Link and Hyperledger

[Anonymous No.10824685]

Sorry to disappoint Link anons but Hyperledger is not using or working with Chainlink as an oracle solution.

I work for IBM and am a Link Marine and have been digging into our Hyperledger docs to find a connections and it's not there.

Hyperledger is doing some unbelievable shit and tackling all problems that most shitcoins are trying to tackle and they're all going to get BTFO by IBM's gigantic crypto dick:

>muh shipping tracking:
Google "TradeLens" - Just signed a huge deal with MERCK aka the biggest shipper in the world

>muh identity
Trusted Identity - See Sovrin connection

>muh counterfeit food tracking
IBM Food Trust - BTFO VeChain and Wabi

>muh banking revolution aka Ripple / XRP
IBM World Wire using Stellar

You clowns really think these billion dollar corporations are going to let these loser startups beat them to the market and win in the long run with the resources and money they have?

Stop being so naive...


Oh yea, and looking at our internal documents, the IBM team looked into using / building on top of the Ethereum blockchain but it was so terrible they decided to build their own blockchain - enter Hyperledger

[Anonymous No.10824696]

>>10824685
Proof you work at IBM or no care.

[Anonymous No.10824733]

Suck my dick and balls

[Anonymous No.10824775]

bump

[Anonymous No.10824909]

>>10824685
Fud. Nice try I am not selling.

[Anonymous No.10825008]

>>10824685
So how are IBM and Hyperledger getting off-chain data onto the Blockchain?

[Anonymous No.10825024]

>>10824696
I believe him because several months ago an anon was posting about how he worked at IBM and they were basically going to steal VeChain's usecase with a new platform they were launching.

That was before any word of tradelens had been heard. I think this is the same anon

[Anonymous No.10825032]

>>10825024
still doesn't answer the only question that matters though -->>10825008

[Anonymous No.10825034]

>>10824685
thanks for being worried about us but I'm not selling and I guess most other link marines aren't selling either. It would take Sergey's order for me to sell, even then I would probably hesitate

[Anonymous No.10825045]

>>10824685
Why is the Hyperledger logo on the Chainlink website?

[Anonymous No.10825051]

[Anonymous No.10825062]

>>10824685
IMB has 366,000 global employees.
Anything you know is already priced in.
>>10825024
>steal VeChain's usecase
Jesus christ someone give me patience with these brainlets

[Anonymous No.10825063]

>>10825008
This

[Anonymous No.10825070]

[Anonymous No.10825071]

>>10824685
bollocks

[Anonymous No.10825082]

[Anonymous No.10825086]

>>10825070
yeah this.

[Anonymous No.10825094]

>>10824685
Which country?
I know lots of IBM Aus fags and they laugh at the sinking ship they are a part of.

[Anonymous No.10825099]

[Anonymous No.10825100]

>>10825062
prove me wrong. VeChain has no intention of revealing their authority nodes, hence the platform is not trustless nor decentralized. Economic nodes held by retail investors do not contribute to the network in any way.

as the last few days have shown, VeChain's NFC/RFID tech is comically bad. IBM will be making chips smaller than a grain of sand. And they have already acquired over 90 enterprise customers. With the infrastructure to support them all and more.

[Anonymous No.10825114]

>>10825094
Also I forgot to mention IBM is really fucken lazy, they rather aquire tools and projects then out source them out. So enjoy that Indian code grade.

[Anonymous No.10825116]

[Anonymous No.10825127]

[Anonymous No.10825128]

>>10825099
>>10825082
>>10825070
>>10825051
OP utterly BTFO

[Anonymous No.10825133]

[Anonymous No.10825142]

>>10825070
It's unbelievable to me how fast this went under the radar. I mentioned it a couple weeks after that post and no one knew what I was talking about. There is an undeniable FUD effort trying to keep people in the dark about LINK.

[Anonymous No.10825165]

>>10825142
If I remember correctly, there were more email exchanges in the whole thread and a lot of the subsequent exchanges seemed to be against a decentralized oracle solution. I'm all in but what OP is talking about is a real risk.

[Anonymous No.10825166]

>>10824685
This faggot gets it. REAL businesses run on regulations and contracts enforced by courts of LAW, nationally as well as internationally. Holy shit, blockchain ain't shit in a real world usecase. Why can't you brainlets understand this? OH RIGHT - you never had a REAL job in a corporation above flipping burgers. MBAs, JDs and anyone else who has just a bit of edumacation you sorely lack, understands this and is laughing their ass off about crypto. Do you Linkies honestly think that a bunch of businesses all around the world are going to use a decentralized oracle network developed by a morbidly obese russian philosopher that is basically run by a cult of NEETs from a racist anime/meme forum who call themselves "The LINK Marines". You really think this shit is going to $1000 one day? In what fucking universe is this sequence of events even remotely possible to actually happen? Wake the FUCK UP Linkies, you're seriously D E L U S I O N A L.

[Anonymous No.10825177]

>>10825133
Eh the CBA connections are weak. I’ve seen the Frassanito thing pop up before, but he doesn’t look to be involved.

[Anonymous No.10825195]

>>10825128
How am I BTFO? Prove one connection between Chainlink / Smarcontracts and IBM / Hyperledger without grasping at straws. And anon, I hold 80k link. I'm just stating facts.

[Anonymous No.10825207]

Where you at OP? You need to refute all this evidence anons have provided.

[Anonymous No.10825208]

>>10825062
I'm a Managing Consultant for IBM in the US, not some pajeet shitting on the street...I know what I'm talking about

[Anonymous No.10825214]

>>10825165

The thing is IIRC you don't have to use Chainlink in a decentralized way. You can write to specific nodes and treat it as a centralized oracle. The cons are data leaks for permissioned environments and that adoption is needed for security, but I'm sure the former can be/is being ironed out by enumerating and addressing those risks, and the latter is simply a function of time.

[Anonymous No.10825215]

>muh I sold low

[Anonymous No.10825216]

>>10825195
After looking through that intranet page what oracle details have you found?

[Anonymous No.10825227]

>>10824685
> Larps as an IBM employee
> Can’t even spell Maersk

[Anonymous No.10825229]

>>10825208

>Consultant

kek. you don't matter. you don't know shit.

[Anonymous No.10825245]

>>10825208
Can you post more of the documents from the Food Trust? I am a big VEN holder scared shitless of IBM

[Anonymous No.10825252]

>>10825195
>Prove one connection between Chainlink / Smarcontracts and IBM / Hyperledger without grasping at straws.

>the Project is pleased to announce that ChainLink, a leading provider of secure oracle services, will develop support for the Accord Project specification. For example, standardized Accord Project service-level-agreements for a ChainLink oracle could be enforced by a smart legal contract using performance data from the source ledger. It is intended that this is one of many such collaborations to improve the process of bringing real-world data into legal contracts.

>The Accord Project operates in collaboration with IBM Blockchain, R3, the International Association for Contract and Commercial Management, IEEE, the Open Identity Exchange, and many others.

https://medium.com/@accordhq/smart-legal-contracts-and-oracles-36d4eb538a92

[Anonymous No.10825268]

>>10825252
What does this have to do with Hyperledger and IBM?

[Anonymous No.10825270]

>>10825216
They are using Chain and something called Chaincode to execute smart contracts. Pic relevant

[Brigadier General Damu !!6rIK3ka6TND No.10825275]

[Anonymous No.10825285]

>>10825229
says the faggot from India

let the adults talk

[Anonymous No.10825293]

>>10824685
Ethereum is the biggest scam tech there is in an industry that is 99% scam

[Anonymous No.10825298]

>>10825270
Thanks. Chain/chaincode has popped up before. Autists, what say you?

[Anonymous No.10825306]

>>10825166
>Do you Linkies honestly think that a bunch of businesses all around the world are going to use a decentralized oracle network developed by a morbidly obese russian philosopher that is basically run by a cult of NEETs from a racist anime/meme forum who call themselves "The LINK Marines".

Yes, if it will save them boatloads of cash.

https://www.capgemini.com/consulting/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2017/07/smart-contracts.pdf

[Anonymous No.10825328]

>>10825268
The Accord Project posts an article on their own medium page about how great Chainlink is, and bluntly states their partnership, and you're asking what the connection is?

1 0 0 0 E O Y
0
0
0
E
O
Y

[Anonymous No.10825373]

>>10825328
No seriously, can you connect Chainlink with Hyperledger? I'm not FUDing, I'm just asking...

[Anonymous No.10825399]

>>10825373
Here's your homework:
find out the connection between Hyperledger and the Accord Project

[Anonymous No.10825426]

>>10825399
Lol this is a good one wonder if he'll find it

[Anonymous No.10825457]

>>10825399
Huh. Who'd a thunk it. I googled Hyperledger, Accord, IBM and Chainlink, and guess what ? There actually is lots of information and connections between all of them. Now I'm not a Managing Consultant or anything fancy like that but can I get a grade on the homework ?

[Anonymous No.10825467]

>>10825399
>>10825426
Hey dummies, just because Chainlink is part of an open source project like the Accord Project (which Accord said anyone can join on their twitter post), and Hyperledger is also a partner in this open source project doesn't mean that Hyperledger is using Chainlink. Are you guys retarded or just grasping at straws?

And I'm not trying to FUD cause I own a lot of Link but come on, stop being faggots and show some real proof...

[Anonymous No.10825476]

>>10825457
What did you find Sherlock Holmes?

[Anonymous No.10825550]

[Anonymous No.10825567]

>Biz: you better network because its all about who you know.
>Also Biz: people working on he same project won't interact and are not curious about solving each others problems.

[Anonymous No.10825581]

>>10825476
Plenty Dickhead, but like I'm going to report my findings to a fucking larp. You know it's there. Google it yourself, it's a free fucking service Link Marine.

[Anonymous No.10825586]

>>10825550
are these the leaked hyperledger emails?

[Anonymous No.10825686]

>>10825467
Hyperledger doesn't use anything, you fucking brainlet. Smartcontract platforms, such as Accord use hyperledger. These smartcontract platforms also will require an oracle in order to get info onto the blockchain. Accord and others have said they will be using chainlink.

[Anonymous No.10825689]

>>10825586
Yes, the snippets that were posted in the original threads, but the link to the whole mailing list doesn't seem to be working anymore. The order of these conversations is all over the place...

Also they're like one year old. If the project is still open source, we should be able to find up to date mailing lists to see more recent developments, why haven't we been following these emails?

[Anonymous No.10825743]

>>10825689
>>10825550
This is incredible, thanks for sharing anon. From my understanding IBM is going to license out Hyperledger out to fortune 500 companies and will keep oracle/sourcing api's (chain and chaincode) in house and keep it as part of their offering. Still trying to read into the tech though

[Anonymous No.10825746]

https://lists.hyperledger.org/g/fabric
https://lists.hyperledger.org/g/fabric/search?p=Created,,oracles,20,2,0,0

[Anonymous No.10825830]

>>10825746
https://lists.hyperledger.org/g/fabric/topic/17549742#2510
original mail, but link to report is dead
does anyone still have it/can repost?

[Anonymous No.10825861]

>>10825686
this thread has made me so bullish on chainlink

[Anonymous No.10825893]

>>10825373
You're either really stupid or a troll.
People have posted actual links which state that there are partnerships between the two groups and all you can do is ask "PROVE IT PROVE IT I CANT READ HURRR."
Fuck this board and fuck the trash (ie you) who clutter it up with these asinine larp attempts.

[Anonymous No.10825931]

>>10824685

ChainLink Fund

https://disclosurequest.com/form/chainlink-crypto-fund-lp/0001728696-18-000001/?returnURL=

Mark Wagner:
General Partner - ChainLink Crypto Fund. LP

Hyperledger's Head of Performance and Scalability Working Group

https://www.hyperledger.org/blog/2017/06/08/hyperledger-announces-performance-and-scalability-working-group

[Anonymous No.10825988]

>>10825931
Boom..

[Anonymous No.10826001]

>>10825988
I need to buy more Link.

[Anonymous No.10826055]

>>10825931
Don't think thats even related to link.

[Anonymous No.10826056]

>>10826001
>hi, is pajeet there?

[Anonymous No.10826100]

>>10825467
I agree, anon, the links to LINK are really tenuous especially when it seems to mainly be thru an open source project.
I'm still HODL

[Anonymous No.10826181]

>>10825931
>>10825988
>>10826001
Sorry to burst your bubble, but don't worry we're still gonna make it

[Anonymous No.10826200]

>>10824685
>going to get BTFO by IBM's gigantic crypto dick
holy fucking shit this is the biggest lie i've ever read on biz. how can someone who purports to be well read in the current business climate make such a claim... IBM's only function is to buy companies to curb the decline of their revenue. it's been happening for years.
IBM ITSELF IS A NOTHING BURGER.
the fact XLM mooned because of IBM goes to show how stupid this market is.
Betting on ancient history... it's like getting a degree in classics and expecting to be rich by default.

[Anonymous No.10826215]

>>10825373
Kys you ugly fucking faggot. You’re going to die alone because all you’ve mastered in your pathetic, baby dick of a life is posting your faggot thoughts on a nepalese sweater weaving forum. What did you think you were going to prove? Every fucking FUD thread made by your ilk is continually disproven. All you fucking retarded faggots ever do is bring link MORE attention. You are literally doing the opposite of what your retarded brain is trying so hard to accomplish.

[Anonymous No.10826303]

Interesting, looking for Wagner infos on the archive I stumbled upon a thread showing an interesting connection, people in the thread thought the left guy was Wagner when it was Kochis, and it seems like this connection never got brought up again.

[Anonymous No.10826332]

>>10825373

lmao retard

[Anonymous No.10826827]

>>10826303
I made that connection.

It was always very obvious to everyone it was Kochis.

I drew a penis on my image

[Anonymous No.10827520]

>>10824685
what car is this? I need to know when chainlink reaches 1k

[Anonymous No.10827539]

>>10824685
companies will use the chainlink network to fetch data into hyperledger. you understand this process right? doesn't necessarily mean the platform will adopt anything, or else they would probably set up the chainlink network as a part of its own.
same with trade lens, etc

[Anonymous No.10827545]

>>10827520
Lamborghini countach

[Anonymous No.10827752]

holy fuck OP got BTFO
he will never recover from this

[Anonymous No.10828163]

>>10826303
Jake Paul partnership confirmed

[Anonymous No.10828699]

>>10825008
Great question. If this anon has looked through all the files, then he should know this. But alas, he does not... because he's a LARPing faggot.

[Anonymous No.10828913]

>>10824685
I also work for IBM and I can confirm that what OP says is true. You're all fucked linkies.

[Anonymous No.10828926]

>>10824685
Don't forget AXA also tried and tested Chainlink 2 years ago and weren't impressed, now seeking other options. see pic related.

[Anonymous No.10828985]

>>10825208
dude fuk off, youre a literal who solutions consultant with no pull or knowledge thats why youre searching your internal repositories for link news.

I've done the same for Oracle where i work. I speak for all of us when i say fuck off you have no pull, and no insider knowledge. Go back to selling MFT solutions and 32 straight quarters of declining revenue you street shitting big blue behemoth.