ChainLINK September 6

[None !!AFDL8hXtPLG No.10969444]

>>SUMMARY OF RECENT NOTABLE LINK THREADS<<

Recently:
>Aragon Research Report mentioned LINK >>/biz/thread/10965079
>LINK insider? 300+ replies >>/biz/thread/10961547
>Mainnet date speculation (Sept 25) >>/biz/thread/10952722
>Sherlocklink latest info, great thread >>/biz/thread/10940612#p10941669
>Running a node by Thomas Hodges >>/biz/thread/10935518
>Great article by Artificial Lawyer (Ctrl+F: results found) >>/biz/thread/10932512
>New team member? >>/biz/thread/10935732

ESSENTIAL INFO (WP, How to buy, etc.):
https://pastebin.com/QTAHpgRf
Official Partners:
> @swiftcommunity
> @AccordHQ (Hyperledger, IBM connection?)
> @OpenLawOfficial (Consensys)
> @initc3org (Town Crier and Ari Juels)
> @zeppelin_os @factom @MarketProtocol @requestnetwork
> @officialgamedex @origami_network @ClinTexCTi @CEEK

Competitors:
>https://pastebin.com/w6E9g69K
Pasta and shit:
>https://pastebin.com/2cbTbWBs
Compilation of previous notable LINK threads:
>https://pastebin.com/uFMn1ygT

Previous thread:
>>>/biz/thread/S10887825

[Anonymous No.10969449]

>>10969444
Nice summary anon. And nice trips.

[None !!AFDL8hXtPLG No.10969452]

Smart Contracts are a type of digital agreement that automatically executes whenever certain pre-determined conditions are met, this allows to make cheaper, more secure and reliable digital agreements without needing to trust a third party
The problem is that Smart Contracts cannot communicate with off-chain data (interest rates, FIAT values, the time, et cetera)
This makes something as revolutionary as Smart Contracts limited to exchanging ERC-20 tokens mostly, and certain Dapps like cryptokitties (on-chain data; example: X amount of ETH = Y amount of ERC-20 tokens/kitties)
To make more appealing Smart Contracts you need something called an "oracle" that is basically a middle man that connects off-chain data to the smart contract, this person has a certain power since they can change the data to their favor (we're back to trusting a middle man, which is not the point)
ChainLink aims to become the leader Oracle service by creating a trust-less, decentralized oracle network, where you don't need to trust an oracle but rather the protocol of the network (think about it like Uber, you don't trust the driver, the driver dosen't trust you, but you both win by using the app, that is trust-less in nature)

This would allow financial institutions to save BILLIONS (Sources: Capgemini and WEF) and that would be just the first implementation of the network

They're working with Accord and OpenLaw so it works with the current legal framework and they've worked with SWIFT so they're compatible with legacy systems (ISO 20022)

>I recommend you read the whitepaper and the god protocol by Nick Szabo if you're interested in what I've said

>>10969444
>checked

[Anonymous No.10969457]

>>10969444
TRIPS CHECKED We are all gonna make it marines

[Anonymous No.10969465]

>>10969452
Municipal marmalade moistened Monday mourners.

[None !!AFDL8hXtPLG No.10969477]

>>10969465
what

[Anonymous No.10969481]

>>10969444

thanks for the summary fren, missed the sherlocklink info !

[Anonymous No.10969507]

>>10969465
just bought 100k

[Anonymous No.10970120]

You missed
- thread about insurtech following up on Sherlocklink's crumbs
- jonny's medium article
- fergly's infographic for normies

[Anonymous No.10970321]

Pretty much sold the rest of my alt trash to be more or less 100% LINK.

[Anonymous No.10970336]

>>10969444

Look into Aegon. They had some trouble with the SEC and are utilizing blockchain tech to fix their fuckups.

[Anonymous No.10970349]

SPACE FOR RENT. BEACH FROM PROPERTY. GREAT RATES!

[Anonymous No.10970399]

>>10969444
Sounds pretty damn cool. Will they deliver tho?

[Anonymous No.10970404]

>>10970321
I did the same but back at 5100

[Anonymous No.10970534]

Did we get anything from Affirm? It’s a shame so many people fell for the larp thread today. I wish we weren’t all so delusional.

[Anonymous No.10970579]

>>10970534
He was obviously a marine who did his research, still comfy. Don't pay attention to the larp predictions but the overall message.

I can't believe affirm isn't on the archive. I've seen it before too. Anybody who has checked Sergeys follow page must have seen it but no one thought it was relevant enough to investigate further? And it brought up further connections to PayPal and Salesforce. We should start from 0 and comb through every single one of his follow all over again.

[Anonymous No.10970612]

I just looked at a chart of link... why are you guys investing in this... it looks like garbage... are u all trapped in losing positions?

[Anonymous No.10970641]

>>10970579
He was just some fucking asshole.
Don't group useless attention whores in with marines that do real digging.

[Anonymous No.10970645]

>>10970612
It's because we're retarded, now leave us alone.

[Anonymous No.10970652]

>>10970641
This.

[Anonymous No.10970666]

>>10970645
Just want a help fren and understand... you guys can't be that retarded.

[Anonymous No.10970673]

>>10970666
>>10969452

[Anonymous No.10970719]

we have best memes real insiders and larps breadcrumb connections cult pastas plebbit fudders assblaster...... Post singularity is actually gonna be boring

[Anonymous No.10970741]

>>10970673
I'm kinda boomerish... so it's a more secure way of making transactions? I would like to do some TA on it
... but just eye balling it, its rough. 1.45 in Jan down to 0.3ish... I don't see it going up for a while.

[Anonymous No.10970753]

>>10970741
Oh you were joking. Got it.

[Anonymous No.10970762]

>>10970741
Get off our board gramps

[Anonymous No.10970775]

I looks like you might have a rounding bottom... that could be positive...

[Anonymous No.10970835]

I'm starting to doubt this fucking shit.

[Anonymous No.10970842]

>>10970835
Then sell your bags you pussy foot

[Anonymous No.10970880]

>>10970775
It's not. We're a mentally deficient suicide cult, we want it to go as low as possible.

[Anonymous No.10970901]

>>10970880
cant wait for 17 cent link and im a marine with moderate bags

[Anonymous No.10970916]

>>10970880
daily reminder: LINK $1000 EOY (((only))) requires a non-stop daily +7.29% for 117 consecutive days, "almost there" kek

[Anonymous No.10970922]

>>10970842
I can't sell now. I shilled it to all my family and friends. If I get out now after they've all lost more money than I did, then they will hate me and I'll have nothing left. If this shit goes down, I have to go down with it and with everyone around me who listened to my stupid fucking ranting and raving about the "oracle problem."

[None !!AFDL8hXtPLG No.10970942]

>>10970120
I didn't see the Insurtech thread, and I forgot to add Jonny's article. Thanks. Fergly's infographic is OP pic by the way

>>10970835
Hopefully it all works out. There was some anon talking about how the price won't just suddenly increase just because it should, i.e., when people were talking about how collateral was supposed to be this much, which means LINK should pump to this price, and so on. I think that's a narrow view regarding LINK's eventual price. What should be focused on is the volume of requests the network will have once mainnet is live, and in extension, how profitable running a node will be. For the former, assuming a high volume, the price would be affected by whatever firms and companies who'd use LINK (remember, you need to pay with LINK in order to use the network). As for the latter, I think that's where all the talk about collateral comes in, where presumably high value contracts would pay out high fees.

[None !!AFDL8hXtPLG No.10970976]

>>10970922
Just do whatever you think can help the project if you're actually desperate right now. Digging up info, making infographics, being a non-retard on plebbit to improve community optics, whatever the fuck you think is going to help. What I'm doing for example takes literally no talent, although I don't know if it's actually helping.
I actually wanted to make a video guide regarding running a node and setting it up with AWS or a VPS but I don't know if it's actually beneficial to make it easier for people to run nodes. I don't know if it will have an effect though since if it's actually too difficult brainlets will just resort to using Linkpool

[Anonymous No.10971073]

>>10970942
>>/biz/thread/S10957639
Riskblock alliance working with consensys, lumen lab working with pwc, a few startups following Sergey
Nothing about Lloyd's

>>10970976
I think a step by step video guide for the tech illiterate brainlet (like me) would be a good idea. I'll use linkpool but getting a clearer, visual understanding of the full process would be appreciated.

[Brigadier General Damu !!6rIK3ka6TND No.10971083]

>>10969444

[None !!AFDL8hXtPLG No.10971117]

>>10971073
Sorry, should have made it clearer
>but I don't know if it's actually beneficial to make it easier for people to run nodes
That is, if it's better to keep it down low as to not split the profits or if it won't matter since people will just resort to Linkpool anyway if it's too hard. If I can be arsed though then I'll probably try making a video once mainnet is out to see how exactly it would work, considering there may still be changes to the UI. Thanks for the link, will include next post

>>10971083

[Anonymous No.10972080]

>>10969465
A sequential non-sense sentence with words that start with the same letter. My autism-sense is tickling. Is this a code?

[Anonymous No.10972147]

>>10970666
>Just want a help fren and understand... you guys can't be that retarded

Go away satan, you will not deceive us from our Lord and Saviour Sergey of Nazarov

[Anonymous No.10972277]

>>10969465
Ok... Why so soon? Shouldn't they wait to fix icebox's bugs?

[Anonymous No.10972331]

>>10972080
Started yesterday - possibly in the related-to-Chainlink-worker larp/non-larp.

[Anonymous No.10972348]

>>10972331
>>10969465
It says "main network released Monday morning". But this has to be a larp

[Anonymous No.10972366]

>>10972147
>Nazarov literally means of Nazareth

[Anonymous No.10972528]

>>10969465
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
what do you mean by this?

[Anonymous No.10972545]

>>10969444
checked

[Anonymous No.10972583]

>>10969444
Bump.

[Anonymous No.10972661]

>>10972348
Can you show me how fren?

[Anonymous No.10973077]

>>10969444
Okay so after reading the OP pic I see the value of having a trustless, decentralized oracle, but how exactly does the Chainlink token come in to play here?
I assume it's to run the node somehow?

I guess what i'm asking is; What gives a Chainlink token it's value? The more you have the more efficient a node will run, something like that?

Not trying to fud, just curious and I can't seem to find any info on this shit outside of biz.

[Anonymous No.10973129]

>>10972147
>>10972366
THE NEXT COMING OF MY LORD AND SAVIOUR. THE EMBODIMENT IS NOT IMPORTANT, IT IS JUST A VESSEL FOR A SUPREME CONSCIOUSNESS, A CONSCIOUS THAT HAS ALREADY WITNESSED THE UNIVERSE, EVERYTHING THAT HAS EVER BEEN AND WILL BE, TRANSPIRED AND FOUND HIS WAY BACK TO EARTH FROM THE DEPTHS OF THE COSMIC NETWORK. SERGEY IS MY COSMIC DEITY AND HAS OPENED MY EYES. $freeman EOY

[Ärimees !!z8a44b3aeWt No.10973163]

>>10969444
Based thread

[Anonymous No.10973323]

>>10972348
So this is what people call weaponized autism?

[Anonymous No.10973346]

>>10973077
token is needed to pay node operators and as collateral for the smart contracts.

[Anonymous No.10973383]

>>10973346
So the node operator gets paid in Chainlink which he can then sell on an exchange for fiat?

[Anonymous No.10973398]

>>10973383
yes

[Anonymous No.10973432]

>one year
>32+ fucking millions
>THIRTY FUCKING TWO
>not even a hint of a functioning product
>not even a fucking roadmap
>cant launch a website without typos
>cant even build their own website without stealing
>biz links it to huge partners
>partners are 3 literally whos fucking start ups
>price keeps dumping 10% for a week and pumping 1% for a dfay on average
>only 18 contributors on github lmao
>as a bonus a bunch of retards fud it everywhere and think they are "helping"
have I forgotten any other interesting facts?

[Anonymous No.10973442]

>>10973398
Why wouldn't an Insurance company just pay the node operators with money rather than a token to exchange for money?

Can't fiat be used as collateral in a Smart Contract?

[Anonymous No.10973517]

>>10973442
whats up with the retard questions? are you trolling me?

[Anonymous No.10973522]

>>10973442
Would I be wrong into thinking it's better to be paid in link since say you stake your link and the information you sent was off like the weather changed or something out of your control you would lose some link for false information correct? This would help build more of a trusted community of oracles imo. We can even get some Oracles to show you how many they missed aka trust has failed while using their Oracle and the user decides where to go for information.

[Anonymous No.10973529]

>>10973442
Customers will be paying in fiat. Link network will make the exchange.
https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2018/09/03/chainlink-solving-the-smart-contract-fiat-money-problem/

[Anonymous No.10973532]

>>10972348
How do you know?

[Anonymous No.10973562]

>>10972661
also interested.

[Anonymous No.10973586]

>>10973442
Smart contracts can’t use fiat as a means of settlement

[Anonymous No.10973610]

>>10973442
companies will use fiat.
then a smart contract will automatically do the trade between the fiat and link tokens.

[Anonymous No.10973638]

>>10973517
I'm genuinely not trolling you, I'm probably retarded but sometime you gotta ask stupid questions if you want to learn. Apologies lad.

>>10973522
>>10973529
>>10973586
>>10973610
Thanks for clearing that up.
Unironically just bought 3000 (poorfag)

[Anonymous No.10973648]

>>10969477
This exact same comment was posted in the larp thread yesterday: >>10964471
I’m scared guys

[Anonymous No.10973657]

>>10973648
interesting.
what did that one mean?

[Anonymous No.10973666]

municipal marmalade, how to fuck is that main network

[Anonymous No.10973701]

looking through warosu there's a bunch of municipal marmalade shit in link threads.

[Anonymous No.10973717]

>>10973701
Didn't it mean main net released on monday morning?

Think it's bullshit though. Better to set your expectations low.

[Anonymous No.10973721]

>>10969465
>>10973192
??

[Anonymous No.10973735]

>>10973638
>Unironically just bought 3000 (poorfag
Congrats, this was NOT retarded. Keep that vibe going fren .

[Anonymous No.10973750]

>>10973717
doesnt look like it.

[Anonymous No.10973789]

>>10973666
I assume there's a website that codes and decodes these. Seems like a joke about how convoluted the puzzles are getting more than anything.

[Anonymous No.10973795]

>>10973701
Can you link them please

[Anonymous No.10973797]

>>10973648
>>10973666
>>10973701
They're load testing the network. It's done. Words from a load test.

[Anonymous No.10973803]

>>10972348
>>10969465

So, let's assume that "Municipal marmalade moistened Monday mourners" means "main network released monday morning".

What does it mean "Morose marsupials marinate municipal marmalade"?

Municipal = main (both adjectives)
marmalade = network (nouns)
moistened = released (participe/adjective)
Monday = Monday (upperCase maintain the word the same?)
mourner = morning (noun)

marsupials = I don't know, i think about codemonkeys, "developers"?
marinate = marinate is similar to prepare some food with special ingredients right, so "prepare"?
Morose = According to oxford dictionary = Sullen and ill-tempered.

Also, every word in that code, i googled it and they appear here http://robseward.com/misc/gum_abbrev/gum.php

[Anonymous No.10973809]

>>10973795
>>/biz/?offset=0&ghost=yes&task=search&search_text=municipal%20marmalade

[Anonymous No.10973819]

he's just a pol fag. move along

[Anonymous No.10973828]

>>10973797
>>/biz/?task=search&ghost=&search_text=Municipal+marmalade

Loads of municipal marmalade in warosu. As far back as May 2018

[Anonymous No.10973883]

>>10973735
thank you m80

good luck and god speed.

[Anonymous No.10973920]

>>10973828
Holy...

[Anonymous No.10973991]

>>10973803

>What does it mean "Morose marsupials marinate municipal marmalade"?

Based on your associations I see it as:
Morose = agitated
marsupials = developers
marinate = cook / wait / until it's time (perfect)
municipal = main
marmelade = core/result

The developers are adding the final polish to the main net

[Anonymous No.10974009]

>>10973991
Interesting, thanks

[Anonymous No.10974045]

>>10973721
>>10973803
Marmalade = JAM or nah?

[Anonymous No.10974101]

>>10969444
>tfw 2 threads I made are on this list

Feels good man

[Anonymous No.10974205]

Anyone else go through that entire "relative of an employee" larp thread yesterday and thoroughly enjoy themselves? I was completely cognizant of it definitely being a larp, but I still felt a huge rush reading it, to an extent that it completely overshadowed the market crash from an emotional standpoint. I think there's something wrong with me

[Anonymous No.10974228]

>>10974045
It is jam

[Anonymous No.10974252]

>>10974205
I felt bad for feeling so good. It's so obviously fake, but I couldn't help hoping.

[Anonymous No.10974304]

>>10974252
>>10974205

i know. opening up the calculator and rubbing my hands together like a merchant between frantically punching in different numbers regarding cashing out $2mm, paying taxes to coast off $1.2mm with 5% returns a year and sitting on the rest of my stack to watch it go up and hopefully cash out huge with just capital gains.

i work for myself and enjoy my job so having a roughly guaranteed $60k/year would make things pretty comfy for me in the meantime.

[Anonymous No.10974359]

Is 300K link enough to make it?

[Anonymous No.10974367]

>>10974205
It was s real tho

[Anonymous No.10974410]

>>10969444
checked and nice shill thread you got going on here, redneck

[Anonymous No.10974488]

>>10973383
Yes, and adoption means many many nodes that need to hold a high amount of Link to qualify for new confirmations. The need for Link will increase significantly as supply decreases. Link rises in value and hodlers learn how to deal with a permanent erection.

[Anonymous No.10974513]

You’d retards are making threads for reddit. I now know what Astro was doing

[Anonymous No.10974529]

>>10970534
What did I miss?

[Anonymous No.10974603]

>>10974205
I know it’s Astro and the Delphi fags trying to be funny

[Anonymous No.10974709]

>>10974410
Image saved.

Is the SEC the entity responsible for labelling tokens as securities? I need to know who to send this picture to, as it seems to imply link is a security. If people are distributing materials promising returns on a purchase, that seems like something they would be interested in.

Does anyone have anything else related to chainlink that the SEC might want to know about?

[Anonymous No.10974797]

>>10970534
>I wish we weren’t all so delusional.

I wish you knew what the fuck you're even talking about

[Anonymous No.10974855]

>>10974603
those faggots have been responsible for most of the link larps

[Anonymous No.10974862]

>>10974709
>what is satirical humor
>what are memes
yeah something tells me you'd most likely be wasting their time you fucking monkey.

[Anonymous No.10974866]

>>10974855
Yep. I’m getting the feeling they are a mix of euros or merimuts based on the times they post the threads

[Anonymous No.10974897]

>>10974488
I want to believe, but I just can’t for some reason.

To me, it seems too good to be true. How a bunch of autistic NEETs stumbled across a paradigm shifting tech needle in a haystack. But I suppose stranger things have happened.

I come from an area of relative poverty so all I need is £100k and I’d be fucking thrilled. Pay off my mortgage and live a life with less stress. That’s all I want, Don’t want no lambos, mansions, nothing like that. Just less stress about making payments.
Is 3000 LINK enough?

[Anonymous No.10974956]

>>10974897
Some of the smarted people that didn’t make it in life post here. It’s not that far fetched

[Anonymous No.10975056]

>>10974897
if you dont need that much, then yeah its probably enough. would try to get to 5k though

[Anonymous No.10975194]

>>10974709
>sir, we just got an anonymous tip on a potential security, the source says it could disrupt the entire crypto field
>what is it, Johnson?
>sir, it appears to be an archive of over a thousand images depicting cartoon frogs, obese naked men, nazi imagery and strange cubes wearing plaid shirts, with a rap song playing in the background... Each image depicting symbols more cryptic and esoteric than the previous one? These don't make any sense...
>my God... Insiders talking in codes and riddles? Get our best task force on this now!

[Anonymous No.10975233]

>>10973432
Confirmation that Corda and Microsoft Azure aren’t using ChainLink.

[Anonymous No.10975253]

microsoft azure is literally describing chainlink

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwrYspdaOx8&t=

[Anonymous No.10975314]

>>10974956
>some of the smarted people

Stop thinking people on 4chan are so intelligent. 90% of the people here are technically illiterate idiots that take what slightly smarter people say seriously and don’t have the ability to see that it is mostly all retards here thinking they’re smart because they’re nerds. I’ve come across two genuinely intelligent people on this board.

[Anonymous No.10975346]

>>10975314
>90% of the people here are idiots that take what slightly smarter people say seriously
case in point

[Anonymous No.10975369]

>>10975253
No, they’re not “literally describing ChainLink.” They are a competitor of SmartCobtract.com, they are accomplishing a similar service, so it sounds similar. Azure doesn’t use ChainLink...nor do they plan on using it.

[Anonymous No.10975388]

>>10974897
>>10975056
you need a lot more than this. Don't believe the memes, $5-$25 would be fucking outrageous, so you need to be aiming for 20k/50k/100k range link stacks and also be prepared to hold that for like 3-5 years.

[Anonymous No.10975436]

>>10972366
Sir Guy of Nazareth

[Anonymous No.10975458]

>>10975369
if you did your research you'd see an article that says that Microsoft are leveraging just open source technologies for their blockchain solutions.

[Anonymous No.10975459]

>>10975253
You need to stop being a brainlet and understand how Smart Contracts work. The whole world isn’t really waiting around for ChainLink to develop smart contracts. ChainLink is just one piece of middleware that the company SmartContract.com thought would be helpful for some of their clients. They developed it and did an ICO for it at the apex of hype of a stupid cryptocurrency bubble.

No one is actually using cryptocurrencies though and there are other middleware entities like Azure that help companies and individuals make smart contracts. You’ve just drunk the koolaid and surely haven’t actually done your own research. Obviously a lot of things will sound like ChainLink if you’re looking at a bunch of projects doing similar work as SmartContract.com.

[Anonymous No.10975461]

>>10975253
MS cloned it like VisiCalc

[Anonymous No.10975473]

>>10975458
I’ve done a lot more than “research.”

[Anonymous No.10975476]

can link produce passive income?

[Anonymous No.10975479]

>>10975388
It would be $40+ just from being top 3 with our current market caps.

[Anonymous No.10975508]

>>10975473
obviously not or you wouldn't of said that dip shit

[Anonymous No.10975518]

>>10975476
Yes

[Anonymous No.10975521]

https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/events/business_law/2018/09/annual/materials/blockchain-basics-2-201809.authcheckdam.pdf

[Anonymous No.10975564]

>>10975508
Wouldn’t HAVE said what? I know for a fact that Azure isn’t using ChainLink. That is why there is nothing out saying that they are. Of course there is going to be “loose connections” between two companies working on a similar endeavor, but Azure 100% isn’t using ChainLink. See for yourself: contact anyone with Azure and ask how they handle on/off chain data for smart contracts. They’ll happily tell you their process.

[Anonymous No.10975605]

>>10975369
You are such a fucking retard. Azure will utilize Chainlink, theres no doubt about it.

[Anonymous No.10975646]

>>10975521
I can't dig now, anything interesting? Please post cliffs

[Anonymous No.10975672]

>>10975605
You cannot prove that...because it isn’t true. You can just provide tangential info that shows people have worked on both projects in some form (since both projects have similarities).

I’m not saying this to FUD or speculate: I’m saying this as a fact that I know.

[Anonymous No.10975707]

>>10975479
I’m bullish but Top 3 is a complete stretch of imagination.

[Anonymous No.10975728]

>>10975672
>ignore all the evidence
>dont buy anything until its announced and priced in
Literally never, EVER going to make it. How could you ever even x10 when you act this way?

[Anonymous No.10975797]

>>10974709
>thinks some random website shilling a token classifies it as a security
>literally can't explain how that meets the Howey test

Was this satire, or are you really that retarded?

[Anonymous No.10975798]

>>10975707
top 3 now is different than having 11b mcap in a couple of months when crypto goes on a small run. its not impossible for link to achieve that.

[Anonymous No.10975839]

>>10975798
Well, I hope you're right. $40 would be insane

[Anonymous No.10975894]

This is my plebfolio boys.
Roast me, should I go all in on Link? Probably get another 900 Link if I did.

My logic was to flip shitty Apollo when it reached £0.005 but I don’t see that happening any time soon.

ZRX was just due to the speculation of it being listed on Coinbase this summer. Guess that never happened either.

[Anonymous No.10975914]

>>10975839
i also consider it to be insane though. unless swift is there right from the get go, which makes it actually not very insane at all.
i said this a couple of times. if swift announces they will start using the network, even with just a few payments initially, we are talking about something bigger than EEA.

[Anonymous No.10975926]

>>10975894
no idea whats apl but keeping a bit of zrx hoping for a big pump doesnt sound very bad.

[Anonymous No.10975995]

>>10973432
>>32+ fucking millions
>>THIRTY FUCKING TWO
show me a proof they actually raised this much you faggot.
show me proof. Do you even know how much of the supply was available to the public during the presale?

[Anonymous No.10976008]

>>10975914
true if big.

>>10975926
>apl
Apollo currecny. It's just this shit 'all-in-one' currency that released quite recently. Got in on the ICO a few months back in the hopes of it doing a x2 but nothing's happening. Probably best to avoid these bags.

[Anonymous No.10976013]

sexy

[Anonymous No.10976022]

>>10975995
They raised 32 million dollars in eth during the presale. 11 cents a token on average

[Anonymous No.10976029]

i cum on cat she his at penis

[Anonymous No.10976053]

>>10976029
wtf that really made me think

[Anonymous No.10976054]

>>10976022
nobody knows what was the rate for private investors and how much tokens was actually sold to them.

[Anonymous No.10976067]

>>10976008
Why are people still putting money in icos?

[Anonymous No.10976137]

>>10976067
cos im a fucking dumb dumb that's why.
Anyway, not doing that anymore.

[Anonymous No.10976187]

>>10975728
I’m telling you what I know for fact. I’ve held BTC since 2011, I made a killing off of XLM, I don’t care about a 10x. I don’t follow speculative BS. I invest based on facts. Anyone buying Link based off speculation is in the red. I’m telling you: Microsoft’s Azure Enterprise Smart Contracts does not and will not use the ChainLink oracle network. Corda (which is an option when building in Azure) won’t either.

[Anonymous No.10976215]

I read the Aragon research paper we are going to make it. The fact they said that if you’re a large enterprise developing smart contracts you need to evaluate chainlink is huge in my opinion.

[Anonymous No.10976217]

>>10976187
Correct, which is the real reason there is no marketing. They have nothing good to say. When they do, they announce/shill it right away (see Accord, OpenLaw) which did dogshit for the price

[Anonymous No.10976221]

>>10969444
thank you for doing this marine. sometimes it's easy to miss out on a golden thread.

[Anonymous No.10976223]

>>10976187
ok corda and azure won't use chainlink, big deal, fuck them. What's your point actually because I see you in every link thread, did you sell because too much "research" shook you out of your bags and you want us to comfort you and make your doubts go away?

[Anonymous No.10976233]

>>10976215
can you please share or tell us more?

[Anonymous No.10976237]

>>10976187
You’re wrong but it’s really fine. I understand everyone can’t be right and if everyone agreed with my position I would know I’m on the wrong side. Strong convictions loosely held.

[Anonymous No.10976240]

>>10976187
FUD

[Anonymous No.10976254]

>>10976233
There’s not much more. It’s just an overview of chainlink everything we know. It’s extremely comfy knowing they state there’s very few projects worth evaluating. Overall decent paper but only 1 page on link specifically.

[Anonymous No.10976283]

>>10976223
That is a very big deal. You should realize this. I’m interested in Smart Contracts and used to be interested in cryptocurrency. Why do you get mad when someone tries to give you objective information regarding an investment you have?

[Anonymous No.10976295]

>>10976283
this is biz

[Anonymous No.10976304]

>>10976283
Azure could very well use chainlink. Sergey has said this himself as an example. Corda as well. I’ve looked into this too and funny how we came to different conclusions lol

[Anonymous No.10976305]

>>10976254
Can you post the whole CL section

[Anonymous No.10976307]

>>10976283
if they are competitors then how is that a big deal that they won't use CL? I think it's pretty logical, you are just scared that LINK will moon regardless of your "research" and you couldn't take the pain seeing neets who fell for the 1k eoy meme actually getting rich while you sit on the sidelines with NOTHING
It's gonna happen

[Anonymous No.10976320]

>>10976237
Haha okay. What contacts do you have at Azure? Who is spearheading the implementation of Chainlink’s Utilization? Why’d they decide on this in the past week after already settling on the oracle solution that’s been used?

[Anonymous No.10976379]

>>10976283
whats the difference between Azure and Cryplets.. ??

[Anonymous No.10976405]

>>10972366
No. Nazareth in Russian is "Haзapeт". "Haзap" is a Russification of the Islamic name Nasser. However, seeing as Nasser means 'commander of the faith', Sergey's last name might still be a good omen...

[Anonymous No.10976419]

>>10975459
You can't be serious when you say shit like this homie

[Anonymous No.10976470]

>>10975369
>SmartCobtract.com

tfw I'm the only one ready for the smart cobtract revolution

[Anonymous No.10976479]

>>10976307
I’m not worried about that. It would make me happy if people got rich off ChainLink. I don’t want people to have financial difficulty. I just don’t think it’ll happen. It’s not impossible obviously.

[Anonymous No.10976501]

>>10976470
kek

[Anonymous No.10976535]

>>10976187
Show evidence of what corda and azure are really using

[Ärimees !!z8a44b3aeWt No.10976556]

>>10974101
Good man

[Anonymous No.10976668]

>>10976535
I think it would be most helpful to Linkies to read the Corda white paper and go back and watch the Enterprise Smart Contracts Consensus presentations and read more about that initiative. A problem I see Linkies constantly have is in trying to confirm their bias instead of viewing things objectively.

[Anonymous No.10976690]

>>10976535
Read about how devs of various hyperledger projects build their oracles now too (I do think Link may make a hyperledger solution for their network), but I’m not sure the rate at which it’ll be used.

[Anonymous No.10976708]

>>10976668
>>10976690
Thanks, will search. Got any quick links to help this bathroom break wagekeker out?

[Anonymous No.10976721]

Goddamn larpfags have too much time on their hands.. giving people false hope.

[Anonymous No.10977050]

>>10976668
How about you just spill the beans instead of fudding

[Anonymous No.10977065]

>>10975672
You will literally never make it.

[Anonymous No.10977091]

>>10976187
>Microsoft’s Azure Enterprise Smart Contracts does not and will not use the ChainLink oracle network. Corda (which is an option when building in Azure) won’t either.
You are incorrect but also clearly a fucking retard so that makes sense. Enjoy being poor.

[Anonymous No.10977132]

>>10976187
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytv8U0bejPA&feature=youtu.be&t=46m2s

46:02, don't forget to KYS after watching

[Anonymous No.10977226]

>>10976187
>>10977132
https://youtube.com/watch?v=aE-tYqBPBDE

This. Listen to the first 30 secs and refute this. Pro tip: you can't

[Anonymous No.10977289]

>>10977226
What the fuck are you even asking? I watched a minuet and a half and nothing even sounds remotely suspicious in regards to Azure not using the Link network. Chainlink is a back end system for data, projects like Azure encompass chainlink which is then sold to the consumer, who pays in their fiat to use the services that will eventually run though link.

[Anonymous No.10977300]

>>10977132
Not ChainLink, and this presentation was given before ChainLink. Also, MS Bletchley isn’t Enterprise Smart Contracts. This presentation is the reason people think Azure uses ChainLink, when this presentation doesn’t even have anything to do with ChainLink.

[Anonymous No.10977302]

>>10977226

[Anonymous No.10977313]

>>10977226
>>10977300
You are mentally handicapped

[Anonymous No.10977332]

>>10977289
Agreeing with you fren. You're video, Sergey clearly states they are working on cryplets. My video, Marley Gray, clearly states enterprise smart contracts are just the marketing term Microsoft gave to cryplets.

[Anonymous No.10977342]

>>10977226
>>10977300
Its insane that people actually believe the horse shit that spews out of mouths like yours

[Anonymous No.10977343]

>>10977226
Sergey contributed to Cryptlets. He didn’t contribute ChainLink to Cryptlets. Do you understand that SmartContract.com has operated without ChainLink by using their scheduling based smart oracles? For a while now...

[Anonymous No.10977354]

>>10977289

How Sergey has time for all of these companies?

http://existlocal.com/
https://www.secureae.com/
http://www.cryptamail.com/

etc.

[Anonymous No.10977359]

>>10977342
It’s insane so many people worship ChainLink and SmartContract.com without understanding much about the network or the company.

[Anonymous No.10977360]

>>10977343
>Sergey contributed to Cryptlets. He didn’t contribute ChainLink to Cryptlets.

[Anonymous No.10977378]

>>10977360
Explain how this makes me a brainlet. Do you know when this work was done and when the idea for ChainLink began to be conceived? If you did, you’d feel retarded. I guarantee you hadn’t even heard of smartcontract.com before biz started shilling ChainLink.

[Anonymous No.10977381]

>>10977359
I really hope you enjoy being poor because that is your destiny forever.

[Anonymous No.10977445]

>>10974045
JAMS, indeed. next time i won't be so obvious.

[Anonymous No.10977448]

Some marine remember the Video where Marley wants to mention CL and selfcorrects himself,

"we are also working with Chain" something along those lines. Find that for these fudding pajeets.

[Anonymous No.10977523]

>>10977448
This is an obvious example of confirming bias. Look, I’m not basing what I say on connecting forced dots because I hope my investment is good. I don’t hold ChainLink anymore and I sold it a while ago. I’m not arguing but I’m happy to point out why people are wrong about a MS or Corda connection to ChainLink (beyond Sergey contributing to Cryptlets prior to ChainLink’s inception, but the nature of that is more related to Azure’s current approach to oracles). I actually really hope ChainLink makes everyone a lot of money because I don’t have a mentality where I want to see people lose, I want everyone to win, but through lots of research, I don’t really believe in ChainLink being a solution that will be utilized in a big way the way that is suggested here. Maybe it’ll get a huge speculative pump like ETH, if that happens, I’d be really happy for the Linkies that make money, but I won’t take that as an indicator of my being wrong about its ubiquitous use.

[Anonymous No.10977525]

>>10977448
He actually meant chain man. Chain.com. @chain on Twitter.

[Anonymous No.10977539]

>>10977523
You just wrote all that out and don’t even realize a project called “chain” exists and that’s exactly what he was talking about. Fucking idiot.

[Anonymous No.10977559]

>>10977523
This is your typical investor. Literally throwing darts kek doesn’t know shit from a hole in the ground. Goes on about how this is the reason he doesn’t hold link topfuckingkek

[Anonymous No.10977569]

>>10977523
>i dont believe in CL being a solution that will be utilized in a big way

[Anonymous No.10977581]

>>10977539
That was what I’m saying: to think someone saying “chain” means they’re saying “ChainLink” and catching themselves is a clear example of confirming bias. Your bias is so strong toward wanting something that you’ll think something that dumb.

[Anonymous No.10977595]

>>10977523
>I’m not basing what I say on connecting forced dots
Not smart enough to know it wasn’t a dot at all you just got blown out by bait. We tested you. And you’re telling everyone chainlink isn’t doing this and that? Fuck outta here.

[Anonymous No.10977603]

>>10977523
Nigga watch the fucking video. I know what confirmation bias is.

That shit was the most clear slip-up. Looking at his body language etc. Find the fucking video and judge for yourself instead of listening to this hating pajeet wanting to sound smart WITH 0 EVIDENCE.

> muh i have info from azure, i can't share but trust me.

fuck off.

[Anonymous No.10977611]

>>10977581
It’s a completely different project you are fucking retarded still don’t underStand you’re lost.

[Anonymous No.10977687]

>>10977603
https://www.watchfintechtv.com/video/blockchain-business-disruptor-or-opportunity

I’ve seen the video

[Anonymous No.10977694]

>>10977687
Fucking lost.

[Anonymous No.10977698]

>>10977611
I think you’re the one missing the point I’m trying to articulate

[Anonymous No.10977719]

>>10977698
No you think someone thought the guy meant chainlink when we all know he meant chain.com. You think it’s a “forced dot” because you’re fucking retarded and weren’t in the thread to read we found the company and in fact chain would benefit from using chainlink but you’re fucking lost fuck off

[Anonymous No.10977754]

>>10977719
>>10977448

[Anonymous No.10977804]

>>10977754
Yeah he obviously didn’t finish reading the thread. Again for the last time you are lost and so is the other guy.

[Anonymous No.10977853]

>>10977804
Ok, good luck with your investment

[Anonymous No.10977870]

>>10977804
>>10977754

Ok, just looked into chain. And it might be a confirmation bias thing, on this particular case.

That still does not prove conclusively that Azure's cryptlets are not working with chainlink/utilizing Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.10977935]

>>10977595
>We
Lol

[Anonymous No.10977956]

>>10977870
Might be interesting to see what other examples of confirmation bias have been created regarding this project. I don’t want to argue anymore though, people get too emotional and aggressive instead of just wanting to discuss. I have been considering making a thread that debunks many of the “partnerships” and speculations with evidence I’ve uncovered, but I can’t help but think people will take it as a personal attack. I view all of this very objectively.

[Anonymous No.10978044]

>>10977956
I would most thoroughly enjoy this thread, and promise i won't attack you.

I also don't deny that there might be some confirmation bias out there.

However, until thus far there has been some circumstantial evidence (for cryptlets being involved)

And so far all a few anons have said is, i've done my research, i've made phonecalls, i have emails.

Well lets see them then.

[Anonymous No.10978050]

>>10977956
Show us the evidence

[Anonymous No.10978090]

I’ll make a thread this weekend with a lot of information I’ve compiled and anonymize myself from communications I’ve had with people, etc (I’m posting from my phone and won’t be home to my desktop computer until Friday evening)

[Anonymous No.10978117]

>>10978090
Sounds promising, i hope you deliver.

[Anonymous No.10978123]

That larper made me feel comfy yesterday

Now I’m back to waiting and doubting my sanity

[Anonymous No.10978126]

>>10978090
you scamming fucktard

[Anonymous No.10978161]

>>10977956
i would enjoy a thread fren if you can provide. i too can provide some insightful info to help debunk

[Anonymous No.10978249]

>>10978161
Okay, I may make a few threads, one for each speculation I’ve been able to outright dispute or create enough doubt that I don’t consider it very strong, I may use a trip code or some unique image.

I just want people to know I’m not trying to FUD, I no longer hold Link, and it doesn’t bother me whether it is a huge success or not (I actually would prefer that it does drastically pump so lots of people here make money because I think that would lead to lots of entertaining content)

[Anonymous No.10978308]

>>10977935
Kek>>10978090
Top kek Link holders are peak deluded. No way this shit gets adopted. No fucking way.

[Anonymous No.10978397]

>>10970976
>I actually wanted to make a video guide regarding running a node and setting it up with AWS or a VPS
Thomas already made a video like that
its up on his chanel

[Anonymous No.10978622]

>>10975564
> just call azure
> they'll happily tell you their process for handling on / off-chain data
> too lazy to even make up a jargon word salad explaining the process to supplement this even if fucking azure would just casually give this info away

Jesus christ you are shit at larping. Stick with what you actually know. Tell us you overheard your boss saying chainlink was bad while you were flipping burgers instead maybe.

[Anonymous No.10979134]

>>10977956
This is fucking metaphysical m9. I wrote confirmation bias earlier in the mmmmm bread and thought 'I haven't heard that in a while'. Now every fucker is saying it.

>is this confirmation bias of the word confirmation bias.