Redpill

[Anonymous No.10742459]

Link is not as big as you think.
There are no conspiracies behind it to guarantee its success.
There are no big players lined up to adopt it at first sign of main net.
There will be only more hard work waiting for both team after it launches.
99% of the dots are made up bullshit.
Deal with it and act accordingly

[Anonymous No.10742474]

who's keen to organise an international bender if link hits 1k eoy

[Anonymous No.10742479]

>>10742459
>Link is not as small as you think.
>There are no conspiracies behind it to guarantee its success.
>There are big players lined up to adopt it at first sign of main net.
>There will be more hard work waiting for both team after it launches.
>99% of the dots are not made up bullshit.
>Deal with it and act accordingly

[Anonymous No.10742481]

>>10742459
or is it ?

[Anonymous No.10742486]

>>10742479
B & R

[Anonymous No.10742489]

>>10742459
Still doesn't deny smart contracts are the lynchpin of crypto
> muh hardworking team
Op unironically no shit

[Anonymous No.10742490]

>>10742474
The delusions are sweet and easy to succumb to, but try to stay cool headed, anon.

[Anonymous No.10742491]

Anyone who sells link before 2020 is a fucking retard, regardless of how much fanfare accompanies main net.

[Anonymous No.10742517]

>>10742459
> several major companies have made it clear that they're working with SmartContract, and describe chainlink's system to the letter when explaining their plans for future financial systems
You've been cutting the contents of this redpill with onions and surplus chromosomes, retard. Take an object in the basement you live in and use it to dig your eyes out so that you can't post this low tier garbage fud anymore please.

[Anonymous No.10742528]

>>10742490
i have no delusion, i said if

[Anonymous No.10742541]

>>10742517
>describe chainlink's system to the letter when explaining their plans for future financial systems
Im sorry anon, that is jus a wishful thinking on your part

[Anonymous No.10742868]

>>10742541
Oh sorry my bad - I guess when they say they're working with smartcontract and then go on to describe something like that it must mean something else, when this is going to be smartcontract's premier service. You're such a genius.

[Anonymous No.10742953]

Here is how I see it, basicly 2 scenerios, and I'm not sure which one is more likely because the team stays super quiet about everything.

1) they already have developed reputation and aggregation in private repos and are testing it successfully behind closed doors with those big companies that anons here connect the dots to

2) they really haven't even started developing it and no one really knows if it's gonna work the way it's envisioned in the whitepaper. In this case I think it's pretty naive that some big companies would commit to something that doesn't even exist and hasn't been tested, thus only smaller projects like ethorse/req/ voiced their interest.

[Anonymous No.10742975]

These threads are literally always the same shit.

Nolinkers, who regardless of what is said, will not change their minds.

Linkers, who regardless of what is said, will not change their minds.

How about everyone just shuts the fuck up?

[Anonymous No.10742992]

>>10742953
Jung’s study of archetypes in myths had convinced him that the creation of symbols was a characteristic of mankind; it wasn’t necessarily pathological — quite the opposite. The “union of rational and irrational truth,” symbols were the essential and necessary product of the unconscious, its “most important function.” Using a language of archetypes and symbols to speak to the conscious mind, the unconscious offered a means toward self-awareness far more profound than the groping of consciousness alone.
We ARE all, unironically, in this together.

[Anonymous No.10743009]

>>10742459
I would think that if biz was right it would show more on the prize, simply due to the enormity of the project it implies and that such information will always leak and be exploited to make a profit. On the other hand one can compare it to the launch and development of the etherum enterprise alliance which didn't really show up on the price until official announcements started pouring out.

[Anonymous No.10743013]

>>10742491
i'll be selling at $5 eoy while you faggots are waiting on 1000 lmao

[Anonymous No.10743015]

>>10742459
Even if true, it WILL actually be used on launch and adoption will grow as the team releases new features. You’re deluded if you think Link adoption wont happen eventually with big names. >>10742491 is right. Anyone who sells before 2020 is a fucking moron.

[Anonymous No.10743016]

redpilled, will kms

[Anonymous No.10743088]

>>10742975
nope. because one is right and the other is delusional

>>10743013
this guys gonna make money

[Anonymous No.10743165]

>>10742489
ada and algorand will shit on link in terms of smart contracts

[Anonymous No.10743176]

Whats the story behind this gif? What was Sergey talking about to that lady?

[Anonymous No.10743209]

>There will be only more hard work waiting for both team after it launches.
>that is jus a wishful thinking on your part
>Here is how I see it, basicly 2 scenerios,

what kind of pajeet thread is this?

[Anonymous No.10743221]

>>10743013
I’ll sell at $1000 a week later tyvm

[Anonymous No.10743458]

you guys reckon aggregation will only work for specific data types initially? Different data types probably need different aggregation methods and planning for all of them seem by 2019 seems too soon. What if it's just aggregation for simple stuffs first like integers(interest rate, weather, scores) and true/false statements.

Dates, GPS coordinates, colour and etc. seems trickier to "average" and could possibly be delayed

[Anonymous No.10743476]

>>10743209
I wanted to type "both team and us"

[Anonymous No.10743589]

>>10743458
please be honest with me is AGP a legitimate thing? do people really transition due to their AGP feelings? as someone who would be considered HSTS (or whatever the other one is) i've always legitimately associated my trans ness with i was meant to be a woman but i was born in the wrong body. i never had anything sexually related to transitioning and overall have a pretty low sex drive. i now consider myself a female but i still have intense body and face dysphoria. i never wrapped my head around people transitioning for sexual reasons and was never exposed to it before the online trannies explained it. i guess im kind of baffled that people actually do that but im trying to understand peoples reasons for it. not trolling just seriously confused

[Anonymous No.10743609]

>>10743458
In statistics there are many ways of filtering outliers and aggregating a result. You could write a smart contract based on ranges for example, I won't describe all the methodology behind finding out which data point is an outlier but the toolbox is filled with options, I don't think there's an issue and there's probably an existing solution for every kind of data.

[Anonymous No.10743620]

>>10742459
>>10742459
yes this is most true, do not be doing the link be doing the needful selling please as is best of those who wish you safe

[Anonymous No.10743990]

>>10742479
>Link is not as small as you think.
>There are conspiracies behind it to guarantee its success.
>There are big players lined up to adopt it at first sign of main net.
>There will be no more hard work waiting for both team after it launches.
>0% of the dots are made up bullshit.
>Deal with it and act accordingly

[Anonymous No.10744742]

>>10742459

https://medium.com/@accordhq/smart-legal-contracts-and-oracles-36d4eb538a92

https://medium.com/@OpenLawOfficial/openlaw-teams-with-chainlink-to-bring-real-world-info-to-smart-contracts-4e7a3dac80a8

http://www.initc3.org/partners.html

>Sure buddy whatever you say

[Anonymous No.10744928]

If link hits 5 dollars i can retire with 6 years salary, taxes paid, and still have well over 50k link in storage.

[Anonymous No.10745003]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuNjJesFWZg


*sip*

[Anonymous No.10745007]

>>10742474
I'm in

[Anonymous No.10745025]

>>10745007
congrats and hold strong

[Anonymous No.10745035]

LINK will never take off. Pic related.

[Anonymous No.10745048]

>>10745035
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vfZRuNMgfE

sure thing bucko

[Anonymous No.10745080]

>>10743209
The kind you sage newfag

[Anonymous No.10745084]

>>10745048
>i'll just connect some more imaginary dots and draw imaginary conclusions

[Anonymous No.10745085]

>>10742459
Yup. Don’t hold your breath waiting. It will take 2-3 years until anything moves.

[Anonymous No.10745101]

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

[Anonymous No.10745107]

>>10742992
>maps of meaning

[Anonymous No.10745109]

>>10745003
this guy a boomer and just chugged a bottle of water you sure he knows what hes talking about?

[Anonymous No.10745119]

>>10745035
>BlockOne IQ is currently focused on private chains
He's lying. They work with ETH.

[Anonymous No.10745121]

>>10743458
>>10743609
there wont be any "averaging out" of data. i went though this a few months back; it isnt LINKs job to do that. LINK simply ensures that data isnt corrupted en-route to the smart contract. any data processing will be the result of the specific smart contract itself, which will be up to the parties involved in drafting th actual smart contract to begin with.

[Anonymous No.10745128]

The team is a bunch of misfits and weirdos. Perhaps the tech is good enough to get $10 but without charisma and class, no international bank wants to be associated with these losers. Thats the truth.

[Anonymous No.10745142]

>>10745128
>no international bank wants to be associated with these losers
Except BNP Paribas, AXA, Santander, Credit Generale, Swift, etc.
Right?

[Anonymous No.10745151]

>>10745119
>He doesn't know you can run a private Ethereum blockchain.
Just stop.

[Anonymous No.10745162]

openlaw and accord were just dots a few weeks ago and today are confirmed so it's likely some others are true. Many are bullshit, but Docusign seems like it's pretty much guaranteed to have some sort of involvement.

[Anonymous No.10745191]

>>10745151
Right, making his argument complete bullshit.

[Anonymous No.10745285]

>>10745128
>Perhaps the tech is good enough to get $10
woah what a pipedream