[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 28 KB, 320x320, 1474026301951.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10700903 No.10700903 [Reply] [Original]

What are some non Crypto ways to make money slowly using accumulated wealth?
>Buy my OC BlockChained Not Bitcoin!
No thanks, don't feel like posting pink wojaks every time the market fluctuates. There seriously should be a /crp/ for you Crypto Kiddies.

>> No.10700931

>>10700903
Just buy stock index ETFs with low expense ratios. Don’t fall the stock picking meme unless you’re a pro (you’re not).

>> No.10700937

>>10700931
Believe me I know that I'm not smart enough to compete against insider trading.

>> No.10700986

>>10700931
what if i told you i know how to pick the exact same stock as major hedgefunds with +100 million assets under management.

without the 50 million it cost for research

>> No.10700999

>>10700986
I would avoid an obvious ponzi scheme.

>> No.10701010

>>10700999
>I would avoid an obvious ponzi scheme.
its not a ponzi scheme, hedgefunds need to disclose their stocks to the SEC. i made a tool that analyses the data and tell me which stock to hold

>> No.10701016

>>10700986
I’d tell you that most major hedge funds don’t even outperform pre expenses.

Also, unless you can buy the stocks before the fund you’re trying to copy, you’ll on average be buying at a higher price than them.

>> No.10701022

>>10701010
So you're losing money by purchasing stocks that have raised in value due to inside knowledge increasing their worth but decreasing their viability?

>> No.10701039

>>10701016
>I’d tell you that most major hedge funds don’t even outperform pre expenses.

some dont, some do by a large margin. its oke to be buying higher price. aslong as the hedgefund is value investing. (long term)

>> No.10701059
File: 59 KB, 2194x543, whale.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10701059

>>10701022
>>10701016

this is copying one hedgefund picking stocks 3 months, a full quarter, after they did. as you can see you are still outperforming the market.

>> No.10701305

>>10701059
So? Pleas don’t tell me you actually believe that’s statistically significant. Also, hedge funds that have outperformed are NOT statistically more likely to outperform in the future (look it up). If you’re smart enough to figure out what the top 5% of hedge funds will be in the next 5 years then you’re smart enough to be stock picking. The vast majority of hedge funds underperform (including the huge ones).

>> No.10701315

>>10701305
That have outperformed in the past*