This is why Chainlink will be bigger than Ethereum

[Anonymous No.10986991]

Vitalik sees Sergey has his main threat. It's obvious why.

[Anonymous No.10986997]

>>10986991
*as his
pardon the autism

[Anonymous No.10987086]

>>10986991
yaaaaaaaaaaaaawn
wheres the working product faggot
MAINNET 2035 LINK 0.001 EOY

[Anonymous No.10987105]

>seems
>not made clear
>may
>could
>we'll soon see
be still my beating heart

[Anonymous No.10987116]

Ethereum, Neo, EOS, and all smart contract platforms are like investing in the commerce of individual cities like NY, SF, LA, etc.

Chainlink is like investing in the interstate highway system that conducts interstate commerce. You get to charge people for using the road and your success doesn't depend on anyone else. If a city fails you just shutdown the road leading to it.

A similar analogy is selling picks & shovels to gold miners instead of starting a gold mine. Few made money in the gold rush from actually mining.

[Anonymous No.10987129]

FUCK CHAINLINK

[Anonymous No.10987146]

>>10987116
Good anology. How people aren't understanding this is beyond me.

[Anonymous No.10987165]

>link
>not wothless
pick one

[Anonymous No.10987206]

>>10987116
Please for the love of God delete this. I really hope people ignore the first part of this post. So I am just writing a whole lot of shit so millennial adhd faggots will skip it and focus on the punchline and go about their day. Anon their is literally no reason to share this with other people especially people who are ignoring chainlinks potential. Please don't help idiots understand this. Please.


HAHAHAHA OMFG HE REALLY BELIEVES CHAINLINK IS GOING TO DO SOMETHING AND ISN'T JUST A ERC20.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ABSOLUTE STINKY LINKIES!

[Anonymous No.10987224]

but link is a sideapp for eth? that isnt even needed as we all know now

[Anonymous No.10987272]

Absolute stink

Absolute link

AbSoLuTe StInKiE lInKiEs

[Anonymous No.10987282]

Market sell your LINK. It's over.

[Anonymous No.10987285]

>>10987206
Fuck off faggot

[Anonymous No.10987288]

ethereum was a big deal before it even launched, and had many developers interested from the very beginning

chainlink has nobody outside of speculators interested, and technical talent has already disregarded it's centralized oracle model

[Anonymous No.10987292]

>>10987206
Don't worry people are way too stupid to get it. Link will be lowkey, until it's literally too late.

[Anonymous No.10987314]

There's actually huge question marks about how atomic swapping and instant cross chain communication is going to affect the price of any of these assets. Institutional clients will generally only want to hold fiat, so there will be backend mechanisms to handle the automated transitions between the fiat they pay for a service and the cryptos that are needed to be purchased to actually use it. But if the person receiving the payment wants fiat as well then they could have a backend mechanism that automatically translates it back into fiat.
So it would work like, say, a company wanting $10 worth of oracle work, so they would pay $10 which would be atomic swapped into LINK while the data feeds are fed into the smart contract, then atomic swapped back into $10 as it goes into the node operator's (fiat) wallet.
The consequences for this near instantaneous transition are hard to predict, but you can only imagine it would vastly reduce the organic buy pressure on the token.
It seems that if this is the case the vast majority of the value of the Chainlink token will simply be in the fact that nodes will want to represent high value for penalty staking and will be required to hold value in the form of the LINK token to do so. Without that direct incentive to hold LINK tokens I would actually be pretty skeptical of how high the non speculative value of these tokens would go.

[Anonymous No.10987334]

>>10987206
this: >>10987292
Chainlink has already been decided in people's minds. Either they get it or they don't. I've been trying to convince the guy who introduced me to 4chan to buy some LINK because I feel like I owe him something. He asked another mutual friend who is a computer science major (he's a smart guy but he hasn't done any research into chainlink) if it was legit and he said it was just a meme because you guys are great at disguising it as a scam. Oh well. Everyday I hope they'll look into it and understand its potential.

[Anonymous No.10987337]

>>10987292
literally pajeet in ID

[Anonymous No.10987340]

>>10987314
1. You pay the node operators with chainlink tokens
2.Tokens are locked up in the nodes

These above reasons will drive up the price.

[Anonymous No.10987358]

>>10987337
Hahaha, ok that is fucking genius. Didn't even see that. Not a pajeet though, so don't worry.

[Anonymous No.10987376]

>>10987358
DIE

[Anonymous No.10987429]

>>10986991
So what's this from?

[Anonymous No.10987461]

>>10987340
middleman tokens like that are only going to get squeezed out for native tokens. an extra erc-20 transfer is massively wasteful and will only get more expensive as ethereum starts charging for storage.

funding tokens are always only good for funding the development, that's why they're called funding tokens.

[Anonymous No.10987470]

>>10987429
Your mother's loose butthole.

[Anonymous No.10987475]

>>10987461
>an extra erc-20 transfer is massively wasteful
But that's what erc20 tokens are for.

[Anonymous No.10987483]

>>10986991
>Utility token

To the trash it went

[Anonymous No.10987508]

>>10987483
Because the world needs another Bitcoin wannabe/ETH killer mineable coin, right?

[Anonymous No.10987616]

>oragle prolem