Breakout imminent

[Anonymous No.10910989]

Get in now

Thank me later

[Anonymous No.10911040]

>>10910989
Not sure if right now, but I also get the feeling there will be a breakout today, probably in the next 12 hours.
Makes me happy to see anons posting the Sayaka image I made. Someone shared it on the Nano Discord too.

[Anonymous No.10911059]

bands tightening
macd about to do crossover

[Anonymous No.10911072]

>>10910989
Nano hodler getting assraped since Jan 2018 buying some more, while screaming: "2 da mooOooOooon!!". Nano is a hyped shitcoin with 756 TPS only and insane node problems, constant crashes http://archive.is/v2noA Sorry . Good luck with your delusional moon-project.

[Anonymous No.10911080]

>>10910989

>put acandily clad child next to NANO logo
>that'll make them buy my bags

[Anonymous No.10911134]

>>10911072
I got in at $1.66, stay poor faggot :')

[Anonymous No.10911160]

Yawn. It's a shitcoin. And most people are down more than 50% in it. Zoom out

[Anonymous No.10911166]

>>10911160
lol, name one coin in which people aren't down 50%.

[Anonymous No.10911171]

>>10910989

[Anonymous No.10911194]

[Anonymous No.10911242]

>>10911194
improved a bit

[Anonymous No.10911332]

[Anonymous No.10911885]

>>10911072
Yeah even if you bought top you could have easily made good money by getting back in sub $1. $50 eoy easy

[Anonymous No.10911902]

>>10911332
i like this one

[Anonymous No.10911935]

>>10911885
BeeeeeppCONeeeeeeect!!
Using your argument, you could also earn good money on Bitconnect after they crashed. They also had dead cat bounce.
>$50 eoy easy
Yeah, right. You base that on what? Drugs, dreams or fairy tales?

[Anonymous No.10911982]

>>10911935
Uh it's one of the very few useful coins and is just a matter of time before it's in the top 5. Even without a massive market bull run Nano can have a huge pump.

[Anonymous No.10911988]

Lol these paid shillers. Nano's kernel has been leaked and they know it.
DO NOT BUY IN! THE EXCHANGE KERNEL IS LEAKING NANO AT HIGH SPEED

[Anonymous No.10911998]

>>10911134
I never trusted Shapiro or Bomber. I got out pre Bitgrail. Stay poor ignorant nanofaggot. You are not a cryptocurrency inverstor, but victim of a an over-hyped cult. Take a look, read the thread >>10873614

[Anonymous No.10912001]

>>10911988
Surely you have sauce?

[Anonymous No.10912013]

>>10911998
Listing major flaws and starts with 700 tps. No point in reading further

[Anonymous No.10912043]

>>10911982
No. Nano will dump to sub 1 USD and stay there, for so slowly to slide towards zero

Nano has only 756 TPS and can not scale to level Nano devs promise. It is physically impossible. Colin admits now that one might have a second layer. But then Ethereum with their vast resources are fare better equipped to undertake such a daunting task. Single Dev Colin has no chance and as always the Dev team are under-informing about these problems. And Nano moonboys are too stupid to understand it. Nano has constant node problems on an insane level. Just the last 30 days. http://archive.is/v2noA

More here in this thread: >>10873614

[Anonymous No.10912053]

>>10912043
Okee dokee. Have fun buying the top

[Anonymous No.10912057]

>>10912013
>Listing major flaws and starts with 700 tps. No point in reading further
You prove yourself to be a moron, belonging to death cult, more than a "tech investor". Here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/98alqy/why_isnt_stress_test_result_published_as_5700_tps/

[Anonymous No.10912059]

>>10910989
Fuck u pedo

[Anonymous No.10912066]

>>10912053
That makes no sense. Google dead cat bounce. After that, google the destiny of Bitconnect coins.

[Anonymous No.10912110]

>>10912066
Why keep posting bitgrail shit 1 year after? Get over it and don't keep shit on exchanges

[Anonymous No.10912163]

>>10912110
You believe Nano dev team having multiple pending lawsuits have no impact on the Nano price? Are you on drugs? Here: https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/24157263/Brola_v_Nano_et_al

>Get over it and don't keep shit on exchanges
Again, for you stupid nanofags: >>10911998

[Anonymous No.10912221]

>>10912163
Not sure why you think existing priced in lawsuits where the dev team has no fault would impact the price. And if it did short term I don't see the relevance to the tech. I'm sure you made some wise investments though, good luck

[Anonymous No.10912250]

$5 End of Monday.

[Anonymous No.10912493]

>>10912221
Nano is in reality a one person dev, Colin. What do you think will happen when he is dragged before court in multiple lawsuits for months, even years? The crypto space is a very crowded and competitive market, he is competing with far larger and more well funded teams, even without the lawsuit. Add to that, the tech does not function, as the multiple code issues clearly show. This is last from last 30 days: http://archive.is/v2noA.. Nano is an over-hyped super buggy high school project with utter business ignorants and amateurs. Their dealing with the BitGrail scandal is a horror show for any manager and a text book example how to NOT deal with a confidence crisis. They came off as complete sociopaths and utterly destroyed the community. Only the most stupid and fanatic are left. No criticism of devs is tolerated in what is left of the Nano community.

[Anonymous No.10912503]

>>10912493
>Nano is in reality a one person dev, Colin.
This is so wrong I didn't even read the rest. It has the most active dev community in cryptospace.

[Anonymous No.10912507]

>>10912221
Nano is in reality a one person dev, Colin. What do you think will happen when he is dragged before court in multiple lawsuits for months, even years? The crypto space is a very crowded and competitive market, he is competing with far larger and more well funded teams, even without the lawsuit. Add to that, the tech does not function, as the multiple code issues clearly show. This is last from last 30 days: http://archive.is/v2noA.. Nano is an over-hyped super buggy high school project with utter business ignorants and amateurs. Their dealing with the BitGrail scandal is a horror show for any manager and a text book example how to NOT deal with a confidence crisis. They came off as complete sociopaths and utterly destroyed the community. Only the most stupid and fanatic are left. No criticism of devs is tolerated in what is left of the Nano community.

[Anonymous No.10912529]

>>10912221
Nano is in reality a one person dev, Colin. What do you think will happen when he is dragged before court in multiple lawsuits for months, even years? The cryptospace is a very crowded and competitive market, he is competing with far larger and more well funded teams, even without the lawsuit. Add to that, the tech does not function, as the multiple code issues clearly show. This is last from last 30 days: http://archive.is/v2noA.. Nano is an over-hyped super buggy high school project with utter business ignorants and amateurs. Their dealing with the BitGrail scandal is a horror show for any manager and a text book example how to NOT deal with a confidence crisis. They came off as complete sociopaths and utterly destroyed the community. Only the most stupid and fanatic sycophants are still there. The community never recovered. No criticism of devs is tolerated in what is left of the Nano community.

[Anonymous No.10912536]

>>10912503
>This is so wrong I didn't even read the rest. It has the most active dev community in cryptospace.
Sure, name the three most groundbreaking coding in Nano not done by Colin. Go on.

[Anonymous No.10912537]

>>10911166
I'm 50% down on Bitcoin. Does that make it a shitcoin?

[Anonymous No.10912555]

>>10912537
Has Bitcoin ever been buggy with constant crashes? http://archive.is/v2noA
Or problems like this: >>10873614

[Anonymous No.10912575]

>>10912536
>Sure, name the three most groundbreaking coding in Nano not done by Colin. Go on.
What does that even mean you spaz?

[Anonymous No.10912579]

>>10912536
Why's every dev on the team need to come up with groundbreaking shit, and why we would need to list 3.

Saying Nano basically has 1 dev, and Nano has an army of devs where people can list out individual groundbreaking code developments by who came up with it are two drastically different things.

God I hate crypto. Non devs have no idea what they're talking about

[Anonymous No.10912648]

>>10912555
Bitcoin has been created in 2009 you retard. Ofcourse it had bugs and crashed back then.

[Anonymous No.10912657]

>>10912579
So you are a dev and you can't even answer me? So where do you work "dev"? When did "devs" like you become so stupid that you didn't even know that Nano has only 756 TPS and you even implied that my claim was false, only to run away when presented with facts from Nanoreddit itself. How do you explain that "dev"? What is it with you idiotic nano fanboys and lying? That and your homoerotic attachment to the Nano team. One critical word against them and full downvoting and then kicked out. Don't you understand that such a behaviour scares the hell out off any investor?

[Anonymous No.10912662]

>>10912648
>Ofcourse it had bugs and crashed back then.
Sure nano moonboy. Documentation.

[Anonymous No.10912737]

>>10912657
Wew. So I didn't answer you about what naming each feature the Nano dev team makes, specifically 3 groundbreaking things from each part of the team? Sure I could dig through the github and discord and grab any big things they were working on, then bring them here for you to say they aren't groundbreaking or up to your standards.

You aren't worth the fucking work.

The TPS Nano is at right now is huge and you're making it seem like it's a shit number. Not seeing the accomplishment there shows how you have no clue what you're talking about, and not being able to see how it is improving over time even more so.

Not sure why you seem to be accusing me of being a fanboy and making it seem like I'm lying about being a dev or something, which is just not relevant and cringy so yeah. I mean, in the same light of "attachment" to nano, why do you feel the need to keep attacking a coin you don't think has potential

[Anonymous No.10912859]

>>10912737
The TPS of Nano is a disaster. Only 756. Compare that to VISA's 56 000. There is no way in hell Nano will ever be a global currency. It is physically impossible. Everything around Nano is a scam. As the 7000 TPS advocated in Dec 2017. Reality was 100-200. Just Bitgrail was a scam. Promoted and defended by the Nano devs for months. They got their millions of Nanos out, http://archive.is/Wkgvn . Ordinary scammed Nano investors did not.

You claim to be a dev, but are too stupid to understand how TPS is correctly calculated. Typical crazy nano fanboy, with nothing but dreams and wishful thinking. Given to him by the dishonest Nano team.

[Anonymous No.10912976]

>>10912859

You realize bitcoin TPS is around 5 right? No shit comparing to Visa is higher, centralized systems perform better. The point is to make a decentralized currency and so far Nano does it better than any other crypto. Holy fuck there are legitimate issues with Nano to discuss and you can't even come up with anything decent

[Anonymous No.10913004]

>>10912859
And cut the fanboy shit and have an actual talk about the tech. I'm probably going to stop checking this thread since arguing with 15 year old "investors" who lost funds on an exchange is a glorious waste of time on this beautiful Saturday

[Anonymous No.10913016]

These fudders are on full force. I guess they want another shot of that sweet sub $1 NANO.
Lmao. Buy my bags now at 200%, idiots.

[Anonymous No.10913065]

>>10912976
>You realize bitcoin TPS is around 5 right?
That's why they are working on the Lightning Network, moron.

>No shit comparing to Visa is higher, centralized systems perform better.
Nano claims to aim to be a global currency, those are the numbers they have to compete with. If they were honest, they would admit that their goals are just shiny objects, detached from reality physically impossible. They don't. As a supposed "dev" and nano investor, you should know this. But of course you don't. You are as fake and little transparent as your heroes, the nano devs. Or maybe you are Zack Shapiro? You have his stupidity and his arrogance.

[Anonymous No.10913074]

>>10913016
Look at Bitconnect. Google dead cat bounce. Look at Nano. Then tell me about your glorious 200% gain and all your heavy bags. Good luck.

[Anonymous No.10913172]

these bollinger bands are real tight on my nuts right now
that release when we're up 30-40% is going to feel so good

hell we might even go up 50%

[Anonymous No.10913180]

>>10911902
Thanks fren

[Anonymous No.10913213]

>>10913074
Sure mate. I hope you succeed in your FUD attempt, I want more sub $1 NANO too, to be honest.
>also 15 posts by this ID
Lol

[Anonymous No.10913643]

>>10911982
Hahahahahaha.

>he thinks he will make it with a currency coin