[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 67 KB, 800x748, 0469C7D5-6DD0-45CF-83BA-0A623EA592C9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11208762 No.11208762 [Reply] [Original]

It is getting to the point where not even those who doubted coins like NANO or REQ would never see a new high before 2019 at the latest have to think differently than the people who cautiously said otherwise. Which were you anon? I saw earlier in the year on /biz/ a lot of talk of a temporary dip but does that apply to bitcoin? Is bitcoin so ingrained that it is immune? You can see these ideas on reddit and /biz/ now but in early 2018 or late 2017 they were nowhere to be seen. Couldn't you have looked at a total crypto market cap below the 1 trillion dollar level without suggesting nobody had thought it wouldn't recover without first thinking it couldn't hit lows of 2017? Is any coin safe from this? What about bitcoin or ethereum?

>> No.11208777

>>11208762
kek. anyone who thinks this was actually a bubble in 2017 is a retard. the real bubble will be between 10-100 trillion total crypto marketcap. we are so early.

>> No.11208802

>>11208762
Jesus I had to read your shitty thread 6 times and I still don't fully understand what you meant.

>> No.11208815

>>11208777
Checked

>> No.11208830

>>11208777
100t market cap
one day ill be paying food with linda coin

>> No.11208892

>>11208802
Which part do you not understand?

>> No.11209001

>>11208802
This

>> No.11209216

>>11209001
I reread it and really do not see a problem with my post. I don't get why you guys are having such trouble with this but whatever. I am talking about a disconnect between the market. If you look back to 2017 whether you go on reddit or /biz/ or other forums there were feelings of an everlasting rise. This contradicted both people on the optimistic side and those more negative who at the time were ignored. Check the charts and it is easy to tell why. The whole year was green except a temporary summer drop. Even twitter influencers were calling for 100k bitcoin without first having some pullback or if so they might have thought a trajectory between 25k at the bottom would hold throughout a push. Now look at the opposite side of the coin where a bear market which is in itself only visible from those who did not call it previously until after it has ended. Never does the TA match until it has already happened. Well this is the opposite view of 2017. Before we had shitcoins multiplying at unheard of levels. Now not even people who previously were telling the bears they were wrong for not accepting that bitcoin could reach 100k before 2020 are falling to the other side. Doesn't this contradict the same logic that they said was not possible in 2017 but are now saying you are an idiot in 2018 if you do not believe them? This makes me wonder if bitcoin has permanently gained value simply because it has not lost value. In other words is bitcoin a safe haven because it has gone up for long enough that people trust it? Do you think this could not work out for reasons other than a lack of technological advancement or the general public not caring anymore as long as the price is not going up for awhile?

>> No.11209238

>>11208802

I’m with you anon, I can’t decipher wtf op is saying.

>> No.11209252

>>11208777
HOSANA

>> No.11209263

>>11209216
Good post.

>> No.11209279

>>11208777
>we are so early
>coinbase #1 app on the appstore
yes we are so early

>> No.11209294

>>11209238
Ok this is really starting to annoy me now. What the fuck do you guys not get? Let me dumb it down for you anons. Do the extreme rise of 2017 and fall of 2018 even out to an overall normal uptrend for main coins like bitcoin to now be considered in a regular upward price movement for the long term?

>> No.11209306

>>11209279

What? Where?

>> No.11209360

>>11209279

Reality check:

>Coinbase, Inc.
#36 in Finance

>> No.11209369

>>11209294
Didn't you debunk this in
>>11209216
>Never does the TA match until it has already happened.


>Do the extreme rise of 2017 and fall of 2018 even out to an overall normal uptrend for main coins like bitcoin to now be considered in a regular upward price movement for the long term?

You are asking for TA.

>> No.11209489

>>11208762
>>11209216
i cant understand what the fuck is being said at all in this thread OP take a fucking writing course or something, is english your second language?

>> No.11209983
File: 298 KB, 600x512, 1531674720274.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11209983

>>11208762
>It is getting to the point where not even those who doubted coins like NANO or REQ would never see a new high before 2019 at the latest have to think differently than the people who cautiously said otherwise. Which were you anon? I saw earlier in the year on /biz/ a lot of talk of a temporary dip but does that apply to bitcoin? Is bitcoin so ingrained that it is immune? You can see these ideas on reddit and /biz/ now but in early 2018 or late 2017 they were nowhere to be seen. Couldn't you have looked at a total crypto market cap below the 1 trillion dollar level without suggesting nobody had thought it wouldn't recover without first thinking it couldn't hit lows of 2017? Is any coin safe from this? What about bitcoin or ethereum?

>> No.11210040

>>11208892
>>11209216
>>11209294
you're not even the OP >>11208762, are you posting from multiple vpns?

Also I agree with everyone else here. You really need to work on your writing ability, it's atrocious.

>> No.11210112

>>11208762

Most alts are never going to reach their satoshi value highs ever again. nano, vechain, prett ymuch none of them will

>> No.11210989

>>11208777
Chiggity checked

>> No.11211028

>>11208802
>>11209216
>>11209238
>>11209263
>>11209489
>>11209983

Does /biz/ really have such a low IQ that they can't discern what he meant in the post or are these people trolling?

>> No.11211124

>>11211028
Thank you. I can't tell if it is because the other anons didn't want to read something longer than their short attention span of one sentence or if they were not smart enough to understand in the first place.