[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 418 KB, 900x1039, 1529840481989.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10745200 No.10745200 [Reply] [Original]

https://b3i.tech/single-news-reader/insureblocks-podcast-ep-22-fizzy-axas-blockchain-case-study.html

Axa has a better Oracle in it's roadmap.

25:25 - 27:20

>> No.10745236

>>10745200

Link has been in development over a year with a detailed white paper explaining their intentions and plan, while you bring this shit that has no whitepaper or whatsoever?

The absolute state of nolinkers. Can't wait to see you guys get salty the upcoming months, while Link steadily rises.

>> No.10745280

Post is bullish fren.

>> No.10745292

>>10745236
its chainlink bro

>> No.10745293

>>10745236
Axa isn't currently using link. But it will be.

>> No.10745304

Link isn’t an oracle its a network

>> No.10745311

>>10745304
a network....of oracles

>> No.10745313

>>10745200
It literally says nothing about oracles.
>fizzy is a fresh new genre in insurance. It offers direct, automatic compensation to policyholders whose flights are delayed. If your plane is more than two hours late, fizzy will reimburse you immediately.
Wow. Groundbreaking shit.

>> No.10745316

>>10745293

Oh sorry completely read your post wrong. Sorry bro.

Ignore my ranting :).

>> No.10745323
File: 190 KB, 1080x1920, 1508196862173.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10745323

>>10745200
>>10745200
>>10745200
hmmmmm

>> No.10745337

>>10745311
Its still something different
everytime someone comes and says “well x has an oracle too so link is useless” they don’t know shit about how link works or what it is

>> No.10745371

>>10745313
Have you listened to the pod cast at the time stamp?

>> No.10745388

AXA will use their own oracle just like SWIFT will.

>> No.10745418

>>10745388
you never worked in banking/insurance, etc. this fuckers outsource any single fucking thing related to software, as it is not their business to develop it. the only thing i've seen at banking developed in-house is fucking basic access shit

>> No.10745443

>>10745371
Yes, and unless my browser is reporting the wrong time on the recording there was no mention of an oracle. Just that the Ethereum community is a bunch of nerds and they are using flightstats for flight tracking, blah blah blah. Why did you take the time to even post this garbage thread?

>> No.10745476
File: 127 KB, 1000x640, 1534568195900.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10745476

>>10745323
That is?

>> No.10745502
File: 46 KB, 1181x321, swift oracle.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10745502

>>10745418
Sorry my friend but I'm afraid to tell you, you are deluded. Even smartcontract.com says SWIFT is using their own oracle. They even underlined it especially for you link autismos.

>> No.10745533

>>10745476

>being this new

>> No.10745554

>>10745502
Good point anon. Pretty shady how they use the chainlink logo in all of the workflow examples in that document about the SWIFT oracle too. It's like they're trying to suggest they're actually using chainlink for the oracle. Pretty fucked up that they'd be that deceptive, isn't it?

>> No.10745557

>>10745502
You're baiting, and it's sour, rotten bait.

>> No.10745564

>>10745443
Lol. Nice try, fren.

>> No.10745578
File: 795 KB, 2998x2082, digging.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10745578

>>10745476

>> No.10745602
File: 307 KB, 951x972, 1522554626521.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10745602

>>10745557
>a screenshot from smartcontract.com is bait

>> No.10745626

>>10745200
Chainlink is a nice idea.
LINK is a useless utility token though.

>> No.10745633

Anyone else already numb to these connections? I used to feel exited when I found one of these threads, but now I'm like eh. I guess I just want to see Chainlink up and running already.

>> No.10745635

>>10745602
his interpretation of it is, fren

>> No.10745658

>>10745635
I'm literally taking it at face value. SWIFT will use their own oracle.

>> No.10745819

>>10745658
Did you even click the link? Why don't you send some screen shots from that?

>> No.10745876

>>10745633
nope, not numb at all. there's confirmations one after another of very big players being involved with projects directly related with chainlink, so that makes me happy as fuck.

>> No.10745895
File: 174 KB, 1098x553, SWIFT1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10745895

>>10745658

Here's one picture in the document regarding SWIFT's own Smart Oracle...

>> No.10745912
File: 121 KB, 996x488, SWIFT2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10745912

>>10745658
Here's another. Pretty fucked up that they'd put all these graphics and information in to trick people into thinking they're using ChainLink in the oracle.

>> No.10745915

>>10745633
Sell your LINK, ungrateful shit.

>> No.10745934

>>10745915
never

>> No.10745938

>>10745895
>>10745912
I agree it's pretty fucking disingenuous for sergey to stick the link cube in there to get more bagholders on board, when it's clearly stated SWIFT will be using their own oracle.

>> No.10746611

>>10745633
Nobody here can relate. Fuck back to r/BernieSanders

>> No.10747203

>>10745938
Yeah and it def won’t be a chainlink Oracle because chainlink is a network, not an Oracle. Filthy Russian scammer..