actual 1000 EOY

[Anonymous No.10842971]

>singularity happening
>easily can reach hundreds of dollars
>likely to compete with Ethereum's price
>most of /biz/ refusing to buy in

Never change

[Anonymous No.10842987]

>>10842971
it's pumped pretty hard recently, should i cut some losses and buy back later at lower prices, hopefully

[Anonymous No.10843015]

>>10842987
That's what we are all asking ourselves. I have no idea if I should sell for now and buy back in later. I'm afraid of it going up to 70k sats without the dip I'm expecting.
Bought in at 21k sats

[Anonymous No.10843029]

>>10842987
Personally I'm holding until I see any obvious downtrend, but you do as you see fit. There's really not much that could take down the price with the current volume. My advice is wait a few more days at least. You could easily end up losing a lot of profit

[Anonymous No.10843099]

>>10843015
You might catch a 5% dip, but tomorrow I'm betting on waking up approaching $4.50. I'm holding tight

[Anonymous No.10843340]

I
STILL
NEED
TO
ACCUMULAYtE

[BUY NANO No.10843353]

>>10842971
>trying to short nano when the chink boomer buys all of the nano
Try something else.

[Anonymous No.10843512]

20 dollars by friday

[Anonymous No.10843581]

>>10842971
133 NANO is all it takes to have the equivalent of 21 BTC. Do what you want in the mean time (timing, trading), but in 5 years make sure you have at least 133 NANO. Think of it as suicide insurance.

[Anonymous No.10843592]

>>10842971
>>10842971
>>10842971

CHANLONK $5K EOY !!!

[Anonymous No.10843644]

>>10843592
>>10843499
>>10843535
Detected.

[Anonymous No.10843882]

>>10842971
>Nano has 756 TPS. For a self-proclaimed global currency, it’s a total joke. VISA can handle over 56 000 TPS. Nano’s claim to be global currency is either delusional or a fraud.
>First coin on Amazon/eBay/etc will be the global currency. Nano’s avoiding partnership. Nano will lose and go to zero.
>No smart contracts. Cannot compete with other coins.
>No incentive to run a node. Bullshit business model.
>One single miner can destroy the network via ddos with 500 gpus at no cost.
>Devs are jumping ship. Insiders obviously know nano is riddled with flaws and future problems.
>Nano team marketing strategy is to have no marketing strategy.
>Nano team adoption strategy is to have no adoption strategy. Doomed. Will go to zero.
>Nano follows same strategy as Betamax vs VHS and HD vs BluRay.
>Nano team are dangerous business amateurs. Pushed Bitgrail when clearly a dangerous exchange. Guaranteed bomber as a good guy. Rebranded to nano right before Bitgrail exploded. Retarded decision. Marketing disaster.
>Nano team are dangerous tech amateurs. Don’t understand the difference between Random (not cryptographically secure) and SecureRandom. Don’t even understand basic cryptography. Total amateurs – a disaster in the waiting.
>Nano is using seriously old-school shit and unreliable UDP, a web protocol created in 1980. Stone age technology.
>Hired pretty girl, G. Coxton, who’s done nothing. Why’s she not on YouTube pushing nano?
>Constant node issues. Withdrawals suspended on several exchanges due to vulnerability multiple times. Cannot function as a currency and will just fade away.
>Ongoing lawsuits against nano devs personally and nano foundation. Will drive price down, they could go bankrupt.
>Same whales that pumped and dumped nano first time (-98% from ATH) are doing it again. The delusional nano hodlers will be stripped of their money again.
>Anyone investing in this shitcoin deserves to loose their money. It will crash and go to zero.

[Anonymous No.10843890]

What proportion of people are buying NANO for its fast and feeless transactions?
What proportion of people are buying NANO hoping someone comes along later to pay them more for it?

[Anonymous No.10843893]

>>10843882
>posting debunked pasta

[Anonymous No.10843941]

>>10843882

biz also fudded eth with baseless shit, good indicator to buy

[Anonymous No.10843981]

>>10843890
I'm buying because it may be end game money. I plan on using it too along the way, always rebuying what I use.

[Anonymous No.10844011]

>>10843890
This. Nano is the most whale manipulated coin in the top 50. You're all going to get dumped on like clockwork.

[Anonymous No.10844165]

>>10843882
Love this pasta desu "loose your money" hahahahahhahaha

[Anonymous No.10844202]

>>10843029
>I'm holding until I see any obvious downtrend
Did you zoom out?

[Anonymous No.10844204]

>>10843893
I saw this on a thread. Not debunked at all. ALL Nano fanboys were running away and just spewing garbage. Show me your counter arguments or where it was debunked. Fool.

Pic. Nano bagholder getting assraped for months since January 2018 (-98% from ATH) and flogged 80% by Bitgrail, still buying more. lol. Good riddance with your shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.10844222]

>>10844165
Too bad you and the nano nuts are too stupid to answer any of the questions. You are not "investors", you are low IQ gamblers.

[Anonymous No.10844223]

[Anonymous No.10844226]

>>10844011
Bitcoin is the most whale manipulated

[Anonymous No.10844227]

>>10843029
>I'm holding until I see any obvious downtrend
Did you zoom out?

[Anonymous No.10844231]

>>10843882
>Nano is using seriously old-school shit and unreliable UDP, a web protocol created in 1980. Stone age technology.
Wow guess what - you're using a Van Neumann architecture computer. That shit's from the 1945!! Abandon ship.

...............................
Never change biz. Never. Change.

[Anonymous No.10844233]

>>10844223
Left: Soul
Right: Soulless

[Anonymous No.10844242]

>>10844204
imagine being this booty blasted about an imaginary internet coin

no but really, sauce on pic?

[Anonymous No.10844268]

>>10844222
What questions do you need answered? What about NANO do you not understand?

[Anonymous No.10844281]

>>10844233
Left: wouldn't fuck
Right: prolly had nice anime tits

[Anonymous No.10844293]

>>10843882
>>10844231
I never read this pasta fully, so I never noticed, but i can't believe it shits on UDP protocol like it's unused outdated technology or that its vulnerabilities cannot be properly nullified with the right environment settings. Literally used for many use cases today, including content sensitive real-time video/audio calls.

[Anonymous No.10844321]

>>10843882

> Nano is using seriously old-school shit and unreliable UDP, a web protocol created in 1980. Stone age technology.

TCP was invented around the same time and the whole internet is running on it you dumbfuck. Both udp and tcp has its use-cases in networking, you've obviously have no fucking idea about distributed applications.

[Anonymous No.10844693]

>>10844231
>>10844293
Colin has admitted it was an error so he will change it. What is it with Nano investors and stupidity? Go run to Shapiro. You can trust your devs, right? I wish you a nice bitgrail. Suckers.

[Anonymous No.10844721]

>>10844321
>10844693
Read >>10844693

Tell Colin he is an idiot. Stupid Nano "investor", You can trust your devs, right?

[Anonymous No.10844730]

shapiro is long gone now shithead

fake news

[Anonymous No.10844751]

>>10843592
damn now THIS is a good punching pepe
first one i've saved in over a year

[Anonymous No.10844753]

>>10844268
Start with TPS. Explain how Nano can be a widely used currency with that kind of TPS.

Are you so stupid that if you Nanofags can't answer the most basic questions regarding your idiotic investment, then it is I and not YOU that don't understand Nano?

[Anonymous No.10844770]

>>10844730
Why did he leave? Surely the transparent Nano dev team explained everything. Right Nano "investor", just as you know how involved Nano dev team was with Bitgrail and how much crypto they managed to get out when withdrawels were closed for anyone else.

[Anonymous No.10844778]

>>10843882
>whales that pumped and dumped the first time are doing it again
If you recognize this, it seems worthwhile to ride again, though it's too high to safely jump in now.

[Anonymous No.10844793]

>>10844693
They changed to UDP because they started restructuring things to work better with the Universal Blocks after they were implemented, to increase performance, you absolute dumbfuck. Your shitty pasta implied that there was some problem with software with UDP in the first place, as if that didn't have a shitton fo use cases. You shitted on it for being old, even though the alternative that is also widely used, TCP, is basically just as old.
In other words, you have absolutely no clue what you are talking about and is just repeating words you don't understand like a braindead monkey.

[Anonymous No.10844844]

if you have so much proof then show it to us or shut the fuck up

[Anonymous No.10844917]

>>10842987
To much chance for a miss. Nano is a top 5 coin so it doesn't even need the market to move to takeoff

[Anonymous No.10844929]

>>10844793
They are not changing TO UDP, you ignorant moron "investor". They are going AWAY from UDP. Here is what Colins had to say. But he is a monkey too, right ape?

"The feedback from people who are experts in networking has been that we’ll be a lot more resilient and compatible using TCP than UDP as its currently supported on the internet. The opinion is that in general the network infrastructure prioritizes UDP traffic lower and global multicast isn’t really rolled out currently.

At the least having TCP compatibility allows the node to use proxies and services like TOR.

I want to maintain that everything is compatible with using UDP in perpetuity and hopefully we can keep push for better adoption."

You Nano idiots are so stupid and ignorant that you inadvertently are calling your own dev team leader for a braindead monkey that don't know what he is talking about. Comedy Gold.