/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.11345283]

Realistic roadmap for chainlink 2019 events and prices? How likely is 50$

[Anonymous No.11345290]

>>11345283
Depends what bitcoin does bro

[Anonymous No.11345328]

>>11345290
bingo

[Anonymous No.11345357]

>>11345283
Mainnet
Usage
$2-5
We got non so far but hopes

[Anonymous No.11345478]

It is getting delisted from binance

[Anonymous No.11345506]

>>11345283
lol, you must be new here. LINK is a shit memecoin. Nobody with half a brain buys that shit.

[Anonymous No.11345510]

>>11345478
No, it's not.

[Anonymous No.11345529]

>>11345506
>Nobody with half a brain buys that shit.
Impressive, who knew half brain fags are correct sometimes, wow, but people with full brains do buy it.

[Anonymous No.11345530]

$6 2019 EOY

[Anonymous No.11345537]

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

[Anonymous No.11345547]

>>11345283
>>11345283
impossible

[Anonymous No.11345553]

>>11345283
$20 next year

[Anonymous No.11345629]

>>11345283
>How likely is 166x
the absolute state of /biz/

[Anonymous No.11345667]

None of you want to talk about this, but this bear market will be a LOT longer than you think. If we are lucky it will end in 2022 and 2023-2024 will be bull market years, but that's still optimistic. Chainlink won't go anywhere without BTC. 2019 LINK will likely still be under 50 cents, which will still be miles better than other coins that will have tanked another 50% from where they are now.

I suggest selling if you are not able to stomach waiting 6+ years.

[Anonymous No.11345671]

Link is not shit

[Anonymous No.11345675]

>>11345283
50 will never happen. 5 is MAYBE possible if we see a massive bullrun. 1 is a more likely “best case.”

[Anonymous No.11345682]

>>11345283
Realistic roadmap?
Nobody know

[Anonymous No.11345690]

1000 eoy

[Anonymous No.11345713]

>>11345690
We don’t know
1000 or 0 nobody know

[Anonymous No.11345776]

>>11345675
he said 2019 not 2018. Stop with the fud, it's ridiculous.

[Anonymous No.11346242]

>>11345675

[Anonymous No.11346496]

>>11345283
$50 is unlikely but $10-$15 by EOY is realistic