[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 522 KB, 1315x2263, fiatrelay.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10859649 No.10859649 [Reply] [Original]

Fiat-Relay Smart Contracts

>> No.10859674

>Ctrl f shitlink
>No results
Alright then

>> No.10859686

Comfy

>> No.10859694
File: 130 KB, 972x587, 08-27-18 at 05.14 PM.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10859694

>>10859674

>> No.10859700

>>10859649
link competitor?
I mean if link does what it should, doesn't this become redundant?

>> No.10859712
File: 221 KB, 1460x447, 08-27-18 at 06.21 PM.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10859712

>>10859700

>> No.10859722

>>10859700
lol linkies eternally btfo

>> No.10859728

>>10859649
And then they realised that decentralised FIAT exchanges are impossible because they have catastrophic counterparty issues.
This unironically makes me doubt capgemini

>> No.10859730

>>10859722
Hey clueless no linker, you see that blue box where the oracle is needed, that would be ChainLink you tard. BTFO on that .

>> No.10859736

>>10859700
>Capgemini
C'mon bruh keep up

>> No.10859738

>>10859712

this. Capgemini is already confirmed. this is bullish af.

>> No.10859746

>Ctrl f oracle
>No results
next!

>> No.10859747

>>10859722
and yet in there it says that mainnet only Q3 2019, they keep on coming but...
also checked

>> No.10859781
File: 550 KB, 983x2942, 08-27-18 at 08.51 PM.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10859781

>>10859746

>> No.10859804

>>10859781
so basically this vantum network is going to use link?

>> No.10859827
File: 82 KB, 537x640, 1535289011826.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10859827

>>10859804
basically
unless it doesn't
we'll see
I believe

>> No.10859828

>>10859804

yup. if a project is aiming to come out at any point past Q4 2018 and refers to an oracle, guaranteed its planning on using LINK. just wait until 2019 when it starts to feel like the 2017 ICO bubble again with all sorts of nextgen dApps that rely on Chainlink to exist running ICOs.

>> No.10859873

>>10859828
this is stupid

>> No.10859890

>>10859873
why

>> No.10859939

>>10859649

> read this image

Anon is this real

>> No.10859983
File: 34 KB, 174x129, Screen Shot 2018-08-27 at 8.09.58 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10859983

Look at that, it's a motherfucking original ChainLink cube inside of the new ChainLink logo.

>> No.10860029

https://twit.tv/shows/this-week-in-law/episodes/431https://twit.tv/shows/this-week-in-law/episodes/431
AWright talking OpenLaw @1:09:45

>>10859983
like 95% of blockchain projects...

>> No.10860048

>>10859828
This is delusional.

>> No.10860067
File: 632 KB, 828x2288, openlaw irs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10860067

>>10860029
1:13
>when you turn assets into something that's equivalent to email, you can start paying people in real time. Imagine a world where in 20 years everybody's not getting paid every two weeks, but because it's so easy to move around assets, people are getting paid every second, you could pay taxes in real time as well, so the government could collect taxes every minute

>> No.10860110

>>10859736
brainlet here...what do you mean?

>> No.10860774

bump

>> No.10860790

>>10860067
Justo, Developer of P3D/Fomo3D here.

We have an internal banking smart contract that pays out our development team, all developers that assisted with our projects, our community moderation team, and our community contributors constantly a percentage of all revenue of our games.

Continuously, a portion of all incoming revenue. It's definitely the future, we don't even have to manage the payroll they just own a percent.

>> No.10860812

>>10860110
https://www.capgemini.com/consulting-de/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2017/08/smart_contracts_paper_long_0.pdf

also see >>10859712

>> No.10861731

>>10860067
Gamified working is also possible.
Employees get a standard rate, but the best workers will be getting bonuses for going the extra mile in realtime.

For example as a software tester you could be getting paid per level 1 bug found, as a developer.. per story point.

>> No.10861856

>>10860790
That's fucking cool, man. Also, love your work. Would never throw money at them but I can definitely appreciate the level of polish you put into your products.

>> No.10861887

>>10859649
Wait wut?
This Vantum thing is the confirmed partner for Capgemini's FiatRelay thing?
How'd they swing that? Impressive.

>> No.10861906

>>10861887
I assume Vantum is a Capgemini creation. Notice how they removed the "open source" bit.
I messaged the project lead about the link between the two and he started typing... then deleted and never replied. Very strange.

>> No.10861915
File: 136 KB, 363x296, 1531021045412.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10861915

>>10861906
>(s)he started typing... then deleted and never replied
t. every one of my crushes ever.

>> No.10861951
File: 94 KB, 785x827, BC46F0466093416D9489222B0BEE4E40.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10861951

>>10861915
dont worry fren soon you'll be able to buy a robot gf with your link fortune

>> No.10862334

Is there any independent confirmation that Capgemini is actually partnered with Vantu?

>> No.10862403

>>10862334
I mean, isn't it possible that Vantu is just straight-up lying?

>> No.10862556
File: 717 KB, 1242x1339, 1535033145530.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10862556

>>10860067
>>10860790
woah

>> No.10862794

Looks like nobody cares

>> No.10862802

>>10859781
Mindblown !
2022
1 Link> 1 Btc