Rational Link Investors

[Anonymous No.10880231]

I’ve been holding 50k Link and swing trading with around 100k Link for the past ~6 months, and it is very easy profit. I’m starting to get pretty uneasy about holding the 50k though and think it’d be smarter to just continue swing trading or invest that money into some equities.

I wanted to delude myself into believing the hype and that Link hype was kept in check through NDAs, but that clearly isn’t true with all these unimportant announcements lately (I agree Accord is kind of cool, but it isn’t as significant as people are trying to make it...my opinion). I was at Consensus and spoke with members of Microsoft Azure and it was very apparent they had no inclination toward using ChainLink (had never even heard of it) which further leads me to believe that just because Sergey had involvement with cryptlets, doesn’t mean that involvement included their use of ChainLink.

Are any other Anons viewing the hype created here rationally? I’m starting to think the singularity is partially from the very easy trading opportunities Link offers (or that hype really has just been created by larps during the last bull run in the hopes of dumping bags). I know this will attract a bunch of nonsense replies, but is anyone in a similar boat? Too many things don’t add up for this to be as significant as people believe. Remember all the huge companies like MS publicly fawning over Ethereum in the early days? No significant entities besides “blockchain consortiums” are talking about ChainLink (except SWIFT, but even that isn’t recent or anything similar to Ethereum’s being heralded as a game changer). There’s just a bunch of unconfirmed breadcrumbs.

[Anonymous No.10880236]

1k eoy faggot

[Anonymous No.10880240]

>>10880231
All link hype created here is just paid shills / freelancers doing their jobs

[Anonymous No.10880255]

>>10880231
so we are just supposed to believe you? also 50k is nothing. step your game up linklet kek. please.

[Anonymous No.10880257]

[Anonymous No.10880278]

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY!
HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

[Anonymous No.10880289]

>>10880240
I know that’s not the case, I just think a picture has been painted that make people think this is a much bigger thing than it is. It is clear most people here have no real world interaction with any entities actually developing blockchain solutions: no one is using any of these token platforms for anything, not does it seem like anyone (at least in my discussions) plan to. I’ve been to three major blockchain conferences this year, and they’ve all made me pretty bearish about the cryptocurrency market as a whole (save for a few projects).

Private blockchains are the chosen technology right now. I know three separate individuals with direct contact to the ChainLink team, and nothing any of them has said makes me feel like this project is even 1/1,000,000 the behemoth people here are trying to imply...

[Anonymous No.10880297]

>>10880231
>I was at Consensus and spoke with members of Microsoft Azure and it was very apparent they had no inclination toward using ChainLink

Yeah and my dad is working at Nintendo and tells me they're finally going to release a virtual reality game with 5D pokemon.

[Anonymous No.10880299]

>>10880255
Well done on missing the point of my post so you could have an opportunity to show your dick size.

[Anonymous No.10880300]

>>10880231
This is still in its early stages. It’s a 2-3 year hold.

[Anonymous No.10880313]

>>10880297
They were very available for discussion. I’m not implying I have some sort of special contact with them. They were very available for Q&A both during and after presentation...

[Anonymous No.10880328]

>>10880299
and what exactly was the point of your post? It is nothing of substance beside "I talked to some people at Microsoft Azure and they didn't know about ChainLink." Ok? And now you want to sell your bags? Sell 'em. Who gives a fuck?

[Anonymous No.10880335]

>>10880231
Man link just dips a little and the spirit is already wavering. We still have 4 months to go till EOY. It will be guaranteed 100€

[Anonymous No.10880342]

>>10880300
I’m not arguing that, I’m arguing that people are deliberately manipulating information to make this seem like it has entirely more potential than it does due to corporate interest that doesn’t actually exist.

[Anonymous No.10880356]

>>10880231
Then sell, faggot.

[Anonymous No.10880361]

>>10880328
More was hoping that anyone has done some ground work regarding their investment besides reading biz posts and could share their findings.

[Anonymous No.10880365]

Here's my take. If smart contracts take off, something like chainlink needs to exist. There doesn't seem to be any compelling alternatives right now, so linkies it is.

[Anonymous No.10880368]

>>10880342
i can tell by your syntax that you shit on a street so i just don't care, pajeet.

[Anonymous No.10880377]

>>10880313
So why didn't shill them chainlink and told the practical applications it has for them?

[Anonymous No.10880386]

>>10880335
It's not going to be 100 euros at eoy. This is a long term project.

[Anonymous No.10880399]

>>10880231
You can't talk to link cultists, they're too far gone. It's especially sad watching the newest members of the cult latch onto any little 'breadcrumb' or old piece of rehashed info about the POC for SWIFT (unrelated to the meme token you hold sweetie) as reassurance they made the right decision to take out that loan and go all-in. Like most cults, this will ending in mass suicide.

[Anonymous No.10880408]

>>10880342
http://digitalchamber.org/assets/smart-contracts-12-use-cases-for-business-and-beyond.pdf

you may need to lurk more, desu.

[Anonymous No.10880412]

>>10880231
Glad I sold my bags in early January

[Anonymous No.10880413]

>>10880386

Tell what's long term, it seems people think 1 months is long in this volatile market.
Much can change in a short period of time. Especially as mainnet will probably be released in the upcoming months.

[Anonymous No.10880423]

>>10880377
I tried to discuss it with them. They described how they make their own oracles and how the information going into the smart contract applications they’re putting together is sourced from trusted entities.

[Anonymous No.10880442]

>>10880408
You may need to get out and actually interact with some of the companies leading the way in these endeavors, like IBM and MS...

[Anonymous No.10880448]

>>10880423
Yup, decentralized oracles are a meme.

[Anonymous No.10880480]

>>10880368
I’m not a pajeet, regardless of my ethnicity, why don’t you try to take some time to be objective, think for yourself, and try to have a thought that hasn’t been hashed out here ad infinitum. To me, the fact that a bunch of literal WHOs are announcing their interest in ChainLink isn’t good. Ethereum was the opposite: huge entities were fascinated by it and showed support. Huge entities already established in lucrative economic sectors. ChainLink is solely garnering attention from blockchain consortiums and unheard of projects that surely generate little to no revenue. If huge entities were very interested, they’d surely be talking about ChainLink now and its test net and potential...

[Anonymous No.10880494]

>>10880442
>passive aggressive.
>refuses to revise a document
>document contains such movers and shakers

Please go back to plebbit.

[Anonymous No.10880499]

I honestly don’t know the site probably won’t give you the answer you’re looking for OP. LINK is a interesting project i’ll buy a little more soon and stop accumulating because this coin is just too overhyped, lots of larps etc.

[Anonymous No.10880510]

And look, I’m not trying to fud, I’m genuinely looking to discuss this with other speculators (especially anyone who has done some real world ground work...not autistic dot connecting in matching individuals’ names that show up on websites, Twitter follows, etc).

[Anonymous No.10880521]

>>10880480
>Swift is an unheard of project

[Anonymous No.10880524]

>>10880413
People who bought bitcoin in 2012 had to wait 5 years until it finally took off.

>>10880423
Why go through the hassle of a trusted entity if sergey will be done soon?

[Anonymous No.10880533]

>>10880231
I don't like calling it investing. I think this will go somewhere in a couple of years, not sooner. Maybe. Nowhere close to 1K. I talk more about crypto because it's more exciting, but most of my money is on other shit and most of my crypto money isn't on LINK. I don't know, to this day I still believe Ethereum is a huge piece of shit.

If you feel the position is too big and you want to put more on other assets by all means go ahead, it's your money and it's only going to affect you, my only advice, don't rush a lot out and don't rush into moving it into something else, your other shit will probably have to wait too if you want good payouts. But it's fine to change your mind. I don't believe swing trading is affecting the price "inorganically", it's more like there's not much more to do with the token than trading it now. The price of all these things stays alive on speculation, it's not like people are spot buying because they need to stake TODAY.

[Anonymous No.10880545]

>>10880423
>Make their own oracles.
If it's not end to end decentralized, then what's the point of using smart contracts?

[Anonymous No.10880546]

>>10880494
I’ve read the document. It doesn’t mention ChainLink. Smart Contracts are not equal to ChainLink.

[Anonymous No.10880559]

>>10880231
to be honest, i think ChainLink only contributed to Microsoft Cryptlets Bletchley by discussing an oracle standard, rather than being the oracle service itself

Since the team didnt mention microsoft on their website, but DID mention SWIFT, i think the SWIFT thing is actually legit

[Anonymous No.10880579]

>>10880545
To cut out a lot of redundancy and extra work/costs associated with existing contractual paradigms. I don’t know why decentralization is necessarily important. I think cost saving is the biggest driving factor.

[Anonymous No.10880591]

>>10880386
Fud. Kill self

[Anonymous No.10880609]

>>10880510
We see through your obvious FUDing. Creative but nonetheless transparent. Swing trading with a 100k link stack? Yeah ok

[Anonymous No.10880618]

>>10880231

Seems easy enough to make profit trading, with a large amount of unnecessary risk. I feel comfortable living my life and saving my energy for living.

[Anonymous No.10880633]

>>10880480
stop shitting on streets, pajeet. bad.

[Anonymous No.10880649]

>>10880231

Where is this pic from? The location.

[Anonymous No.10880684]

>>10880559
I agree...and unfortunately I don’t think that’s as big of a deal as the type of smart contract development scale that will implemented in private industry by the likes of MS and IBM. If these types of huge players aren’t concerned with decentralization, no one will be. I understand there is a push for DLT, but you don’t necessarily need the oracles to be decentralized also to achieve this end...

[Anonymous No.10880699]

>>10880361
ever heard of psd2 faggot? ever heard of the open banking initiative and LINK's role in it? stop larping with your " I met with Microsoft Azure"

[Anonymous No.10880719]

>>10880684
DLT isn't D without the DO (Decentralized Oracles) retard. This FUD thread looks big brained but is actually quite small.

[Anonymous No.10880722]

>>10880231
All chainlink threads are rational my man.

[Anonymous No.10880754]

>>10880231

>Are any other Anons viewing the hype created here rationally?

being rational on the internet just means pessimistically listing off every reservation you have on a topic in as even-hinged of a manner as is possible, usually on a relevant subreddit, but to anyone here who has even a cursory understanding of chainlink lore it's pretty clear that you're wrong about literally everything. but that's beside the point: you *seem* reasonable so now we have to engage you as if you were.

anyways, thanks for posting your critique. really made me think.

[Anonymous No.10880772]

1. All other projects in the space are garbage for the most part.
2. Most can be replaced with an oracle.
3. Where else are you going to put your money?
4. Wait for the mainnet.
5. If you believe in blockchains future they need an oracle. Without it you have pointless tokenization.
6. Watch Marley Grey - the lead architect behind Azure describe the future of blockchain to put things into perspective.
7. I invest 2-3 years ahead in the future before people wake up about sleepers.
8. All it takes is a couple projects announcing a partnership to launch eyes onto the project and send the chart flying (why would the team want this before mainnet , they will be bombarded with questions)
9. Who else has such a powerful first mover? The network effect is impossible for other firms to recreate and its barely even started yet.
10. Look at the scarcity / token valuation modes engrained into LINK. ITS DESIGNED TO INCREASE IN PRICE.
11. Understand the future of the API economy and it’s sheer scale (Mulesoft)

Come on man don’t get restless feet. Use your gut. If you’re scared you’re putting too much emotion/size on your position.

[Anonymous No.10880783]

>>10880231
Here's the sensible value proposition of Chainlink:
A reliable and easy to use platform for connecting API data to smart contracts is a great idea.
It's not technically that difficult (compared to the leap of genius it took to solve other crypto problems) and can be useful even it isnt perfect.
The team is professional, experienced and well funded.
There are so many coins in the top 20 that are literally useless and which a working oracle platform would deserve to replace that a fair valuation would probably be 2 or 3BN in today's market.
This gives a valuation of $3-$10 per LINK (depending on how you count mcap) for a functional mainnet.

[Anonymous No.10880784]

>>10880699
Yes, where is there any evidence of Chainlink’s involvement with PSD2 besides breadcrumb suggestions on biz?

[Anonymous No.10880814]

>>10880719
Distributed doesn’t mean completely decentralized. We can have a discussion without name calling. I’m not trying to “insult your investment” or make you feel bad. Just trying to take an objective perspective which doesn’t seem to happen here...well...ever

[Anonymous No.10880824]

>>10880231
Why would anyone praise a tech that is (still) non existant?

Gl with the trades though
Dont do anything stupid these next couple of days

[Anonymous No.10880831]

>>10880546
read the connections:

https://www.sibos.com/sites/default/files/sibos_toronto_2017_sibos_issues_wrapup_edition.pdf

Let's check out some of the relevant passages.

Most of this is from the section "Friend or foe?", but the entire doc is full of gems.

1) "The European Union’s second
Payments Services Directive (PSD2) and
the UK’s Open Banking Initiative, due to
come into effect from 2018, both mandate
use of standardised open APIs to facilitate
access to bank customers’ transaction and
account data."
>FANTASTIC news for Chainlink, which relies entirely on external data sources like open APIs.
>This also means anyone can run a very desirable node, since previously internal bank info will become externally available APIs.

2) "You can see that the rhetoric around fintech
has changed from disruption and revolution
to collaborative outcomes."
>Extremely relevant to Chainlink, which is set to enter into the biggest collaborations ever between crypto and traditional finance

[Anonymous No.10880835]

>>10880772
So many simple procedures , clearing houses , lawyers etc will be replaced. You need a decntruwlized web for those procedures. Private blockchain infrastructure running on closed Oracle infrastructure defeats the purpose of a blockchain doesn’t it? The trust / immutable nature is gone (and are the costs the same? Are they cheaper?) with models like LINK YOU GET REWARDED FOR HOLDING IT / INVESTING IN THE NETWORK(could you say the same about a private system)

[Anonymous No.10880838]

>>10880231
this is the 'red.ditor' from yesterday. same style, same comebacks to insults

[Anonymous No.10880855]

>>10880784
put two and two together. you managed to make it to three different blockchain conferences after putting on your big boy pants by yourself. why don't you use your brain for once and think about it. Chainlink is on the verge of supporting the very formats that will run the post-PSD2 banking world. It is not a coincidence that mainnet will most likely launch around the time most of these banks will have to comply to the new PSD2 laws.

[Anonymous No.10880899]

>>10880855

ya ok fine sure whatever great i guess, but do you have any
p Ro o F

[Anonymous No.10880907]

>>10880899
Please no one answer idiots like this. Pointless bumps.

[Anonymous No.10880915]

>>10880231
also what on earth makes you think equities is a better idea to transfer your 15k into? risk management much?

[Anonymous No.10880957]

>>10880772
Thanks for this reply. I’ve admittedly been researching more and more into the potential for future API economy and it is my hold out reservation. I’m just not sure it might not be simpler to penalize an API provider for providing bad data for a smart contract and use a secure oracle in the way Microsoft Azure and IBM are now. Seems like there could be several solutions, not all involving an added expense in the smart contract...?

[Anonymous No.10880982]

>>10880855
But there’s been no actual suggestion as to Mainnet’s release or Chainlink’s involvement. Unless I missed something?

[Anonymous No.10880985]

>>10880231
you get upset with the namecalling. do you wanna know why people here are pissed off? because you come in here knowing fully you have 90% of your networth invested in LINK, yet somehow you have serious reservations about the project that stem from a complete lack of understanding of the project's history and development.

[Anonymous No.10880988]

>>10880899
when there is proof, LINK will be at 1k

[Anonymous No.10881024]

>>10880231
OP, all of crypto is a meme. Of course CL isn't 1/10,000 of what a handful of retards here are shilling. The majority of this bs is to sell bags. I've taken part in that months back myself, as I got caught up in the hype of the ICO here and bought after it was listed on Binance.
Take your profits swing trading, and GTFO before the game is over. Nobody wants this shit and it is moments away from its last breath.

[Anonymous No.10881046]

>>10880231
Link is a meme scamcoin

Just sell it and buy BTC or split it on Monero too, many alts will die in this bear market and you don't want to hold those bags forever, do you?

[Anonymous No.10881070]

https://tezosfoundation.ch/news/clause/

all fud btfo
tezos using accord which uses chainlink
all fudders can suck my hairy shlong ya fucking shlomoes

[Anonymous No.10881072]

>>10880957
You have to imagine a world in the future where thousands upon thousands of people will try to connect with each other with all differing information.
You need 1. A connector to any blockchain.
2. A web of random people that will be rewarded for doing work.
3. A model that takes coins out of the circulating supply (scarcity)
4. A reputation system to flush out the bad actors.
5. Proper aggregation so you identify the correct API call.

Now how do you determine who made the right call and who didn’t by sending their API information? Is there a central figure that will authorize these? Are they going to use an aggregation formula?

You slowly start to realize these concepts will only work with a bunch of middleman processing information retrieval’s that don’t know each other. I remember an anon breaking down exactly why a decentrialized network is the only answer. I wish I could provide it to you but it’s darted my mind.

Random businesses will want to join the network in the simplest form possible so they can wipe out as much jobs as they can. Further automating their whole process. Once they see xxx Corp reaping the benefits they’ll all want a piece of the pie. They’re always going to choose a model of random nodes given the opportunity to process the information through reputation because it will be the cheapest most reliable option.

[Anonymous No.10881129]

>>10881072
Would be grateful for that description. Was it here, and therefore will be archived?

[Anonymous No.10881130]

>>10880231
haven't read others posts yet but a few things i wanted to say:
a) rational is believing that link will value itself considerably. If you had the delusion of 1000 eoy, off course that's irrational and it will lead to disappointment.
b) nda's tend to be justified for big companies and or companies that are present in the stock market. Its perfectly normal small things can be announced, while bigger ones can't be announced through the twitter of some random con. this is actually kinda bullish cause we know there is a collaboration with swift but there was never a need to promote it, because you can bet if it was just some random one time thing, another crypto project would have announced it right away.
c) this also aligns with sergey's article eoy 2017. The goal was to build the chainlink network. You can have big players using their system but chainlink objective is a global decentralized network of oracles. Everything matters, from shitcoins to smaller companies. Right now you have seen shitcoins announcing they will be using link and some new players announcing they will be using chainlink
d) accord is big as fuck because, not only it confirms several breadcrumbs, it also opens up an entire area of legislation that was expected in the near future, but not necessarily (at least i didnt expect) working right away with chainlink to make smart contracts actually functioning complex legal mechanisms.
e) ic3. how is that not big?

[Anonymous No.10881161]

>>10881070
Also use Corda which doesn’t use Link...

[Anonymous No.10881249]

>>10881130
I don’t consider it big because it doesn’t involve actual private industry. That is where money is made.

[Anonymous No.10881290]

>>10881249
>consumer facing businesses don't make money
wew

[Anonymous No.10881307]

>>10881249
this is how I know you are actually retarded. without a doubt you are trolling. do you not have anything better to do? here you are asking for helpful, meaningful replies and this is what we get in return.

[Anonymous No.10881362]

>>10881307
I like this thread. It's good to get some actual heavy fud every now and again.
Sick of retards like cardfag making discussion impossible.

[Anonymous No.10881385]

>>10881307
No...? What has IC3 accomplished? Has it produced anything beyond being an agademic get together to try to solve issues?

[Anonymous No.10881389]

>>10881362
he's just trying to come across as an intelligent troll. notice that he can't even refute any of the posters comments other 4 comments.
>>10881130

[Anonymous No.10881398]

>>10880907
>>10880988

i was making fun of people who demand proof and can't see the forest for the trees, fellas. jeez

[Anonymous No.10881424]

You dumb link bagholders fucking kek, you guys crack me up.

>it's a longterm hold
>EOY
>mainnet soon

No it's not you fags have been saying this for a year now, how does it feel to earn nothing on a whole year?

[Anonymous No.10881470]

>>10880231
mhhh nazarov has some beatiful feet, would love to suck on them

[Anonymous No.10881507]

>>10880365
If BCH smart contracts take off BCH will have its own oracle

[Anonymous No.10881524]

>>10881389
Ok? His suggestion about NDAs only being for companies on the stock market is completely wrong. NDAs are for anyone to whom you’re presenting an idea of which you do not want any details disclosed. This can be for discussing a formulation with a producer, talking about a business idea with a graphics designer, soliciting an endorsement from a celebrity, etc etc etc. NDAs are used in uncountable applications. I can’t really refute Sergey’s vision because it deals in the future. I feel similarly about Accord as I do about IC3. Neither of these are revenue generating entities and I’m not sure why involvement is considered so exciting. Sure, I could see the potential that could arise from that, but I don’t find it to be that incredible. OpenLaw is kind of interesting too. Swift involvement is the most exciting confirmed involvement, but I don’t feel optimistic that many private/public companies with actual revenue are dying for Mainnet to be ready so they can use it.

[Anonymous No.10881530]

>>10881129
a few months ago yes

[Anonymous No.10881565]

And please don’t misread that last post. Sure, some potential COULD come from some kind of precedent being developed via Accord...but that isn’t guaranteed, and the likelihood of precedent necessitating the use of ChainLink seems very unlikely. I don’t want to make it seem like that isn’t very interesting conceptually

[Anonymous No.10881604]

>>10881524
you've probably heard automation is going to slash costs for the past 15 years and you don't think real businesses are clamoring to use a network that allows them to eliminate costly, wasteful, soon-to-be redundant employees? what in the actual fuck

[Anonymous No.10881607]

never follow the general sentiment of /biz/
if you sense that it's time to be more rational, double down

[Anonymous No.10881623]

>>10880231
Which projects in crypto do you like? I'm in London and there are some blockchain events here but I haven't attended anything.

[Anonymous No.10881678]

>>10881604
Where did I say that? Companies don’t need ChainLink for automation and/or smart contracts.

[Anonymous No.10881709]

>>10881678
how will they assure the fidelity of the data which triggers their smart contracts if they don't use link?

[Anonymous No.10881719]

Tips on swingtrading Link? Can I get to 100k by crazily swing trading a 2k stack? Pls respond

[Anonymous No.10881752]

>>10881709
By penalizing providers of bad data. I imagine most applications won't need some sort of "consensus data" or that there won't even be such data available.

[Anonymous No.10881756]

>>10881719
Plz help

[Anonymous No.10881785]

>>10881756
You'll make like 100 link every couple of days, best case scenario dude

[Anonymous No.10881799]

>>10881719
What kind of tips are you looking for? Do you have any experience in trading in any markets? Growing your stack 50x isn't going to happen for a long time with Link's current movement.

[Anonymous No.10881886]

>>10880231
How is there this much debate? Dude just sell your 50k stack into btc & wait

[Anonymous No.10881968]

>>10881623
I'm not that interested in any crypto projects anymore. I'm more interested in the platforms on which companies are building their blockchain projects (which aren't token platforms). I still hold a fair amount of BTC though (besides my Link)

[Anonymous No.10882007]

>>10880579
You wouldn't be cutting costs though. You would be unnecessarily increasing costs.

If you wanted to cut costs, you would just execute the contract on the computer. You wouldn't use the computer to feed the info into a decentralized computational environment. That would be an unnecessary and expensive step.

[Anonymous No.10882069]

>>10881752
how will they penaleze them, and how will they prevent mitm attacks?

[Anonymous No.10882141]

>>10882069
Through contractual stipulation

[Anonymous No.10882169]

>>10881756
I haven't seen much that's too special about trading it compared to random shitcoin #3543 and I don't think that idea is coming from people that trade too often.

I think this is helpful if you're starting, whatever the market
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uzq1jgNKuBc
Even more blackpill version:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDkE6RHke9U

Cryptotwitter niggies I think are smart and post clean shit:
@CacheBoi
@AureliusBTC
@Cryptorae
@Tradermayne
@edwardmorra_btc
@CryptoCred I don't follow his shit much but I know he has a lot of technical beginner content. I think he also started livecommenting on his trades on telegram.

Make it simple, track your progress and then you can start complicating it. You can just trade 1 pair. Shit like risking 1-2% on a trade is not a bad habit, compounding each week adds up don't try to get too far too fast and learn to lose money as well. For all the fancy indicators and shit you'll see people looking at, you would be surprised how well some people do just sitting waiting until they can buy support / sell resistance or altering their biases after lower lows change to higher lows. Keep records, see where you're fucking up and actually do something about it if you want to improve.

[Anonymous No.10882193]

>>10880236
What to do about hornets? I've had it for about 5 times now where I was just comfy playing vidya or watching a movie in my apartment at night when these fuckers come in. They ruin my mood and the sound they make is nerve-wrecking. On one particular night I had three of them coming in within 10 minutes.
I was thinking of getting insecticide spray but I was afraid it just pisses them off without killing them, and that it might be venomous to me or my pets.
I suppose a nest is nearby but I have no idea how to take care of that since my landlord probably doesn't give a shit.
What do lads?

[Anonymous No.10882255]

>>10880278
you are a MANIAC

[Anonymous No.10882681]

>>10880231
Fucking brainlet.

[Anonymous No.10882697]

>>10882193
Get an insect net

[Anonymous No.10883633]

Seems to me like OP and many others are not "investors" instead expect instant moon a month after buying token. Entire market is down man up or nut out bro. Two things, speculation on LINK will already be gg, but ask yourself these decentralized blockchain platforms that will "power our world" that everyone is head over heels for. You think these blockchains are going to say hey for our data communication we're going to use a centralized oracle? Some of you are just in desperate need of mommy to tell you LINK will moon every single day because you bit off more than you can chew. It's ok!!!!

[Anonymous No.10883640]

>>10882697
After a lot of time contemplating and reading many 'lovely' comments about trans women from cis guys on this board I've come to the conclusion they're just not worth it.

Trans men are, for several reasons better
-they won't objectify me and see me as more than an actual sex object
-they can actually emphatize with what dysphoria and depression feels like
-they won't make me question my womanhood despite me being trans
-they'll be more likely to be okay with my neo vag and not make fun of it or call it an "axe wound"
-they're generally not as douchy as all the cis guys here
-at the same time they're more handsome

The only problem is what they've down there, but I don't care. I mean they probably don't like it either. And people with functional dicks are dicks themselves for the most part anyways.
Inb4: 't.larping ftm',
I'm mtf and cis guys just suck and everyone should avoid dating them if they can, I'd actually become prison transbian if trans guys wouldn't exist
Inb4 "lol ftm are women"
they're more masculine than any of you will ever be

[Anonymous No.10883649]

>>10883633
I am excited to see this board when BTC poops out again and LINK goes to 10 cents and I buy all of your bags HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

[Anonymous No.10884124]

>>10880342
Top 400 wallet here. So you aren't wrong, but you aren't right. Small bags are praying this is the second coming of crypto and are shilling it as such. It may or may not be. But the fact of the matter is that if you believe smart contracts aren't a meme and will be a large part of the future, getting information securely into and out of smart contracts is SUPER important. You obviously know Chainlink is currently the best looking decentralized solution to do this currently. IF Chainlink becomes the de facto oracle service of smart contracts, we will be rich. That's it. It doesn't matter when this happens. Once again. If you think smart contracts will be a large part of business and the world at large moving forward, and Chainlink becomes the thing that connects the coming API explosion to smart contracts... that's all you need to know anon. $1000 EOY. SOME YEAR.

[Anonymous No.10884131]

>>10884124
>>10884041 #
HAVING SEX WITH MY WIFE IS A MYSTERY
LET HER FUCK MEN WHILE I'M LOCKED IN CHASTITY
MAYBE ONE DAY SHE'LL LET ME LICK HER PUSSY

3 CHILDREN THAT I HAVE LOST
NOW BEING RAISED BY SHANE
WHEN I SEE THEM I CRY OUT IN PAIN

A COCK IN MY WIFE
IT'S BIG, BLACK AND LOOKS REALLY NICE
I JERK OFF AND LET HER BANG OTHER GUYS...

[Anonymous No.10884202]

>>10880231
Honestly, I treat most LINK threads as satire. Most of us have DYOR on LINK and at least know the basics of what it is trying to do, and it looks promising as fuck. 1k EOY is a joke, but we don't need 1k to make gains, even 2$ would put literally all of us in the green and thats fine.

The community though, the community is what will drive it's success. Yeah, LINK memes are pretty wild and unrefined for now, but that's what happens with 4chan memes. A few years from now they will be as mainstream as pepe or doge. 1K eoy is a fantasy, but i've certainly seen stranger things happen on 4chan. I think of LINK as a good play for the mid-long term with some small gains and a good potential for lotto-esque gains.

[Anonymous No.10884262]

>>10884202
If you bought ETH at $.33 like some did in the ICO...How long was it until $1k? 3 years. Expect the same from LINK. No large businesses knew they were even interested in Ethereum when it was created. Trusted oracles are THE next step. Smart contracts are worthless without them.

[Anonymous No.10884371]

I just have to think that if chainlink were as “big” as people think it is here then you’d see stuff like pic related. Bur I don’t see the biggest VC firms in the world interested in chainlink

[Anonymous No.10884397]

>>10884262
>Trusted oracles are THE next step. Smart contracts are worthless without them.
This is something that has been ingrained into your skull by reading link threads 24/7.

[Anonymous No.10884425]

>>10882141
>he thinks that contractual stipulation protects against mitm attacks

[Anonymous No.10884453]

Cryplets seem to be a dated thing anyway, from what I understand Microsoft replaced that with coco which is just a centralized oracle?

[Anonymous No.10884858]

ITT
We discuss why chainlink won't be massive because the breadcrumbs are breadcrumbs.

Still a better investment for small money than most other things.

[Anonymous No.10884900]

>>10884262
>Trusted oracles
you don't know what you're talking about
chainlink is a trustless oracle.

[Anonymous No.10884966]

>>10880231
Complete link newfag here with $400
Do I buy all link? When should I stop buying link? im not kidding I'm just fucking buying as much as possible. I get paid every two weeks. When should I stop buying into link?

[Anonymous No.10884980]

>>10884262
nobody gave a shit about crypto at all back when eth had an ico. times have changed. you can't predict the future.

[Anonymous No.10885023]

>>10884966
Just keep buying it for now. You can stop buying when you're a millionaire.

[Anonymous No.10885134]

>>10884371
>doesn't understand the very basics of the vc space

[Anonymous No.10885891]

>>10880231
As long as all the shilling and fudding stays on the 4corners of 4chan i dont give a shit
LINK $5000 EOY

[Anonymous No.10886101]

>>10884397
No. Actually it's just an easy way to get my point across to a fucking retard like you. Kys.

[Anonymous No.10886116]

>>10884900
I misspoke. I more meant "true" opposed to trusted based on the nature of the decentralized aggregation.

[Anonymous No.10886148]

>>10884980
Interestingly enough, I heard about Ethereum in January of 2014 and knew the magnitude of what was about to happen. LINK will follow a similar 3 year timeline. Believe it or not, I don't give a fuck. This is the next step. It won't happen with nearly as much fanfare as Ethereum, but the gains will be similar in magnitude.

[Anonymous No.10886959]

>>10880297
What you anons don't understand is that while partnerships are good for the price, they're not the only thing needed.
Traditional banks and insurance companies will join the hype and make their own centralized oracle, because the jew doesn't understand fair just contracts, so he'll keep jewing more of people.
But some new insurances and banks will start and develop around blockchain and will market themselves this way and those will be super valuable, if chainlink works, then the market will find a way to make us the new 31337

[Anonymous No.10887002]

98% of what is posted about link is pure garbage
A thread would sooner fill up with memes than actual discussion.

[Anonymous No.10887046]

>>10886959
did companys made own email and SAP system? No. They will focus to their main business and use external systems.

[Anonymous No.10887587]

>>10885134
What do you mean?

[Anonymous No.10888300]

>>10884980
Like anybody gives a fuck now that there is a bear market. Situation is pretty much the same. There won't be a bull market untill the next BTC halvening.

[Anonymous No.10888446]

>>10880231

Why has he not had a Monster Energy shopped into his hand yet?

[Anonymous No.10889010]

It’s fucking over.

[Anonymous No.10890073]

>>10880231
What about the one guy who works for MSFT azure and wrote the article about LINK? He still contributes to the GitHub, I forgot his name