[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 26 KB, 660x464, 2018-BCH-election.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11777454 No.11777454 [Reply] [Original]

Holy shit boys, can you believe they are STILL counting the votes? Voter participation is at record highs. Roger is using shady tactics to steal votes, but Craig won't let him keep getting away with it! Who will win? STAY TUNED

>> No.11777466

>>11777454
BTCSV obviously.

>> No.11777471

>>11777454
I voted for Satoshi

>> No.11777473

BTCSV will be $100000 a coin one day

>> No.11777475
File: 125 KB, 200x200, 1530532286820.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11777475

>>11777466
checked
there is one true vision

>> No.11777487

>>11777454
Roger looks so Onions compared to Boss Kanichi-san

>> No.11777491

>>11777454
Smells like low IQ curry in this thread.

Why doesn't one of you reasonably explain why SV should exist?

>> No.11777502

I'm sitting on 600 of each of these. Either side wins I win. I still would've preferred that they work together though....

>> No.11777505
File: 55 KB, 346x346, 1542328395405.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11777505

>>11777491
>smells like low IQ curry in this thread
it didn't until you showed up, dirty street-shitter

>> No.11777514

>>11777505
Great you got that out of the way now why SV?

>> No.11777521

>>11777514
dyor faggot

>> No.11777532

>>11777521
No, all of these sock puppet threads don't have a single viable reason why anyone would use this shit.

Reminds me of the BTCP pajeets.

>> No.11777536

>>11777532
>thinks biz is a place to do research
not gonna make it. not even close.

>> No.11777538

>>11777454
Anyone. Prove yourselves not to be paid pajeets from TG

Why SV?

>> No.11777551

>>11777536
>>11777521
No it's that this seems to be a low IQ signal war and it will die out in a month unless there is some technical reason why anyone should care.

Following some fucking moron doesn't have legs as we have seen in the space.

>> No.11777562

>>11777538
Bump.

Nearing proof that this so a sockpuppet shill campaign. No one can even bring a positive fact to light about their social annexing.

Going to continue bumping so everyone sees the incompetence.

>> No.11777569
File: 723 KB, 400x300, chewing.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11777569

>>11777538
DESU I am scared of the FUD spread that BTC will collapse and that he will sell 1 milli BTC to beat ABC...would you rather the people love you or fear you? No one loves Roger of Jo...they fear Craig could be right on what he is saying...

>> No.11777573

20k bchsv will be life changing one day

>> No.11777582

>>11777569
I don't think that anyone fears him. He also said if he wins he will dump regardless so why should I care? There is also no proof that he has it.
>>11777573
Why Ranjeesh?

>> No.11777595

>>11777582
So far we have that we should buy SV because of fear of an unproven threat

Anyone else want to step in? Why SV?

>> No.11777619

>>11777595
You only need to see what blockstream has done to btc to see why bchsv is needed. With bchsv there are no "GOVT REGULATIONS" no futures pulling it down. Instant transactions (with out need of a centralized ledger like rip) can scale infinitely. No restrictions. Theres a lot more it can do. for example decentralized internet on the nodes.

BCHSV is SATOSHIS VISION

>> No.11777623
File: 34 KB, 500x382, mouaw.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11777623

>>11777595
Checkpoint is a huge fuck up on the ABC block IMO too. They were even scared of CW threats that they went and fucked up their own coin by centralizing it.

>> No.11777695

>>11777623
How is protecting against reorgs centralized? It's stored on the blockchain not Vers laptop.

Also, odd that satoshi's vision is so against that when the first mention of it was Satoshi saying that he wanted to implement it. "Bitcoin-ABC supporters quickly noted that the dominant Bitcoin client, Bitcoin Core, itself has checkpoints built into it, starting from Satoshi’s 0.3.2 release in 2010 (h/t Daniel Dickey and Matt Odell’s discussion). When releasing this, Satoshi noted:

I’ll probably put a checkpoint in each version from now on. Once the software has settled what the widely accepted block chain is, there’s no point in leaving open the unwanted non-zero possibility of revision months later."