on the unmasked form.
https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1042&context=fimspres
>>11808912
This one is more subtle, but it fits the pattern. A direct mention of REP is a major red flag. The writer has an arrangement with a crypto-related marketing agency. It's likely he keeps it hidden from Tech Review. Undetectable if he's paid in crypto.

[Anonymous No.11809082]

>>11808995
we are not some normie tier attention yet that've seen with bitcoin in november last year e.g. coinbase #1 trending app on appstore

[Anonymous No.11809140]

woah, a blog that mentioned a shitcoin? stop the presses

[Anonymous No.11809153]

>>11806511
Szabo Tier Based

[Anonymous No.11809163]

>>11808741
look who's following this account btw

(he's only following 74 other accounts)

elon musk partnering with chainlink confirmed

$5000 eoy

[Anonymous No.11809203]

Im a NoLinker, or a linklet

anyway, this is a good example of why chainlink is a scam, tomorrow you will see that from those 850k people looking, nobody will buy into it, realizing it's just a random Json Parser, meanwhile all you fucks are getting spammed right and left all day long with memes and that's why you feel this is the new big thing, you probably don't even know how to pseudocode

see ya fags

[Anonymous No.11809219]

>>11809163
Happening

[Anonymous No.11809230]

>>11809203
>hates link so much he has to go in all the link threads and tell people
Lets listen to this guy everyone

[Anonymous No.11809234]

>>11809203
that plebbit spacing
go back

[Anonymous No.11809245]

>>11806228
This is much better than a partnership.

>>11806274
This is the real world bucko. Nobody goes around screaming "IT'S HAPPENING, THE RUMOR IS TRUE, WE SOLVED IT".

I guess what I'm trying to say is, cope more.

[Anonymous No.11809278]

>>11809234
>reddit invented paragraphs
when will this meme die?

[Anonymous No.11809280]

>>11808138
A complete wipeout of all crypto journalists? Pretty much anyone that writes about crypto offers paid articles, it's how they make a living.

[Anonymous No.11809288]

>>11806839
Jesus christ, I've been hodling since ICO presale, and this is the first time I'm actually going from "optimistic" to "confident".

[Anonymous No.11809292]

so sergey is the new vitalik?

[Anonymous No.11809334]

>>11809292
maybe, except sergey looks more human, is a good public speaker, and isn't as autistic

[Anonymous No.11809346]

>>11809278
>2 enters after every sentence
>paragraphs
Lmao

[Anonymous No.11809374]

>>11809278
you have to go back son

[Anonymous No.11809391]

>>11809292
no. Sergey knows exactly what he has in his hands.
People still don't grasp the notion that link is a network that takes advantage of dlt's. Any of it. Link will be worth more than ETH and it won't even take that long, cause the market today has much more liquidity than 3 years ago.

[Anonymous No.11809393]

Paid shill confirmed.
"No, Bitcoin probably won’t doom our climate—but we have no idea how much electricity it uses"
Not paid, neutral tone. Short, 344 words, even though there's lots of source material.
https://www.technologyreview.com/the-download/612355/no-bitcoin-probably-wont-doom-our-climate-but-we-have-no-idea-how-much/

"It’s undeniable: Bitcoin’s energy guzzling is a growing environmental problem."
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/611908/this-company-thinks-it-can-help-solve-bitcoins-energy-problem/
Obvious paid shill for Soluna's token offering. 763 words, even though the source material is much worse than a paper in Nature.
Notice how he repeated the 'wind-farms in Morocco' point two times: at the beginning and the end.
It's much more aggressive than chainlink shilling, he even put a direct link to their whitepaper. They must have paid for the premium package.

[Anonymous No.11809423]

>>11809393
who even cares if it's paid? it's good publicity for us

[Anonymous No.11809429]

>>11809288
I was starting to feel the same but then i read the last sentence that said "good first attempt" lmfao

[Anonymous No.11809444]

>>11809423
because it doesn't mean what you think it means

[Anonymous No.11809451]

>>11809423

if it's paid then someone paid for it

and the target seems to be certain type of people

[Anonymous No.11809461]

>>11809423
When your brain is only able to think one step ahead lmfao dont be like this guy

[Anonymous No.11809464]

>>11809429
what the fuck do you want them to say about a project that still hasn't been released? that's exactly what chainlink, an attempt to solve an issue.

[Anonymous No.11809498]

>>11809464
I liked what sergey said, we are the clostest we've ever been to solving the oracle problem...i dont wanna hear "yeah you know its a good first attempt" also consider this is said by chainlinks partner. So your telling me that link is solving the god protocol and all we get is a 'yeah its a good first attempt' LMFAO

[Anonymous No.11809514]

>>11809464
Forgot to call you a dumb fucking retarded faggot

[Anonymous No.11809548]

>>11809423
You should ask why they decided to pay for ads now? What do they hope to achieve?
Is it adoption or token price pump? Seems to me it's the latter. Link is middleware and something only smart contract developers would concern themselves with. It's not like a manager is going to tell them to use link for an oracle. No, they are going to be tasked to implement whatever blockchain solution he wants. No manager is going to give a shit about low-level details like that, or care what oracles are.
If it's a pump attempt it's to create demand for a big sale.

[Anonymous No.11809568]

>>11809393
Yeah no shit, Forbes and CNBC were adelyns work too. It's part of the game.

[Anonymous No.11809590]

>>11808272
Run your startup like a cult.
The_soyhands_of plebbit are too frail.
We are the chosen spastics.
Even if LINK does not deliver, it will pump in price, no one else can do it boys.

[Anonymous No.11809613]

>>11809548
It's not about pumping the token it's about building an industry reputation and creating awareness. It's an integral part of targeting customers. If they just wanted to pump it, they'd also be actively shilling on social media like all shit coins.

[Anonymous No.11809679]

>>11806536
>>11806274
>>11807950
>>11809429
>>11809498
you guys are so autistic you're missing the big picture

all that matters is that the name "chainlink" is mentioned multiple times, and gets more recognition in normie land

you faggots probably don't even remember the first write-ups on ethereum, it was exactly the same, nobody could predict shit so they all approached with caution

[Anonymous No.11809703]

>>11809613

the narrative was always that they raised reputation and awareness behind the curtains, so it doesn't make sense that they are now paying ads unless spoiler: they have no partnerships at all

[Anonymous No.11809734]

>>11809429
"Good first attempt" at absolutely transforming the legacy finance landscape.
Like Windows 1.0 was a "good first attempt" at a consumer-grade computer interface.

Cope, swingboi.

[Anonymous No.11809764]

>>11809703
yeah this doesnt really fit the assblaster narrative if they paid for this ad

[Anonymous No.11809965]

>>11809393
>>11809444
>>11809451
>>11809461
>>11809548
>>11809568

You're retarded.

Soluna is an infrastructural project, they actually have the lease to the land in Morocco. Read up on it. This very project even sparked a territorial dispute between Morocco and Western Sahara.
And their token is explicitly a "security" audited by E&Y and managed by Entoro.

That article in technologyreview is literally and objectively describing what Soluna is actually doing. Nothing indicates it was paid for.

Swingfags getting desperate lmao.

[Anonymous No.11809985]

>>11809764
>if they paid for this ad
They didn't.

[Anonymous No.11810029]

>>11809965

you are a literal bagholder that went bagholding through the bitcoin bullrush and you would be millonaire by now if you just sold bitcoin during that time

who is coping

[Anonymous No.11810033]

>>11808625
lmao you are a retard

[Anonymous No.11810038]

>>11809203
You're right. I did the same thing with BTC in 2012. Could have bought around $17 but was too skeptical and lazy. See you on the other side.

[Anonymous No.11810052]

>>11810029
"I have no argument yet I must post", the post.

[Anonymous No.11810064]

No one remembers a few weeks ago when three articles that were all extremely similar with the same talking points were posted within a couple days?
Welcome to the blockchain space. Baggies who have been entirely focused on their portfolio instead of the space as a whole for the last 12 months really have no idea what's happening around them.

[Anonymous No.11810087]

>>11810052

you just literally said you were into the pre ico sale, everything you say is invalid, probably a whale lmao

>>11809288

[Anonymous No.11810088]

Is now a good time to buy Chainlink with Fiat? I already have a solid amount but want more...or should i wait? thx frens

[Anonymous No.11810111]

>>11810088
>wanna be rich
Buy

>wanna be poor
Don't buy

[Anonymous No.11810112]

So, let's recap the fud so far shall we?
I identified two main strains:

1) "haha it says it's only a good first attempt!"

and

2) "haha it's actually a paid ad article!"

These do of course directly contradict each other, so only one of these strains can win the "absolute brainlet" grand fud prize.

Cast your votes now: 1) or 2)

[Anonymous No.11810146]

>>11810112
2

[Anonymous No.11810151]

>>11810112
This may be a shock to you, but not everything is fud designed to crash the price (what's the point check out the charts for everything atm)
Its called a reality check so retard moonboys don't PE

[Anonymous No.11810158]

>>11810087
So you're aware that I bought at ICO, yet you still call me a bagholder even though I'm up in fiat, sats, and gwei.

Also,
"I have no argument yet I must post", the second post.

[Anonymous No.11810159]

S E R G E Y A N D T H E S I N G U L A R I T Y

[Anonymous No.11810188]

>>11810112
They’re both pretty retarded, but 2) takes the cake because it came after 1)

[Anonymous No.11810195]

>>11809965
I didn't write that Soluna is shit, just that the article is an obvious shill.
I have no idea which part of your post was supposed to be an argument against that.

[beginning]
>The firm, called Soluna, has acquired a 37,000-acre wind-farm site in Morocco that it says has the potential to host up to 900 megawatts of power-generating capacity.
[near the end]
>Soluna projects (PDF) that its Moroccan wind farm will be able to generate power as cheap as the cheapest Chinese coal power.

Explain why these two sentences exist. It should be something like:
>The firm, called Soluna, has acquired a 37,000-acre wind-farm site in Morocco that it says has the potential to host up to 900 megawatts of power-generating capacity, projected to generate power as cheap as the cheapest Chinese coal power.
There's only one explanation: it's an intentional attempt to make the reader remember. That's the proof it's a paid article.

[Anonymous No.11810208]

>>11810112
I cast my vote with my stack...don't give these turds the time of day. They'll be shining your shoes soon enough...get your Shinebox

[Anonymous No.11810258]

>>11810195
>I didn't write that Soluna is shit
And I didn't say you did lol.

>just that the article is an obvious shill.
Except it isn't.

The article objectively describes what Soluna is and does. With zero hype and editorialization.

>hurrr but they mention the wind farm twice
Well no shit, that's their entire schtick, and they do actually hold the lease to that land.

>Explain why these two sentences exist.
Because they say two different things.
First states the megawatts, second explains the cost of generation.

[Anonymous No.11810279]

>>11810158
You could have more than 10x'ed your current stack but you haven't because you're a deluded HODLredditard
I refuse to believe anyone who got in at ico didn't sell at the sibos pump or the $1 pump, because I sure as hell did
When did you really buy?

[Anonymous No.11810338]

>>11810279
Thanks for caring about my gains, anon. Lmao.

[Anonymous No.11810339]

>mfw linkies think because they got an article from a paid shill that writes about vaporware they are right

do you even realize that this guy has written before on all the shitcoins that have gone literally to 0 price?

[Anonymous No.11810360]

>>11810339
>paid shill
Scroll up trenchbrain

[Anonymous No.11810408]

link megawhale here since the ico i used to fud link for fun then hired pajeets to do it when i got lazy now stupid fucks actually do it for free

when u stupid no link faggot cuck bitches finally kill ur selves it will be glorious lmao

paid ads hahahahahahahaha u had one year to accumulate

buy now or fukn kill urselves by next year

[Anonymous No.11810432]

>>11810360

Chainlink is so amateur that even in a paid article they are called a good first attempt and that's actually good for chainlink because they put them just above amateur level

you just don't realize how low you are on the corporative level >muh partnerships

[Anonymous No.11810445]

>>11810432
if u say muh ur a faggot and should kill urself

[Anonymous No.11810448]

>>11810360
>blockchain journalist
>not a paid shill
How new are you to crypto? Honestly? Because if you dont know it by now you'll never get it. I bet you believe the TA and FA twitter faggots aren't getting paid to shill either.

[Anonymous No.11810454]

>>11810445

>replying

[Anonymous No.11810476]

>>11810279
Too many people have gotten emotionally invested, the worst think is getting a tribal identity.
I fell victim to it too, although not in link's case.
Tribal identity is hard to escape, because as 'your' coin is attacked by 'enemies' from other crypto 'tribes' all social evolutionary instincts are working against you.

[Anonymous No.11810503]

>>11810454
being a newfag cuck bitch
>muh autism

[Anonymous No.11810515]

>>11810503

you need to go back

[Anonymous No.11810550]

>>11810339
See https://www.technologyreview.com/contributor/mike-orcutt/
and point out these shitcoins to me.

I'm a year into his history and so far I found:
- a rather negative article on Augur
- an article on a non-crowdfunded TEE project Oasis Labs
- a rather negative article on EOS
- a rather negative article on Ripple

Even a whole list of articles on how many ICOs are shitty.

Zero shilling found, so point it out to me.

[Anonymous No.11810560]

>>11810515
Anon makes paragraphs legible which a 3rd grader can do
>muh plebbit spacing
>have go back
>i’m all in nano
>link is shit

N P C

[Anonymous No.11810587]

>>11810448
See >>11810550

>>11810432
Nice try, but you simply can't make these two completely contradictory pieces of fud work together.

[Anonymous No.11810590]

>>11809025

This is much bigger. That forbes thing was written by a meaningless forbes "contributor".

[Anonymous No.11810620]

>>11810587

Yes, you can do, it's basically calling a meet up a start up, and a start up a good first try

[Anonymous No.11810688]

Let’s recap the fudders textbook boomer cope:

1) Link is shit because it is front page of a major magazine website, but it’s a paid ad

2) OpenLaw founder says “it’s a good first attempt”, which HAS to mean the project is over, no further development will happen and no more improvements....before mainnet is even out

The absolute state of link fudders boomer coping.

stay poor faggots

[Anonymous No.11810706]

>>11810688
Checked, fudders creampied in the boipussy

[Anonymous No.11810719]

>>11810620
Did sergay touch you in your special place

Why can’t you just go make a nano thread or google azn braps and remain poor the rest of you life

[Anonymous No.11810721]

>>11810620
k

[Anonymous No.11810765]

>>11810587
going through his history doesn't prove anything
if you have had your head out of the same these last 8 months and haven't been solely focused on chainlink biz happenings you would have seen lots of crypto news outlets and twitter personalities etc slowly moving their model to suit paid advertising
outlets which have seemed legit for ages suddenly being outsed by projects for offering services
it's a rapidly changing space, hits are way down compared to 2017 and they have to make money somehow

imagine being this willingly ignorant simply because it clashes with your delusions of the financial elite buying into your orders on binance because of a single article on the Internet.. sad desu

[Anonymous No.11810817]

>>11810765
>going through his history doesn't prove anything
So you're saying this Chainlink piece is his first gig as a paid shill?
After 7 years of writing for MIT Technology Review?

[Anonymous No.11810836]

>>11810817
Trying to strawman this desperately
Dont get so emotionally invested dude maybe you won't have these problems

[Anonymous No.11810842]

Hey, where do you think bottom is? Probably coming up soonish, right?

I was thinking about dumping a bunch more into Linkies. I bought in around .23 cents, so I'm still black right now. I have a feeling we're going to be looking great in January, if not April/May next year, so I was thinking about bolstering my already kinda comfy 15k.

Whatcha say, lads? #1, good idea? #2, where's the bottom at? I think we're close right now.

[Anonymous No.11810864]

>>11810765
JEsus Christ shut the fuck up you saddo.

Chainlink featured in Forbes, CNBC and MIT review for the first time. This is great. If it’s part of Adelyns plan then GOOD, paid or not, I think she knows a bit more about marketing than you. Take a look at her previous success stories. Go on.

Chainlink were silent for a year and finally shit is happening. It’s time to get some attention, get participation in the network and so on. It can’t stay muh secret club token forever. Sorry mate.

[Anonymous No.11810865]

Where are you guys when there's countless articles on the other shitcoins. Why is there so much skepticism only towards chainlink.

[Anonymous No.11810881]

>be bagholder
>be euphoric because of the last couple weeks of pumping
>be so euphoric delude yourself into believing it will keep pumping, refuse to secure profits
>entire market is capitulating, chainlink primed to fall even further
>delude yourself into believing some article will save you from this Hell
not gonna happen

[Anonymous No.11810883]

>>11810836
>strawman
You're cute when you try to use words you don't understand.

[Anonymous No.11810886]

bitniggers

[Anonymous No.11810914]

>>11810881
k

[Anonymous No.11810926]

>>11810842
At least wait for bitcoin to stop freefalling.
I’d buy more now and more later just in case btc really does go to 3k, 1k.

[Anonymous No.11810929]

>>11810817
>link is shit because it is being shilled with paid ads and has nothing to do with its merit

welp that’s it fags let’s call aapl a scam too they advertise their products

whew lad now i understand the mentality of the average link fudder. link is literally above your comprehension you just can’t grasp industrial revolutions

[Anonymous No.11810931]

>>11810864

You are a moron, the point is that if they are paying shills cataloging themselves as a startup then they have literally 0 partnerships confirmed, no SWIFT, no Microsoft, nothing

if fucking OpenLaw called them a good try, a literal who company, just imagine the level chainlink is at

[Anonymous No.11810932]

>>11806131
...and the price keeps falling.

[Anonymous No.11810937]

>>11810881
You accumulating still?

[Anonymous No.11810959]

>>11810929
Wrong quote bro?

[Anonymous No.11810966]

>>11810864
forbes contributor
cnbc Africa
great lol...

[Anonymous No.11810980]

>>11810926
Sounds like a good idea. I'll pick up a few hundred at it's current price, then if BTC keeps dropping, I'll grab some later. Overall, I think we're all going to be looking great come next year.

[Anonymous No.11810991]

>>11810959
link fudders are worse than nano holders

[Anonymous No.11810995]

>>11810931
>if they are paying shills
They aren't.

>>11810966
>cnbc Africa
That was just how the screencap was taken, it was featured globally.

[Anonymous No.11811020]

>>11810995
how haven’t u fucking killed urself yet what r u waiting for

[Anonymous No.11811054]

>>11811020
Bro, wrong quote again?

[Anonymous No.11811067]

>>11811020

>average link holder

[Anonymous No.11811092]

>>11811054
i’m not ur bro plebbit link fudder

[Anonymous No.11811115]

>>11811092
I'm not a fudder bro.
Read my posts.

[Anonymous No.11811126]

>>11811092
he's not fudding link though, its the dark blue ID guy

[Anonymous No.11811130]

0.39c

[Anonymous No.11811148]

ah, down 12% so this is the cutting edge new tech you're talking about for a whole year. This is where you spend your time. It's at 40% the price it was in januari. Nice guys. Productive year you had there in the 4th industrial revolution. Honestly i would be surprised if it isn't 3$ by may

[Anonymous No.11811176]

>>11811067
I must admit it’s been very difficult year

....bitch

[Anonymous No.11811192]

>>11811148
How are you this unaware of grampacoin shitting the bed?

[Anonymous No.11811206]

>>11811115
shut the fuck up u npc faggot fuck

buy link

[Anonymous No.11811219]

>>11811192
What? Link is blockchain agnostic and used by major companies around the world?

[Anonymous No.11811220]

>>11811176

So you will sell once it hits 3 usd am i right? do you realize your post are giving hope to holders with barely 10k bags?

[Anonymous No.11811240]

>>11811219
>new evolved form of link fud
>link is down 12% hahahhaha
>entire market undergoing biggest decline of the quarter

lmao

[Anonymous No.11811246]

>>11811206
Bro... bro.

>>11811219
Not used yet, fudfag.

[Anonymous No.11811263]

>>11811220
i’m going to sell whenever you fomo in, you’re right we’re not here for the tech we’re here to kill the little guy

[Anonymous No.11811287]

>>11811246
i’m not ur bro bitch

[Anonymous No.11811312]

>>11811219
Do you want to receive my limp penis?

[Anonymous No.11811320]

>>11811287
hug it out bro

[Anonymous No.11811359]

>>11811320
fuckn buy link now nano fag
apologize

[Anonymous No.11811432]

>>11811312
bring it to me

[Anonymous No.11811955]

>>11810151
If it was a paid article to make Chainlink look good then you’d expect them to say a bit more than “a good first attempt”.

[Anonymous No.11811983]

>>11811955

No, because for the world and chainlink team they know they have 0 partnerships so calling them something just above a startup like the first mover attempt is good enough shilling

[Anonymous No.11811999]

>>11811320
stay mad bitch not selling $1000 EOY

[Anonymous No.11812020]

>>11811999
check these fuckin trips faggots, kek has blessed us.

[Anonymous No.11812052]

>>11811955
Very much like jonny from Linkpools review.

The one thing I would say, is Sergey would agree. He isn't some hype shill who would get offended at hearing his project isn't perfect in its first iteration.

If you notice, when he talks he says "this is the first part of our thesis" and things like that. He is essentially proving scientific and philosophical theory using blockchain technology, while solving real world problems

[Anonymous No.11812094]

>>11809203
>see ya fags
>16 posts later
lmao

[Anonymous No.11812106]

>>11811999
>>11812020
>trips
>2020
LINK is the Berkshire Hathaway of crypto by 2020 confirmed

[Anonymous No.11812124]

>>11812094

lmfao got me

[Anonymous No.11812191]

LINK $1000 EOY

buying more tomorrow

Christ is the savior

[Anonymous No.11812197]

>>11806963
Based shloposter

[Anonymous No.11812198]

>>11812191
shes a big girl

[Anonymous No.11812207]

volume is steadily increasing on binance

[Anonymous No.11812222]

>>11812207
867K follower.... it takes time... it will come

[Anonymous No.11812234]

>>11811983
What are you on about? There’s multiple confirmed partnerships.

[Anonymous No.11812303]

>>11812222
god damn

[Anonymous No.11812515]

>>11812222
based, we're all gonna make it

[Anonymous No.11812676]

>>11811999
Fucking checked

Kek has guaranteed our wealth unless I too get doubles

[Anonymous No.11812729]

looks like we're bouncing back

comfy

[Anonymous No.11813307]

>>11808523
eoy is less than two months away

[Anonymous No.11813316]

>>11812198
idk why, a lot of super muscular chicks I find gross, but this one I find very sexy.

[Anonymous No.11813324]

>>11813307
he said eoy, didn't say which year :^)

[Anonymous No.11814189]

how do i buy chainlink?

[Anonymous No.11814255]

I've been here since the start of last year. Should I actually buy chainlink or what? Please help, I'm stupid and really need it.

[Anonymous No.11814310]

>>11809245
BIT CONNNEEEEEEEEEEEEEEECCTTTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!!

[Anonymous No.11814324]

>>11814189
>>11814255
Send BTC/ETH to Cryptopia account and buy it there

[Anonymous No.11814363]

>>11812234
he's just shitposting, bro

[Anonymous No.11814384]

>>11814324
CL is on cryptopia? That doesn't show up on CMC. Also, on an unrelated note, how hard is it to contact Cryptopia and regain access to my account if I lost access to my google authenticator code. Before you ask phone died and I didn't have enough on Cryptopia at the time to bother contacting them to sort it out.

[Anonymous No.11814523]

>>11806131

OP

you are a fag

stop sharing it with these tards on /biz/

[Anonymous No.11814586]

>>11808755
This is broadcasting Chainlink to 800,000 users most of whom are probably not crypto natives. Some fraction of them may investigate and eventually decide to pick up some bags, but it won't be an instantaneous pump because they'll have to navigate setting up a binance account, coinbase account, buying some bitcone, transferring, etc etc.

This should have a steady buoying effect on the price over the next week or so but don't expect any flash pumps from it.

[Anonymous No.11814633]

>>11812198
For you.

[Anonymous No.11814638]

>>11806511
checked and heartily keked

[Anonymous No.11814868]

>>11814384
Buy on binance with eth

[Anonymous No.11814961]

>>11814868
Don't suppose you know what exchange Exodus uses for internal exchange? I know they used to use shapeshift, but I doubt they are using that anymore.

[Anonymous No.11815060]

>>11814961
I am a brainlet when it comes to non link matters fren, not even sure what Exodus is

[Anonymous No.11815112]

>>11814586

>some will buy when all the market is crashing non stop

[Anonymous No.11815181]

>>11806131
FUCKING DELETE THIS RIGHT NOW I NEED MORE TIME

[Anonymous No.11815396]

>>11810408
Sir, you still haven't payed last pay check, good sir. Please see your books, and pay me, sir. I need to feed wife and many kids. Do the deedful, I always good shitpost strong, kind Sir.

[Anonymous No.11816269]

>>11806131
I went to the same high school as Sergey, I was two years above him and he was the same little faggot back then as he is now. There were a few incidents I remember. Once he hooked up with Fat Kylie during a field trip at the museum, he licked her out in the baby change room AND she pissed over him (lol). He also paid $5 for a handjob on the school bus from this ghetto freshman girl (he was junior at the time). She took pics of his dick then told everyone how he had a really small (tiny) limp cock that his massive belly covered up. The girls in school photocopied the pictures and stuck them up all around the school and changed the computer lab screensavers to pics of his dick. He got suspended for the bus thing for 2 weeks and when he came back everyone would wave their pinky finger at him in the cafeteria. One morning he even cried and ran off because of it and his group of bitches had to go and console him (poor babby). The guy is a total dickwad and a fucking loser.

Oh, last two things were rumours but probably true knowing the type of faggot he is. First, he got his family's dog to lick dog food off his dick and balls in front of his friends at a sleepover. He also jerked off in front of his friends out the front of his house under a lamppost (gay). Second was he hurt his dick when he stuck it down the vacuum cleaner hose to the point it was bleeding. His mom found him and had to take him to the ER.

It's good to see he hasn't changed at all and is still a little tryhard brainlet who thinks he is top shit. Get a fucking life Sergey, you're still a sad loser.

[Anonymous No.11816560]

>>11812303
>american psycho patrick bateman pointing
kek

[Anonymous No.11816982]

>>11806131
>Tfw Link still has the biggest percentage loss in my portfolio today
At least I can keep accumulating more