JUST

[Anonymous No.10868732]

>it's august 28th, 2018 and you still have no idea when chainlink mainnet will be released

[Anonymous No.10868742]

Sure I do anon
When it's ready

[Anonymous No.10868970]

[Anonymous No.10869012]

>>10868732
From their pivotal
>Switch node version to Dubnium LTS in October
That's the last batch of tasks in the icebox. Rory has said that the entire icebox doesn't need to be finished before mainnet. So a rough estimate would be late September or anytime in October.

[Anonymous No.10869016]

>>10868732
One more push and it is out.
Eoy $1k for me

[Anonymous No.10869029]

Does anyone have the "I'm more qualified than most anons" pasta? Haven't seen it in a while

[Anonymous No.10869054]

>>10869029
NONONONO

WERE NOT DOING THIS AGAIN ANON

[Anonymous No.10869075]

>>10869029
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

[Anonymous No.10869204]

>>10869075
Thank you for this information. I have just sold all of my stack and traded for Mobius.

[Anonymous No.10869297]

>>10869012
LTS is a pretty fucking good sign. You clearly know a thing or two about software

[Anonymous No.10869316]

>>10869297
>>10869012
SIKE. Dubnium LTS has nothing to do with chainlink mainnet you neet

[Anonymous No.10869447]

>>10869316
I never said that it did. I'm just pointing out that most of the icebox tasks will be done by/in October.

[Anonymous No.10870163]

>>10868732
>linku is safu

[Anonymous No.10870352]

>>10869075
ETH now is a disappointment so that guy may be right also about the whole post if you think about it

[Anonymous No.10870392]

>>10869075

You just sold me on it. Chainlink solves my problem by providing a decentralized API that replaces monetized centralized API. The fact that they dont want this to happen just adds value to it.