[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 791 KB, 2560x1580, 1525292798002.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10937055 No.10937055 [Reply] [Original]

https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2018/09/03/chainlink-solving-the-smart-contract-fiat-money-problem/

Face it guys the swift partnership has been priced in for ages now.

>> No.10937157

you realize Artificial Lawyer would not report they are "partnered" without a confimation. After reporting on Openlaw and Accord he now understands how big Chainlink will be. What the fuck did Sherlock know about Accord, openlaw and artificial lawyer?

>> No.10937244

>>10937157
elaborate

>> No.10937252

>>10937157
Prly Sergey or Steve

>> No.10937293

>>10937157
this. Tromans runs his own consulting firm and is deep in law. he wouldnt write that if they weren't confirmed 100%

>> No.10937313
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1523377045268s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10937313

>>10937293
https://www.tromansconsulting.com/

TromansConsulting provides strategy consulting services for law firms. I operate across the UK and globally. I am based in London.

I advise management teams on areas such as: business expansion, merger and international development via new offices or networks, as well innovation and the adoption of new technology, such as AI, that has a strategic aspect.

I have particular skills advising law firms on:

- Merger candidate analysis

- International network strategy

- Innovation development

>> No.10937321

>>10937244
on what. Artificial Lawyer is a reputable website that reports facts. He must've gotten confirmation from Chainlink to state the Swift Partnership. Also Sherlocklink stated months ago that Chainlink would partner with accord and openlaw then something about sergey guest posting on artificial lawyer...the guest post never happened but the timing of this post is weird...almost same timing Sherlock gave a while back.

>> No.10937343

Post it in the general

>> No.10937358

>>10937313
literally who?

>> No.10937370

>>10937343
General threads are board killing cancer.

>> No.10937377

>>10937358
dude who runs Artificial Lawyer.
just because you don't know many people in the outside world because you dont leave your mommys basement doesn't mean we aren't familiar with them.

>> No.10937383

What does this mean for link

>> No.10937403
File: 51 KB, 645x729, 1523157616491.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10937403

>>10937383
use your brain and put two and two together

>> No.10937408

>>10937321
>https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2018/09/03/chainlink-solving-the-smart-contract-fiat-money-problem/
I remember that you wouldn't happen to have the thread would you.

>> No.10937427
File: 1.11 MB, 1944x2592, 1510921677583.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10937427

>>10937157
so i guess there's an insider lurking /biz

>> No.10937557

>>10937427
Anybody not building a significant stack of Link has to be crazy at this point. Link is about to moon.

>> No.10937564

I was gonna make a thread about tromans consulting before but checked the archive and there were no mentions of him so I figured he wasn't that relevant. Would be nice to find out who his clients are... I wouldn't be surprised if he has a link stack kek.

>> No.10937725
File: 220 KB, 1080x1200, Sxsw March 14.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10937725

>>10937321
It's not the timing Sherlock gave.
Sherlock isn't an insider, just a speculator like the rest of us and probably got the info about AL post from another source.

He predicted the accord announcement in March but it happened in July.
He announced a guest post by Sergey was submitted on AL and AL did run a series of guest articles around that time but none by Sergey. One of them was by David Fisher, the chairman of the global legal consortium and Integra ledger. For some reason Tromans never published the Sergey one, if it does exist... Maybe if someone asked him about it he would reply?

>> No.10937802

>>10937725
someone is asking right now and will report back

>> No.10938956

>>10937157
>Artificial Lawyer
>Artificial
artificial = not real
never heard of this blog, must be a sensationalist tabloid writer at the wheel

>> No.10939041
File: 46 KB, 1181x321, swift oracle.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10939041

>>10937157
Yes it's "partnered" with SWIFT to create SWIFT's OWN oracle, doofus. They won't be using your dumb erc20 shittoken.

>> No.10939065

>>10937055

>>10938888

>> No.10939066

>>10937403
>oh you're stupid? great! solve this math.

>> No.10939076

>>10937377
>just because you don't know many people in the outside world because you dont leave your mommys basement doesn't mean we aren't familiar with them.
lol

>> No.10939118

Came for news about Line
Leaving with a face full of The Other Link

>> No.10939178

>>10937725
maybe he meant sxsw 2019?

>> No.10939219

>>10937157
How do you know it isn't just lazy journalism? We see a lot of that these days, it is possible

t. 33k link holder

>> No.10939264

>>10939219
The jews have programmed you to distrust the written word whenever the news is positive.

>> No.10939286

>>10937321
Swift is on the website. He doesn’t really need confirmation from the team to write something that’s on the front page and has slide show of swift chainlink etc. the problem is there’s been zero “official confirmation” from chainlink or swift officially. Him reporting swift is not wrong or right is what I’m saying

>> No.10939321

>>10939041
"...how this works with the Swift Chainlink"

-Sergey Nazarov

>> No.10939373
File: 57 KB, 749x500, jews.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10939373

>>10939264

>> No.10939392

>>10939264
nothing wrong with healthy skepticism

>> No.10939405

>>10939286
Just like there wasn't confirmation on other speculated partnerships like openlaw. We all know Chainlink has been taking things slow as far as marketing goes. They arent going to rush to announce and confirm a Gigantic partnership like swift.

This is the time to get greedy and stack up as much link as you can. BUT most are inexperienced traders/investors and will FOMO in when news hits and price is 30% up already.

>> No.10939411

>‘This partnership shows a promising way forward to lower those [transactional] barriers and make using cryptocurrency in smart contracts simpler and more intuitive for everyday users,’ said the companies.

Who are the companies?

>> No.10939416

>>10939392
Exactly...the article on the website can simply be parroting what breadcrumbs they were given like we do on 4chan. Unless Swift or a LINK team member actually make an official partnership confirmation, this is all speculation...albeit strong speculation.

>> No.10939473

Swift doesn't want price to increase yet, nor does Link. If it does will be too expensive for nodes to aquire Link. In my opinion.

>> No.10939486

>>10939416
Look at how cautious the team is. It is stated on their site, Sergey mentioned it in his EOY update and Rory has confirmed it.

>> No.10939514

>>10939473
Yes also the reason for slow approach to marketing. Adelyn wasnt hired to do nothing. She has been obviously told the slow approach they are taking with marketing and confirming partnerships.

>> No.10939524

>>10939486
>Look at how cautious the team is
A nice breath of fresh air don't you think? Compared to other teams in the crypto space

>> No.10939562

>>10939514
Some of the time since she was hired has likely been to educate her on the project too

>> No.10939671

People get all hung on up on SWIFT "partnership" when the whole concept is a fucking stupid normie meme that VEN fucked to death over the last year. "Partnered" with SWIFT or not doesn't mean anything.

>> No.10939716

>>10939562
and on the all-encompassing evil that is the cis white male

>> No.10939966

>>10939524
I've been breathing this fresh air for half a year now. I believe that this 'freshness' is just partially digested big mac intestinal vapours.

>> No.10939992

>>10939671
it's not about the partnership itself, it's about whether SWIFT will actually use the tokens or not

>> No.10940121

>>10939992
the answer is no

>> No.10940130

>>10939411
Accord and openlaw I assume

>> No.10940163

>>10940121
I'm leaning towards that answer too, 70/30
the universe simply wouldn't allow us neets to escape wageslavery for much longer

>> No.10940335

>>10940163
maybe the universe wouldnt want it for you, but it does want it for one of us. 5000$ eoy famalampai

>> No.10940351 [DELETED] 
File: 29 KB, 618x258, 0C7ABA34-0616-4ABB-932C-5AA18F999741.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10940351

>>10937055
Japanese LINK forever

>> No.10940387

>>10939405
30% wow, thats like pennies.
SICK!

>> No.10940390
File: 296 KB, 1024x1113, 1533664267471.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10940390

>>10940163
>tl;dr version

We are inconsequential in the greater scheme of things. Do you know how many people will get shaken out? Do you know why there is such a big difference between the circulating supply and the actual supply? Do you know how many people will and actually can run a node and just sell their coins for a profit?

350,000,000 LINK is the total circulating supply. When it reaches $1000 it will have a marketcap of 350,000,000,000. Considering that $1 of new money increases the marketcap of a coin by $10 that is around $35,000,000,000 of actual money entering the market.

The EU is talking about decoupling from the USD and focusing on using home grown solutions like SWIFT to decrease dependence on the USA for global payments.

>Global non-cash transactions broke a decade-long record for growth in 2014-2015 with volumes exceeding 11% growth to
reach more than 433 billion. In WPR 2017, we estimate that global non-cash transaction volumes will record a CAGR of 10.9%
during 2015–2020E. Which markets will drive this growth? Developing markets are expected to boost the global growth rate of
non-cash transaction volumes with a sustained CAGR of 19.6% during this period, while mature markets are expected to grow
by a modest 5.6%. Europe, including the Eurozone, is expected to witness stable growth of 6.5% over the next five years.

>Tackling Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities in the New Payments Ecosystem

>All stakeholders must strengthen the security of transactions against potential cyber threats. Banks and other stakeholders have three options available to them: Collaborating with FinTechs, making investments in advanced technologies and monitoring tools, and strengthening internal governance to ensure seamless compliance.

Using Link Tokens to save billions a year is nothing. Banks don't have to think about time the way we do. Institutions live longer than us. $35 billion entering the market for this kind of tech is literally nothing.

>> No.10940527

>>10940387
I didnt say it would stop pumping at 30% I said brainlets like you would buy in after it pumped instead of now. Also thats only pennies to basement dwellers like you who have tiny positions like you. Its ok though if you learn to not be so cynical you might learn to grow your $500 Dollar portfolio to 5k.

>> No.10941178
File: 33 KB, 378x256, DAD0A0DA-9C4D-4AAA-93A6-A2C24FE9A4D7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10941178

>>10937557
>about to moon

>> No.10941223

>>10940121
>>10940163
SWIFT won’t be using a meme token. Jesus Christ. The chainlink network builds off the POC with Swift but is distinct. SmartContract itself may have some paid work with Swift but it won’t involve Chainlink.

>> No.10941560

>>10939473
and here I thought the pajeet meme was just a meme

>> No.10941984
File: 1.16 MB, 1200x2334, Screenshot_20180903-201306_Chrome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10941984

>> No.10942030
File: 791 KB, 1020x1020, fruitmarine989.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10942030

>>10937157
he knew mangoes were imperative

>> No.10942258

>>10939992
Swift doesn't have to use the token, but their partner Chainlink will have a huge supply of data they get through Swift to support other transactions that do, and Swift will get a cut of all of it, not to mention a huge stack of Link that isn't in circulation. Swift going to make HUGE money off Link.

>> No.10942684

>>10942258
This is an interesting angle that I haven't heard anyone else mention. SWIFT themselves might not use Chainlink directly for their clients as some brainlets think as SC has built a private oracle just for them. BUT it's highly likely whatever SC built them will be able to work with Chainlink's decentralized oracle network very easily and there will be certain transactions that make sense to use the LINK network for. SWIFT gets to hold the hand of any big entity needing this service and might even push for it for certain things because Sergey sold them a metric fuck ton of LINK tokens at a cheap price. SWIFT gets to play both sides now. If their centralized oracle that SC built for them isn't the answer for a client's transaction, they can then push them to use the decentralized version (Chainlink network) to so their transaction. They make money either way.

>> No.10942923

>>10942684
I am suggesting they make money on all transactions Link is involved in exchange for their financial support and backing. Think about who "owns" Swift.

>> No.10943168

>>10940390
Great write up my man. It sure seems an optimistic forecast but I appreciate it

>> No.10943207

>>10939473
>how does crypto work?
>brainlet.jpg

>> No.10943224

>>10939992
They have to. It’s the chainlink NETWORK. Plus the erc is what fetched the data.

>> No.10943246

>>10941223
imagine being this stupid.
>what is an erc token that fetches data?