Should I buy this meme?

[Anonymous No.11576034]

I did my DYOR on it and i am 98% sure it will flop

I did my DYOR on BTC and pulled out in January

[Anonymous No.11576063]

>>11576034
> "did my do your own research" on it
Nolinkers, everyone.

[Anonymous No.11576098]

>>11576034
Can you enlighten us with a summary of the main factors leading to this conclusion?

[Anonymous No.11576112]

>>11576034
The second you buy it will dump, so no. Don't buy sir.

[Anonymous No.11576160]

>>11576034
DYOR literally does not apply to LINK and I'll tell you why: No matter how much you research, I don't care if it's 12h a day for a month straight, you're not covering 1% of what the autists here have covered througout the last 13 months. Seriously. LINK is about as researched as NASDAQ listed stocks, but instead of hedge funds and institutions, it's a bunch of 4chan autists doing the digging. And they haven't found a single point of FUD that sticks. Not. A. Single. One. Right now the consensus would seem to be that LINK might fail due to just some bad luck like Sergey getting ran over a car (even this wouldn't do it btw), but otherwise it's as solid as it gets. Literally every other crypto has more solid criticism that can be pointed as a reason not to invest, including Ethereum and Bitcoin itself. ChainLink is, and I say this sincerely, the best investment anyone on this planet Earth can make right now. This is it. Theres literally nothing with more upside and less risk than LINK. And that only 4chan (basically) knows about this is frankly insane.

[Anonymous No.11576161]

>>11576034
It is a meme, brainlet. Kill yourself if you couldn't even figure that out on your own

[Anonymous No.11576168]

I'm a no linker, but why is everyone wishing bad things to link? I think everyone should be happy that we are all making money in one project or another, instead of being assholes.

[Anonymous No.11576173]

>>11576160
Linked and ChainPilled

[Anonymous No.11576184]

>>11576168
They just don’t want you to have any part in Link. They want your tokens. They are very pajeeted and poor in spirit. Link is our saving grace and they want you to wallow in eternal misery.

Plus most people here unironically aren’t worthy and don’t understand anything about the project and will get rich from it

[Anonymous No.11576196]

>>11576184
>our
fuck right off

[Anonymous No.11576209]

>>11576168
Because, retard, a bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth. Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons. Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story. The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes. In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

[Anonymous No.11576222]

So you're telling me this project has confirmed ties to the banking cartel, the cream of the crop of global legal firms and institutions as well as some of the biggest tech companies in the blockchain space focused on the soon to be mass adopted enterprise level smart contracts such as consensys, IBM, Intel and Digital Asset and that the solution to the oracle problem which it is aiming to solve is essentially the God protocol as described by the creator of the smart contract concept, ie one of the main pillars of the fourth industrial revolution and the backbone of the future blockchain infrastructure (10% of global GDP in less than 10 years) that will allow massive automation of post trade processing, thus saving all the biggest markets such as derivatives and insurance possibly trillions in saving, AND its the only project of its kind due to its decentralized nature and has the first mover advantage, but despite all these confirmed facts it's being largely ignored by the crypto community, although it has gone up from 120 to 60 ranking in a bear market with no marketing just in a couple of months, simply because a dozens of dedicated autistic neets down vote every possible clue about it on reddit because they're the only ones who realized this revolutionary project would basically replace all the lawyers with neet nodes where 1 link needs to be worth at least 5k usd in order to be sufficient collateral for the quadrillion derivatives market? Do you realize how delusional and insane that sounds? Personally I'm all in.

[Anonymous No.11576358]

>>11576168
Just go back retard, and stay out.