[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 414 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_2018-11-15-10-25-54-919_com.android.chrome.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11753912 No.11753912 [Reply] [Original]

Who will it be?

>> No.11753918
File: 478 KB, 2000x1372, 1535432841570.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11753918

>>11753912
>RLC's MC is now only $26m
>Max supply almost all on the market
>It has unironically better fundamentals than larger projects people shill the fuck out of on here.
>Could 5X and still only get a $130m MC.

What people don't get is that iExec's marketing is targeted towards enterprises, so we don't hear much about it because we, the crypto community, are not their target market. They already secured a major partner with Intel, but it's been forgotten because people in crypto are brainlets. If the space isn't truly dead from the BTC hash war, this has some potential to moon and 5-10x, at least.

>> No.11753919

>>11753912
>announcement of an announcement

>> No.11753949

>>11753919
It worked for tron

>> No.11754036

>>11753919
I also agree that its kind of overkill, but if you want to spread the word in the market this is the way to do it. Look at >>11753918, IBM, Intel, Ubisoft and now this and still at 26m marketcap ???.

>> No.11754058

>>11753919
>RLC never gets traction from social media

>> No.11754132

>>11753912
Cringe

>> No.11754142

MICROSOFT

>> No.11754200

How will RLC fit in to the picture now that Chainlink does off chain computation? It makes sense for the ETH alliance to co-operate so I believe they are trying to get the best out of both projects. I just can't imagine the details of this. Anyone has any thoughts. Why is RLC not made obsolete by CL? Seems desperate

>> No.11754266

>>11754200
Please answer how chainlink would verify that computations are correct and not simulated

>> No.11754284

>>11753919
This.
Top cringe at the countdown timer too.

>> No.11754358

Idk what fortune 500 it is.
But i can tell you that if this is a user, and not a worker, this will be huge. Adoption is coming guys. Iexec Knows how to networking

>> No.11754386

>>11754358
like you know how to grammar

>> No.11754405

>>11754266
Enclaves. Not having access to the computations. Town Crier and SGX.

>> No.11754413

>>11754266
Can you explain if RLC somehow does this while Chainlink does not?

>> No.11754422

>>11754413
Yeah, read iexec PoCo articles.

>> No.11754453

>>11754422
I'll take that as a no. If you can't explain it in a few sentences it's probably bs

>> No.11754490

>>11754405
>T-they can do it this way! I think..
>>11754413
>but if they cant TELL ME RIGHT NOW WHY YOURS IS BETTER

the child like mind of stinkies everyone

>> No.11754532

>>11754386
Like you know how to be stupid

>> No.11754533

>>11754453
I'll put as simple as possible for your mongol brain:
Protecting data and verifying results are two different things.
Iexec can do both, link cannot

>> No.11754541

Linkies are funny

>> No.11754580

>>11754490
>>11754541
shitcoin holder cope

>> No.11754633

U don’t realise we gonna be fucking rich in some years

>> No.11754637

>>11754580
looks like you are the one who is coping

>> No.11754675

>>11754413
>>11754453
>>11754541
>>11754637
Can't linkies and execubros get along?

Don't you faggots know that RLC and LINK together is the best combo?
RLC will someday use CL to pull real life data into the cloud

>> No.11754701

>>11754637
I'm up x2 in bear market
how is your shitcoin doing?

>> No.11754713

>>11754675
Linkholder here since ico. Kinda wish link would crash just to flood these newfags out of the system.

>> No.11754723

>>11754490
Well this anon asked me to tell how link does it. And I told him in like ten words. I ask if he can now in return to tell me if there's another way RLC does it and he tells me to go read a shit load of documents. I get that the details of pretty much anything are not simple and can't be explained briefly, but the basic mechanisms of working systems can usually be described very easily. Take the solar system. Heavier objects bend the space-time and that causes lighter objects to seemingly circulate them. There you have an extremely complicated and detailed process explained in simple terms. It's not that difficult when what you explain actually makes sense and works

>> No.11754731

>>11754533
I see. Thanks anon. How is the verification done? How can it be simulated in Chainlinks case?

>> No.11754852

>>11754731
I really dont have time to give a detailed answer right now as im sitting in office. Try iexec slack, or if this thread hasnt died down in 4 hours ill asnwer then

>> No.11754879

>>11754852
Alright. Thanks anon, have a nice day! I don't mean to fuck with you, but I'm not looking for a detailed answer. I hold RLC too if that matters. I just don't have high hopes in it's regard

>> No.11755740

This shit's getting murdered right now.

Below initial investment with this thing and I cannot buy any more.

Life is suffering...

>> No.11755892

>>11753912
The price won't move a bit.

>>11754453
>>11754723
Linkies are really retarded.
If you went to read the medium article instead of writing this garbage post you would already know it you fucking subhuman.

>> No.11756035

>>11755892
It will move to 0.8 usd

>> No.11756041

>>11756035
Please! Then I'll only be 20% below intial!