#2 trade volume(BTC) on Poloniex

[Anonymous No.11708726]

https://poloniex.com/exchange#btc_bchsv

[Anonymous No.11708728]

>>11708726
Soon #1

[Anonymous No.11708733]

Jihan won't see us coming

[Anonymous No.11708803]

>>11708726

Bought 100 BCHSV lets gamble this shit.

[Anonymous No.11709367]

>>11708803
Me too, this is going to be fun

[Anonymous No.11709385]

>>11708726
OMG...

I fucking LOVE Biz memes.

Biz is soooo fucking based lol. Craig = le god.

We need to meme him into emperor status lol, how frickin based would that be guys?

It's like... he's just as based as Trump and MoonMan. I think its because he's so sassy and non-sequitorious.

This is TOTALLY the next, most epic and righteous BASED meme.... get this:

He's on the internet...

He's contrarian to what seems reasonable and admirable...

Controversial...

Quite silly and ironic...

But actually a super fun and great guy.

[Anonymous No.11709507]

>>11708726

Why are all these scammer shitheads coming out of the woodwork constantly fudding any cash use case?

[Anonymous No.11709517]

Bought me some BCH-SV too. 11 so far. Just waiting for our Lord and Savior CSW to deliver the final attack to the Chinks and we flippen

[Anonymous No.11709547]

>>11709507
>>11709507
>Why are all these scammer shitheads coming out of the woodwork
stay poor rajeesh

[greenpill-freenode !TuLip3ssUE No.11709558]

>>11709385

Instead of investing in hashpower they invested in this pasta and reddit upvotes.

[Anonymous No.11709565]

>>11709385
Except he's a Coke snorting faggot
Pullease.

[Anonymous No.11710352]

Update:#1

[Anonymous No.11710375]

>>11708803
>>11709517
what if theres no split?

[Anonymous No.11711056]

>>11709558
Pathetic, ain't it?

[Anonymous No.11711161]

>>11710375
Updates are incompatible. Someone has to win the hash war, or someone has to capitulate before then.

[Anonymous No.11712007]

>>11711161
There's only one exchange that has said that they will allocate the BCH ticker to whichever of the candidates in question has the highest hashrate between SV and ABC. It's also interesting to note this is the exact same exchange that did the exact opposite thing when the exact same question came up for S2X vs Legacy BTC. It's also interesting to note that exchange is Bitfinex.
For those paying attention, that tells you a lot about what is actually going on here. Taken in concert with Craig becoming chummy with the core crew, receiving offers of technical support from his royal auburn beardness one meg greg, taking conference calls with bowl cut vays, it is looking more certain by the hour SV is nothing but an attempt to attack BCH backed by core interests with an infinitesimal fraction of total available sha256d hashing power, and the theory that although the largest holders of BCH presently control orders of magnitude more, they won't switch to block said attack because it would be a breach of their fiduciary duty to their investors to not allow an opposing army marching on their vault to take control of it.

This is an amusingly stupid proposition with a pretty damned predictable outcome.

[Anonymous No.11712166]

>>11712007
>Bitfinex

What about Binance and Poloniex. Heck, even Coinbase will have two tickers if there's a split, and in the event of a hashwar, the BCH ticker goes to the winner.

There is no alliance between Criag and Core, lmao, what are you smoking. Greg facetiously said Craig was benefiting Core, yet you ABC fags twist his words, and the truth.

If Jihan is legally bound to mine BTC by contract, please explain how he has the power to intervene with such assets during a hashwar. That would go very badly for him.

[Anonymous No.11712236]

>>11712166
> What about Binance and Poloniex.
Have both said they're going with ABC.

> Heck, even Coinbase will have two tickers if there's a split, and in the event of a hashwar, the BCH ticker goes to the winner.
That's not what they announced at all. They said they would go with ABC, and there might be technical difficulties caused by the contention due to SV.

> There is no alliance between Criag and Core, lmao, what are you smoking.
If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck. They've started buddying up.

> Greg facetiously said Craig was benefiting Core
Whether it was facetious or not, it's true.

> yet you ABC fags twist his words, and the truth.
Super convincing argument, we're nasty because we make you look like an idiot.

> If Jihan is legally bound to mine BTC by contract
He's not. Would you acquire a million BCH if you were legally bound by contract to mine a competing chain that would prevent you from defending it in the event of attack? This is simple legal braying from the SV side because their technical attack has failed, as ABC/BU both scaled to the 32 mb poison blocks just fine. Because poison blocks is a bullshit core lie and always has been.

[Anonymous No.11712918]

>>11712007
>Craig becoming chummy with the core crew

[Anonymous No.11713028]

>>11712007
Keep your frens close
And you enemies closer

[Anonymous No.11713098]

>>11712236
Wrong.

Read the Poloniex faq on how futures will be settled after the hardfork.

Coinbase said it would honor a chainsplit if it did happen.

Fuck off, Core shill.