Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

If you can see this message, the SSL certificate expiration has been fixed.
Become a Patron!

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 1.06 MB, 1117x1836, monkeylink.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11423573 No.11423573 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe]

Hey anons, I am someone who is affiliated with some of the top people in the crypto space and I hate to come and pop the LINK bubble for you all but I must tell you something.

There is a tech that has been in the works for just as long as chainlink, unlike chainlink it uses permissioned nodes that are trusted by all the parties involved. This route makes things cheaper and faster to set up contracts. It looks like it will be the one all these big institutions and companies want to use from what I am hearing.
I am not meaning to hurt anyones feelings or spread FUD this is just my knowledge and I would feel bad not sharing.

>> No.11423632
File: 208 KB, 756x1118, 1523335071601.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11423632

>>11423573
>They're not gonna use chainlink because they have central nodes they trust.

riiight

>> No.11423699

>>11423632
The nodes are distributed, no one node feeds one contract. There will be multiple nodes run at different places.

>> No.11424543

this is always the systemic risk chainlink and every other public blockchain that hope to see any institutional use face. i'm not sure why you think this is new or interesting

>> No.11424893

>>11424543
?? I am just telling the people of information I have, clearly everyone is deep in link here, nice non point

>> No.11424921

>>11423573
Thanks Bonps Chi - Just sold 100K!

>> No.11424923

>>11423573
Ok fag. What’s this oracle network called?

>> No.11424941

>>11423573
>Enterprises will never use tcp/ip they will make their own private internet

>> No.11424968

>>11423573
Spill the beans fag!

>> No.11424991

>>11423573
>there is a tech.
>doesnt name tech.
fuck off.

>> No.11425018

>>11423573
You’re thinking of that one... the ceo is named Ian right?

>> No.11425058

>>11423573
>not naming the thing you're talking about
You're almost as bad as larpers who claim to be close to the team and get everyone's hopes up. Source your information or kys, shill.

>> No.11425145

its called "The Oracle Network" hits theatres June 2nd, what would u guys rate this FUD??

>> No.11425152
File: 2.29 MB, 3508x2480, 1515321257209.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11425152

>>11423573
>>11423699
>>11424893
>>11425145

>> No.11425159

>>11423573
This. Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth. Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons. Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story. The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes. In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

>> No.11425204

>>11423699
checked

>> No.11425271
File: 400 KB, 1466x742, Screen Shot 2018-10-16 at 7.50.05 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11425271

>>11423573
hey OP, fuck yourself
pic related

>> No.11425574

>>11425271
chill bro im on ur side, are u saying this infographic is referring to link entirely?

>> No.11425603

>>11425574
the dumb street shitter posted it on tweeter too with zero explanation. everyone is supposed to read between the words and see chainlink chainlink chainlink chainlink chainlink chainlink chainlink chainlink chainlink chainlink chainlinkdfnhlkjsgfkje;qfjleruwfh;eiof

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action