LINK+DOCUSIGN=BTFO

[Anonymous No.11034284]

Aragon research BTFO chainlink + docusign potential partnership
>Through 2022 Blockchain will offer no significant advantages for digital signatures over current eSignature and digital signature approaches

[Anonymous No.11034296]

>>11034284
thx op sold everything

[Anonymous No.11034298]

Nice to see Linkies starting to be more realistic about their shitcoin

[Anonymous No.11034303]

[Anonymous No.11034312]

>>11034284

Well yes, docusign already utilises a cryptographic proof system. But the very next paragraph then goes on to discuss smart contracts - which is where, by 2022, the added value will come to make an impact, since the contract proofs can trigger the terms of a contract in validation of it's authenticity. In other words they aren't rushing, they're taking their time to develop it correctly. Good, in 3 years at the latest then we're all millionaires.

[Anonymous No.11034313]

>>11034303
16 weeks left :^)

[Anonymous No.11034352]

>>11034312
Agree, this is positive not negative and confirms DocuSign is working with Link. Should create positive speculation.

[Anonymous No.11034518]

Mainnet Q2 2019 seems more realistic now.

[Anonymous No.11034550]

>>11034284

[Anonymous No.11034574]

Nice try and conflating two separate paragraphs OP.

2/10 fud

[Anonymous No.11034614]

>>11034574
See >>11034550
We are years away. It’s quite sad in reality but was planning on holding until 2020 anyways so whatever.

[Anonymous No.11034652]

>>11034614
Nothing about that screenshot says we are "years away".

[Anonymous No.11034738]

>>11034284
The fucking founder retweeted a chainlink still account and appeared with Sergey at a conference. I don’t give a fuck what your report says

[Anonymous No.11034772]

>>11034284
>projects desires unto paragraph which has nothing to do with chainlink or smart contracts and tries to put puzzle pieces together which don’t fit
>doesn’t read the very next paragraph which talks about chainlink and smart contracts being useful
>comes to post on biz to show how smurt he is
Epitome of bizlets who haven’t bought LINK yet. Literally sub human level IQs.

[Anonymous No.11034827]

>>11034284
Well duh. Why would you need a blockchain for digital signatures? Let me spell it out for you fucking brainlets...The Chainlink + Docusign collab is about signing smart contracts - making smart contracts have the same legal status as any digital or handwritten signed contract. That's totally different to "e-signatures on the blockchain!"

Can't believe I have to spoonfeed you retards. You don't even know what you're buying into.

[Anonymous No.11034981]

>>11034772
They wish they were assblasters and team family members so they are trying... let them, its good for them,

see:

>>11034284
WOW nice find, thanks for your research.

[Anonymous No.11035130]

>>11034284
Way to completely miss the point of the article OP you are a true brainlet congratulations on this seriously

[Anonymous No.11035154]

>>11034284
Nice try OP, no one with half a brain will fall for this

[Anonymous No.11035159]

thanks you my man, just sold 100k immediately.

[Anonymous No.11035180]

>>11034284
arago what?

[Anonymous No.11035181]

why would some middleman network like chainlink offer signing security?

you put your signed documents on bitcoin, not some minority insecure network like link

[Anonymous No.11035246]

>>11035181
Is it physically painful being this retarded?

[Anonymous No.11035351]

>>11035159
same

[Anonymous No.11035424]

>>11034284
Rare Sergey interview

[Anonymous No.11035450]

>>11035246
i dont think it's particularly retarded to avoid obvious useless alts like chainlink, no

[Anonymous No.11035456]

Link to entire PDF.

[Anonymous No.11035500]

>>11035424
Reeeeeeeee. You fucking wagies are so impatient it makes me sick. Get back in your cage!

[Anonymous No.11035555]

>>11035424
Source or your mom dies tonight

[Anonymous No.11035571]

>>11035450
kek

[Anonymous No.11035580]

>>11035555
Don't fuck with those quads anon. Source, now

[Anonymous No.11035620]

>>11035500
>>11035555
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/venturebeat.com/2017/09/20/chainlink-raises-32-million-to-connect-blockchains-with-external-data/amp/

There you go brainlets

[Anonymous No.11035967]

>>11034284
So according to that, blockchain won't offer a significant advantage for digital signatures, but will offer an advantage when it comes to smart contracts.

Fucking nice.

[Anonymous No.11036284]

>>11034827
thanks anon, im glad someone understands this as well as i do

[Anonymous No.11036331]

>>11035424
>>11035620
This must've been before they partnered with Mastercard, Visa and Paypal

[Anonymous No.11036391]

>>11035424
>>11035555
>>11035580
tfw Sergey calls SWIFT "mid-sized data provider". Imagine the partnerships he has lined up.

[Anonymous No.11036507]

>>11036391
more likely referring to docusign

[Anonymous No.11036525]

>>11036391
sergy is a fucking tard