LINK holders - we're gonna make it

[Anonymous No.11659250]

If you own more than 1K link you're in the top 20% of link holders (322k people). If you own more than 14k you're in the top 1% (13k people) . We're a relatively small group of people, fellow linkers, and we're all gonna make it.

(1) Take a look at google trends for the keyword "chainlink coin" worldwide for the last 5 years. The area under the curve represents total interest during that period. That number is 1405. (google presents the numbers in such a way that the peak value is 100)

(2) Take a look at google trends for the keyword "bitcoin" vs "chainlink" worldwide for the last 5 years. The area under each curve represents total interest for each keyword during the preiod. All points for "chainlink" are less than one. I will assume the peak for this series is 0.75, just because I find it to be reasonable (it could be any value between 0 and 0.9999999). "Bitcoin" adds up to 2261 for the last 5 years (peak = 100).

(3) The peak for "chainlink" in step (2) is 0.75, while the peak for "chainlink coin" in step (1) is 100 (google trends always normalizes so the peak is 100). Therefore we need to take 1405 and multiply it by (0.01*0.75) to ensure its peak is = 0.75, and therefore both series will be comparable.

(4) The result is that total interest for "bitcoin" during the period is 2261, while the total interest for "chainlink coin" during the period is 10.5375. This means the link/bitcoin ratio is 10.5375/2261 = 0.00466

(5) Take another rough estimation, such as the one I wrote here >>11658504

In that estimation the link/bitcoin ratio is 10.8/76900 = 0.00014044213

(6) Make another quick estimation with normie sources. Such as:

www.reddit.com/r/bitcoin/ has 977347 subs
www.reddit.com/r/linktrader has 9116 subs

The ratio there is 9116/977347 = 0.009327

(7) The average LINK/Bitcoin ratio we get from google, youtube and reddit is:

(0.00466 + 0.000140 + 0.009327) / 3 = 0.014127/3 = 0.004709


... to be continued

[Anonymous No.11659271]

....

(8) Bitcoin's market cap is approximately 50% of the global crypto market cap. If there was no overlap between coins, and one assumes that on ***average*** people invest a comparable amount of money on crypto, regardless of what crypto one chooses, then it would be fair to say 3% of the population (50% of the 6% that own crypto) own bitcoin. But that's not true...there is overlap between coins, so probably the real number is closer to 4.5% (halfway between 3% and 6% just to make it simple).

(9) Therefore, 0.004709 * 4.5% is a reasonable estimation of the percentage of the world population that owns some chainlink. This is 1,610,478 people.

(10) Using a rough approximation of the 80/20 rule (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle)), we can estimate that the richest 20% of LINK holders are 322,000 people who own 0.8*350,000,000 LINK = 280,000,000 LINK. An average of 869 link per holder.

(11) 20% of the richest 20% of LINK holders are 64,400 people, who own 0.8*280M LINK = 224,000,000. This means the average top 4% (20% of 20%) LINK holder owns 224M / 64400 = 3500 LINK.

(12) The top 0.8% (.2*.2*.2) LINK holders are 12880 people, who own a total of 179.2M LINK - an average of 13,913 per person.

(13) I'm not gonna keep going...I think you get the picture. Many of us are BY FAR in the top 1% of LINK holders. We're all gonna make it, and we are definitely innovators/early adopters.

[Anonymous No.11659283]

What does “make it” mean?

[Anonymous No.11659315]

>>11659271
I'm finally a member of the 0.5% club!

[Anonymous No.11659320]

>>11659271
Can you keep going. I don't know what these numbers mean but I like seeing them go higher.

[Anonymous No.11659328]

>>11659283
Not having to wagecuck

[Anonymous No.11659347]

>>11659328
How do any of these numbers suggest that we’ll make money on ChainLink?

[Anonymous No.11659355]

Nice math anon, autism at its finest.

>>11659271
>average of 13,913 LINK per person
Whaaat ? Im under average ? Fuck

12k under average linklet here. Hold me frens

[Anonymous No.11659384]

We are the champions

My friends

[Anonymous No.11659397]

this is getting almost sad how deluded you stinky linkies are but I do respect the autism

[Anonymous No.11659408]

your whole eqaution that you pulled out of your ass can be applied to literally 1000 other ERC 20 shittokens - nothing special here

[Anonymous No.11659435]

>>11659283
>>11659328
Not just that, but having some "fuck you" money, too. If you have 2 mil and are responsible you can avoid wagecucking forever, but I'd set actually making it between 4-6 mil.

[Anonymous No.11659458]

[Anonymous No.11659459]

lmao this post is such a waste of time cant believe i read all of it, we already know this yes we are gunna make it thanks for backing it up with a bunch of numbers and symbols, would be more useful if you actaully did something useful

[Anonymous No.11659475]

i have 50k link and will need 2.5 mil to become the ultimate neet. so i need 50$ link. i have absolute confidence that this will happen within 2 years.

[Anonymous No.11659508]

>>11659347
after a long day of throwing my chicken bones on the sidewalk, i too suffer from an inability to comprehend words.

[Anonymous No.11659509]

>>11659355
You still have time

[Anonymous No.11659591]

>>11659475
50usd link is 17bn mcap. The amount of shitcoins that got to or past 17bn on hype alone is absurd during January. It's absolutely possible.

[Anonymous No.11659612]

>>11659459
right? go build something OP

[Anonymous No.11659618]

>>11659250
Only 23551 wallets hold LINK you muppet

[Anonymous No.11659620]

>>11659250
thank you. this is brilliant stuff. we're all gonna ake it fren. 1000k eoy

[Anonymous No.11659622]

I actually think the idea behind Chainlink isn’t that bad. But the tokenomics of the Chainlink project just do not make it an attractive investment. not only is there too much total supply, but the team still has more than half of them! And even the ones that are out there the distribution is just too uneven to take off! How is this a “decentralised” oracle when 99% of the tokens are held by a few whales? In the future data providers will provide data directly to the blockchain using a reputation based API no need to use Chainlink and give control over all data to a few Chainlink whales + linkpool. The people able to run their own Chainlink full nodes will be a drop in the ocean. That is why The Chainlink team don’t bother doing any marketing it’s because they’re embarrassed. they already know they fucked up with the ICO and short of burning all the whales tokens which will drop the price to 0 there is nothing they can do. I sold all my links at $1 many months ago and I advise you to do the same before the uselessness of Chainlink dawns on everyone else.

[Anonymous No.11659633]

ALRIGHT, time to talk about ChainLink's price.

I've been crunching some numbers, researching how much api providers charge right now, looking into Oraclize and other oracle services customer-base and how much are they paying...

And I've came to the conclusion that LINK holders are completely out of their mind. The network just WON'T have nowhere near the fee revenue to justify the price predictions that are thrown around in this board.

If we're LUCKY, we might see a 10MM USD a YEAR at the beginning at the network. It's fucking ridiculous.

Even if we the network eventually gets adopted by a few banks for derivatives trading purposes (which WON'T happen in less than 03 years, you idiots have no idea how far away smart contracts are from being actually usable) it'll be HARD to get over 100 MM usd a YEAR in network fees. Shit just isn't that profitable.

So yeah, LINK is basically overinflated in price because delusional neets bought into the non-sense from a group of LARPERS and didnt actually do any research.

[Anonymous No.11659657]

>>11659618
Some of those wallets are exchanges, where several accounts are consolidated into one wallet, you muppet.

[Anonymous No.11659662]

>>11659591
thanks fren

[Anonymous No.11659664]

>>11659633
>I've been crunching some numbers
where are your fucking numbers then you retard? how much "work" did you put into this? this is a complete joke.

[Anonymous No.11659721]

>>11659622
>the team still has more than half of them
No they don't. They're out of supply ready to be paid to node operators.

Btw am I replying to a pasta guy?

[Anonymous No.11659746]

>>11659664
Brainlets respond to brainlet pasta.

[Anonymous No.11659794]

>mfw the bitcucks are about to get destroyed after FUDing LINK for the past year

[Anonymous No.11659810]

>>11659657
So you claim to know exactly how many people keep all their LINK on exchanges and it's over x10 the people who don't. Kys you larping faggot

[Anonymous No.11659827]

>>11659271
>4.5% is a reasonable estimation of the percentage of the world population that owns some chainlink. This is 1,610,478 people.

What?
There's no way this is even remotely close to reality

[Anonymous No.11659834]

>>11659721
>They're out of supply
Which means that the team has them.

[Anonymous No.11659854]

>>11659810
Never said anything about exactly, don't put words in my mouth. It's a rough estimation, but it's as close as you're gonna get with the data avaliable.

Just to reiterate the fact that the number of wallets has nothing to do with the number of owners:

There are around 30 million bitcoin wallets in the world, yet there are estimations that around 456 million people (6% of the world pop) own some sort of crypto currency.

Does this mean 420 million people own some sort of crypto while owning ZERO bitcooin? come on. It's obvious that the number of wallets has nothing to do with the number of owners.

[Anonymous No.11659866]

>>11659827

0.004709 * 4.5% = 0.0211905%

[Anonymous No.11659888]

>>11659854
That's because most btc owned by small fries is on exchanges. But I bet most stinkies have the majority of their link offline because we're not normie morons.

[Anonymous No.11659890]

>>11659866
Ah I see, my bad anon

[Anonymous No.11659936]

>>11659250
You sir, are a tremendous faggot who is pulling numbers out of his rectum

[Anonymous No.11659938]

Doesn't matter if you are in the top 0,5%, 1% or 20% if you are holding literal bullshit.

CL failing will be the funniest moment in the history of /biz/

[Anonymous No.11659948]

>>11659936
you're in insignificant faggot who puts numbers in his rectum.

[Anonymous No.11659958]

>>11659948
Stop samefagging

[Anonymous No.11659961]

>>11659250
quality post
this kind of research and calculations is what companies are paying 50000$/year net

[Anonymous No.11659966]

>>11659888
That may well be the case, and it's a hunch I would agree with...but I can't think how one could transform that hunch into numbers in order to conisder that effect it in the estimations above. I did the best I could anon.

[Anonymous No.11660007]

So i only need 4k more linkies to get in the elites? Nice

[Anonymous No.11660069]

>>11659794
Question: I've only started following ChainLink recently.

The price used to be around 4.5k sats rougly, recently it's spiked up to around 6-8k sats

What has the price been historically? What is considered a 'high' price for it and what was the old normal? I feel like im buying the top right now

[Anonymous No.11660101]

Legitimate question: What will happen to this board in link fails?

[Anonymous No.11660106]

>>11660069
the "high" is like $1.40, over 10k sats. do you know how to read a chart

[Anonymous No.11660134]

>>11660106
binance doesnt go futher back than a year, last year it was at 10k sats, and then dropped like a fucking rock

what happend?

[Anonymous No.11660163]

>>11660134
the entire crypto market crashed, newfag

[Anonymous No.11660237]

>>11659435
>Not just that, but having some "fuck you" money, too. If you have 2 mil and are responsible you can avoid wagecucking forever, but I'd set actually making it between 4-6 mil.
This.

With 1 mil, I could invest in passive index funds and plan to live off 3% a year, which would be about $30k/yr. That's a good living in many places.

However, I make $250k/yr in Manhattan. To quit my job and maintain my current lifestyle living on 3%, I would need to have about $8.3M.

Fortunately, I have 250k link. If link hits $10, I will have the option of saying fuck it all and leaving NYC to enjoy life somewhere cheap, where I can make stupid videogames forever or some dumb shit and never work again.

If link is stupidly successful, then I can do the above but in a luxury apartment in Manhattan.

[Anonymous No.11660315]

>>11659458
>>11660237

How does it feel being in the top 100 holders?

[Anonymous No.11660351]

>>11659250
It's exhausting constantly seeing people tout Chainlink as a solution for everything. Chainlink won't be used for PSD2 compliance, there is no evidence suggesting it will be. I'm still waiting for anyone to post evidence of there being vulnerability in any oracles.

Has anyone noticed how Chainlink is only partnered with "Academic" endeavors like OpenLaw and Accord (aside from a proof of concept). Do you really think a bunch of multibillion dollar tech companies wouldn't be chomping at the bit to get this tech? Do you really think they wouldn't have horded tokens long ago if this platform was SO necessary and needed?

Link's best chance is having a pump somehow like Ethereum did. But Ethereum only has pumped because of idiots buying cryptocurrencies that don't understand them. Chainlink only has any value because of idiots buying that don't understand smart contracts and oracles.

[Anonymous No.11660542]

>>11659250
>The area under the curve
>The area under each curve
what are you on about

[Anonymous No.11660552]

>>11660351
You make some good points anon however you forget one important fact. Think back to when Chainlink started attending conferences around the October run up of last year. Do you recall the keynote speech that was given by Sergey?

[Anonymous No.11660611]

Bump to read the novel later

[Anonymous No.11660617]

>>11660542
In general, if you have a curve showing "something" over time, the area under the curve represents the total "something" over the given period.

In this case, each curve shows interest for a particular topic over time, so the area under each curve represents total interest for that topic for the given period.

I looked at two google trends graphs:

a) "chainlink" vs "bitcoin", worldwide, for 5 years.
b) "chainlink coin", worldwide, for 5 years.


In the first graph, the chainlink interest curve is reported as "<1" because the values are too small compared to the bitcoin interest curve. This happens because google sets the maximum value of any curve in the chart to 100, and all other points are expressed relative to that number. To work around this I used the second graph ( chainlink interest only, without comparing it to bitcoin) in order to estimate the actual values of the "chainlink interest" curve.

[Anonymous No.11660631]

>>11659397
Laughed at this but also realized I'm a LINK holder and can't help but hope these autists are correct.

[Anonymous No.11660651]

>>11660237
Advice to you, anon: buy a relatively cheap apartment you're happy with in Manhattan bc that shit will be under water in your lifetime. Buy a super nice house or apt in a non-coastal city you're excited about as well for when that happens in about 20-30 years.

[Anonymous No.11660666]

>>11660351

Unironically this. The whole crypto and LINK have made people to lose their mind and rationality and deluded day dreaming about lamboland

[Anonymous No.11660669]

>>11659250
>>11659271
Gas yourself idiots. Nobody wants your shit ERC token.

[Anonymous No.11660687]

>>11660552
Can you just make your point for the rest of us?

[Anonymous No.11660696]

>>11660666
Cursed trips

[Anonymous No.11660709]

>>11660651
lmao people we're saying this in the 90's
never going to happen in our lifetime

[Anonymous No.11660722]

>>11660687
I could but I spent hours watching the old videos to fully understand this project. It would be a disservice to relay this info while it's already out in the open albeit not picked up on as much on this message board.

[Anonymous No.11660743]

>>11660666
Nice english pajeet

[Anonymous No.11660751]

>>11660722
That’s fair I guess? But I mean, I’ve watched them too. My guess for why insiders don’t seem to have gone hog wild is because Sergey hasn’t even really shilled the potential value of the token to the people he’s spoken to. He’s instead presented it as a solution and made deals with them to get some number of tokens from him directly.

[Anonymous No.11660772]

>>11660751
That's Adelyns job. Sergey is the face of the project.

[Anonymous No.11660780]

>>11659271
There are only about 22,000 addresses that own link tokens. How can there be over a million people who own chainlink.

[Anonymous No.11660789]

I only own 400 LINK

[Anonymous No.11660815]

>>11660751
That is tiger moms job and if you think 'insiders' dont know than idk what to tell you man, i guess youre the smartest one in this game huh?

[Anonymous No.11660825]

>>11659250
i own 1700 linkies . should i buy more ? iam planning to buy a tesla

[Anonymous No.11660862]

>>11660722
>Being mysterious
It's the toilet faggot.
Just admit it.

[Anonymous No.11660877]

>>11660825
stupid fucking normie go back to plebbit

[Anonymous No.11660894]

Top 750 here.

Collective autism will save us

[Anonymous No.11660900]

>>11660815
Nah, not smartest- luckiest. I guess I’m still in the dark on your answer that sparked this. Time to rewatch old vids I guess.

[Anonymous No.11660915]

I can't believe How stupid the OP is... at first your like wow this poster is pretty brilliant with all the math. But once he said over 1 million people own link I laughed. I have like a 90 IQ and basic fucking common sense will tell you there's no where near 1 million individual holders.


Jesus Christ op you are fucking stupid

[Anonymous No.11660971]

>>11660862
The jerk store called. They're running out of you!

[Anonymous No.11660972]

>>11659271
>>11660780
>>11660915
I'd like to know where he got that number as well.

[Anonymous No.11661005]

>>11660815
No, not smartest. Luckiest. I still don’t know what the anon up thread was hinting at but I guess it’s time to rewatch the old vids.

[Anonymous No.11661017]

>>11660780
Like I said above........ you people are unironically very stupid. As soon as he said there were a million Link holders I laughed out loud and I'm borderline retarded.

You fucking morons don't have a lick of common sense if you think over 1 million people own chainlink.

[Anonymous No.11661051]

>>11660780
Also I had no clue how many actual wallets there were and I still laughed at the fact that OP said there were over 1 million link holders.

[Anonymous No.11661052]

>>11661005
Damn, walking in the rain. Thought that hadn’t gotten posted.

[Anonymous No.11661102]

Like 70% of the world is fucking Muslim spic and black. Out of that 5 billion people you might have like literally 600 link holders.

Figure the white world is about 2 billion people. Your telling me 1 out of every 1,800 people own some chainlink? Cuz that's what it would basically take to have a million link holders.

I would bet my left testicle that when I go to the bears game this week.... if I could ask all 70,000 fans if they own any chainlink that nobody would own it.

Take a city like chicago with 7 million people.... how many do you think own link? I'd guess at most 50 people own link .

[Anonymous No.11661255]

>>11661102
So according to your math 50/7,000,000 is a good approximation for the amount of people that own link, at least in the "white world" (around 2bn people) + only a few rest of the world link holders.

So we would have a total of (50/7,000,000)*2bn + 600 = 14285+600 = 14885. Let's round up to 15,000 people holding link.

This would mean the average link holder owns 23k LINK, which right now is about 11k USD.

Using a rough 80/20 distribution, this would mean the bottom 80% of link holders are 12,000 people, who own 70,000,000 LINK overall. Then the average bottom 80% holder has 5800 LINK, while the average top 20% holder (3,000 people) has an average of 93k LINK .

This would also imply that the ****average**** amount of wallets per user is greater than one (not less than one, like one would assume given the existance of massive exchanges).

I'm not saying it isn't possible, it just seems unlikely to me.

[Anonymous No.11661318]

>>11661102
Most link holders are in Brisbane, Australia.

[Anonymous No.11661440]

>>11661318
BRISVEGAS YEEEWWWW SCARNON CUNCE

>this post brought to you by Logan gang

[Anonymous No.11661445]

>>11660780
This, people in this place are stupid as fuck. There are only 20k wallets.

[Anonymous No.11661522]

>>11660666
nice try satan

[Anonymous No.11661535]

industry token. banking cartel have their fingers all over this. 1000$ EOY confirmed

[Anonymous No.11661538]

>>11661318

OY DAMO M8, WEN U GET UR CENTALINK PAYMNT MATE, BUY DIS THING CALLED CHAINLINK EYYYY.

CIGGY BUTT BRAIN

[Anonymous No.11661618]

>>11659250
JUST TELL US THE 2019 EOY PRICE

[Anonymous No.11661767]

>>11661255
Yes this makes much more sense I mean.... literally who else is accumulating link in the 5-15k USD dollar area other than biz?

Take all individual link holders. Just regular people buying Link. What % of those are biz? I'd guess at least 80%? If not almost all.

And I'm sure on avg maybe 1 biz link holder has gotten on average close to 1 other person to invest.

So the 15k amount of people makes a lot of sense who own it

AND I would have considered myself an average holder and after your updated math..... of 23k that makes sense because I have 28k

[Anonymous No.11661875]

>>11660237
Stupid idiots like this guy are going to be the real JUSTed people. Not no linkers.

You fucking morons are going to make a few million and through it all into An overinflated stock market propped up by 0% interest rates for a decade and your going to fucking lose it all.

I would sooner take my millions from Link and play blackjack than put it in this sham stock market. At least in blackjack I have a chance of making more. You'll get fucking slaughtered in the illegal central bank fueled market

[Anonymous No.11661992]

>>11661875
can you unironically imagine saying putting money on blackjack is a safer investment then the stock market.

[Anonymous No.11662061]

>>11661440
SPRINGWOOD REPRESENT FUCK YEEEAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.11662062]

>>11659633
He doesn't know about collateral insurance....

[Anonymous No.11662167]

>>11661445
23k anon
>Stop lying

[Anonymous No.11662194]

>>11662061
Of all the places possible...

[Anonymous No.11662265]

>>11661992
>>11661992
Blackjack you at least have A 49% chance of winning. You think there's a higher than 49% chance that the stock market isn't going to get completely fucked?

Yeah everything in the stock market is just going to go up forever and ever.

Fucking nigger

[Anonymous No.11662299]

>>11661992
Also.... the Jews and Zionist's control the stock market by way of the central bank. Pumping all sorts of free money and liquidity into it to prop it up

You people are literally so fucking dumb. You have to concept of constitutional economics. You are unironally complete normies.

Quotation: "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered.... I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." - Thomas Jefferson

[Anonymous No.11662312]

>>11662299
To be honest, I wouldn't trust the average person to wash my car let alone manage finances.

[Anonymous No.11662422]

>>11662265
>>11662299

[Anonymous No.11662576]

>>11659250
You are a fucking maniac.

[Anonymous No.11662766]

>>11662312
Exactly. You need to buy a real store of value.

[Anonymous No.11662820]

>>11662312
who are you kidding bitch you ride a bus.

[Anonymous No.11662825]

>>11661535
Fugg I was wondering why the TC logo was giving me bad vibes

[Anonymous No.11662968]

>>11659591
>>11659475
Ripple's ATH mcap is ~140 billion. I think link will hit this mcap by 2021.
140,000,000,000/350,000,000=400
mfw $400 link

[Anonymous No.11663047]

>>11662299

One word.

Usury

Every time the market goes up, cheap interest that the Jews "generously" give.

Every time the market goes up, the general population defaults and lose what they own.

Rinse and repeat and now you own the world. Interest over 30% should be illegal.

[Anonymous No.11663054]

>>11663047

fuck I meant down when they population defaults rip

[Anonymous No.11663105]

>>11661318
>>11661440
>>11662061
YEEEEEAAAAAH KUNTZ

[Anonymous No.11663124]

>>11661767
I have 100k link. Just a regular human being.

[Anonymous No.11663136]

>>11659591
When put like that it looks almost like a pretty sure bet but I think we are transferring from the hype phase to the usage phases. The projects that increase in value from here will have to be because of a real world working product. This makes it a lot riskier in theory.

[Anonymous No.11663166]

>>11661992
at this moment in time it probably is

[Anonymous No.11663253]

>>11661102
Anon, the bears game is already over.

[Anonymous No.11663292]

Hey folks, here's a decent trade set up for you. Most distributional lengths are way overheated to continue trending. You're either going to see trending mean reversion or lateral mean reversion for the remainder of the week. As soon as you dip below 7100 expect a strait shot to the 4h 200 MA. If we manage to stay above that value you can expect lateral trading as defined by the 50 period distribution; a range between 8200 and 7100.

Just some tips on risk management using volatility theory. Do note if price dips below the defined support you will see sustained downward moves.

[Anonymous No.11663318]

>>11661875
Anyone buying link isn’t the type of investor that would chunk it all into a 4% yielding mutual fund kek. We going full blown real estate, buying gold, land, cash flow business, running a node, or simply keeping some in link/bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.11663329]

>>11663292
gtfo with your btc chart you fucking retard
>b-but Im up in sats

[Anonymous No.11663347]

>>11663329
Right, because trading off of a lower volume pair that forces you to use derivative information is SO much more effective

[Anonymous No.11663349]

>>11663253
Underrated

[Anonymous No.11663396]

>>11663292
no one fucking cares about ur magic meme lines friend. we are all here for the long haul and couldn't care where the fuck you think this is going the next couple weeks.

[Anonymous No.11663473]

>>11663396
Sustainable growth is the alignment of expectations of all market participants. If you had the tools to measure when expectations were no longer aligned for growth, even if just the short term, would that not be information that could potentially help you over blind devotion?

[Anonymous No.11663502]

> mfw 400 LINK away from being the top 1%

[Anonymous No.11663646]

I want to believe but then again I'm taking financial advice from autistics on a Chinese wax paper image board.

[Anonymous No.11664471]

>>11659508
Kek

[Anonymous No.11664720]

I OWN LESS THAN 1K
LIFE IS SUFFERING
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.11664733]

I OWN LESS THAN 1K. I DONT EVEN WANNA MAKENIT JUST WANT TO BE ABLE TO BUY AN APARTMENT
LIFE IS SUFFERING
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.11664810]

>>11660780

It's like a metaphor but different

[Anonymous No.11665015]

>>11664733
>tfw only have 30k

[Anonymous No.11665047]

>>11665015
I have 30k as well. We're going to make it friend, just don't sell early

[Anonymous No.11665700]

>>11659271
People can own more than one wallet though, as well. Think of all the different exchanges that one person might be logged into and be holding in