FUD me on this

[Anonymous No.11518963]

What makes it a scam? Should I watch the Blockchain Brad video?

[Anonymous No.11518977]

no, the video is a scam and will install a keylogger on your pc. Gilbert and Brad are in cahoots with eachother, don't fall for this scam

[Anonymous No.11518983]

>>11518977
dont forget that gilbert and brad are reptoids. they will steal your money be careful.

[Anonymous No.11519006]

>>11518983
Fuck, they didn't warn their fellow reptoid. Bassstardsss!

[Anonymous No.11519191]

>>11518963
>Brit limey scam coin
Name me one good thing those imperial bastards ever did right.

[Anonymous No.11519213]

$100 eoy

[Anonymous No.11519217]

>>11518963
>posts grainy jpeg of "decentralized amazon"
>nothing more on this
don't fomo in anon you will lose money

[Anonymous No.11519226]

>>11519217

[Anonymous No.11519229]

>>11519217
kys

[Anonymous No.11519238]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4VI5vI_fjE&index=3&t=39s&list=LLVOwcU1zqmSR7AvpxqwQHLg

>>11519217
ya sure

[Anonymous No.11519244]

>>11519217


https://bitcoinist.com/russia-to-focus-on-blockchain-technology/

https://www.pymnts.com/blockchain/2018/russia-blockchain-technology-international-standards/

https://blockchain24-7.com/blockchain-experts-gather-for-world-first-in-london/

https://www.finder.com.au/the-internet-belonged-to-america-blockchain-will-belong-to-russia

> Lloyds Bank confirmed client
> Working with Mastercard on blockchain service
> Multiple Fortune 500 and FTSE100 companies partnerships/clients under NDA
> Partnered with Chinese Government Ministry of Commerce
> Partnered with Indian Government of Andra Pradesh
> Partnered with Armenian Government Ministry of Technology
> Partnered with University College London
> Partnered with Germany Hamburg University
> Partnered with Cognizant & DXC
> Partnered with Accord Project
> Partnered with AI Nexus
> Integrating Overledger with Zapier
> Held talks with USA Dept of Homeland Security
> Held talks with Samsung
> Held talks with FTSE 100 company who wanted to acquire Quant Network
> Held talks with 2nd largest Venture Capitalist firm
> Held talks with UK tax office HMRC
> Announcement with large US bank coming soon
> Huobi/Bitfinex coming soon
> Building Enterprise Blockchain solution to compete with Hyperledger
> Building anupstream Power Exchange. Allowing for P2P Power networks (like Powerledger) to cross-exchange with other P2P Power networks.
> Possibly building Decentralised Exchange (DEX) or Digital Bank
> SDK already released which connects Ethereum, Bitcoin, Ripple, Hyperledger, IOTA and JP Morgan’s Quorum blockchains. Stellar and Corda on the todo list. Possibly Bitcoin Cash and Litecoin next.
>CEO worked in Downing St, HM Treasury, Cabinet Office and Ministry of Justice. Holds role at US Federal Reserve
> CEO founder of TC ISO 307 (46 countries and organisations are working on developing global Blockchain ISO Standard)
> Cofounder is blockchain advisor to European Union and United Nations

[Anonymous No.11519272]

>>11519244
Could you please take this post down in five minutes? Thanks.

[Anonymous No.11519277]

>>11519226
>>11519229
>>11519238
>>11519244
damn, you know your shit.
I appreciate the research you've put into this, and thank you for sharing it. I hope others seriously consider your warning

[Anonymous No.11519314]

>>11518963
deleet plz

[Anonymous No.11519323]

>>11519244
kys

[Anonymous No.11519365]

>>11519244
But seriously, what's wrong with this list? Putting aside "talks", can the partnerships be debunked? Lloyds and Mastercard? At first glance that looks pretty good.

[Anonymous No.11519371]

>>11519244
Also, why is the Russia thing relevant? Or was this just to drop Gilbert's name as having been present at the London event?

[Anonymous No.11519374]

>>11519277
whatever do you mean ?

dont get burned nothing is guaranteed

buy and sell before next major exch

rinse and repeat

[Anonymous No.11519380]

moon

qnt

[Anonymous No.11519387]

no one is actually going to need an 'overledger'

[Anonymous No.11519395]

This shit has been shilled for months now and I haven't seen even one post explaining what it does. It's just partnership announcements from a very shady britbong.

[Anonymous No.11519398]

the news is spreading fast

[Anonymous No.11519399]

retrace time

[Anonymous No.11519461]

>>11519395
they make something called an 'overledger' which is basically just an operating system (like windows) which you can use multiple different blockchains on (like ethereum and neo for instance)
the token is used to buy their product (basically a useless token)

[Anonymous No.11519472]

>>11518963
Cryptozombie video just released explains it

https://youtu.be/vuZ2RlOYzVA

[Anonymous No.11519500]

>>11519461
Looking at the Overledger Business Paper:

Quant will be launching a number of revenue streams. We aim to strike a balance between providing the funds needed for further development and keeping an open platform where the whole community can benefit. We believe this business model will lead to the wholesale adoption of our framework (see Section 4).
To that aim, we will:
+ Produce a Quant token (ticker: QNT) which will give access to the Quant Overledger platform for both developers and users of the different MApps.
+ Create a transactional charging mechanism whereby a developer can choose to create free applications, but with the capability of introducing a transactional charge for each application.

The tokens will be dual-purposed, initially used for the token offering, later as an access token to access the Quant network. We envisage the token keys will be embedded in specific applications, using the Quant network to authenticate the user and authorise the use of particular aspects of the network and underlying blockchains. We’re excited to see the possibilities of this approach and what people can create.

Aside from the entry cost, it seems logical to me that if the Overledger platform takes off there would be competition between developers. Wouldn't they undercut each other in regards to the token costs of using their applications? Or am I a brainlet and misunderstanding how this is supposed to work?

[Anonymous No.11519511]

>>11519500
Meaning developers undercutting each other = reduced demand for the token.

[Anonymous No.11519600]

delete this

[Anonymous No.11519622]

!

[Anonymous No.11519693]

>>11518963
>What makes it a scam?
everything Quant is building you can build on other chains as dApps.

> if the Overledger platform takes off
that's a big IF
i'd rather see someone trying to optimize the projects and infrastructure people are using already (but that's me).

[Anonymous No.11519776]

>>11519693
>What makes it a scam?
>everything Quant is building you can build on other chains as dApps.

A9mWnqac, do you have an answer to this? For comparison, a similar argument could be made about Chainlink - platforms could develop their own oracles where needed.

[Anonymous No.11519777]

>>11519693
Yeah because some random fag on 4chan knows better than experts who have been in the tech/cybersecurity space for decades, kek

[Anonymous No.11519810]

>>11519777
Nice trips guy.
If you have an actual counter arguement I'd love to hear it.

[Anonymous No.11519839]

It's not a scam but it IS massively overhyped currently. Most tokens don't need to exist, but this one in particular definitely does not.

It's up massively lately and on a huge roll, but being propped up by ridiuclous buy orders.

It will all end in tears, mark my words.

[Anonymous No.11519854]

>>11519810
Overledger is an overlay on top of existing blockchains, it's not an isolated blockchain, so I don't know how dApps have anything to do with it. It wouldn't be blockchain agnostic if it were run via a dApp, which probably isn't even possible...

They already have huge enterprise clients under NDA, so if any interoperability project in the space were to take off, Quant would be the top contender.

[Anonymous No.11519866]

>>11519839
screencapped and saged

[Anonymous No.11519876]

>>11519839
>but being propped up by ridiuclous buy orders.

What qualifies as 'ridiculous'? $25m marketcap for a project of this caliber is the only thing that seems ridiculous to me. You just sound salty because you missed out, although you still have time to FOMO in before the real rally.

[Anonymous No.11519891]

>>11519876
>You just sound salty because you missed out

I assure you, I have more QNT than the rest of this thread put together.

I am just aware of what happens after insane pumps like this. The buy orders are ridiculous because they're a long way below current price and get moved lower when the price does come down.

i.e. they are not "real" buy orders, from people actually hoping to get them filled. Just like a few weeks ago when there was a 1000 eth buy order at about 30% the price at the time. It's just designed to put a rocket under the price and make people buy into the waiting sell orders.

This is basic stuff.

[Anonymous No.11519948]

>>11519891
Thanks for explaining, anon.

[Anonymous No.11519963]

>>11519891
>The buy orders are ridiculous because they're a long way below current price

If you're going to LARP, at least do it right. The QNT order book is bar none the strongest there is on IDEX right now. FUDding on 4chan is not going to cause a price drop, you're best suited to just FOMO in and enjoy the ride before it does another +500% 4 weeks from now.

[Anonymous No.11520025]

>>11519854
>Overledger is an overlay on top of existing blockchains
what does that mean
and how is it decentralised
why do we need an interface os if developers can access blockchains directly throught smart contracts and so.

Maybe I don't understand what they are trying to build.

> how dApps have anything to do with it.
their demo featured this.
>Quant created a Decentralized Amazon running simultaneously across Ethereum, Ripple and Bitcoin powered by Overledger
Aion can do the same
Wanchain too

[Anonymous No.11520039]

>>11519963
You picture just proves my point, lol. The 1000s of ETH are nowhere near the current price, they are not "real" orders.

And I can't FOMO in because I am already a majority % in QNT and have been for months. But thanks for the suggestion, noob.
baka

[Anonymous No.11520304]

>>11518963
I know Gilbert from Australia and I wouldn't trust him to run with scissors. He takes a lot of credit for the work of others, I'd cast a critical eye over his resume before investing too much money.

[Anonymous No.11520318]

bank partnership announcement eom. I reckon sunday

[Anonymous No.11520359]

>>11520025
They are building an 'overledger' that allows companies to connect seamlessly between different blockchaind. It's already tested and working. Large companies want access to multiple blockchains with minimal change to their own systems.

[Anonymous No.11520397]

>falling for QNT fud
top kek
thanks god I bought at 0.004

[Anonymous No.11520398]

>>11519500
>Aside from the entry cost, it seems logical to me that if the Overledger platform takes off there would be competition between developers. Wouldn't they undercut each other in regards to the token costs of using their applications? Or am I a brainlet and misunderstanding how this is supposed to work?

Just bumping my own post, as nobody has really addressed this. Overledger sounds like a great idea, but so does almost every damned project in this space. Realistically, what pressures are there going to be on the token price if adoption is successful? Or does adoption not really matter and you all plan to dump at the top of the next bull run? Honest answers now.

[Anonymous No.11520493]

>>11518963
The token does not have a real usecase.
Muh "Developers need QNT to access the network and built applications"

lol

How many developers are there in the world.

The tech is ok (no blockchain lol) but the Token is useless.

[Anonymous No.11520521]

>>11520398
Even if enterprise scale adoption does occur, do you expect people here to hold tokens indefinitely? Of course people are going to take profits during the bull run, I know I am.

[Anonymous No.11520625]

Doesn't Overledger rely on Amazon AWS for (centralized) data storage and API calls for "interoperability"?

lel

[Anonymous No.11520676]

>>11520493
>The token does not have a real usecase
like the rest of crypto...

[Anonymous No.11521570]

>>11519191
Gave birth to your greasy burger land

[Anonymous No.11521614]

>>11520398
The tech is patented. They'd need to create a better system.
Also Gilbert is the best connected nigger in the entire space.

[Anonymous No.11522014]

>>11519191
Us Brits do things better than you burgers, always have done.
What normally happens is you lot copy us and make it worse (think sports and TV shows).

[Anonymous No.11522940]

>>11518963
BRITISH HUSTLE

Seriously, the Brits (especially cockneys and scousers) are the most devious scammy fuckers in the world. These bastards learn to be wheeler-dealers from a young age and wouldn't hesitate to scam their granny for a few "bob" (see Del Boy). Forget the Chinese, these limey fuckers can hustle like no other. You have been warned.

[Anonymous No.11523169]

>>11522014
The Office
The Apprentice
Kitchen Nightmares
X Factor
Britains Got Talent
Sherlock Holmes

Probably loads more but I haven’t TV in years

[Anonymous No.11523399]

>>11523169
Shameless, Skins and IT Crowd to name a few.
Don't forget sports. We invented Football, Rugby, Cricket, Boxing (queensberry rules) and they get adopted worldwide.
Burger sports are just sports copied from us, renamed and adopted by no one but themselves. American football (Rugby with padding), baseball (rounders), basketball (netball). They even copied the name football and used it for a sport which you use your hands for. Dumb burgers.