[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 37 KB, 570x480, nChain_BitcoinSV_small2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11713673 No.11713673 [Reply] [Original]

https://poloniex.com/exchange#usdc_bchsv

>> No.11713681

i'm tired of this shit

>> No.11713685
File: 11 KB, 246x205, 1537169794361.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11713685

>>11713681
>i'm tired of this shit

>> No.11714046

>>11713681
Check dat volume tho

>> No.11714089

>>11714046
Are you going to use it?

>> No.11714151

>>11714089
meaning?

>> No.11714177
File: 72 KB, 323x323, 14912983719237.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11714177

>>11714046
O R G A N I C
R
G
A
N
I
C

>> No.11714186

>>11714151
English?

>> No.11714191

>>11714186
Use what you fucking spastic?

>> No.11714209

S2X. same shit. :-) Gonna laugh my ass off.

>> No.11714213

>>11714191
Alright, you're just a speculator.

>> No.11714349

abc down, sv up
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-cash-abc/
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-cash-sv/

>> No.11714555

>>11714349
Who cares? They're both shitcoins.

>> No.11715177

>>11713673

What is the expected price if SV wins?

>> No.11715257

>>11715177
i don't know but I bought it at 102 dollars

>> No.11715276

>>11714555
I make money on shitcoins

>> No.11715283

>>11715257
sell before fork and withdraw to cold storage

you don't want your coins in poloniex when it forks, it's more risky

>> No.11715288

>>11713673
>Bitcoin Satoshi's Vision
this name screams scam, this will probably be p&d constantly, like bcash

>> No.11715295

>>11715283
I'm waiting to 120$ again to sell all. 25% profits.
if it goes to 103$ imma sell aswell at 1%

>> No.11715313

>>11715283
or trade into USDC before fork

>> No.11715324

>>11715313
its fucking free I love to trade it there


I think 120$ BCHSV is the top and it's time to short it
ITS NOT GOING TO 0.02 IMHO

What yo say frens?

>> No.11715330

>>11713673
Those coins will not be valid in the SV chain. CSW has already said that all split coins will be blacklisted and rewarded to the miners

>> No.11715336

>>11715330
all in tether before wednesday and an XRP reserve guyz

>> No.11715379

>>11713673
Another fake Bitcoin, I bet you have a fake Rolex as well.

>> No.11715480

>>11715379
i bet your mum has fake tits

>> No.11715492
File: 1.35 MB, 1676x992, btc.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11715492

>>11715379
>fake Bitcoin
actually it's btc fake coin

>> No.11715543

>>11715492
Oh, my bad. Is that why Bakkt is taking physical delivery of BTC? Maybe that’s why Fidelity Investments is taking physical delivery of BTC?

>> No.11715573

>>11715480
Is your counsel house comfy AF?

>> No.11715585

>>11715573
not as comfy as resting my head on your mum's tits

>> No.11715586
File: 238 KB, 696x391, 1539085260689.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11715586

>>11715543
>fuck banks and kikes
>we need banks and wallstreet jews to pump our bags

>> No.11715606

>>11715586
The BCH split is entertaining because it brings the BCH faction's hypocrisies to bear.

"forking is governance!" – enjoy your fork
"only hash power matters" – so you'll support SV if it wins then?
"big blocks at all costs" – so you'll support SV (128 mb) over ABC (32 m

>> No.11715621
File: 46 KB, 465x407, EDA69B65-5153-42E8-9505-0C621169603A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11715621

>>11715586
And now that CSW has been finally disavowed by even Bcashers, I'd love to hear more about the Tulip trust and how he's going to kill Bitcoin in 2020! A lot of "credible" HF/VCs told me this in earnest while pumping Bcash. I wonder what they believe now?
One thing that is consistent about the BCH crew is the submission to corporatism. Lots of talk about Bitmain "bailing out" the ABC side of the fork with a reallocation of hashpower. This is considered to be a good thing.

>> No.11715623

>>11715283
How are you supposed to withdraw bchsv to cold storage before it’s actually forked?

>> No.11715667

>>11715606

this kills the SVlets and ABCels

>> No.11715686

>>11713673
Its honestly depressing to know there are people like you in this world with such little shame.

>> No.11715719

>>11715686
SEETHING

>> No.11715760

BIGGER BLOCKS BIGGER BLOCKS BIGGER BLOCKS
BIGGERBLOCKS.COM

>> No.11715835

>>11715667
They got BTFO.

>> No.11715935
File: 54 KB, 1129x679, bchsv.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11715935

NO trace of ABC will be allowed to exist.

There is no capitulation and allowing ABC back. There is death. There is a software that is to be considered dishonest and cancer and will only be orphaned - no matter what rules they want to hide in

>> No.11716608

>>11715330
SV isn't a split it's what BCH will be after the upgrade, he's only going to blacklist coins sent from DSV nodes/addresses

>> No.11717306

>>11714555
trips of truth
who would fucking buy these shit coins

>> No.11717515

>>11715606
Nothing hypocritical about that

> "forking is governance!" – enjoy your fork
And they're changing the consensus rules with a fork, which others are free not to go with if they so choose, however stupid that choice may be.

> "only hash power matters" – so you'll support SV if it wins then?
"Win" doesn't mean anything in this context. If ABC and SV split, and they both are hashed by different sets of miners, now there's two forks. Let's say that SV attacks the ABC chain by dropping its own hashpower to do so. Firstly, that's pretty stupid as they're lowering their own defenses and reducing their own rewards to act as a thorn in the side of a potential competitor, and secondly, ABC will simply defend against those attacks. It's worth 4x SV already on the futures market, it will be able to defend its chain, assuming otherwise is simply wrong. And *lastly* even if all the large interests holding tons of BCH and holding tons of mining equipment also for some reason decide not to defend the chain, it takes one set of allies within the community to setup keyed mining where only blocks issued by a set of authorized keys are accepted as legitimate. Then all the unkeyed hashpower in the world will not be able to attack the chain, end of story.
No matter which way you look at it, SV can't prevent ABC from running their own chain, they can only compete.

> "big blocks at all costs" – so you'll support SV (128 mb) over ABC (32 m
That's exactly why CTOR is being added, costs are being taken into account. To improve the ability to process large blocks.
You've got two space missions scheduled, and the guy who is planning his space mission around a 747 is telling you he can take four times the payload of the guy planning it with a hydrazine rocket that works out of the atmosphere. Is the first mission better because the payload is four times larger, even though without a propulsion method that works outside the atmosphere it's guaranteed to fail?