KALEIDO PARTNERSHIP (CONSENSYS)

[BOAT ANON No.11676375]

From the Anon who brought you the Open Law partnership and many other useful tidbits. I present to you : Kaleido partnered with Chainlink as part of its stack.

>Through the Kaleido marketplace, businesses have access to AWS services like private networking and data backup, other common blockchain services like HD wallets, and industry products like Chainlink (for smart contracts), Viant (for supply chain management), and OpenLaw (for legal contracts).

https://coinspectator.com/news/1023481/consensys-kaleido-launches-full-stack-marketplace-platform-for-enterprise-blockchains

[Anonymous No.11676393]

WE ALL GONNA MAKE IT

[Anonymous No.11676427]

>>11676375
>industry products like chainlink
The industry standard.

[BOAT ANON No.11676432]

>>11676393
https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarahhansen/2018/11/08/consensys-kaleido-launches-full-stack-marketplace-platform-for-enterprise-blockchains/#729d1872ad8c

[Anonymous No.11676444]

holy fuck. I will name my newborn baby Biz

[Anonymous No.11676474]

Ctrl f...wtf!

[Anonymous No.11676475]

>>11676432

[Anonymous No.11676476]

https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarahhansen/2018/11/08/consensys-kaleido-launches-full-stack-marketplace-platform-for-enterprise-blockchains/#7eccc9b62ad8

[Anonymous No.11676480]

It's on Forbes, again

[Anonymous No.11676482]

>>11676375

[Anonymous No.11676494]

Reminder that this is another one that dots connecting autism predicted. Adhara is next.

[BOAT ANON No.11676495]

And just incase none of you can read.... this confirms Komgo will be using Chainlink

[Anonymous No.11676497]

[Anonymous No.11676520]

>>11676494
When? Cant remember this name

[Anonymous No.11676528]

>>11676495
>Commodities platform Komgo, whose network of financial institutions includes Citi, ING, Koch Supply & Trading, MUFG Bank, Societe Generale, Credit Agricole Group, BNP Paribas, and Shell, is a current client

[Anonymous No.11676537]

>>11676375

Holy

[Anonymous No.11676543]

#Linkthestandard

[Anonymous No.11676547]

>>11676537
>>11676537
>>11676537
STRAP IN

[BOAT ANON No.11676555]

>>11676520
The guy from Adhara (Tyndall) was a rumour on here just before the D1 Conf (He was speaking)

I've done my research on Kaleido for months.

The whole Kaleido team was following Chainlink on twitter. If more than one person from an org follows Chainlink on Twitter then it is likely to be a partnership.

[Anonymous No.11676559]

stinky linky <3

[Anonymous No.11676569]

WHAT THE FUCK IS UP WITH THOSE KALEIDO CLIENTS HOLY SHIT, I THOUGHT YOU GUYS WERE MEMEING

[Anonymous No.11676570]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

[Anonymous No.11676583]

>>11676375
POMP EET!

[Anonymous No.11676584]

>>11676537
Whitelisted

[Anonymous No.11676587]

this is getting fucking INSANE

[BOAT ANON No.11676592]

>>11676584
Nice find m80

[Anonymous No.11676596]

kek, kaleido is doing enterprise blockchains much like aws offers business apps.

the kaleido solutions have nothing to do with the mainnet tokens of any of the chains.

what they are offering are out-of-the-box solutions — deployment of private blockchains for business. again, this has nothing to do with any mainnet tokens, including chainlink erc20 tokens.

not only that, but this is perfectly inline with what Sergey himself said here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vn2D7QQRhSo&feature=youtu.be&t=2125

[Anonymous No.11676602]

>>11676592
https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/privatelink?ref_=saas_pdp_private_link

[Anonymous No.11676607]

>>11676584
jesus christ

[Anonymous No.11676610]

this is like august/september 2018 here on biz when retards posted a link to omg on google cloud website and everyone when nuts screaming OMG GOOGLE PARTNERSHIP CONFIRMED FUCK THE MOON WE ARE GOING TO JUPITER.

use your brain

[Anonymous No.11676620]

Jesus fuck. Dear lord and savior I regret selling part of my link stack I'll go all-in again now

[Anonymous No.11676623]

>>11676584
I don’t understand, this says nothing about chainlink?

[Anonymous No.11676624]

>>11676610
>>11676596
Fudder on suicide watch

[Anonymous No.11676626]

>>11676623
>I don't understand
Understatement of the thread

[Anonymous No.11676630]

>>11676624
HOW MUCH IS ENOUGH?
WILL I MAKE IT WITH 15k?

[Anonymous No.11676631]

>>11676375
I told you all over and over the one Larper I have confidence in said November would be comfy. I believe more to come as well. $1 by end of month.

[Anonymous No.11676634]

>>11676624
it's cool, keep holding Sergey's bags guys kek. It's only been 13 months.

[Anonymous No.11676638]

>>11676626
Surely “PrivateLink” is not chainlink. That’s retarded.

[Anonymous No.11676639]

>>11676630
you will make it

[Anonymous No.11676641]

My my linkies gonna moon?

[Anonymous No.11676649]

>>11676634
>i-its c-cool I-I d-don't want p-profits a-anyway!

[Anonymous No.11676664]

>>11676634
its still cheap you cuck, better start ccumulatin

[Anonymous No.11676676]

Link megawhale here since ICO.

We're all gonna fucking make it brahs.

The fudders and the true ones will be sorry - they already are.

[Anonymous No.11676679]

[Anonymous No.11676685]

What should I ask the Kaleido team today?

[Anonymous No.11676686]

>>11676664
I would love to and it's super cheap per your "predictions" guys. I mean I'd be retarded not to, right?

but care to refute these?

>>11676596
>>11676610

[Anonymous No.11676694]

>>11676676
uhm, so missed all the true moons in the past 13-14 months? and just kept holding your link bags that never mooned while pretty much everything else did?

What are you expecting to happen to link? and when? What's your price target to sell? Or will you never sell?

[Anonymous No.11676697]

>>11676555
Oh fuck thats what i thought, literally hundreds of teams

[Anonymous No.11676702]

>>11676686
>>11676694
>dat weak FUD

[Anonymous No.11676720]

I'm having lobster for dinner tonight. Lmao at the frantic swing traders, you can feel their desperation.

[Anonymous No.11676726]

>>11676685
ask them if any of their customers when using the Kaleido solutions will buy chainlink erc20 tokens for whatever

[Anonymous No.11676733]

>>11676686
not gonna spoon feed you, better start reading white paper, and checking on articles on the web

[Anonymous No.11676736]

>>11676726
Dumb question, why would they? Network users never need to know about the token for it to be valuable

[Anonymous No.11676741]

>>11676634
>every company should be worth billions 13 months into existence
The absolute state of zoomers.

[Anonymous No.11676745]

>>11676736

This, users won't need to buy or even be aware of tokens, they are for node operators

[Anonymous No.11676790]

>>11676736
STOP SPOONFEEDING THE NEWFAGS YOU FUCKING CUNT. LET THEM EXPERIENCE THE UNCERTAINTY WE HAD TO GO THROUGH

[Anonymous No.11676808]

>>11676726
They tokens will be automatically bought through kyber. The users will never even know they bought LINK tokens.

[Anonymous No.11676811]

>>11676745
I mean, like I said in my replies here, kaleido is not using the mainnets of the blockchains they are using.

They only do eth tethering https://docs.kaleido.io/kaleido-services/mainnet-tether/

Do you expect kaleido customers to use the chainlink mainnet nodes? And incur the chainlink coin costs (and chainlink is supposed to moon btw, right?) as opposed to using the chainlink software (which has nothing to do with that erc20 chainlink token that you are holding).

[Anonymous No.11676828]

>>11676808
Thanks, so kaleido users will pay for the incurred cost of the chainlink tokens? The tokens that are also supposed to have mooned by then right?

And kaleido customers will use the chainlink mainnet? And not private networks like they with the rest of kaleido solutions?

[Anonymous No.11676844]

>>11676811
Yeah they'll use the token, they'll pay in fiat though so won't need to see it. We're monetising protocols you fucking idiot and thats where the erc20 is necessary

[Anonymous No.11676846]

btw anons you can totally go and register at kaleido.io

and then go to https://marketplace.kaleido.io/partner/chainlink/

click chainlink

and click "use on kaleido" and provision it on your blockchain deployment

what does do I wonder? use the non-existing chainlink mainnet? or the chainlink software?

[Anonymous No.11676850]

>>11676828
Almost back at your 4k sat buy in, anon. Keep it up, you'll get there! Ahahahahaha

[Anonymous No.11676861]

>>11676846
Delete this, seriously.

[Anonymous No.11676863]

>>11676861
seriously

[Anonymous No.11676867]

>>11676844
> We're monetising protocols

Nice. btw did you know that you can deploy a protocol on your machine? And other anons can do that too, and it'll have nothing to do with the mainnet of the protocol (if there is one). You can totally deploy as many network blockchain solutions as you like using the same software.

Is this what kaleido is doing?

hmm

https://docs.kaleido.io/getting-started/about-kaleido/

[Anonymous No.11676906]

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY! HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

[Anonymous No.11676925]

>>11676846
>decentralised

[Anonymous No.11676953]

>>11676925
Yes, anon, go ahead and register and provision the decentralized chainlink on kaleido. I mean you support chainlink, right?

You using it should drive the price up, right?

If all anons itt provision chainlink using kaleido, it'll drive up the use of erc20 chainlink tokens. How cool would that be?

[Anonymous No.11676995]

>>11676444
So fucked based lmao. I may take this idea. Also, checked. 4 is my favourite number.

[Anonymous No.11677005]

>>11676995
sergey or nazarov as a middle name is a given if singularity is real

[Anonymous No.11677027]

I hate this retarded market. LINK is down 100 sats since I read this thread half an hour ago.

[Anonymous No.11677038]

>>11677027
People are stupid, but value will be proven

[Anonymous No.11677041]

>>11676596
Why wouldn't they use mainnet and LINK tokens when it becomes available? Surely it would be another "depth of defense" approach for Kaleidos' clents it they decide they need it.

[Anonymous No.11677045]

>>11677041
Clients. Fuck.

[Anonymous No.11677065]

>>11676596
Even if you were right and this is purely on private blockchain, it’s still super bullish

[Anonymous No.11677068]

>>11677041
> Surely it would be another "depth of defense" approach for Kaleidos' clents

Yeah that would, but a) enterprises would a verifiable zero-knowledge proof implementation and b) it's easier to have a private network

The current defense that Kaleido offers is ethereum-tethering, which seems to be a solid compromise for having a private network (essential for enterprises) and a verifiable immutability mechanism.

[Anonymous No.11677071]

>>11676953
Okay, fine. Sure. Don’t buy stakes in the backend of the future economy. By the way, your argument also applies to bitcoin and ethereum. Now go fuck off you miserable prick

[Anonymous No.11677118]

>>11677071
>By the way, your argument also applies to bitcoin and ethereum.

It does. And that's exactly what kaleido is doing with ethereum.

I honestly think that consumers and not enterprises is where the real money is when we talk crypto.

Yeah, I'll fuck off now, getting kinda bored in this thread.

But honestly wish you guys luck and moon on chainlink, even though this >>11676906 is your best shot with chainlink.

[Anonymous No.11677123]

Forbes just tweeted it
15m followers about to learn about it

[Anonymous No.11677148]

>>11676634
I will one up you, i will even buy more.

[Anonymous No.11677149]

>>11677068
Couple things. A) there are no zero knowledge proof implementations yet are there? And SGX or other TEEs aren't ready yet either? B) private or not, Chainlink can still be used correct?

You actually seem believably right about a lot of this ITT, but why? Why come in and do this? You obviously know what you are talking about, so you either have a huge stack already or are trying to suppress this announcement because you need more. What gives anon?

[Anonymous No.11677168]

>>11677123
https://twitter.com/Forbes/status/1060524419444080640?s=19

[Anonymous No.11677177]

>>11677123
>>11677168
Hahaha, but it was written by a no-name intern. Hahahah.

[Anonymous No.11677180]

>>11677149
I honestly think that a lot of the fud is just intellectual dick waving as a way for relatively intelligent but socially powerless neets to exert power over other people. In this case, credulous newfags who don't know any better. I wouldn't be surprised if it had nothing to do with accumulation or price suppression, and was just a low grade form of bullying and posturing for miserable people who think they're smarter than everyone else.

[Anonymous No.11677200]

>>11677180
I hope so because there's too many faggots in here that don't want to hear criticism and he made some decent points. Instead of talking it out, he gets met with shit like >>11677071 and he leaves. Getting cocky with LINK doesn't help. It's barely $.50 and everyone in here thinks big money is guaranteed. It's not.

[Anonymous No.11677201]

>>11677177
Forbes’ official account just tweeted it out to their 15million subs

[Anonymous No.11677218]

>>11677200
We’ve spent 12 months attacking chainlink from every angle. After it’s tech was assured, FUD was the natural outlet for creativity because there was nothing left to seriously attack.

[Anonymous No.11677224]

this feels extremely surreal - can't describe it.. like a dream. The world changes and we are sitting in the first row watching the show.

[Anonymous No.11677238]

>>11677218
I agree, but using the Smartcontract.com side of Chainlink is a very real thing. And if that aspect of their service is utilized more than the Chainlink side, that doesn't do much for us. The biggest hurdle for Chainlink is adoption.

[Anonymous No.11677243]

>>11676867
>White label partnerships

[Anonymous No.11677246]

With how little price movement there is, I've always been afraid of the general indifference crypto can be. Google can annouce their using chainlink and the price would pump 10% and then dump 20%.

[Anonymous No.11677256]

>>11677068
If you guys are falling for this fudding faggot, you don't deserve LINK

[Anonymous No.11677266]

>>11677246
Thats going to continue happening as long as their product is not being used. Wait until people start staking and running nodes. It will stop dumping. Be patient anon.

[Anonymous No.11677276]

>>11677246
Eyeball TA
Look at the 6 month link/eth chart, and look at the distance between dips. Whats going to happen shortly

[Anonymous No.11677289]

>>11677238
You might want to go read the whitepaper. I think you’re implying the smartcontract.com part is separate from the token. If any company wants to use the network, the token is required for every data call.

[Anonymous No.11677302]

>>11677246
Yeah, as many (and above poster) have said before, all price action before mainnet is in essence useless. The only thing driving the price upwards will be speculation. When mainnet comes the actual tokenomics (hate that work) will drive the price upwards in tune with adoption and usage of the network. If we are to believe Sergey and what all the breadcrumbs detectives on this australian snakeskin weaving forum find they are lining up for widespread adoption. Quack quack

[Anonymous No.11677303]

>>11677289
smartcontract.com is the company, chainlink is the product

[Anonymous No.11677331]

Minor pump

Nobody cares, move along

[Anonymous No.11677356]

>>11677331
This. Is anyone else getting sleepy? *yawn*

Time for a nap anon

[Anonymous No.11677366]

>>11677356
Cant even break 8k sats with news like this

NOBODY CARES

[Anonymous No.11677397]

OH MY GOD

[Anonymous No.11677405]

>>11677246
>Up for 4 months straight
>thinks he has an fud case for little price movement

[Anonymous No.11677450]

>>11677289
Nah. You have no idea wtf you are talking about.

[Anonymous No.11677474]

>Through the Kaleido marketplace, businesses have access to AWS services like private networking and data backup, other common blockchain services like HD wallets, and INDUSTRY PRODUCTS LIKE CHAINLINK (for smart contracts), Viant (for supply chain management), and OpenLaw (for legal contracts).

[Anonymous No.11677523]

Everyone start tweeting Nazi swatzikas where Forbes tweeted out info on this

[Anonymous No.11677528]

>>11676596
LINK holder, but this.

[Anonymous No.11677563]

>>11676584
Holy shit. This to me is as big as SWIFT, especially when looking into the future. SWIFT is struggling to keep relevant. This shit is avant garde. This is coming from someone who has larped as AB and Riddle anon back in the days, grew tired of CL dot connecting when we dug enough to fall into certainty, but this thing got me excited again. Sips 'n flushes

[Anonymous No.11677614]

>>11677246

[Anonymous No.11677624]

>>11676584
black person/brainlet here can someone tell me what this means

[Anonymous No.11677629]

>>11676596
Private needs to be distributed in the first place. Data sources need to be decentralized to ensure end-to-end trustlessness, this is what this whole tech is about for fucks sake. Why not just something something? Because end-to-end trustlessness.

[Anonymous No.11677639]

>>11677624
>black person/brainlet
Why do you repeat yourself?

[Anonymous No.11677645]

>>11677624
Its only for white people

[Anonymous No.11677649]

>>11677624
It means it's very likely that ChainLink will make ALOT of us VERY rich due to price action following actual fucking use and adoption by BIG BUSINESSES. If you believe you can make short-term good trades which end up netting you more Link for when Mainnet is released do that. If not I'd all-in.

[Anonymous No.11677651]

>>11677624
fellow mentally challenged basketball American here, also confused. who can ooga booga me an explanation?

[Anonymous No.11677653]

I wonder if any of those college kids in Thousand Oaks who got slaughtered last night were chainlink holders.

[Anonymous No.11677659]

>>11677649
This shit better moon before holo. I need to get myself 500 million hot

[Ärimees !!z8a44b3aeWt No.11677684]

>>11676555
Check
You smart, nice work!

[Anonymous No.11677722]

>>11676828
Comment you replied to got deleted. What did it say?

[Anonymous No.11677758]

>>11677624
>>11677651
One of the prevailing theories surrounding Chainlink is that companies will offer LINK services under different names, using a legal agreement known as a 'white label partnership.' The current legal adviser to Chainlink specializes in these.

The PrivateLink service discussed in the pic sounds suspiciously similar to running information through an SGX-enabled node, making the anon conclude that Kaleido -- in addition to offering Chainlink as a seperate service -- is also offering a white labeled version of sgx-enabled link under their own product name.

Now both of you admit that you're white, that your entire family line is an opiate-addled genetic cesspool, and that poking fun of black people is the only way you have to feel superior in your pathetic lives, and that after reading this message you're going to go watch black cuckold porn, and finally that your brains are too small and twisted into too many pretzels to acknowledge the irony.

[Anonymous No.11677764]

>>11677758
>One of the prevailing theories surrounding Chainlink is that companies will offer LINK services under different names, using a legal agreement known as a 'white label partnership

It's not a theory Sergey said it himself you retard.

[Anonymous No.11677806]

>>11677764
He mentioned it briefly during a Q&A surreptitiously filmed with a fucking iPhone, yes. Hardly the scale of confirmation one would hope for, unless your a credulous cultist.

[Anonymous No.11677841]

>>11677806
So you think he would randomly come and say outright lies?

[Anonymous No.11677844]

>>11677758
blacker than the blackest black times infinity.

[Anonymous No.11677845]

>>11677841
> reading comprehension

[Anonymous No.11677846]

>>11677758
Will white label partnerships affect the price of the token? Will these partnerships be using CL network and their nodes

[Anonymous No.11677856]

>>11677758
Thanks for the explanation. Why do you think I'm white? You think black people are too poor to buy? Fucking racist

[Anonymous No.11677858]

>>11677845
It seems that you have no reading comprehension first you say it's a theory when he said clearly himself. So it's not a theory you mental gopnik retard.

[Anonymous No.11677867]

>>11676375
fuck what larper said this a long time ago someone check the archives

[Anonymous No.11677874]

>>11677846
White labeling is called so because of the imagery of taking a product, sticking a blank label over the product name, then writing a new name on top of it. The product itself hasn’t changed. A lot of websites do this with affiliate partnerships - you think you’re shopping on company X’s site but it’s actually company Y with company X’s logo. In short, the same network and tokens would be used, just people will think it’s an Amazon or whatever product.

[Anonymous No.11677880]

Fuck literally everything in this thread except one question. Can you use a chain link without interacting with mainnet? Ie not using the tokens?

Someone ask Rory please

[Anonymous No.11677881]

>>11677846
Think of white label partnerships as 'Chainlink with a different name.' Companies will likely create their own UI to better integrate with their services, but it will all still be running on the Chainlink network/nodes.

One could theoretically argue that these partnerships might impede chances of a singularity event (there won't be as many people who know what Chainlink is/recognize it by name, thus cutting back on the # of normans rushing to buy), but I'd venture that it will help the price -- more traffic on the network, greater and faster adoption, et cetera. We're still selling the shovels in the gold rush.

[Anonymous No.11677908]

>>11677881
This kaleido partnership won't be using the network right they are just using the source code since CL is open source

[Anonymous No.11677915]

>>11677880

[Anonymous No.11677921]

>>11677881
>Chainlink mcap is $500 million
>smart contract asks for node with $550 million in collateral
>oh shit! The node can’t provide sufficient collateral, EVEN IF they buy 100% of the supply
>mainnet screeches to a halt
>crashes
>unironically ogre
OH NO NO NO NO NO HA HA HA

[Anonymous No.11677926]

>>11677921
Brainlet tier fud

[Anonymous No.11677927]

>>11677908
Hypothetically, one could fork the code and run their own version -- I guess. But who is running the nodes on this mirror-chainlink? You're talking yourself into some FUD thats easily disproven if you have even a rudimentary understanding of what chainlink is and how it works.

Also, the SGX stuff is now proprietary.

[Anonymous No.11677941]

>>11677927
Is SGX developed enough to work right now?

[Anonymous No.11677968]

>>11677926
Adoption will be the DOWNFALL of Chainlink. Once the amount of collateral needed in USD value exceeds that available across all nodes, the network won’t fucking work anymore.

[Anonymous No.11677972]

>>11677941
If you wanted to concoct some god-tier FUD, I'd center it on SGX. Remember how the 'create an sgx multiplier adapter' task floated around the pivotal for 3 months, with multiple missteps and false starts?

What if they acquired TownCrier because they couldn't solve it themselves? It was a desperation move, and one that -- based on the pivotal -- still hasn't led to any breakthroughs.

Lolno, SGX is good and ready and it's great that they bought the Cornell project. but what if...

[Anonymous No.11677998]

>>11677972
That's some next level shit. I don't see Sergey wasting his time acquiring a privacy solution like that unless he knew it would be useful though. Especially when their will be other TEEs that come out soon enough.

[Anonymous No.11678015]

>>11677118
>I honestly think that consumers and not enterprises is where the real money is when we talk crypto.

srsly, congrats on this.

to all the retards listening to this guy. keep it up. you are doing gods work. sekk now or forever hold you peace.

[Anonymous No.11678034]

>>11676584
>>11676607
>>11677563
PrivateLink is literally nothing to do with Chainlink, deluded linkies
https://youtu.be/8WhLO4y5-J0

[Anonymous No.11678055]

>>11677218
Hadn't thought about it that way. Good insight.

[Anonymous No.11678058]

>>11678034

[Anonymous No.11678099]

>>11677758
>your entire family line is an opiate-addled genetic cesspool, and that poking fun of black people is the only way you have to feel superior in your pathetic lives

Basketball American cope post

[Anonymous No.11678109]

>>11677874
This is way more common in industry than people realize. I used to work in medical devices and this was common practice, even for very expensive and complicated products.

[Anonymous No.11678117]

>>11677846
God these questions fucking kill me. How much of a fucking pathetic retard do you have to be to fixate on "how will this affect muh gains" when the news is 10,000x bigger than that.

[Anonymous No.11678204]

>>11677968
Oh no, never before has demand increased relative to supply of a good. How ever will the market deal with this absolute state of chaos?

[Anonymous No.11678211]

How long untill the official @chainlink twitter is going to announce this?

[Anonymous No.11678337]

>>11676375
>https://coinspectator.com/news/1023481/consensys-kaleido-launches-full-stack-marketplace-platform-for-enterprise-blockchains

This is bearish for Chainlink, because

[Anonymous No.11678356]

>kaleido, ANOTHER startup
literally who?

[Anonymous No.11678390]

>>11678356
Consensys nigga

[Anonymous No.11678423]

>>11678390
>ConsenSys
Who?

[Anonymous No.11678488]

>>11677180
S-shut up

[Anonymous No.11678516]

>>11676444

Checked

[Anonymous No.11678542]

>>11678117
Kaleido isn't even using the CL nodes tho. they're just using the open source software. Only then CL will come out and say it's a partnership. This is not really a partnership for CL since they won't be using the CL network unlike other white label partnerships

[Anonymous No.11678550]

>>11676846

There's networks other than ETH main net bud. CL is BLOCKCHAIN AGNOSTIC DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND???


I'm not even going to tell you which chain Kaleido contracts run on because its so fucking obvious.

[Anonymous No.11678558]

>>11676790
The degree of uncertainty will never happen again.

[Anonymous No.11678561]

>>11678542
you make no sense

[Anonymous No.11678596]

>>11678542
The software is to run the network. You can't run the network without nodes.

You're just saying words.

[Anonymous No.11678612]

>>11677624
What about WHITEpaper don't you understand?

>we love you anon but the puns must be said

[Anonymous No.11678626]

>>11678542
THIS, there not using Chainlink

[Anonymous No.11678630]

>>11677758
>whites are the REAL drug addicts! Lmao never travel or you'll hang yourself.

[Anonymous No.11678700]

pee pee poo poo

[Anonymous No.11678774]

>>11676375
If it's possible to create an ethereum private chain and thus control the Ether on it, it is also possible that the LINK token is controlled by the network.

Try the platform. You can request Ether just as you would for testnet. Same thing will go for LINK

[Anonymous No.11678865]

>>11676375

[Anonymous No.11678879]

>>11676375
Another source on this: https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/kaleido-launches-blockchain-marketplace-with-plug-and-play-services-and-solution-partnership-program-1027707866

[Anonymous No.11678922]

It sounds like a lot of people are planning on using the network.. it’s starting to snowball with more and more teams announcing they are implementing the chainlink network.

[Anonymous No.11678927]

>>11678423

[Anonymous No.11678983]

>>11678927

I guarantee that you’ve never heard of consenSys before today

[Anonymous No.11679000]

>>11676634
I've held btc bags for 7 years what kind of retarded argument is this? BTC took longer to get where it's at.

drown yourself my dude

[Anonymous No.11679020]

>>11678596
>>11678596
You're more dumb than this nigger in pic related
t. subhuman faggot

[Anonymous No.11679023]

>>11678983

[Anonymous No.11679061]

Kaleido: "let's partner with a work in progress"

no main net how to partner?

[Anonymous No.11679094]

>>11677068
>verifiable immutability mechanism
nice. dude nobody is going to sell their links because of yet another fud post. just bite the bullet and buy back in, it's not gonna dump

[Anonymous No.11679104]

>>11677200
>he made some decent points
you're a brainlet. Tell me which of his points are "decent". Oh right, you don't know what you're talking about and just wanna sound smart and join the big boy conversations

[Anonymous No.11679120]

>>11678983
What do I win for your guarantee being worth absolute dogshit? It's been mentioned daily on this board for fucking months you complete spastic.

[Anonymous No.11679136]

>>11677758
The fact that some blacks are smart (probably yourself included), and some whites act niggardly, does not invalidate general trends

[Anonymous No.11679162]

>>11678034
>reading this and unironically thinking people are excited because "privatelink" contains the word link
Oh boy

[Anonymous No.11679171]

B-bu-t it's no news November rrreeeeeeeeeeee

[Anonymous No.11679182]

>>11677758
hero

[Anonymous No.11679183]

>>11677972
TC included chainlink as a fundamental part of their "how do we know the data is correct" problem. It's in their FAQ. The decentralized network and secure enclave work in concert. Sure in some applications you might want one or the other, but they clearly believe the decentralized network will be a key part of it.

[Anonymous No.11679252]

>>11677027
Perfect chance to buy more. Dont fret.

[Anonymous No.11679331]

>>11679136
>niggardly
That word doesn’t mean what you think it does, ya fuckin hick

[Anonymous No.11679483]

Do you guys tell people in real life that you browse this board

[Anonymous No.11679531]

>>11679331
settle down Tyrone this isn't a spelling bee

[Anonymous No.11680043]

Bump

[Anonymous No.11680256]

>>11677880
Yes.

You can run a fork of eth.
You can run on a testnet.

[Anonymous No.11680766]

>>11676444
Since you got trips, you actually have to follow through with it now.

[Anonymous No.11680999]

Price didn’t even flinch...why?

[Anonymous No.11681021]

>>11676480
forbes contributors are basically just medium article writers

[Anonymous No.11681316]

>>11677758
Stay based anon. Fellow black linky here. We're all gonna make it.

I'm graduating soon and won't have steady income to invest until May. How much longer can I accumulate <$1 link? Thanks brother

[Anonymous No.11681372]

>>11680954
Wow that sounds really complicated and NOT user friendly my fellow 4 channer.

I can see why mainstream adoption is so far away. Its like using the internet without Microsoft edge, it's going to need to improve leaps and bounds before I even consider buying any digital cash coins.

I'm the kind of investor who can usually spot an emerging trend from miles away and have been very successful. I can safely say internet digital cash/coins are not ready to be taken seriously by businesses or any serious investors worth their salt.

[Anonymous No.11681378]

>>11677908

[Anonymous No.11681379]

>>11681316
Moroccan here, I miss the day when we could walk south and bring 50 nigger women to keep as sex slaves and 10 niggers to do the chores around.
Based islamic days are gone, all that's left is the nostalgia.

[Anonymous No.11681463]

>>11678204
It will approach equilibrium such that supply is equal to demand at $0.000000000000000001

[Anonymous No.11681499]

>>11680999
It's tanking now.

[Anonymous No.11681512]

>>11681499
Topkek, it's literally dumping right noe, target 1590 sats

[Anonymous No.11681722]

>>11677927
Sgx is a centralized manmade software that can be hacked and is controlled by intel. Trusting only intel sgx to prevent sybil attacks and repuration farming is a central point of failure.

On the topic of copying the open source code and making another better chainlink, let me tell you that it can already he done. We know multibillion dollar companies dealing in api's want their data on the blockchain they will fork the code and create their own oracle network but this one will have nodes run by their business partners providing api's and data feeds for them. It will be similar to hyperledger which is a pseudo blockchain being built for corporations. Any corporation using this fork build from the ground up by industry leaders for use by industry leaders know that the nodes being run by major corporations will be way more secure than random nodes being run presumably buy random neets in their basements. They will still be able to choose nodes based on their reputation, uptime, etc.

Noone will use chainlink because the important node operators are major corporate entities and they will go where the work is. The major corporations will provide work for their business partners on the pseudo private chainlink fork. Chainlink may be the first public decentralized oracle network but they don't even have a mainnet and the fork will have all the transactional volume to begin with.

[Anonymous No.11681798]

>>11681722
It's actually true.

Anyone can copy the open source code and deploy their own chainlink network with a whole new set of link tokens.

Prove me wrong!

[Anonymous No.11681811]

>>11681798
Anyone can start a new Bitcoin too.

[Anonymous No.11681812]

>>11678700
Redpilled and based

[Anonymous No.11681889]

>>11681798
The value comes from the network they’re building. Their code is open source, go fork it and start shilling it to polkadot, kaleido, open law etc

[Anonymous No.11681934]

>>11681889

All those companies you mentioned have essentially forked the code and will run their own internal oracle networks with their own nodes and data In a permissioned safe environment.

If it's open source it is free to use in such a way. And that's how companies will use it ? What am I missing here ?

[Anonymous No.11681936]

>>11681722
>>11681798
>The open standard will fail because corporations will make their own private one
You zoomers won't remember but this argument is as old as the internet. I can't pinpoint why, but and it's almost always wrong.

[Anonymous No.11682052]

>>11681499
This shit will never increase in price. I swear it just keeps dumping

[Anonymous No.11682075]

>>11681811
>>11681798
>>11681889
Bitcoin has already taken off. Miners which are in simpler terms node operators go where the transactional volume is. The value in btc comes from its massive user base and backing miners. You cannot create another better btc without the transactional volume and the node operators. Chainlink has not taken off yet and has not solidified itself as the industry leader for oracles so node operators have no incentive to set up shop on the cjainlink network until there is demand for api's and data feeds on the network. Corporations like intel, swift, salesforce, ibm, ey, microsoft, aws, and google as well as others have already announced their own solution for getting their data on the blockchain.

They will all be using a decentralized oracle network similar to hyperledger in that corporations will run all of the nodes because businesses are more trustworthy, will have more server uptime, and will provide more accurate data because they actually care about long term reliability and reputation unlike some random programmer who decides to start providing api's as a hobby. Its like you completely missed my point. Chainlink will fail because these major institutions have their own pseudo private industry solution.

[Anonymous No.11682118]

>>11682075
I'm agreeing with you faggot. Ffs

[Anonymous No.11682135]

>>11681934
>What am I missing here ?

your missing a lot

[Anonymous No.11682199]

>>11681934

[Anonymous No.11682219]

>>11682135
> your

You're missing an '&e

[Anonymous No.11682230]

>>11676596
>we're gonna go to the hassle of using a decentralised oracle network to just pick a piece of data using a node and API we trust.
great bait mate.

[Anonymous No.11682262]

>>11682118
i no rite

[Anonymous No.11682269]

>>11676444
>>11680766
dubs confirm

[Anonymous No.11682317]

>>11682075
k

[Anonymous No.11682318]

>>11679483
Jesus christ anon are you insane?

[Anonymous No.11682321]

>>11679483
The drive thru workers at McDonald's don't give a fuck about my browsing habits and i don't have any other interaction IRL

[Anonymous No.11682535]

>>11682321
your diary is a lucky lady

[Anonymous No.11682599]

>>11677659
>selling link to buy holo
glhf

[Anonymous No.11682658]

>>11679483
I link the funniest stuff to some of me m8s

[Anonymous No.11682753]

>>11676495
>>11676528
confirmation of komgo partnership will probably initiate singularity imo

[Anonymous No.11682867]

>>11682075
Kek you just thought this up?

[Anonymous No.11682981]

>>11682075
>Chainlink has not taken off yet and has not solidified itself as the industry leader for oracles
lying is a sin you flaming faggot

[Anonymous No.11683085]

>>11681379
Based morracan

[Anonymous No.11683381]

>>11681379
>50 sex slaves
how much link for that?

[Anonymous No.11683415]

So why is this shitcoin dumping right now?

[Anonymous No.11683430]

>>11683381
0,00001
>>11683415
This. It's literally dumping right now. Target: 2300 sats

[Anonymous No.11683508]

>>11683430
Target idiot and you win first prize.

[Anonymous No.11683793]

>>11681934
>>11682075
Please don’t breed

[Anonymous No.11683939]

>>11676444
Or Sergey..

[Anonymous No.11684543]

>>11677005
Nazie for short?

[Anonymous No.11684565]

>>11677238
You don’t assume smartcontracts will be using chainlink ?