NANO

[Anonymous No.11607698]

Coinbase rumors true?

[Anonymous No.11607719]

>>11607698
It is not a rumor thing, Nano is in their custody list.
Coinbase has announced many times they plan on listing many new assets, and their custody list is the short list.
Just a matter of when, then the normies seeing this shit on their phones fomo in.

[Anonymous No.11607732]

>>11607719
how many to make it fren?

[Anonymous No.11607733]

>>11607698
>Not a useless erc20 token
>No ICO, not subjected to U.S laws
What do you think ?

[Anonymous No.11607742]

>>11607698
Doesn't really matter. Its not going to pump regardless

[Anonymous No.11607862]

bump

[Anonymous No.11607949]

>>11607862
Yep, I remember the shift from relational databases to key value. All the old fags basing all their logic on Oracle and MySQL got absolutely BTFO by the wave of new infinitely scale-able apps hitting the market.
I do not know a single significant app now that still uses old DB tech as their primary data source.
But don't you ever under-estimate the power of being the trading pair, none of this shit will detrhone BTC until the market agrees on a new currency for trading. Tech does not matter when none of the transactions happen on chain.

[Anonymous No.11607964]

Will coinbase really want to deal with the headache of listing this coin?

[Anonymous No.11608027]

>withdrawals suspended

[Anonymous No.11608054]

>>11608027
mine are working fine? a few seconds using Binance

[Anonymous No.11608248]

>>11607949
>dethrone
Agreed, but goddamn does that thought make my dick hard

[Anonymous No.11608323]

>>11608248
i'm thinking NANO, LINK and ICX to make it

what else is good?

[Anonymous No.11608362]

>>11608323
Besides the boomer coins (bitcoin, eth), nano is about the only one I really believe in. I hold a bunch of crap that never really panned out.
For me I think the time is finally right to get some LINK and XRP

[Anonymous No.11608382]

>>11608362
XRP good for the pumps, but I don't know about the future, considering things like Bakkt, Liquid, Fidelity, etc will make it easier to transact

[Anonymous No.11608411]

>>11608382
And it's already 3rd in market cap so if it pump bitcoin will too. I'm honestly in a spot where I've done ok and now I'm afraid to put money in and mess it up. I might just roll with what I have and trust in nano. I keep flip flopping if I should put more money in it sucks.

[Anonymous No.11608635]

>>11608411
just be careful if bitcoin breaks 6k

[Anonymous No.11608660]

>>11608054
My point is.....they have had to put a stop to withdrawals across the board multiple times....you think coinbase is gonna want to deal with that shit show? It reflects bad on them....

[Anonymous No.11608677]

>>11608660
sure, but that seems to be fixed now; new exchange listings have had no issues

[Anonymous No.11608706]

>>11608660
It's not some shitty clone of BTC or another ERC-20 token waiting for main net. They made major shifts to the voting protocol and block format, these changes are long over and the platform has been stable for months.
if you think there is a tech blocker for coinbase that is not it, all they care about is distributed unmanipulated volume so they can do the manipulation.
That 73 million dollars in volume in a single day on a single exchange a couple weeks ago is likely linked to them.

[Anonymous No.11608901]

>>11608706
>73 million dollars in volume
source? also, once NANO gets on Coinbase adoption should be really fast

[Anonymous No.11608920]

>>11607732
I'mma say 1,000

[Anonymous No.11608941]

>>11608901
08/25-26/2018 Binance, the super pump for no reason then Coinbase custody announcement.