Low unemployment is a myth

[Anonymous No.11289201]

The low unemployment rate that the republicans shill is a myth, the labor participation rate drop has coincided with it.

Drumpftards BTFO

[Anonymous No.11289219]

>>11289201
But the drop on the left graph clearly starts in 2008 while the right graph starts in 2010.

[Anonymous No.11289222]

>>11289201

>less people than ever are wagecucking
>this is a bad thing

If it was up to you democrats we’d have some perverse hybrid of corporate socialism where we all make 15 usd an hour and have free housing and food provided by amazon/facebook/McDonald’s.

[Anonymous No.11289229]

I could think about having an intelligent discussion about how figures like this along with inflation etc have been manipulated for decades but you had to make this about Muh Republicans which shows you are neither red pilled or smart enough to accept that kind of fact based discussion yet.

[Anonymous No.11289232]

>>11289219
this is irrelevant anon.

[Anonymous No.11289247]

>>11289219
It just means people aren't looking for work, so are no longer counted towards unemployment nor the labor participation rate.
>>11289222
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2qpuB_stEU

[Anonymous No.11289256]

All trump supporters have pea sized brains. They only chose to believe in alternative "facts" that support their agenda. It's their coping mechanism for the hatred they have of themselves

[Anonymous No.11289261]

>>11289201

AHAHAHA

drumpf

hilarious.

[Anonymous No.11289276]

>>11289261
Sack'o'manure fir brains.

[Anonymous No.11289290]

>>11289232
How is it irrelevant, the rate movements are not coincided. Labor force participation drops from 08-15 while unemployment drops from 10-18. How would labor force participation drop while unemployment rises for 2 years if there's some sort of relation? How would unemployment drop while labor force participation remains constant for 3 years if there's some sort of relation? Half of the graph is under Obama anyway lmao.

[Anonymous No.11289291]

>>11289201
Dems did the exact same thing under BHO.

Out of the workforce 6 months? You must not be job seeking. Take them out of the unemployment numbers.

Most prosperous economy evar!!!

[Anonymous No.11289310]

>>11289290

the movements dont coincide because the economy was imploding during those 2 years

[Anonymous No.11289339]

>>11289310
No shit, both trends start under Obama in the aftermath of 08

[Anonymous No.11289344]

>>11289290
08-10 is the recovery from the housing crisis the recovery was too fast for the participation drop to have an effect. the participation rate effects the unemployment rate without a doubt. 3% of the USA is 10 million people

[Anonymous No.11289355]

>>11289310
this exactly thank you

[Anonymous No.11289396]

What is the labor participation graph for 16 to 65?

[Anonymous No.11289412]

>>11289344
>the recovery was too fast
lmao what, the economy as a whole took like a decade to fully recover. There's no reason to think that a drop in labor force participation means all of those people are becoming unemployed, especially when the unemployment rate is decreasing. The evidence you've presented directly contradicts your claim. The obvious explanation that your graphs support is that several million people ended up leaving the labor force. They were more than likely boomers, who as an age group reaching retirement make up a disproportionate fraction of the population.

[Anonymous No.11289980]

>>11289219
increase of employment was started by obama. trump just likes to claim he did it like when america was built up by slaves, white people take credit.

[Anonymous No.11289996]

>>11289980
yeah, because those blacks would have built america all by themselves, like they did in africa

oh wait no they wouldn't have
because niggers are retarded and lazy- a terrible combination

[Anonymous No.11290020]

>oy vey everbody is working goy
>wages are at all time high
>you get 15 jew papers per hour

yeah not falling for it wagie
keep paying for my neetbux I have to make it through winter

[Anonymous No.11290027]

>>11289996
>not knowing egypt and libya is in africa.

[Anonymous No.11290049]

>>11290027
> ARAB'd

[Anonymous No.11290056]

>>11290049
>arabs arent black

[Anonymous No.11290159]

>>11290056
>w-we aren't worthless, look at these egyptians! WE WUZ EGYPTIANS !!! and look, they made these big triangles one time, proof that niggers are just as good as white people

[Anonymous No.11290482]

>>11290159
>blacks conquered egypt just as they will now conquer europe.
lol

[Anonymous No.11290625]

disease ridden shitskins are all equally worthless.