[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 5 KB, 209x241, chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11413536 No.11413536 [Reply] [Original]

Remind that the news today about Fidelity Labs announcing crypto trading platform is incredibly bullish for Chainlink.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeldelcastillo/2018/10/15/fidelity-launches-institutional-platform-for-bitcoin-and-ethereum/#67112fd093c4

CTRL+F that article for "Tom Jessop" and you'll see that the person leading the Fidelity Digital Asset platform is Tom Jessop, Who was the former president of Chain Inc.

Chainlink, Fidelity Labs, and Chain Inc can all be seen on the page of partners for the IC3 Initiative for Cryptocurrencies: https://www.initc3.org/partners.html

>> No.11413544

link is shit

>> No.11413552

>>11413536
I also noticed that, also Fidelity Labs belongs to Fidelity Investments.

>> No.11414258

>>11413552
2.45 trillion in assets under management. they're a big fucking deal. their stream this morning was good as well

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidelity_Investments

>> No.11414269

>>11414258
fuck i meant $7 trillion assets under management. minor 4.5 trillion dollar mistake sry

>> No.11414804

>>11413544
Checked
In all seriousness we already know we’re gonna make it. Let’s jist shut the fuck up.

>> No.11415052
File: 323 KB, 500x622, 128F3705-1DDB-4426-93FF-D1B3E0130081.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11415052

pee pee poo poo

>> No.11415427

>>11414269
https://www.relbanks.com/rankings/largest-asset-managers

Where is the $7 trillion number coming from?

>> No.11415743

Chain uses Stellar. Does Chainlink have any ties to Stellar? No. Zero.

>> No.11415898

>>11415743
Blockchain agnostic.

>> No.11415961
File: 138 KB, 500x246, 1534514237261.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11415961

>>11413536

>former president of chain
>chain

>> No.11415993

>>11413544
This. Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth. Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons. Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story. The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes. In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

>> No.11416059
File: 145 KB, 320x320, 1520998313634.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11416059

>> No.11416571

>>11415898
How come there aren't adapters for all other blockchains being built for LINK right now? I know Jonny made one for IOTA. Why isn't there one for Stellar, NEO, etc already built?

>> No.11416602

>>11416571

Kek can you imagine unironically asking this question?

>> No.11416689

>>11416571
> wasting time making adapters for other alts instead of finalizing everything before taking on the derivatives and api markets
Link will purge the market of shitcoins without unique use cases based on its interactions with eth smartcontracts alone.

>> No.11416695
File: 34 KB, 408x450, d1507408558370.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11416695

>>11416571
>How come there aren't adapters for all other blockchains being built for LINK right now? I know Jonny made one for IOTA. Why isn't there one for Stellar, NEO, etc already built?
Are you really this stupid that you are asking this question?

>> No.11416996
File: 59 KB, 500x523, 1539525999957.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11416996

>>11416571

>> No.11417018

>>11416602
>>11416689
>>11416695
>>11416996
Nice answer, pajeets.

>> No.11417032

chainlink has nothing to do with chain Inc.

chainlink is a pajeet scam