Only 10K nodes, cheap to get in

[Anonymous No.10785634]

Get this now, mainnet soon. darkpools, maximum 10k nodes. almost free money

[Anonymous No.10785650]

Delete this
Sage

[Anonymous No.10785667]

>>10785634
>darkpools
why is this needed when you can already do hidden orders on bitfinex?

[Anonymous No.10785686]

>>10785667
because the logo looks cool

[Anonymous No.10785690]

>>10785634
>almost free money
how much for a node in $

[Anonymous No.10785709]

>>10785690
I think around $2200 now
>>10785667
Logo is cool, also less effect on market/price

[Anonymous No.10785728]

>>10785634

Already got my node, no fiat left for a second..

But this project worries me. If they make the best darkpool protocol and no one has even heard of them, how the hell do they hope to succeed?

They need BIG liquidity partners right from the get go.

[Anonymous No.10785745]

>>10785686
>>10785709
hm I remember looking at this a few months ago. iirc polychain capital invested like $10 million into this. Only saying that because they are probably the only non meme hedge fund in crypto.

Had a look and seems theyve made some progress on the testnet since I last looked. The UI looks like dogshit though. Also, are orders all settled onchain? i.e. you have to pay ETH fees? Why not do this on EOS instead.

[Anonymous No.10785755]

>>10785728
>BIG liquidity partners right from the get go.
I think they do. They have polychain capital. They have $1 billion+ in liquid crypto. I dont know if polychain is still hodling though..

[Anonymous No.10785767]

>>10785728
Valid concern. I suppose this is the biggest risk of investing in this one right now.

[Anonymous No.10785776]

>>10785634
The logo reminds me of one of these. Who used to play with this as a kid?

[Anonymous No.10785804]

>>10785667

I don't know what you're talking about.

Bitfinex has an OTC desk, and it's literally a desk, manned by a guy in a suit, who takes calls and emails, and matches orders via Skype. I know because I called the guy, probing around for information and how they operate.

[Anonymous No.10785828]

>>10785804
well that makes sense. You still need OTC even with dark pools because even if the orders are hidden, they size of the order still indirectly influences the price. So if your buying 10's or even hundreds of millions, you'll do it OTC. Even if you have access to a dark pool exchange

[Anonymous No.10785846]

>>10785755
>I think they do.

I meant like an exchange. They need to partner with the equivalent of a Kraken or Binance as their go-to dark pool service.

Ideally, if their protocol is slick, they hope to link up orders from multiple exchanges with their APIs, so theoretically, it's possible for them to become the go-to dark pool matching service which would be amazing.

Of course the risk is, that it will fizzle out without anyone ever hearing of them.

But such is life investing in VC and crypto shit.

[Anonymous No.10785851]

thoughts on this? https://blog.airswap.io/introducing-conversational-otc-trading-358f15d8e9e4

[Anonymous No.10785875]

>>10785745
I think they said its not tied to Eth, can be run on a different platform as well in the future if needed.

Not sure how flexible the atomic swap layer is. Not my expertise.

[Anonymous No.10785906]

>>10785686
Dude, it looks like some IBM tier shit, holy fuck, I might invest just because of the logo

[Anonymous No.10786599]

My initial investment got REKT, but this was always a longer play.

[Anonymous No.10787280]

>>10786599
cope