Strap in marines

[Anonymous No.11070206]

They removed all tasks after September 23. I think we all know what this means

[Anonymous No.11070211]

good god....

[Anonymous No.11070231]

>>11070206
NO! I need more time. There’s no way 40k is enough

[Anonymous No.11070235]

HOW IS THIS STILL @ 26 CENTS???????

[Anonymous No.11070241]

[Anonymous No.11070246]

>I think it can be done without too much troubles, but I'm afraid I won't have time to work on it because of September...

What did navyadmiral mean by this?

[Anonymous No.11070253]

Mainnet?

[Anonymous No.11070254]

>>11070246
Where did he say that?

[AccuallySergey !H2ggiG575I No.11070256]

Strap in boys!

[Anonymous No.11070264]

>>11070206
Guck you. I want more linkies !!

[Anonymous No.11070265]

>>11070206

>devnet -> rename

ooooooooooo

[Anonymous No.11070269]

>>11070264
Too late. You had a year

[Anonymous No.11070271]

>>11070246
Delete this. Seriously

[Anonymous No.11070275]

>>11070254

[Anonymous No.11070287]

>>11070246
delet

[Anonymous No.11070291]

>>11070275
>W-w-hat did he mean by this???

[Anonymous No.11070294]

>>11070275

"I've also heard that modals are a design smell, especially for errors."

What did he mean by this?

[Anonymous No.11070295]

End of the month exit scam confirmed.

[Anonymous No.11070322]

>>11070275
My god

[AccuallySergey !H2ggiG575I No.11070329]

>>11070275
>handle GETs differently from POSTs
Check em

[Anonymous No.11070344]

Can anyone explain in more detail about modals and what navyadmiral is talking about here?

[Anonymous No.11070350]

>>11070344

Why are the modals smelly? Are they stinky ???????

[Anonymous No.11070352]

>>11070294
Just saying that modal windows "stink" as a UI style.

[Anonymous No.11070358]

>>11070206
>finished accumulating on the latest dip
Take me to the moon Sergey

[Anonymous No.11070375]

>>11070344
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modal_window

[Anonymous No.11070397]

>>11070352
>our memes were so viral they corrupted the dev team
HODL me anons.

[Anonymous No.11070512]

>>11070206
>>11070211
>>11070231
>>11070235
>>11070241
>>11070246
>>11070253
>>11070254
>>11070256
>>11070264
>>11070265
>>11070269
>>11070271
>>11070275
>>11070287
>>11070291
>>11070294
>>11070322
>>11070329
>>11070344
>>11070350
>>11070352
>>11070358
>>11070375
>>11070397
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gs069dndIYk

[Anonymous No.11070529]

pee pee poo poo

[Anonymous No.11070534]

>>11070512

FUCK this is SEXY

PLAYING THIS NONSTOP ALL DAY IF CHAINLINK RELEASES MAINNET IN SEPT

[Anonymous No.11070597]

>>11070512
Such a perfect song for this moment

[Anonymous No.11070612]

>>11070534
>>11070512
>>11070597
Well damn son now I'm playing it too. Just tossed $420 at Coinbase to send some BTC my way for more linkies in time.

[Anonymous No.11070613]

>>11070529
Oh shit it's /r9k/. Nooo!

[Anonymous No.11070616]

>>11070612
heh. the weed number. nice

[Anonymous No.11070662]

>>11070612
Nice. I just bought another 500 to bring my stack above 25k.

[Anonymous No.11070690]

daily reminder reputation hasnt even been started on yet

[Anonymous No.11070698]

>>11070662
>my stack above 25k.
Wow that's a lot anon. I only have a meager 5k linkies.
I am worried that if it hits $10 I might get shaky and sell to pay off my student loans.

[Anonymous No.11070709]

>>11070350

[Anonymous No.11070713]

>>11070529
Based pee pee poo poo poster.

[Anonymous No.11070727]

[Anonymous No.11070732]

>>11070698
Dont fucking sell. Would you rather be a debt free wageslave or a fucking pimp lambo driving multimillionaire

[Anonymous No.11070742]

>>11070732
I just want enough money to start a little coffee shop, be an author, and have like 8 kids.
Maybe travel the world a bit first if it really takes off.

[Anonymous No.11070777]

>>11070742
You will need to be a pimp multimillionaire to do that

[Anonymous No.11070793]

fuck boys is 6.5k link enough to make it?

[Anonymous No.11070807]

>>11070742
Quit being a pussy and just drive a lambo and fuck hookers like a normal millionaire

[Anonymous No.11070814]

>>11070793
Only if you can wait 6ish years

[Anonymous No.11070815]

>tfw only 2k linkies and no way of pumping more fiat into crypto
>cant sell other shitcoins cause theyre 90% down

J U S T
U
S
T

[Anonymous No.11070826]

>>11070814
>tfw want to pump more fiat but afraid of waiting 3 days for the BPAY to go though and suddenly it happens before i can buy more Linkies

[Anonymous No.11070828]

>>11070793
Its more than enough. You just have to hold until link takes over the derivatives market

[Anonymous No.11070837]

>>11070815
Just sell them. If you know one coin is going to do far better than another one, why would you hold the worse one. It doesnt matter when you bought

[Anonymous No.11070846]

>>11070727
ID: 1kEOQ

[Anonymous No.11070847]

Rory mentioned on the CL Telegram that it would be pretty clear watching the pivotal tracker when mainnet would launch. I say it’s coming within a few weeks.

Questions are being ignored about the pivotal tracker schedule right now in the official telegram. Makes me think they are being cautious with NDAs.

[Anonymous No.11070848]

>>11070793
6.5 * 1k + staking = Im rich bitch

[Anonymous No.11070885]

>>11070807
But I grew up without a father and I would like to be the father I never had to my kids.
Lambos, Hookers, and gold diggers don't make that a reality.

[Brigadier General Damu !!6rIK3ka6TND No.11070896]

>>11070826
>tfw don't pump with fiat and you just have worthless fiat
>tfw if you had done it three days ago it would be cleared

[Anonymous No.11070905]

>>11070815
Fuck and I only have 100k and want more. I’ll pray for you sir.

[Anonymous No.11070908]

Remember. Dreamforce.

-V

[Anonymous No.11070917]

>>11070896
tfw i literally already pumped 3 days ago for my current investment. the 6.5k i bought in this morning.

[Anonymous No.11070918]

>>11070847
what's the liklihood that agg and repo are being developed without being public?

[Anonymous No.11070928]

>>11070847
>Questions are being ignored about the pivotal tracker schedule right now in the official telegram
Because pajeets with poor grammar keep asking retarded questions every ten minutes.

[Anonymous No.11070955]

>>11070206
It means they'll be adding more on Monday, brainlet. thats how it always works.

[Anonymous No.11070962]

>>11070698
Stake them for passive income. Are you mentally retarded?

[Anonymous No.11070963]

>>11070905
I thought I’d genuinely be content at 100k but it really doesn’t fucking stop. I have an addiction. AN ADDICTION

T. 132k as of today

[Anonymous No.11070968]

>>11070206
I'm with you brother

lets make this money

[Anonymous No.11071015]

If mainnet does release, why do you anons think it will cause a moon? All mainnets released so far for other projects have actually caused the price to tank. I just find it hard to believe something will moon significantly in this brutal bear market.

[Anonymous No.11071020]

>>11071015
because larpers have been promising them "singularity on mainnet" for almost a year now

[Anonymous No.11071030]

>>11071015
Because if they pull off even a fraction of what they are aiming to, this brings a lot of real world applications not just to ethereum standard contracts but any other dapp requiring real world datafeed - providing an adapter has been made for it, and from what I can tell they have tried to make that part as easy as possible. It won't just "moon,' it will change the market and many shitcoins will die as a result.

[Anonymous No.11071033]

>>11071015
main net = partner announcements

[Anonymous No.11071038]

>>11071030
a real world*

[Anonymous No.11071045]

>>11070847
Thomas has been answering questions and it's very clear mainnet won't be released without reputation

[Anonymous No.11071053]

https://www.docusign.com/blog/follow-docusign-fall-18-release/

"we have a pre-built integration with the Ethereum blockchain, the most popular blockchain for smart contracts."

[Anonymous No.11071059]

>>11071045
Finally some sense for these anons acting like it’s an episode of the Kardashians

[Anonymous No.11071098]

>>11071053
H O L Y F U C K

[Anonymous No.11071103]

>>11071059
>>11071045
suppose that aggregation and reputation have been completed privately and mainnet is released and it functions exactly as everyone hoped it would, would it matter if they boldface lied about not having a private repository?

[Anonymous No.11071128]

>>11071098
ur slow

[Anonymous No.11071137]

>>11071103
He has said there's no secret private repo but keep deluding yourself if you wish

[Anonymous No.11071139]

>>11071103
yes, it would

[Anonymous No.11071160]

>>11071137
no delusion, just pondering

[Anonymous No.11071191]

>>11070885
This is wholesome

[Anonymous No.11071218]

>>11070512
Based boomer post

[Anonymous No.11071220]

>>11070777

Checked.

[Anonymous No.11071223]

>>11070815

I sold my other cryptos at a massive loss to buy LINK

[Anonymous No.11071224]

>>11070690
Verifiably false

[Anonymous No.11071235]

>>11070727
>>11070846
Holy...

[Anonymous No.11071259]

2500$ EOY

[Anonymous No.11071272]

>>11071220

[Anonymous No.11071277]

>>11070275
He has his vacation in sept

[Anonymous No.11071314]

Doesn't the price always peak at mainnet -3 days and then dump heavily? I made a killing at the TRX main net by calling the top, this news seems bearish if anything

[Anonymous No.11071323]

>>11071033
Lol nah. There will be users.

[Anonymous No.11071348]

>>11071314
This ia not TRX or anyother crypro in the market right now.

[Anonymous No.11071359]

>>11070698
Jesus Christ..... you deserve a military tribunal and execution by your fellow marines firing squad

[Anonymous No.11071368]

>>11070905
Found the Jew in the thread

[Anonymous No.11071389]

>>11070846

[Anonymous No.11071442]

>>11071277
i thought i saw this too. anyone confirm?

[Anonymous No.11071451]

>>11070206
Exit scam Sept 22nd

[Anonymous No.11071683]

>>11070206
Nothing will happen that day. LTS is going to be implemented in October.

[Anonymous No.11071942]

>>11070206
exit scam on sep 23. get out while you can.

[Anonymous No.11072286]

>>11070246
>navyadmiral
Who?

[Anonymous No.11072315]

>>11070698
i plan to cash 1000 out at 100$ and the other 1000 at 1000$. you could structure it differently but i think its the best way to avoid gambling and ill still have made it

[Anonymous No.11072338]

>>11070918
Thomas has said zero chance. But also that the network basically functions as mvp already.

[Anonymous No.11072377]

>ctrl+f
>exit scam
>3 results
>99 posts
So many dumb dumbs and such a small majority of intelligent posters. No wonder this place is cancer.

[Anonymous No.11072414]

>>11071224
verify it then

[Anonymous No.11072493]

>>11070955
Checked - Dubs ot truth

[Anonymous No.11072496]

>>11071053
good read - ty op

[Anonymous No.11072829]

>>11070294
>imagine the smell

[Anonymous No.11073044]

>>11071368
ha a butthurt poorfag

[Anonymous No.11073145]

Just got up to 10k. Feels good for a poor fag. Avg buy 25.3¢.

[Anonymous No.11073339]

>>11070727
1kEOQ
1k End of Quarter?
That’s this month, are you sure kek?

[Anonymous No.11073455]

>>11071030
Not to FUD but oracles do already exist - they’re just centralised ones. Obviously decentralised is an advantage but it’s overstating it a bit to say it brings an entirely new range of functionality to ethereum. And how many contracts will be willing to pay extra for decentralised oracles.

This is the FUD that keeps me up at night so I’m posting it in hopes of being BTFO by someone on here. Obviously partnership announcements will give us huge gains if they happen.

t. 23k linklet

[Anonymous No.11073491]

>>11073455
you mean t. brainlet

[Anonymous No.11073509]

>>11073455
trust is expensive removing trust factor = moon

[Anonymous No.11073513]

>>11073455
you don't realise how important it is for oracles to be decentralised.
if youre using centralised oracles then you may as well not use blockchain tech at all

[Anonymous No.11073517]

>>11073455
>Muh centralized oracles

[Anonymous No.11073576]

>>11073491
>>11073509
>>11073513
>>11073517
Thanks frens I hope you are right

By the way, what did docusign mean by pic related?

[Anonymous No.11073601]

>>11073509
This anon gets it.

>>11073455
> imagine yourself
> imagine a pile of money
> imagine a bunch of layers of bureaucracy, lawyers, management, taxes, and various non-Aryans standing between you and that pile of money
> now imagine those layers were replaced with a series of computer programs
> the programs just_work.jpg
> you dont have to worry about bullshit or kikery
> imagine yourself
> imagine the pile of money
> imagine a giant ChainLink logo between the two

You know what to do.

[Anonymous No.11073652]

Reminder we're all gonna make it

[Anonymous No.11073666]

https://www.docusign.com/products/blockchain


Blockchain-based smart contracts
DocuSign’s vision has always been to make paper agreements digital and, ultimately, make them smart. A smart contract turns a contract into something like a computer program. The Internet-connected program monitors data and triggers actions relevant to the contract’s terms. For example, a crop-insurance smart contract might use a trusted Internet feed of weather data. If the temperature goes above 85 degrees Fahrenheit in April, the smart contract will automatically trigger a crop-insurance payout, again via the Internet. This total automation eliminates ambiguity and promises large savings in time and effort for all parties involved.

Although the field of smart contracts is still emerging, and a blockchain is only one of many ways to enable smart contracts, blockchain technology is catalyzing interest in smart contracts. Having been one of the earliest participants in the field, DocuSign welcomes this interest and is continuing to work at the forefront of research into commercializing smart contracts.

[Anonymous No.11073856]

>>11073509
Does anyone know how much “trust” costs. Anywhere I can look to get some real world figures?

[Ärimees !!z8a44b3aeWt No.11074379]

>>11070512
Über tune man, fuck <3

[Anonymous No.11074394]

>>11073856
Legend has it the secret recipe lies hidden under the sands of Zanzibar.

[Anonymous No.11074469]

>>11073856

http://changingminds.org/explanations/trust/transaction_cost.htm

[Anonymous No.11074583]

>>11070512
Do you remember?
The 24th night of September?
Serg was changin' the minds NoLinkers.
while launching main net that dayyyyy

Our hearts were were boomin'
watchin' the green candle reach the moon.
As we danced at the yacht, remember,
all the FUD we had to fight awayyyyy

[Anonymous No.11074610]

>>11074583
A select few of us know it's happening.
We will be rewarded for our patience

[Anonymous No.11074626]

>>11074610
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqczaF0KT3Q

[Anonymous No.11074658]

>>11070846
1k end of quartal

[Anonymous No.11074663]

>>11074610
>>11074626
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EElKJao9cmA

[Anonymous No.11074703]

15/10-2018

Soon

[Anonymous No.11074708]

>>11074663
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NU9JoFKlaZ0

[Anonymous No.11074726]

>>11074708
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2WilM6ljUg

[Anonymous No.11074740]

All we know is that we will be richer than our wildest dreams very soon

[Anonymous No.11074778]

>>11070846

[Anonymous No.11074814]

>tfw only have 100 links
No, please!
I get my paycheck in 3 weeks, have mercy Sergey

[Anonymous No.11074882]

you morons rushing for a main net; when whales will only sell the news anyway and crash the price -50% from here

[Anonymous No.11074928]

>>11074882
damn, you know your shit.
I appreciate the research you've put into this, and thank you for sharing it. I hope others seriously consider your warning

[Anonymous No.11074944]

>>11074882
Thanks just sold 100k

[Anonymous No.11074955]

ITS HAPPENING

[Anonymous No.11074964]

>>11071015
Because 99% of shitcoins are all hype and 0 delivery, so they hype up announcements and then the truth is underwhelming. CL is the exact opposite where they have no hype, and real collaborations, so when people realize big companies are actually going to use LINK, the price will go up.

[Anonymous No.11074981]

>>11071137
Reputation is 3rd party , so there could be private repo's for Rep that the team isn't part of.

[Anonymous No.11074994]

>>11074981
No. Stop.

[Anonymous No.11075018]

>>11074994
Stop what? Reputation is 3rd party, CL will have a reputation algo that the team runs, they have a solid idea of how that rep will work, it just hasn't started coding.

All these statements are verifiably true.

[Anonymous No.11075046]

>>11074994
They'll have some sort of basic reputation but most of it will be from 3rd parties' systems.

[Anonymous No.11075056]

>>11075018
>>11075046
Look up the recent AMA

[Anonymous No.11075072]

>>11070727
>1K EOQ

[Anonymous No.11075075]

>>11073517
Really nice that someone would compile oraclize fud lmao.

[Anonymous No.11075122]

>>11075056

I have, now you use common sense. Would the team , KNOWING that they will have 3rd party rep providers, go through all this, making all these connections, just to have reputation be something that they will trust "someone" to figure out? Or even worse just try and have their own algorithm run every SC on the planet? Either they are

>A) Kicking the can down the road and hoping they can make a perfect reputation system that has no flaws that everyone will use, also they haven't started on that system.

OR

>B) Have all their big players (SWIFT, Docusign, Accord etc) working on rep systems, as they have their own standards and will need to make sure their own SC's are airtight.

Which do you think?

[Anonymous No.11075132]

>>11075056
They'll say whatever they have to say to avoid being classified a security on compromising NDAs. Thomas and Rory love giving vague answers.

[Anonymous No.11075146]

>>11075122
>>11075132
You have been given clear answers but still prefer believing in conspiracy theories, suit yourselves

[Anonymous No.11075159]

>>11073601
>directions unclear
>masturbated while staring at my link stack on etherscan
>feelsgoodman.jpeg

[Anonymous No.11075200]

>>11070275
>Posted Sep 10, 6:55 PM
Check em.

[Anonymous No.11075221]

Boy that smart contract payout system seems oddly specific

[Anonymous No.11075233]

>>11075146

You aren't even addressing anything I've said, please kill your whole family then yourself you bad faith faggot piece of shit.

[Anonymous No.11075238]

>>11075221
>CTRL+F
>0 results for Chainlink
it's nothing

[Anonymous No.11075257]

>>11070529
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

[Anonymous No.11075266]

>>11071103
Bald faced. Not bold

[Anonymous No.11075275]

>>11075238
Cainlink is a middleware.
Transportation companies don't make much of a fuss about the brand of tires they use on their trucks, but they sure do use them.

[Anonymous No.11075312]

>>11075275
>Chainlink is a new revolutionary idea everyone, which saves billions of dollars for companies, being used by Swift, everyone is talking about
>Chainlink is useful middleware, not worth mentioning
you can pick only one

[Anonymous No.11075340]

>>11075312
>NDAs exist and big boi cumpanies use them
>NDAs don't exist
you can pick only one

[Anonymous No.11075350]

>>11075312
Hardly anyone outside of the finance industry knows what Swift is either, yet it's THE global banking network, and one of the very biggest influencers in banking.

Brainletism, it happened to you.

[Anonymous No.11075355]

>>11070206
I am actually an insider believe it or not. My dad is involved with the project and he told me that chainlink actually isn't a scam. It was the 1st time I've seen him in almost a year. He'd put on 40-50 lbs and grew a beard that was covered in crusted big mac sauce. He's my dad so I still love him despite the fact that he voted for Bernie initially and then Hillary. But man, I can't stop thinking to myself that he has absolutely lost his mind. He won't stop talking about how he's trying to convince McDonalds to change the name of their burger from "Big Mac" to "Oracle". My mom's boyfriend Tyrone even thinks that he's crazy, so it's not just me.

[Anonymous No.11075439]

>>11075221
>might use a trusted internet feed of weather data

OH NO NO NO NO NO

THEY'RE NOT USING A TRUSTLESS SYSTEM

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.11075457]

>>11075439
>he thinks trustless oracles = trustless sources
lmao

Protip: the individual sources are never going to be trustless. That's not what oracles do.

[Anonymous No.11075468]

[Anonymous No.11075484]

I can't believe I just bought this stupid shit.
Just tell me the scam already. I want to enjoy posting pinkies tomorrow morning.

[Anonymous No.11075529]

This market is dead.

[Anonymous No.11075541]

Price singularity of 1 LINK = 1 BTC on 9/23

[Anonymous No.11075548]

>>11070727
hng

[Satan No.11075556]

FUCK, are both NANO and LINK really explode at the same time in September?
To hell with it. I'm just going with 50% of my portfolio in each and not move it for six months.
The two only really worthwhile projects in crypto right now anyway.

[Anonymous No.11075575]

>>11075556
nano exploded already bro. what you are seeing is the agony of bagholders pumping and dumping .

[Anonymous No.11075602]

>>11075146
There have been no clear answers, just "when we begin to work on aggregation and reputation it'll be on the pivotal" or "when main net is getting ready to be released it will appear on the pivotal".

They don't want to possibly reveal any collaborations protected by NDAs. We'll find out soon enough what is going on, but anybody with half a brain who looks at the Pivotal can see there's obviously some sort of release or announcement coming up

[Anonymous No.11075604]

>>11072377
Checked

[Anonymous No.11075613]

>>11075575
Sure, whatever you say fren. I have insider info but can't prove it. Look back at your comment in two weeks and you will understand.
But if you are in LINK you will still make it though. So just keep on that, bro.

[Anonymous No.11075640]

Why is my bitcoin transaction from coinbase to binance still pending fuck I need my linkies

[Anonymous No.11075656]

>>11070206
Exit time?

[Anonymous No.11075660]

>>11074469
that's a rare sergey man

[Anonymous No.11075673]

>>11075200
Checkd

[Anonymous No.11075780]

Anyone remember this shit from last year? A bunch of /pol/tards thought something big was happening September 23rd of last year..what if it was really about chainlink this year

[Anonymous No.11075920]

>>11075439
To dispute this FUD I'd probably say this is normie speak for trustless. It can be trusted because it is trustless. Normie wouldn't get this, all they care about is can it be trusted?

>it can
>$1000 eoy

[Anonymous No.11075988]

>>11070807
For real though

[Anonymous No.11076022]

>>11075484
kys faggot

[Anonymous No.11076146]

http://fintechconferences.com/?gclid=CjwKCAjwuO3cBRAyEiwAzOxKsuf7qPg92upktwvv5Rw_xLth5PlqIlYCb6HoOQeuLpbn4Cf2sk0D_xoCLxYQAvD_BwE

tik tok tik tok

[Anonymous No.11076149]

>>11075780
It was /x/ as well as /pol/. I've been thinking about this recently. The ChainLink ICO was 4 days before this.

[Anonymous No.11076162]

>>11073145
good stuff marine, congrats

[Anonymous No.11076170]

>>11075780
>>11076149
Can you elaborate on this? I don't remember. If the familylarper is real then Main net goes live on 9/24 and announced 9/25

[Anonymous No.11076198]

>>11075920
Agreed. It's just normie speak

[Anonymous No.11076200]

>>11076170
Family larp was literally shit tier and not believable at all though

[Anonymous No.11076206]

>>11076170
It was to do with the world ending. There of course were people on /x/ spouting the standard doomsday apocalypse shit, but on a more subtle level I think this was to do with the new world that would come from smart contracts and chainlink. Read Revelations chapter 12 for more info.

[Anonymous No.11076244]

>>11071015
Because they are attempting to not be labelled as a "Security". You may only advertise your product to investors if you have a working product. You may not guarantee profits and mislead the public. Working product -> allows you to release partnerships without it looking like you're misleading.

[Anonymous No.11076302]

>>11076200
He dropped affirm

[Anonymous No.11076315]

>>11076200
How would you explain the Affirm lead, which legitimately isn't discussed on /biz, and is a credible possibility.

His credibility is a debatable point. The only thing that makes you think it's a larp is because of his comments about Coinbase, but that isn't out of the realm of possibility when you consider that he is claiming to be a family member, which means that he wouldn't have a razor sharp understanding of all the key aspects of Chainlink, but just what he picks up here and there in passing.

[Anonymous No.11076320]

>>11076315
I searched the archives and found nothing beyond his post. Thats what makes me think he could be real.

[Anonymous No.11076381]

>>11076315
mfw i I'm the anon who got him to drop the affirm lead and got him to talk about coinbase. I think he is a larp who was probably on affirms website and saw the salesforce logo and decided to use that as "proof".

[Anonymous No.11076388]

>>11076149
my bad (same guy, on computer instead of phone), lost my original paragraph while phoneposting because of a finger slip, meant to include /x/
>>11076206
plus I think it aligns with peoples' thinking that kek was going away for a while - the insane digits and memes slowly drifted over here to /biz/. I mean this shit is crazy. There's new information almost every day now and the memetic power behind chainlink cannot be denied.

[Anonymous No.11076428]

>>11076381
Why would he know to go to the affirm website? He was asked to provide a connection that biz hadn't seen before and delivered.

[Anonymous No.11076454]

>>11076146
Will sergey be there?

[Anonymous No.11076464]

>>11076428
Through Twitter following. He is not credible at all

[Anonymous No.11076479]

>>11076454
judging by the topics i think he would have either an interesting time, or its all old news to him and he just goes to meet people who work in his field of reach.

[Anonymous No.11076488]

This has gotten me irrationally exuberant.

[Anonymous No.11076489]

>>11076388
>plus I think it aligns with peoples' thinking that kek was going away for a while - the insane digits and memes slowly drifted over here to /biz/
checked

[Anonymous No.11076531]

>>11075439
It could be viewed as they trust Chainlink's oracle, because it is trustless. Just a terrible way to describe it.

Checkmate.

[Anonymous No.11076591]

>>11076206
>>11076388
>kek was going away for a while
kek is not real you know this right?

[Anonymous No.11076600]

>>11076315
he looked on sergeys twitter and saw that he was following Affrim. that's the entirety of his credibility.

[Anonymous No.11076609]

>>11076591
>doesn't get digits

[Anonymous No.11076612]

>>11076591
>kek is not real you know this right?
Quick. Pile on the dubs to disprove this post marines.

[Anonymous No.11076633]

>>11076591
Found the NPC

[Anonymous No.11076650]

>>11076633
Kek speaks.

NPCs btfo

[Anonymous No.11076655]

>>11076633
czequed

[Anonymous No.11076662]

What does this mean?

[Anonymous No.11076668]

>>11076162
Thanks marine

[Anonymous No.11076698]

>>11076662
what does that mean?

[Anonymous No.11076776]

>>11076633
P R A I S E

[Anonymous No.11076840]

>>11076662
>>11076698
Guessing it's like a car gps that adjusts your time of arrival based on speed/conditions etc

[Anonymous No.11076933]

>>11076840
fug anon what a great summary
how do I unironically get gud at explaining through examples? My weakest communication skill by far

[Anonymous No.11076992]

>>11076933
>>11076776
>>11076489
W-will I make it? I can't afford any more.

[Anonymous No.11076996]

>>11076933
LSD is helping me think about abstract concepts in pictures or illustrated visualizations

[Anonymous No.11077051]

>>11076992

[Anonymous No.11077106]

>>11076996
Oh trust me I am good at that.
I am about 85% percent certain I bit into a san pedro cactus when I was visiting family in the midwest as a little kid, I have all these extremely trippy memories and nightmares from when I was 3 and I had to go to therapy for a few months afterwards. I thought at the time that I'd gotten a really bad flu but when I rediscovered psychs in college it was way way too familiar.
My problem isn't the visualizing. It's communicating to other people. I actually have an idea for a crazy as shit invention that will make it a moot point but until then I ought to learn to put concepts I grasp easily into better terms for others around me.

[Anonymous No.11077121]

>>11076591
How do you know kek “isn’t real?” What IS real? Do you know everything about everything? There is plenty that is misunderstood about our universe.

[Anonymous No.11077168]

[Anonymous No.11077190]

>>11076662
wrf, I thought I was in every channel, how do i get into this one?

[Anonymous No.11077267]

>>11076992
You'll be fine, marine. Owning any amount of link puts you ahead of 99.9% of the shit normies out there. Hold on for enough years and you'll be a millionaire.

[Anonymous No.11077276]

>>11070727
>1kEOQ
End of quarter? Is it really this close?!

[Anonymous No.11077335]

>>11077267
checked

[Anonymous No.11077352]

>>11075340
Doesn’t seem like many people understand the actual use(s) of NDAs.

Why would any large companies enter into an NDA with ChainLink that forbids the discussion of ChainLink. Also, why would ChainLink be okay with a bunch of whos like Market Protocol making announcements but not major companies?

Anyone who believes there are thousands of signed, notorized NDAs sitting around and that is why no one important is talking about ChainLink is (willfully) delusional.

[Anonymous No.11077383]

>>11077352
>Why would any large companies enter into an NDA with ChainLink that forbids the discussion of ChainLink.
>Why would any large companies enter into an NDA with ChainLink that forbids the discussion of the large companies

FTFY

[Anonymous No.11077406]

>>11077352
You can't think of one reason to have an NDA, or at least to remain silent until the network is actually in use?

[Anonymous No.11077414]

>>11076992
You have 370 more than 99.9999999% of the worlds population anon. Holdfast marine.

[Anonymous No.11077418]

>>11077106
i see your problem now and i experience it sometimes too.
but i think what unironically helped me with this is listening to hiphop. not the typical blingbling bullshit but conscious rap or sth like that. they use a lot of metaphors some of them really make me smile because they're so witty. idk i guess i kinda adapted to this kind of thinking over time.

[Anonymous No.11077437]

>>11077352
because of the SEC most likely. Imagine how much hype your average shitcoin would get if they were mentioned in the same breath as SWIFT, Digital Asset, Cryptlets, etc. It would be a quick way to get classified as a security and lose any momentum that you had

[Anonymous No.11077454]

>>11076149
spoopy

[Anonymous No.11077473]

>>11077437
You contradicted yourself. Link is openly talked about with Swift (and Cryptlets just had Sergey’s contribution prior to ChainLink even being conceived, I think people here will be surprised to discover everything being accomplished by Enterprise Smart Contracts without ChainLink and no plan to use it).

Also, NDAs wouldn’t help with the SEC in any way regardless; what do you even mean?

[Anonymous No.11077490]

>>11077106
I unironically had a similar example ready to go of the automatic petrol 'left' gage in a car but couldn't quite get it succinct enough. Look at idioms and metaphor meaning lists and you'll start being able to form you own. Biz isn't best place for idioms cos autism is black and white. Look how much ducks in a row has taken off in last 2 days after it was explained.

[Anonymous No.11077523]

>>11077406
I can think of millions of reasons to have an NDA: but not of one that forbids large companies from expressing interest in your product. No one would do this.

[Anonymous No.11077594]

>>11077418
https://youtu.be/mV84OxugDtY

[Anonymous No.11077627]

>>11072377
>small majority
>we’re the dumb dumbs

[Anonymous No.11077628]

September 23

>My birthday
>The return of christ
>Release of the mainnet

I AM GOD

[Anonymous No.11077633]

>>11077523
How about keeping a low profile so you waste minimal time talking to hyped people who don't matter? The point is to work on the product, not stroke eachother off in public.

[Anonymous No.11077760]

>>11076633
Showed that cocksucker NPC.
KEK IS REAL!

[Anonymous No.11077770]

>>11077628
guille?

[Anonymous No.11077773]

>>11077523
Have you ever been in a corporate environment?

[Anonymous No.11077781]

>>11077523
really? new technology that is going to save trillions of dollars is about to hit the market and you can't see of a reason to keep quiet about it?
so you'd rather have your competitotrs be ready instead of getting caught with their pants down

[Anonymous No.11077785]

>>11077633
No, you’re trying to make stuff up. No one would enter into an NDA with: Microsoft, Docusign, etc with the stipulation that those companies and their agents cannot mention them...it just wouldn’t happen. That’s not even considering the liability headache.

This isn’t even the real point of an NDA anyway. It’s just such a dumb suggestion to make, I wish people here would be more realistic.

[Anonymous No.11077790]

I have to ask
Is 13k enough to make it

[Anonymous No.11077815]

>>11077790
all in at ~3k here
believe it fren
picking up another ~1-2k tomorrow with my last paycheck

[Anonymous No.11077834]

>>11077773
Yes, I’ve been in corporate engineering and I’ve started three companies where we had to use NDAs for various purposes: hiding product design, hiding logo ideas, generating proprietary formulation, keeping details privately general.

NDAs don’t hide EVERYTHING, they are for specific details and specific relationships, usually to prevent proprietary advantages your company offers from being disclosed by those individuals with which you share that info

[Anonymous No.11077858]

>>11077781

They have a fucking website and a white paper and it is an open source project for fucks sake. They also aren’t being demure about their goals.

[Anonymous No.11077880]

>>11077858
yeah if they didn't they wouldn't be making a decentralized network, retard

[Anonymous No.11077903]

>>11070206
what the fuck, this has to be a paid shill no way this many autists actually think a glorified json parser is going to moon.

[Anonymous No.11077925]

bump for 300 reply link thread

[Anonymous No.11077956]

>>11077880
You’re being willfully dumb and smoking the hopium. Every smart contract company is openly talking about their projects and progress. They aren’t sitting around waiting for a small company to make a network of oracle nodes.

[Anonymous No.11077979]

>>11077523
I work in IT, we have to sign NDAs all the time. Say we have ibm come in and talk about a new line of servers that aren't out yet, they make sure we have an NDA before doing so. It's so they don't lose a competitive advantage, or so they don't lose the thunder of announcement. You think apples vendors didn't have one when before they announced the new iPhones?

[Anonymous No.11078007]

>>11077903
The autists are 100% real. There are probably a few pnd groups too, but there really are a lot of people without any professional relationship to chainlink who spend a lot of their free time thinking about it.

[Anonymous No.11078020]

>>11077979
You’re comparing IBM to SmartContract.com. Also, post pictures of those NDAs, I guarantee the stipulations are only regarding important technical details regarding the product/service offered. Wouldn’t prevent mentioning of having services provided by IBM

[Anonymous No.11078029]

>>11078007
t. me

[Anonymous No.11078045]

>he doesn't know that LINK will dump hard upon mainnett

[Anonymous No.11078067]

>>11070512
I love you guys

[Anonymous No.11078073]

>>11070918
fuck all... but i asked before if high value contracts could be executed safely without reputation and aggregation contracts and the answer was yes. If the contract maker trusts the data providers

[Anonymous No.11078082]

>>11078045
if it does then I hope mainnet is tomorrow so I can get more than 2k extra stinkies with my paycheck

[Anonymous No.11078105]

>>11077628
Mine birthday too, we are gonna make it fren.

[Anonymous No.11078160]

>>11078007
t.me I read about oracles daily /smart contracts

[Anonymous No.11078232]

>>11074708
wait is that the chick from westworld

[Anonymous No.11078264]

>>11078020
You're right. We can't talk about the whatever they haven't announced, but are certainly allowed to say that we're working with IBM. In this case though, the theory is chainlink is going to give these law firms and banks a competitive edge. It's not all that far fetched to think that Microsoft wouldn't want to talk about that relationship until it's ready to go. Here's an IBM example where they are telling devs they're covered by NDA just for attending a conference

[Anonymous No.11078294]

>>11077190
We added it recently. All users in the discord should be there by default

[Anonymous No.11078349]

>>11074583
Nazarov! Mainnet in September
Nazarov! Big Mac Sauce forever
Nazarov! To the moon we fly awayyy

[Anonymous No.11078497]

>>11077777

[Anonymous No.11078560]

>>11078264
Just saying “covered by NDA” doesn’t mean shit. All the attendees had to sign something (digitally or physically) in order to enter into a nondisclosure agreement.

Microsoft isn’t using ChainLink. I know there is speculation, but that is one thing I can actually say with certitude: Azure’s Enterprise Smart Contracts May have had contribution from Sergey while Cryptlets, but that was before ChainLink, and there is no relationship with the ChainLink network (I have much deeper info regarding this, but I’m not going to share it here, so I guess you’ll have to make up your own mind as I know the words of an anonymous person don’t hold much weight, nor should they).

Additionally, I just don’t buy any of this NDA stuff.

[Anonymous No.11078633]

>>11077925

[Anonymous No.11078658]

>>11078560
> i have info but i won’t share it
You sound like a teasing bitch, anon

[Anonymous No.11078661]

>>11070206
Puzzle larper where are you.

er ds nk le

[Anonymous No.11078687]

>>11078560
ok cool.
So Sergey was working with cryplets and got fustrated by the institutional incompetence. He proceded to solve the oracle problem and start his own company.
Then when crypleys fails, they will use chainlink.

This story has played out hundreds of times before in many industries.

[Anonymous No.11078694]

>>11078658
sounds like a larper desperate for attention to me

[Anonymous No.11078707]

>>11078294
Send discord link pls, im not in it

[Anonymous No.11078735]

>>11078560
? Chainlink have never claimed to have NDAs. To the best of my knowledge no team member has ever said anything about NDAs.
They have been explicit that whoever is using the project is free to discuss it any way they like.
Why are you so obsessed with NDAs?

Btw
>Sergey is the CEO of SmartContract.com and Chainlink which specialize in providing highly secure and reliable oracles to both large enterprises (SWIFT) and various leading smart contract development teams.
https://web3summit.com/speaker/sergey-nazarov/

Is that a clear enough statement for you?

[Anonymous No.11078755]

>>11077628
>I AM GOD

[Anonymous No.11078776]

For all of the shit talking that happens with LINK, does anyone actually look at all the work they are accomplishing in the tracker?

[Anonymous No.11078787]

>>11078560
you do this on every other thread about chainlink
stfu pajeet.

[Anonymous No.11078793]

>>11078735
NDAs are usually recursive

[Anonymous No.11078799]

>>11078776
shiposting and solving puzzle larper shit takes too much of my time already.

[Anonymous No.11078871]

>>11070206
>https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/events/business_law/2018/09/annual/materials/blockchain-basics-2-201809.authcheckdam.pdf

Just the American Bar Association having a presentation from the usual suspects today (Accord, Openlaw) about the future of Smart Contracts. NBD.

[Anonymous No.11078997]

>>11078735
I’ve been trying to tell people how dumb it sounds to think info regarding collaboration is being withheld due to NDAs

[Anonymous No.11079014]

>>11078687
Maybe, that would be best case scenario obviously. I’m still learning about Smartcontract.com’s approach and whether ChainLink will change that very dramatically.

[Anonymous No.11079222]

>>11078560
>has deep info
>not sharing it anonymously
Sounds like your under an NDA anon

[Anonymous No.11079321]

>>11078997
Well you're also saying a bunch of balls about microsoft.
Listen: if you want a powerful decentralised network you need to incentivise the independant actors. There's no way around it.
You want this shit you have to pay neets to do it.

So if microsoft or anyone else wants to be all clever and make "muh permissioned blockchain" and pretend like it's not just a fancy database then they're welcome to try.
Let the best system win.

[Anonymous No.11079446]

>>11075920
>It can be trusted because it is trustless.
this kek

[Anonymous No.11079468]

[Anonymous No.11079552]

My linkies stay stinky

[Anonymous No.11079568]

>>11077051
God damn it, you had to bring up gematria.
I just checked 10,077. 10,078 was worse.
I need to change my stack number now.

[Anonymous No.11079571]

>>11079552
1fuckingk

[Anonymous No.11079638]

Could they just be updating the testnet?

[Anonymous No.11079663]

Basedboys btfo

[Anonymous No.11079681]

Basedboys WORD FILTERED MODS CONFIRMED FOR ONIONS

[Anonymous No.11079776]

>How can link possible be only 25 cents with this news.
You niggers haven't seen nothing. When main net does drop you're gonna be seeing 15 cents. The one chance for you retards to make it and the dev does the release during a brutal bear market. Your bags will never recover lel.

[Anonymous No.11079841]

>>11079776
Keep on believing that,faggot. Stay poor.

[Anonymous No.11079960]

I LOVE YOU GUYS. no homo

[Anonymous No.11079967]

[Anonymous No.11079980]

>>11078871

screencap the important parts for mobile

[Anonymous No.11080070]

>>11076315
>Coinbase family member talking about Link
What?

[Anonymous No.11080096]

>>11076591
STONE THE BLASPHEMER

[Anonymous No.11080418]

>>11075159
Fuck off redditor

[Anonymous No.11080496]

>>11076315
I think the LARP part is not knowing about the tech. In that first thread he was playing dumb about some low level things, and then sharp as fuck about more obscure stuff iirc.

Probably works for artificial lawyer or something. Not a family member.

I think some of these recent larps like the last letters anon and this one might actually be Adelyn.

[Anonymous No.11080522]

>>11080496
What do you really think Artficial lawyer or Adelyn would come to Biz?
I don't know sounds a bit farfetched...

[Anonymous No.11080592]

>>11079967
The memes are official marketing from adelyn

[Anonymous No.11080618]

>>11079776
LINK will singlehandedly create the next bull market.

[Anonymous No.11080636]

300th post

[Anonymous No.11080642]

>>11076206
Not ending, but a once every 5k years or something celestial event. I think it was actually supposed to be the birth of something. It was a celestial event predicted in Revelation

[Anonymous No.11080658]

>>11080522
Work in blockchain marketing. Not far fetched. You (us) autists drive sentiment more than you know.

[Anonymous No.11080667]

>>11080592
Tigermommy was just shitposting so that we would feel comfy before mainnet thanks tigermommy.

[Anonymous No.11080690]

Can someone explain all of this to me like the brainlet I am? I'm new to all this.

[Anonymous No.11080846]

>>11080690
software called an oracle that allows real world data to be processed on blockchains without paying/needing a trusted middle man (chainlink does this by making a network of decentralized oracles operated as indepedent nodes) is either close to completion or still far off, all we have to go on is breadcrumbs of marginal amounts of plausibility and unverified larps; if all goes well LINK will gain HUGE value over the next few years

[Anonymous No.11080847]

You will need 400k LINK to make it

[Anonymous No.11080876]

>>11080690
if you want to buy some, buy ETH on coinbase with USD, send it to binance, and trade ETH for LINK on binance, store your private keys somewhere other than binance though, I have a ledger nano S that interfaces with myetherwallet.com

[Anonymous No.11080972]

>>11080876
>store your private keys

uh.. you mean your tokens? what private keys are on binance

[Anonymous No.11081004]

>>11080972
funds are on the blockchain, you access those funds for transfer by signing a withdrawal transaction with your private key, if your funds are "on" an exchange it just means that you store your private keys with that exchange rather than on your hard drive or another hardware "wallet"

[Anonymous No.11081006]

>>11080972
The ones that let you send your tokens elsewhere. Binance controls your private key

[Anonymous No.11081012]

>>11080658
Damn, that sounds quite crazy haha. Well I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.

[Anonymous No.11081019]

300 complete

[Anonymous No.11081065]

>>11081004
tru

[Anonymous No.11081075]

>>11081004
>>11081006
wow, thank you fren <33

[Anonymous No.11081173]

>>11078020
You clearly don't know Sergey background.

[Anonymous No.11081482]

>>11078020
you are consistently disingenuous getting your relationships backwards in these arguments

[Anonymous No.11081997]

>>11078007

Stinky detective confirming