[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 144 KB, 573x602, 1537754558338.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11337160 No.11337160 [Reply] [Original]

http://boards.4chan.org/biz/thread/11297473/d2-ft-es-on-rk#top

> Posted 10/04/18(Thu)15:40:37
>What does AQL's have to do with Chainlink? Depending on the needs of the company, you'll be able to take a bigger sample (more nodes = more expensive, used for banking, identify confirmation for dapps, medical records, etc), or a smaller one (simple dapps = cheaper).
.
.
.
Minute 27:40 - 28:15
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5TQzHIFV-A&app=desktop
>Video uploaded Oct 8 2018

WTFFFFFFF WAS THE LARPER A REAL INSIDER!? WHAT THE FUCK IS HAPPENING IN THIS TIMELINE!!???

HE MADE THE POST 4 DAYS BEFORE SERGEYS PRESENTATION!!!!!!!!!!

>> No.11337177
File: 86 KB, 680x748, 1515715395300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11337177

>>11337160
OP, does the word Assblaster mean anything to you?

>> No.11337185

>>11337177
Do you think he was assblaster??

>> No.11337207
File: 15 KB, 385x266, A660DB00-CEA0-4B9F-B89B-EDD208C0C42F.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11337207

>>11337177
Fucking checked.

>> No.11337216

>>11337160
Sergey is such a pure soul. I hope he exitscams biz. You don't deserve him. I would be chearing and clapping if he did.

>> No.11337231

Was he assblaster?? Do you guys think assblaster and sherlorlink are the same guy?

>> No.11337238

>>11337185
Yup

>> No.11337243
File: 409 KB, 1413x1016, 1539047037394.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11337243

>> No.11337286

>>11337160
Holy shit so what does the code mean? D2 is obviously PSD2, feels like ft would then be swift..

Psd2 swift creates ___ network?

>> No.11337295

>>11337160
>5 years

>> No.11337297

>>11337238
I can understand why he wouldn't want to use his old trip tho. He lost people a lot if money with coinmetro.

>> No.11337307

Why is there only five people in the audience?

>> No.11337308
File: 12 KB, 236x236, 8e9ea894565de645bc83e29d7da590be--fastfood-big-mac.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11337308

>> No.11337312

here’s the full larp thread op mentioned
>>/biz/thread/S11297473

>> No.11337314

>>11337307
I counted 25, watch the whole video

>> No.11337316

>>11337160
Can somebody please explain this to a brainlet? Holy shit I am lost

>> No.11337328

>>11337312
he said hold link for five years.

>>11337314
ok im still watching it.

>> No.11337330

>>11337295
If this dude is AB it's funny how he went from "3$ may 2018" to "5 years for the price to explode". Either way, it's obvious this dude was the real deal. I will believe his December 2019 prediction. I will hold as long as it takes. We will make it people. Anyone who does not believe this is the future has a mental disorder.

>> No.11337339
File: 51 KB, 606x346, E1480B45-4604-4D6B-9ACC-4F0E0B696276.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11337339

anyone solve the riddle?
>D2 FT ES ON RK
some to start out with..psd2 swift mulesoft

>> No.11337340

>>11337160
Thanks OP now I’ll sleep well at night reassured I’m going to be a millionaire in a few years

>> No.11337352

>>11337330
>I will hold as long as it takes
thats fucking stupid if thats the case. Im taking my money out and keeping my value instead of riding the bullshit roller coaster.

the whole assblaster thing has me confused

>> No.11337366

>>11337328
>he said hold link for five years
5 years is nothing if link can give eth levels of gains

>> No.11337368

>>11337339
PS(D2) SWI(FT) US(ES) XXX(ON) (R)IN(K)EBY?

>> No.11337379

>>11337366
>>he said hold link for five years
>5 years is nothing if link can give eth levels of gains

not really, most of us are poor fags and don't hold that much link. People working a regular job will be making more money in 5 years then they would be holding link

>> No.11337387

>>11337216
A million times this

>> No.11337406

5 fucking years just for a 15-150 dollar premice range?

Fucking hell Ill be a 30 year old boomer and that point. What a fucking rip off.

>> No.11337409
File: 356 KB, 612x468, 0DA4C4BA-0E14-4D2E-86A7-0C1FB19CB478.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11337409

my iq is too low for this kinda of shit i hope you guys solve the riddle

>> No.11337412
File: 140 KB, 708x916, 1538693219577.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11337412

Can someone explain this? Because the LINK in this image has nothing to do with chainlink...

>> No.11337420

>>11337406
i already am

>> No.11337425

Larping faggot. No one knows where this will to. December 2019? Jese christ another retard guessing another date.

LINK holders are fucking idiots.

LINK is a good coin but jesus you guys believe any fucking Larper.

>> No.11337440

>>11337425
it has to be before 2020 at least. iirc that's when psd2 takes effect.

>> No.11337458

>>11337440
The insider said that minimum 5 years because of pds2 legislation. I'm bullish on link but he might have a point

>> No.11337467

>>11337458
i know. what im saying is the deadline is supposed to be 2020. Let me look it up real quick.

>> No.11337476

>>11337467
I actually think it's q1 2019 is the deadline. But it might take some time before the network is fully adopted.

>> No.11337481

>>11337467
the deadline is to have API's available for consumption, not to have them offered into smartcontracts

>> No.11337485

>>11337476
fuck im worng. Everything im finding was saying 2018.

https://www.bbva.com/en/psd2-next-deadline-year-away-where-do-we-stand/

>> No.11337490

>>11337458
There are so many use cases besides PSD2. Not to mention speculation as normies figure out the potential of link or atleast crypto whales. Price should continue to climb

>> No.11337504

>>11337490
five fucking years though? cmon

>> No.11337526

>>11337504
I don't believe it. Full adoption in 5 years maybe but price rises before full adoption

>> No.11337529

>>11337504
I mean, better than waiting until we're 60, I guess.

>> No.11337532

>>11337352
Good Luck timing the market.

>> No.11337548

>>11337529
im 31 and a neet atm. Only thing i have left is joining the army if they take me

>> No.11337578

>>11337379
How much link do you have? Also what is stopping you from getting a regular job?

>> No.11337588

>>11337406
30 is still very young anon

>> No.11337615

>>11337548
better hurry with that anon. If you're a burger, the army won't take you after 35. Might be an ok way to get fit and pass the time until the singularity.

>> No.11337616

It's funny how all the neets get triggered with the 5 years prediction. I mean, before crypto, no one would ever think of becoming rich like this. The 2017 bull run really ruined the lives and minds of a lot of people...If all you have to do is wait 5 years to become extremely wealthy (assuming you have more than 5K LINK), I don't understand all the fags who're complaining. I will make it by 2020 (100K stack) but even if I have to wait until 2023, life goes on. Don't get fixated on price predictions. Live your life, check the price every once in a while in case some absurd pump happens and you miss it. We WILL make it.

>> No.11337644

>>11337177
Checked and redlisted

>> No.11337656

Does anyone know how many links does assblaster has?

>> No.11337661
File: 847 KB, 1809x2023, 1539043375607.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11337661

>>11337616
But I want to savor the making it with my marines. That why I hope the singularity just jump the price to 1k over night so everyone makes it at the same time.

>> No.11337668

>>11337656
Fucking autocorrect , please ignore the second "does "

>> No.11337721

>>11337656
He said around 200/300k if I remember correctly.

>> No.11337769

LINK
-1%

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

>> No.11337817

>>11337330
If you actually read his posts you would know he made both predictive statements. But leaned heavily on the long term progress of LINK. He would mention it reaching it's speculative value before its real value and the whole process taking a year to several years.

>> No.11337826

>>11337661
The singularity will come, sooner or later. Just be happy you are a part of this. That you had the chance to invest, at the earliest time possible, in the next life changing piece of tech. 10 years from now you will look back and remember these days with disbelief. Just become a better person in the meantime. You really don't want to become rich and blow it all like a retard.

>> No.11337883

5 years is a ridiculous amount of time especially with Crypto where the technology is rapidly getting better.
A better project is going to replace LINK, like Astraea.

>> No.11337889

Is 50k enough

>> No.11337910

>>11337817
I believe AB more than doubled his stack by now even though he said he didn't need to make risky choices like that because he had a good job and other investments. It was a perfect storm for someone in the know not to sell and rebuy lower. Anyway, I also believe he continues to come here and post. He will probably reemerge when LINK hits 10$ or some shit like that. For all the larp accusations, he was the real deal. He called the start of the bubble burst to a fucking T.

>> No.11337913

>>11337889
I also need to know, pls respond

>> No.11337920

>>11337826
Link already has an mcap of over 100M though, at best we can hope for a mcap of 10B if all goes well and that's very optimistic. We would get to about 30$ per token, you'd need over 33k LINK to get 1M from that, not an amazing investment it seems. I feel like betting on a lower mcap coin has a much higher chance of yielding a good ROI, am I missing something?

>> No.11337930

>>11337920
30 per token is a roughly a 100x from now...not bad at all.

>> No.11337935

>>11337920

muh marketcap

>> No.11337938

>>11337913
enough for what exactly?
the more the better, dont invest more than you are happy to lose

>> No.11337949

>>11337930
Of course it's not bad, but even if it does reach 10B, it would most likely take much longer to do so than a low mcap coin at around 10m for example to do a 10x which you could then reinvest instead of just missing all the moon missions by holding LINK all the way

>> No.11337956

>>11337920
>not an amazing investment it seems
jesus, how old are you?
just because a few shitcoins exploded last year does not make a 100x on an investement "not amazing"

>> No.11337961

>>11337938
I'm not greedy, I just want $50M+

But seriously, I just want to escape wagecucking for good. I'll never sell my Link, just stake forever and start selling rewards when the price is high enough

>> No.11337966

>>11337339
psd2 swift oracles on network

>> No.11337967

>>11337949
But at least it'd get to that price from real adoption, not hype. That means maybe it won't dump when the market does.

>> No.11337968

>>11337930
Also, ETH level gains is over 500x (from under 2$ to over 1000$)

>> No.11337977

>>11337920
>not an amazing investment it seems
That's why I say this board has gone to shit. Go invest in the stock market then. This fucking guy...
Nobody is talking about other shitcoins except you. If you just want to gamble, go to a casino. LINK is a safe bet. The safest bet in crypto. You just have to be patient.

>> No.11337990

>>11337961
>I'm not greedy, I just want $50M+
haha, but you are greedy
you can get out of wagecucking with 10% of that

>> No.11337996

>>11337977
This.
if you think there are going to be another flood of "moon missions" you arent paying attention to the market

>> No.11338025

Eoy:

2018: $0.5 - $1
2019: $1 - $5
2020: $5 - $20
2021: $20 - $60
2022: $60 - 150

>> No.11338078

>>11338025
Are you the larper?

>> No.11338101

>>11337160
Chainlink is love. Chainlink is life.

>> No.11338130

>>11338078
Yes and banks are suppressing the price of LINK. Banks have a huge bag to fill (multiple banks and each bank are looking to hoard 8 figures of LINK tokens)...they are squeezing every ounce.

>> No.11338138

>>11337966
This and checked

>> No.11338151

>>11338130
Dad works for Swift and said you’re a faggot.

>> No.11338158
File: 21 KB, 600x705, 1538043249809.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11338158

>>11338130
>Yes
You're not the larper

>> No.11338176

>>11337504
It won't be 5 years. Maybe not eoy, but we won't be waiting 5.
Ethereum as an example might have a lower supply, but it has barely scraped the surface of what it can do (mostly shitcoin icos atm) and look at how it has been valued. I unironically believe link will trigger the next bull while simulataneously purging unworthy shitcoins by allowing decent projects to realize their full potential.

>> No.11338187
File: 18 KB, 326x384, nfw.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11338187

>>11338151

>> No.11338202

fuck you faggots
$1000 EOY

>> No.11338223

>>11337949
You don’t understand the project. The circulating supply will be much lower than it is today. The modeling I’ve done has given me a circulating supply of 200m after staking, so a $10b market cap would be $50 per token.

>> No.11338233

SWIFT works with 11,000 banks...imagine each bank wanting a piece of the decentralized oracle network where trust-less data become valuable.

this is the reason why LINK has been long undervalued...accumulation. the big whales and market makers hasn't finished accumulating. they have one shot at pumping LINK and they are figuring how high can LINK pump but since this is a new tech, there is no benchmark so they are being careful to see how high it can go.

>> No.11338234

>>11337949
Also the circulating supply will decrease over time as more and more tokens are locked up. Buyers who want to stake will outnumber speculators, so tokens will exit the market quicker than they come in. This is the mechanic of the singularity.

>> No.11338316

>>11338234
That's a good point, but even with 200circ supply, I don't see LINK reaching the ridiculous 1000$ amount (that would be a 200B mcap!)

>> No.11338326

how long does it take to get ISO-9001 certified? maybe that's what's holding things up

>> No.11338346

>End of 2019
>5 years

This shis is starting to get me. Reee i want 1k eoy this year :(

>> No.11338369

>>11338326
assuming CL partnerships would all be seeking this ISO, it would take time for them all to get their respective ducks in a row - certification wise

>> No.11338465

>>11337406
where does he say this and how can he predict these prices?

>> No.11338506

>>11338316
If total crypto marketcap goes to 5T-20T then $1000 is fud

>> No.11338580

>>11338233
From whom are they accumulating exactly?

>> No.11338624

>>11338506
Sounds completely ridiculous, I guess it's not totally impossible but if so would probably 10 years or so

>> No.11338635

>>11338580
trading algorithms. they can paint a bearish chart (selling to themselves, bots) due to low volume and get people to think that the chart looks like it's about to dump. this causes people to panic sell

>> No.11338682

>>11337412
I highlighted that shit. Don’t believe it haha.

>> No.11338685

>>11338624
It’s not ridiculous. If you take crypto’s annual growth rate and extrapolate it out you get total market cap predictions of $3T and then $19T within 3-5 years. Crypto is on an adoption s-curve.

>> No.11338690

>>11338682
That’s also why I didn’t trust that larp. I found it in a PDF I think. It looked like breadcrumbs but was a huge stretch. Him saving that photo means he was in a breadcrumbs thread which is pointless because he should know everything if he’s an insider. I called him out on the larp too. I really think that guy is full of shit. He could be telling the truth but who knows

>> No.11338754
File: 199 KB, 613x636, Screenshot_20181009-140351~2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11338754

>>11337949
>he thinks every random 10m shitcoin will 10x.

>> No.11338787

>>11338685
Crypto market cap being in the range of 3T-20T I can belive, what I can't believe is 1000$ being fud. I understand LINK is a fudamental piece of the blockchain space, but even then I doubt it will have that big of a piece of the blockchain pie

>> No.11338806
File: 105 KB, 960x548, 1524885127231.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11338806

>>11338624

>> No.11338822

Fud incoming. They’re spamming the boards.

>> No.11338844
File: 358 KB, 521x488, 1536935816342.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11338844

>>11338822
Checked and based. Fudders will pry these bags from my cold dead hands.

>> No.11338854

I thought Assblaster was European and worked in London or Brussels.

>> No.11338871

>>11337656
>>11337721
I remember him saying her had around 320k spread out over different wallets, but that was like 10 months + ago. Everyone's stacks are bigger now

>> No.11338903

>>11338787
Evolve your thinking. Imagine that 90% of chainlink is either vested or staked - fairly plausible. Only about 35-50m May be circulating, so $1000 per token would give us a cap of $50b. At $3T, $50b is 1.67% of the market, which is equivalent to a cap of $3.3b in today’s market.

>> No.11338905

>>11338635

They are getting their Link OTC not through some shitty exchange lol.

>> No.11338909

>>11338905
Yes they are getting it OTC. With conditions.

>> No.11338943

>>11338903
What you say does make sense but 90% LINK being vested or staked is the part where we'll just have to wait and see.

>> No.11338946

>>11337990
Who do I share this board with? Go away.

>> No.11339130

>>11338905
theres 11,000 banks...not enough OTC supply to go around. how hard would it be to buy off exchange...if they can generate a 100x return. i'm sure they would figure it out

>> No.11339156

>>11337412
he's a larper. that's how you explain it

>> No.11339163

>>11339130
Banks aren’t buying off Binance. Lmao.

>> No.11339164

>>11337160
Larper? Holy fuck you faggots need to read the fucking whitepaper.
>What does AQL's have to do with Chainlink? Depending on the needs of the company, you'll be able to take a bigger sample (more nodes = more expensive, used for banking, identify confirmation for dapps, medical records, etc), or a smaller one (simple dapps = cheaper).
THIS WAS EXPLAINED IN THE FUCKING WHITEPAPER YOU BRAINLETS. THE LARPER WAS LARPING, YOU'RE JUST A FUCKING NPC, OP

>> No.11339185

>>11338903
>about 35-50m May be circulating, so $1000 per token would give us a cap of $50b.
That's not how circulating supply works.

If someone has link, they can choose to stake it or sell it.

If the price rises beyond the amount they expect to make through staking, they will sell.

Sort of like how an apartment complex is not on the market because the owners are making money renting out the units and don't care to sell, but might consider it if the price rises.

>> No.11339192

>>11339163
banks are buying from insider connections and insiders are buying from binance

>> No.11339217

>>11337160
chainlink has been exposted.. all chainlink posts/meme's are done by the marketing company that starts with L... look at his site.. he offers posts, replies to posts, copy pasta's new meme's. for 4k a month. it's just a scam. all chainlink p threads look the same

>> No.11339462

>>11339185
Not if they’re staked for a certain period of time. Also, the team’s tokens will be vested and the 350m for partners will be sold with a restriction against when they can be re-sold (this will be done via smart contract). So yeh, I’m right.

>> No.11340223
File: 400 KB, 1200x1200, 1534551068814.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11340223

we gonna make it brahs

>> No.11340241

>>11337160
look at this fake post with fake replies. no one actually cares about link. its all fake.

>> No.11340257

>>11339130
banks aren't buying this shit at all. Only price action happening is people on /biz/.

>> No.11340925

>>11339192
No. No they aren't. That's delusional anon.

>> No.11340956

>>11337966

>tfw kek show us the truth

Checked

>> No.11341016
File: 68 KB, 763x771, IMG_1123.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11341016

>>11340241

>> No.11341842

>>11337966
Checked, thank you based anon