Link next month

File: 113 KB, 759x560, moon mission 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Link next month Anonymous Mon Sep 24 13:45:33 2018 No.11195355 [Reply] [Original]

The following month will be very interesting for link. Here are some events where link, or companies associated to link, will be presented.

Dreamforce 25-28th september
SFBW 5-12th october
Web3 summit 22-24th october
Sibos 22-24th october

Also eom predictions. My guess 1,5 eurodollars

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 13:48:56 2018 No.11195396 >>11195355 >Also eom predictions. My guess 1,5 eurodollars depends of whats announced.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 13:50:26 2018 No.11195415 >>11195355 There will be no mention of chainlink at dreamforce or sibos. get over it buddy.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 13:52:02 2018 No.11195435 >>11195415 This, you all keep falling for coordinated shill pump and dumps.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 13:52:15 2018 No.11195439 What is "1,5" and "eurodollar"?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 13:53:49 2018 No.11195456 >>11195439 One fiddy eurodorra.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 13:59:22 2018 No.11195531 >>11195355 Wow, Dreamforce starts already tomorrow - strap in boys.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:00:16 2018 No.11195546 >>11195415 I hope for major announcements, but then again chainlink partners could release something. >>11195439 that means one-and-a-half eurodollar

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:14:03 2018 No.11195668 >>11195415 Forgot to add that salesforce is planning to reveal thei blockhain related project on Dreamforce https://chainlink.news/salesforce/

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:15:53 2018 No.11195684 >>11195355 link is shit that solves no purpose. also, USA cant invest in it due to their TOS. also its not an investment due to their TOS. also, its a security https://www.reddit.com/r/Chainlink/comments/8gcix9/chainlink_as_a_security/

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:16:39 2018 No.11195694 >>11195668 They will mention azure not cl

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:17:57 2018 No.11195707 >>11195684 >look mommy I posted it again >mommy look look >ow mommy plz no don't hit me >i'm sorry mommy

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:19:53 2018 No.11195724 >>11195694 Azure is chainlink faggot

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:19:56 2018 No.11195725 >>11195707 >ignorance makes breaking the law OK >look copper look >ow copper plz dont jail me >im sorry copper

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:22:15 2018 No.11195747

SFBW and Web3 are the only two that matter. Dreamforce and SIBOS will not mention LINK this year. Stop deluding yourselves, there is enough bullish news out there without just making shit up.
Salesforce will announce their product, but they're not going to be shilling other companies on their big day(s). And SIBOS is guaranteed not to mention it. There's no reason to.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:25:27 2018 No.11195780 >>11195725 Except no laws have been broken, it's not a security and you mother will die in her sleep tonight. ooga booga bix nood you're a fucking nigger

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:29:01 2018 No.11195819 Chainlink will literally, genuinely, unironically and authentically be the main principal in the fifth industrial revolution and there is absolutely nothing that can stop this.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:30:34 2018 No.11195835 >>11195780 did you read the reddit link? people seem to think it is. did you read the whitepaper? why ban USA if you aren't worried its a security? did you look in your moms bed? shes fucking other men.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:33:35 2018 No.11195866 File: 135 KB, 704x1000, 1535179369722.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11195835 >>11195835 >did you read the reddit link? people seem to think it is. Some nobody on reddit has an opinion? Thanks, just sold 100k

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:35:29 2018 No.11195896

>>11195866
it fails the howey test dude. Its funds, in an enterprise (devs hold that 35% wallet for node commissions). Profit comes from that enterprise, outside of investors control.

believe what you want - but at least do your own research.

>It is an investment of money
>There is an expectation of profits from the investment
>The investment of money is in a common enterprise
>Any profit comes from the efforts of a promoter or third party
>Although the Howey Test uses the term "money," later cases have expanded this to include investments of assets other than money. The term "common enterprise" isn't precisely defined, and courts have used different interpretations. Most federal courts define a common enterprise as one that is horizontal, meaning that investors pool their money or assets together to invest in a project. However, other courts use different definitions.

>The final factor of the Howey Test concerns whether any profit that comes from the investment is largely or wholly outside of the investor's control. If so, then the investment might be a security. If, however, the investor's own actions largely dictate whether an investment will be profitable, then that investment is probably not a security.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:36:29 2018 No.11195902 File: 432 KB, 1500x1000, sergey chainlink.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11195355

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:36:38 2018 No.11195903 File: 788 KB, 750x1334, IMG_1142.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11195866 Some anime fag on 4chan is skeptical? Just bought 100k

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:38:49 2018 No.11195934 >>11195896 lmao are you the howey test nigger who submitted a complaint to the SEC then proceeded to say you don't know shit so the experts need to decide? lmao kys for FUDing a coin you don't own

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:40:45 2018 No.11195952 >>11195934 no? I love how you think only one person believes its a security. look at reddit talking about howey test. google it. mutliple people are making the same point. its a fucking security.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:42:25 2018 No.11195968 >>11195724 It’s microsoft cloud you moron.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:49:13 2018 No.11196048 >>11195903 >IMG_1142.png >>/biz/image/NLlAygTz5gc6NZCKC2m9eA You are one of the least intelligent posters I have ever seen on this board.

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:51:01 2018 No.11196067

>>11195896
chainlink passes the second Howey item because sergey has never shilled it or led investors to believe it will gain value.
the fourth item is also questionable, and an argument against
>The final factor of the Howey Test concerns whether any profit that comes from the investment is largely or wholly outside of the investor's control. If so, then the investment might be a security. If, however, the investor's own actions largely dictate whether an investment will be profitable, then that investment is probably not a security.
is that the investor's own decisions (operating the node) will determine a large portion of their return.

pretty much every shitcoin project out there is definitely a security but chainlink has a pretty strong argument against this, particularly once the mainnet is operational

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:51:46 2018 No.11196075 File: 1.37 MB, 750x1334, IMG_1106.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11196048 >he thinks i'm the only one who posts pepe

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:56:14 2018 No.11196116 >>11196075 You are clearly the only person dumb enough to post a screenshot from your iPhone rather than saving an image. Unless you are insinuating someone else took an identical screenshot.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 14:58:22 2018 No.11196137 >>11196067 running a node is not how an average investor will use the token, nor or they made aware that they are only able to buy less than half the tokens when they go to purchase them. But whatever, be delusional. Time will tell,

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:01:56 2018 No.11196177
File: 30 KB, 505x567, Thisismyfavoriteone_259e338415e6f2983bb8c66c1892563c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11196137
An ICO is officaly not an investment brainlet.
Man you're definitely that fuckhead who was acting smug he reported chainlink as a security haha. You were even too afraid to show actual proof.
Pleas KYS.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:02:31 2018 No.11196181 >>11196177 ? i have literally no clue what you are talking about i came from reddit.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:02:56 2018 No.11196185 >>11196137 those are shit arguments, you need to take a break and think of some more effective fud

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:04:42 2018 No.11196207 >>11196185 so most of the investors who buy btc run nodes?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:04:42 2018 No.11196208 >>11196177 Out of interest do you think LinkPool could hypothetically be classed as a security? I'm just curious since they didn't allow Americans into the crowdsale.

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:05:17 2018 No.11196213

>>11195355
Developers have also expressed interest in the ability to have external systems communicate initiate transactions to create users, create contracts, and update contracts on a ledger. While this functionality is not currently exposed in public preview, a sample that delivers that capability can be found at http://aka.ms/blockchain-workbench-integration-sample..

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:06:35 2018 No.11196224
File: 10 KB, 221x250, IMG_1293.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11196116
>You are clearly the only person dumb enough to post a screenshot from your iPhone rather than saving an image. Unless you are insinuating someone else took an identical screenshot.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:08:06 2018 No.11196252 File: 62 KB, 474x485, Reddit Faggot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11196181 >came from reddit >Thinks this is less worse Go back to your karma buddies, faggot.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:08:48 2018 No.11196265 >>11196208 i think chainlink is the security and i think linkpool is propagating a security. Difference is, linkpool seems to be run by people not in the USA so they might be OK. Chainlink developers are mostly in USA.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:10:27 2018 No.11196285 >>11196265 So what's your beef with Securities (Link is not one)? You hate freedoms or some shit? You a fuckin commie?

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:11:57 2018 No.11196302

>>11196208
Nah I don't think so, but USA is shit tier in such regulations. There are some companies in the USA that literally have to specify in a manual that you can't put a product in a microwave, because else they could be sued for not being 'clear' enough.
This is pajeet tier fud, don't worry too much about it.

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:13:30 2018 No.11196326

>>11196285
most securities are ponzi-schemes. link seems like one too.
>hey buy this token (can only buy 45% of the pool, rest are for devs)
>hey run this node (only those staking more link will get money)
>hey we promise youll make money (only those who are running a node, staking more, and rank high in devs db will actually make money)

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:14:06 2018 No.11196335 File: 231 KB, 500x376, 1530287830219.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11196181

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:15:59 2018 No.11196360 >>11196302 I'm not worried at all. I just like watching these retards make themselves try and appear intelligent. 10k Link and top twenty LinkPool contributor here.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:17:05 2018 No.11196376 >>11195355 i'm going to be working at web3 summit, hope to see sergey live there! i'm excited

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:17:26 2018 No.11196385

>>11196326
The team hasn't said any of those things, but fuck that. I wanna know why you think you have the right to tell me what to buy. The (((accredited investor))) scheme is an unconstitutional title of nobility. How about you go fuck yourself and mind you own goddamn business. I'll buy whatever the fuck I want to

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:25:02 2018 No.11196472
File: 101 KB, 966x525, wallets.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11196385
Total Token Supply of 1,000,000,000 LINK to be distributed:

>35% going to Node Operators and to Incentivize the Ecosystem
>30% will go to the Company for Continued Development
65% is controlled by devs.

People have the right to be told what to buy because it saves average joe from investing in a scam.

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:26:04 2018 No.11196494

>>11196385
>>11196472
>How much LINK is required to be a node operator?
>No LINK is required in order to be a node operator. However, holding LINK on your node (commonly referred to as staking) helps with ranking your node against others. Your node will also need some LINK in order to bid on smart contracts with the penalty amount. If the node is not selected to perform the job, or the node successfully completes the job, then it can retrieve that paid penalty amount.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:28:54 2018 No.11196531 >>11196472 First you said the rest are for the developers, now you're a backpedaling faggot citing where they explain how they plan to distribute it. Your first statement was wrong and you just proved it yourself, thanks.

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:30:48 2018 No.11196555

>>11196494
Again you played yourself, first you said the team claimed that staking makes you more money. Then you post their own words explicitly stating that you don't need Link to run a node, and nowhere do they explicitly say "more staked link = more money." Nice try Schlomo

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:30:48 2018 No.11196556

>>11196531
literally waht
>35% going to Node Operators and to Incentivize the Ecosystem
how else are they going to incentivize the ecosystem? its controlled by the developers, and up to their descression how its paid out. that means those funds are outside of the investors control.

>30% will go to the Company for Continued Development
also controlled by devs.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:31:50 2018 No.11196564 >>11196555 it literally says those that stake link rank higher. that means unstaked nodes will not get jobs. keep trying to call it not a security. anyone with a brain can see it is.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:33:16 2018 No.11196574 You're a lying greedy rat Jew, fudding faggot. Go fuck your mother. Extenuate your inbred Jewish lineage. I'm done playing your game, kike.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:33:33 2018 No.11196578 you are just mad you are proven wrong

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:37:22 2018 No.11196616
File: 94 KB, 953x1282, 1535751598067.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11196578
Nah. he's mad that he called you out on your bullshit, but you still refuse to admit it. Just go back to Plebbit, you're not fooling anyone here. We allready desroyed you in your original thread, so go cry to your mommy.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:38:11 2018 No.11196626 >>11196616 how can you refute that these funds, controlled by developers are inside investors control? >>11196556 >>11196564 easy part of the howey test. prove that worng.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:38:27 2018 No.11196627 File: 344 KB, 450x792, Screen Shot 2018-09-24 at 12.39.11 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11196116

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:38:28 2018 No.11196628 File: 1.08 MB, 1230x874, Screen Shot 2018-09-01 at 11.09.29 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11196472 >65% is controlled by devs. Do you have a brain tumor like john mcshitstain and this is why you say retarded things?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:39:13 2018 No.11196631 >>11196628 how are these not controlled by devs, but investors instead? >>11196556 >>11196564 every investor runs a node? every investor has control of those funds?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:39:35 2018 No.11196637 >>11196627 Kek

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:41:32 2018 No.11196657 Chainlink website redirects to this now: >https://www.howeycoins.com/index.html#investment-ladder Checkmate SEC fags.

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:43:22 2018 No.11196675

>>11196631
how much link do you hold, or are you really this retarded? What else is in your portfolio?
nobody is claiming what you're arguing against. We're just saying that the fact that many investors will earn much of their income based off of how/if they run a node, and that's an argument for chainlink not being considered a security

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:44:48 2018 No.11196685

>>11196675
>The final factor of the Howey Test concerns whether any profit that comes from the investment is largely or wholly outside of the investor's control.

part of the howey test is is funds are controlled by a common enterprise, and profit is largely outside investors control.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:47:06 2018 No.11196706 >>11196685 Got that email time stamp for me yet?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:47:29 2018 No.11196712 >>11196706 what timestamp? >>11196675 also my portfolio is just btc.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:47:59 2018 No.11196722 >>11196326 You are such a faggot

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:49:03 2018 No.11196734 >>11196722 I provide facts >You: herp derp you are a faggot. whatever man, i'm not the one investing in a ponzi-scheme-json-parser

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:49:22 2018 No.11196742 >>11196712 The one I asked you for in the last thread you made

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:49:52 2018 No.11196749 >>11196734 Enjoy being poor you BTC maxipad

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:50:23 2018 No.11196756 File: 125 KB, 1541x964, Yuri_red_alert.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11195355 now i cant get this C&C music out of my head!!!!ahhhhhhh

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 15:50:45 2018 No.11196759 >>11196742 Not a clue who you are? >>11196749 every shitcoin is based on BTC ratio. BTC tanks, shitcoins tank. Ive been invested since $260 - far from poor. also frequent /smg/ as thats the rest of my funds in robinhood.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 16:00:47 2018 No.11196852 >>11196759 Link is more valuable than BTC

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 16:05:27 2018 No.11196901 >>11196759 Weird, you say you come from Reddit and yet word for word match an earlier post from here. Any chance you have amnesia anon? Maybe if we give you a rundown of what happened it might help you remember

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 16:57:31 2018 No.11197518 >>11196181 That's literally worse then shitposting about it being a security. Kill yourself fucking reddit scum

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 17:24:06 2018 No.11197766 If you own 10k links you have 1 piece of a 100 thousand pieces cake. If the cake is well baked that'll be enough to keep your belly full for life anon-kun

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 17:26:00 2018 No.11197788 >>11197766 Just 1000 Link is the equivalent of 21 BTC

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 17:29:04 2018 No.11197813 >>11197766 >>11197788 Kek has spoken throught us tonight anon-kun

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 17:31:32 2018 No.11197836
File: 649 KB, 538x720, lonk.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11197788
>mfw i only just realised i hold the equivalent of 3000BTC in LINK, in terms of proportion of the network
>mfw I am absolutely certain that Chainlink will pass BTC's current market cap.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 17:32:11 2018 No.11197846 File: 136 KB, 734x737, 1529488960910.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11197766 based and redpilled

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 17:35:11 2018 No.11197866 File: 71 KB, 1024x640, 1515108798833.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11197836 >i hold the equivalent of 3000BTC in LINK >3mm link Larp

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 17:35:25 2018 No.11197872 Why would it be bad if chainlink was classed as a security?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 17:36:33 2018 No.11197882 >>11197872 The devs would have to fill in pieces of paper, thus crashing the price to 0

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 17:42:18 2018 No.11197931 >>11197872 It would make it slightly inconvenient for Americans who are not accredited investors. American poorfags think they matter.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 17:43:01 2018 No.11197938 File: 1.01 MB, 995x962, 1487144820008.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11196472 >>11196556 >>11196564 >>11196626

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 17:46:55 2018 No.11197976 >>11197866 Might want to redo your math there, champ

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 18:30:48 2018 No.11198417 https://techemy.capital/about#clients-&-projects >Ctrl+f "chainlink" >1 results found

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 18:34:55 2018 No.11198453
File: 892 KB, 1904x1532, lesson1+2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11196759
hi astro/delphi/whoever from another discord virgin shitgroup of inviduals who are cancer of this board. i would trade fkin 1000 pajeets to come here and spam this board with fuckin scams daily rather than having you fucks here.

you retards are posting some fuckin irrevelant fud, when LINK went 60+ positions on CMC in last months, and there's literally no point in FUDing this project on this board.

COZ

people with 3 digits IQ are invested in project.

EAT

A

DICK

Also I dont post often, because as a LINK holder I just pass on those fuckin threads.

Miss me with this gay shit FUD.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 18:36:33 2018 No.11198470 File: 216 KB, 1898x899, lesson3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] fuck delphi

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 18:37:37 2018 No.11198480 File: 220 KB, 1891x915, lesson4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] fuck astro. fuck LINK FUD. bitchass fuckin pedo/tranny lovers with 2 inch dicks

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 18:39:05 2018 No.11198494 >>11196531 >>11196555 pls anon, dont buy chainlink, it is just a meme and a complete scam. youre right anon, chainlink is a bad investment.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 18:39:19 2018 No.11198496 File: 241 KB, 1273x808, ezpz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] fuck watchbro

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 18:45:25 2018 No.11198554 >>11197931 Here's the loophole though... to be an accredited investor you only need $1M net worth so pretty much everyone holding more than 10k LINK will soon be an accredited investor. Suck on that SEC.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 18:49:48 2018 No.11198589 >>11197766 checked

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 19:17:28 2018 No.11198821 >>11196759 >21 posts by this ID Jeez you’re posting a lot about something you’re not invested in You ok sweetie? :)

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 19:19:44 2018 No.11198852 >>11196181 please go back, im asking nicely. we genuinely dont want you here.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 19:28:20 2018 No.11198933 File: 195 KB, 640x360, DIGITS.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11195355 >>11195866 >>11196177 >>11196722 >>11197766 >>11197866 >>11196555

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 20:50:45 2018 No.11199750 >>11195747 This x10000 Anons, stop being manipulated. October might be cool. September is going to be boring.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 20:51:48 2018 No.11199757 >>11196116 I don't know what's bait anymore

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 20:52:48 2018 No.11199767 >>11196208 LinkPool token is definitely a security, but since they don't operate in the USA I don't know how it will affect such thing to burgers

Anonymous Mon Sep 24 20:55:52 2018 No.11199800

>>11196326
Every fiat currency is a ponzi scheme
>hey work for me so you can earn currency X in exchange of your time
>hey buy this fancy thing that you don't really need but you should totally own
>hey we promise youll make money by working even more hours

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 20:56:23 2018 No.11199810 >>11196326 you fucking discord losers are cancer, biz is a the patrician bored of 4chan, we are actually successful individuals who come here for a laugh, fuck off back to r9k if you are so butthurt about LINK and its potential success

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 20:56:58 2018 No.11199819 >>11199750 Agree. Sergey presenting twice in a month is fucking huge.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 21:11:39 2018 No.11199956 just noticed chainlink has the worst fuds but also the worst shills. just bought 100k

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 21:17:49 2018 No.11200017 >>11195835 >did you not read the reddit link? I have never met a more easily fooled person

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 21:23:56 2018 No.11200091 File: 273 KB, 872x652, 1537620604313.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11198933 Chekt

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 21:34:49 2018 No.11200195 >>11195415 >There will be no mention of chainlink at dreamforce or sibos. get over it buddy. this is actually bullish for LINK, and if you dont already know why, then you wouldnt understand if i told you.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 21:48:53 2018 No.11200290 >>11200195 Swift gets first dibs

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 22:11:51 2018 No.11200504 >>11195415 CL will run in the background of so many projects. All these moonbois need "muh announcements". GTFO and go invest in TRON and VeChain. LINK is not for you.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 22:21:24 2018 No.11200599 Why did I just waste 5 minutes of my life on this thread. JFC.

>>	Brigadier General Damu !!6rIK3ka6TND Mon Sep 24 22:22:16 2018 No.11200604 File: 27 KB, 1000x600, 1511586469152.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11195355

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 22:25:02 2018 No.11200636 >>11198453 If you ever see astro, just remind him that he's a beta orbiter cuck who whiteknights for pedos who collect underage nudes on dating websites. He gets so angry because its true - so funny.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 22:27:01 2018 No.11200663 >>11200604 lmao We must secure the existence of our LINK and a future for White children.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 24 22:42:38 2018 No.11200818 >>11195747 This

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance