[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 427 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_20180814-115500_Twitter.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689430 No.10689430 [Reply] [Original]

Literally shaking. Its all true.

>> No.10689453

>>10689430
True if big.

>> No.10689454

>>10689430
HOLY FUCK

>> No.10689456

HOLY SHIT GET IN HERE IT'S TRUE

>> No.10689459
File: 214 KB, 1418x1160, 1527966336005.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689459

Was there ever any doubt?

$1000 EOY


Last fucking chance to get in on the floor NoLinkers.

>> No.10689463

OMG!!!!!!

>> No.10689465

>>10689430
>It's real
Doesn't post a link.

>> No.10689476

>>10689465
Just check their twitter, brainlet

>> No.10689479

>>10689430
Fake and gay.

>> No.10689480
File: 69 KB, 1200x750, DjparkgW4AACwZM.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689480

>>10689465
Can't you use a computer faggot? it's in their official twitter
TO DA MOON MAN

>> No.10689482

>>10689465
https://twitter.com/OpenLawOfficial

Retard

>> No.10689483

1000 EOY

>> No.10689487

>>10689465
https://twitter.com/openlawofficial/status/1029378816706338821?s=21

>> No.10689499

>>10689430
>openlaw

Literally a who startup

>> No.10689504

>>10689430
Remember the Anon a couple days ago that said Link to top 50? BOOM. Hope u didn't sell looking for a bigger drop.

>> No.10689512
File: 290 KB, 466x443, IMG_0554.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689512

>it's fucking real

AAAAAAAAHHHHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

ALERT ALERT

ITS HAPPENING

ITS HAPPENING

NOLINKERS BTFO IN FIVE...

>> No.10689517

>>10689487
Fake and gay

>> No.10689519

I thought it was something for a second, it's just another blockchain startup, that's worse than the origami "partnership"
What is OpenLaw?
OpenLaw is a blockchain-based protocol for the creation and execution of legal agreements. Using OpenLaw, lawyers can more efficiently engage in transactional work and digitally sign and store legal agreements in a highly secure manner, all while leveraging next generation blockchain-based smart contracts.

Using OpenLaw, you can create “legal templates” which can be enhanced using our “Legal Markup” language. Our Legal Markup language is akin to Wikipedia’s “wiki text” with greater functionality and enables anyone to wrap logic and other contextual information around traditional legal prose.

>> No.10689520

who the fook is open law tho

>> No.10689523

>>10689430
>https://twitter.com/OpenLawOfficial
Its literally another blockchain product shitcoin. Doesnt mean anything.

>> No.10689546

Look at their markup language for law contracts though, if the partnership is confirmed by chainlink the it means mainnet is close.
https://docs.openlaw.io/markdown/index.html

>> No.10689551

IT'S REAL HOLY SHIT

>> No.10689556

priced in

>> No.10689563

holy shit a partnership with another im shaking but ironically

>> No.10689594

>>10689499
That’s not the point you dip. The point is that this connection was found based on a twitter following and some common fucking sense. God I can’t wait for all the other partnerships to be revealed. This is happening the way that one larper said it would.... looks like September might be the month after all

>> No.10689595

marine here what is so special about opnenlaw? it aeems that it is just another startup

>> No.10689612

>>10689594
Also, there was a guy who made a thread 2 days ago saying that in 2 days something would happen. He was a real insider too it seems. The trouble is sifting the real insiders from the larpers

>> No.10689617
File: 1.70 MB, 2048x1568, 1529887078522.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689617

Give it to me Sergey. Tell me my dreams will come true.

>> No.10689627

>>10689499
this lol. you nerd cucks get excited just like a redditor when he sees a nintendo


>using ChainLink’s middleware, we can calculate the equivalent amount of ETH at the moment of transfer. For example, if a party agrees to a $10,000 per month contract via an OpenLaw agreement, the exchange rate can be converted via ChainLink’s oracle each month to pay in Ether at the latest exchange rates.

LOL. no one irl gives a shit unless they get paid in cash, not some gay shitcoins

>> No.10689634

>>10689617
YOUR DREAMS WILL COME TRUE MARINE,
CHECK EM

>> No.10689647

>>10689430
OpenLaw is a scam created by Chainllink pajeets

>> No.10689648
File: 2.19 MB, 2061x2056, D989E7E9-05B9-4B8C-87A4-5F0B49F67E98.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689648

>> No.10689656

>>10689517
? The tweet is real.

>> No.10689659

>>10689430
>THIS MEANS THE UNDERLYING COIN MUST BE WORTH THOUSANDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111111111111111111111111

>> No.10689667

this is just advertising for the openlaw ico

>> No.10689669
File: 190 KB, 750x498, IMG_0316.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689669

>>10689430
Chainlink is love. Chainlink is life.

>> No.10689670

>>10689595
They make creating a legally-binding smart contract very easy. The easier it is the easier adoption will come. If you can write a smart contract that a norm is can understand (i.e. not computer code), legally sign it, and then securely chainlink it to a data feed that will trigger it, you’ve just revolutionized the legal system

>> No.10689678

>>10689430
fuck me. it's true... all of it. Please pepe, let Masters be the next annoucement..... looking more and more like sibos might be the grand daddy of them all

>> No.10689696

-ic3
-Accord
-Openlaw

Next please!!

>> No.10689714
File: 493 KB, 700x699, 1533082580974.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689714

>> No.10689729

>>10689670
at this point docusign is all but confirmed

>> No.10689736
File: 154 KB, 750x1272, AD2A68AE-0499-4572-AF26-C146E866C50C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689736

>>10689430
It’s true. Make sure to give make claps.

>> No.10689737
File: 72 KB, 788x685, 307.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689737

They called us STINKY
They called us Deluded.
They called us Pajeets (partially true)
They called us PND shitcoin.
They called us FAT.
They called us memecoiners.
They called us a 2 man team.
They called us Russian Scam.
They called us Assblasted.
They laughed.
They filtered.
They ignored.
Then they raged.
And they despaired.
When the cryptoworld is on fire. And now they see LINK for what it is.
The saviour.
The Chosen.
The One crypto to save all Cryptos.
And in the darkness bring crypto mainstream.
It's not too late noLinkers.
Make your choice.

>> No.10689746

>>10689430
Who the fuck is OpenLaw?

>> No.10689763

>>10689430
1000 EOY BABY

>> No.10689770

>a literal no name partnership
holy shit when did linkies become such normalfag moonboys? Congrats on this seriously. Enjoy your bags when this dumps to sub 20 cents. I’ll be accumulating

>> No.10689793

>>10689770
you won't be doing shit you desperate swing trading faggot, stay on the sidelines you cuck

>> No.10689812

>>10689430
Just checked and OpenLaw is a firm with a less than 1kk market value. Topkek, even small cafeterias are worth more than that.

>> No.10689822

>>10689812
Lmao

>> No.10689830

>>10689793
Like I said, enjoy the bags. I’ll pick some up at a lower price.

>> No.10689837

>>10689430
Holy shit it's a fucking no name startup. This is unironically bearish.

>> No.10689856
File: 507 KB, 1070x601, 33481015d04b3974f9ed7acf616592901b13507ebdabf48ee1d6d09d63acc2c4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689856

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO FUCKFU FUCKCOAJKWFIPHJWFIOHWUIOFHWIOFHWGFIJWFJIAWFIOJIOWFJ

I'M DEPOSTING $1000 TOMORROW PLS TELL ME NOBODY EVEN KNOWS ABOUT THIS EXCEPT FOR THE MARINES ON BIZ

>> No.10689862

>>10689830
like I said stay in the corner and watch from there loser!

>> No.10689866

>>10689430

Thinking about flipping my LINK stack for ETH while it's about to rebound.

Fuck it, I'm doing it

>> No.10689873

You guys ought to look into Aaron Wright, who "is chair of the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance’s Legal Working Group, an academic fellow at CoinCenter, an editor at Ledger, and has a forthcoming book with Primavera DeFilippi (Blockchain Technology and the Law: The Rule of Code) under contract with Harvard University Press."

>> No.10689875

>>10689862
You bought the top of these pnd’s didn’t you?

>> No.10689882

>>10689812
where did you find that information?

>> No.10689909
File: 92 KB, 800x800, 1517778096677.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689909

>>10689875
no retard I bought all my LINK in november or december between 13 and 20c, couldn't give less of a fuck of what some desperate swing trader thinks lmao you fucks think you're better because "hurr I'm a trader" have fun watching from the corner faggot

>> No.10689938

THIS IS THE BEST TIME LINE


LINK $1000 EOY

>> No.10689947

>OpenLaw
>a @ConsenSys spoke.
Interesting links desu.

>> No.10689958

> CTRL-F chainlink
> 10 results

HOLY FUCK, IT'S REAL

$2500 EOY

>> No.10689963

>>10689837
Look into ConsenSys. Start here https://new.consensys.net/labs/

>> No.10689970

>ctrl+f oracles
>0 results

>> No.10689982

>>10689963
I think they recently hit 1k employees.

>> No.10689992

>>10689958
lol

>> No.10690002
File: 1.64 MB, 1257x2113, IMG_1111.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690002

Link $2500 end of year.

There is literally no stopping us. We are going to overtake bitcoin's market cap. Nobody can stop the coming singularity. People will write books and movies about us. When people think of crypto, their first thoughts will be "those lucky link millionaires". We are the chosen. We are the new elite. We are GOING TO MAKE IT

>> No.10690007

>>10689982
https://consensys.net/ventures/partnerships/

>> No.10690008

>>10689737
Fucking deluded stinky

>> No.10690009
File: 171 KB, 1410x835, Capture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690009

you guys dont get it. biz uncovered the open law connection with ease. this ties in together connections like with Dom Steil (Salesforce/Dapps inc) and others making them extremely plausible.

>> No.10690020

>>10689430
What's with all the Factom shilling lately? Honest question. Factom, Storj, these coins are worthless. There is no reason for them. What's with this shilling?

>> No.10690022

>>10689627
You can convert crypto to usd you tard and the dollar has been so manipulated and controlled by the jew bankers convince me why I'd want to put my livelihood in that fucked up system that's doomed to fall anyways.

>> No.10690026

>>10689430
Anyone who doubts link and doesnt know who openlaw is and who they work with has literally done zero research. Its not worth telling them thr who what where and why.

Just watch the nolinkers rage in a year or so

>> No.10690032
File: 48 KB, 770x481, lubinOpenLaw.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690032

>>10689947
>>10689963
Look who retweeted it...

>> No.10690037

>>10689430
I kind of am shaking lmao.

Jesus fucking christ, Chainlink IS crypto at this point.

>> No.10690041

>>10689856
nice, you might be able to afford a whole LINK with that by tomorrow :)

>> No.10690046

>>10690026
OpenLaw.io is not the Openlaw you're thinking of that's affiliated with Harvard

>> No.10690056

>>10689627
? That’s why you have chain link trigger the bank transaction and nobody has to see or think about the internet funny money orchestrating behind the scenes

>> No.10690059

>>10689430
>linkies linking with crumbling institutions
Stinkie is right. Gross!

>> No.10690063
File: 285 KB, 641x511, E8285451-5F16-4C38-982E-504866A089A3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690063

>>10690032

>> No.10690067

>>10689519
This. Just another fag startup. No big leads. Their team are a bunch of fags and idiots.

>> No.10690079

>>10689812
That made me spit my drink out lmfaf

>> No.10690097

>>10690067
LMFAO.
cope.

>> No.10690103

>>10690032
:)

>> No.10690117
File: 609 KB, 1387x1020, link comfy sitting room.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690117

>>10690032
this is the good shit

>> No.10690146

i am a senior trader with a major banking institution, and i have a meeting in 30 mins on blockchain. willing to shill chainlink at the meeting, but i need some of you NEETS to research kaleido.io for me. thanks.

>> No.10690149
File: 702 KB, 627x625, 1517780332013.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690149

What if it's all true? What if we all really make it?

>> No.10690153

>>10689746
Dont worry youll be hearing alot about them

>> No.10690165

>>10690032

my lord this is it boys

>> No.10690176
File: 204 KB, 750x500, 1508517737980.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690176

>>10690149
>if
nigga, we already rich, you just don't have the money physically yet but having enough LINK is like holding a winning lottery ticket that can be redeemed a few months from now, it's basicly the equivalent of already being rich

>> No.10690188

The word partnership is overused. It sounds like openlaw will use chainlink in their processes. It's like saying I have a partnership with McDonald's because I go there to eat. I'm a client/user/customer, which imo is better than vague partnerships.

>> No.10690197

>>10690188
this.

>> No.10690207

>>10690188
doesn't matter how it's called, the point is Chainlink is the only project in this shitty market that is a solution to an existing problem, it's the customers waiting for LINK not some shitcoin (half-assed) waiting for people willing to use that.

>> No.10690208

>>10690188
Weak. Shitcoin partnerships are overdone. Chainlink partnerships are a different thing. Do you notice how Openlaw is announcing the partnership? Notice any difference to the usual shitcoin partnership announcements?

>> No.10690212

>>10689430
https://medium.com/@OpenLawOfficial/openlaw-2018-the-year-ahead-f52afa5d1760

This link gives an idea of the timeframe. They've been in talks with Chainlink since before March. Good info to know how long these partnerships take to develop.

>> No.10690213

OMG my anal sphincter is literally quivering right now.

>> No.10690216

>>10689812
AHAHAHAHA LINKIES GET BLOWN
THE
FUCK
O
U
T

>> No.10690218
File: 42 KB, 368x278, hardatwork.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690218

>>10690188

>> No.10690222

Well i'll be damned..following all those breadcrumbs turned out positive....link fudders BTFO HAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHhHaAhHhHhHaAAHhhAAHHaHAhHHHhHaAAahhHhHhahAAaAAAAAA

>> No.10690227
File: 16 KB, 230x300, sweat0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690227

>>10690007
>https://consensys.net/ventures/partnerships/

>> No.10690229
File: 77 KB, 900x900, 1513273653373.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690229

>>10690149
it is all true. we all really make it.

>> No.10690232
File: 31 KB, 600x600, 1523299853335.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690232

>>10689866
You sell stable Link right before mainnet and another partnership reveal for freefalling eth? Are you retarded?

>> No.10690238

>>10689812
lmao

>> No.10690242

>>10689459
That's pretty high risk. Chainlink has moved 60 positions on CMC while most things worth dropping have slid. A lateral trade that involves a 60% loss to speculate on Chainlink is too high stakes for most. This is unironically the kind of psychological barrier that keeps people from hurr durr just hopping on when the rocket launches. It's nice to have that one answered too.

>> No.10690246

Shitcoin partners with a shitcoin. Wew lads, rank 1000 EOY.

How's that REQ partnership working out?

>> No.10690251

>>10690232
don't man... let him. it's natural selection.

>> No.10690252

>>10690188

Well Chainlink is not announcing anything, it's actually the companies that want to use it that announce it, that already tells you something.

>> No.10690257

>>10690213
What is the exact status of you guys anal sphincters right this very moment?

>> No.10690258
File: 332 KB, 640x1065, 1532904489487.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690258

>>10690188
Exactly. Look at how Accord had to address all the frenzied linkies who bombarded them with autism after "muh partnership"

>> No.10690263

>>10690188
>>10690207
>>10690197
Shit-tier coping skills lolmao.

"We're excited to announce our new partnership with @chainlink"
t. @OpenLawOfficial

>> No.10690295

>>10690032
>https://consensys.net/ventures/partnerships/

HAHA any fudding here is just doing so in hopes of keeping the price down.

>> No.10690305

>>10690188
>>10690258
Anon, you didn't.... you didn't sell down there, below 4k sats.... did you? You're too smart to do something like that......

>> No.10690307

>>10689812
>>10689822
>>10690079
>>10690238
>>10690216
OpenLaw is an offshoot of Consensys.
You do know about Consensys, riiiiiiight anon?

>> No.10690309

>>10689430

When will the morbidly obese russian philosopher announce his partnership with Mcdonalds HIHOHIHOHIII

>> No.10690312

>>10690295
Nah. Some of you guys are just really easy to trigger.

>> No.10690316

>>10690222
czeched
we gon make it

>> No.10690319

>>10690188
He's saying them using chainlink as a client is better than a partnership. He's not fudding, you brainlets.

>> No.10690343

I have 14.. going to make it? Sold all my holo literally minute ago to go all in link.

frens...?

>> No.10690344

-10.08%

>> No.10690347

>>10690258
You think they give a shit about what people say on twitter? If there's money to be made, voices will be ignored.

>> No.10690351
File: 176 KB, 1656x1029, accord partners.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690351

>>10690319
You can be both a partner and a user/client.
The word partnership is indeed a meme in crypto, but it still holds non-meme meaning too.
And it's Openlaw who used the word. And Accord (pic related).

>> No.10690353

it's gona moon mofos, get in now!

>> No.10690382
File: 102 KB, 746x500, 1522064423919.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690382

>>10690351
>Associates

>> No.10690404

>>10690382
Beyond crypto, "partner" and "associate" mean virtually the same thing, and are on the same level.
Hence why they share a tab.

>> No.10690410
File: 57 KB, 400x500, 1519010874010.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690410

>>10690343
Just hodl for 10 years and you made it fren.
Need 1K to make it in less than 3.

>> No.10690416
File: 503 KB, 1082x695, BA82C305-38FF-47C0-8B5C-9669E6997007.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690416

>>10689430
Increased my stack from 73k to 151k. Where does that put me on the rankings?

>> No.10690425

>>10689456
IM IN HERE BABE AND IM PRETTY SURE YOU SPELLED YOUR NAME WRONG

>> No.10690443

Out of every major crash a technological titan rises from the ashes and takes over the world.

>> No.10690445

>>10689947
>>10689963
>>10690007
>>10690009

heres a pretty plain english primer on consensys

>> No.10690455

>>10690443
based and redpilled.

>> No.10690458

>>10689465
>Tweet

Fuck man, your not /biz/ worthy.

>> No.10690499

HOW MUCH LINKIES TO MAKE IT?!?!? NEED TO MAKE SOME MOVES!!!!

>> No.10690507

>>10690257
Primed and prepped for Sergay cock marine!

>> No.10690524
File: 102 KB, 1920x1080, 1531600378416.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690524

>>10690499
10K eoy 2018

tick tock..

>> No.10690526

>>10690499
i have 4,3k links,currently contemplating fomo'ing my fiat savings

>> No.10690534

Too bad it crapped it's pants yesterday, or we could have a real chad pump

>> No.10690543

>>10690146
> https://kaleido.io/

It seems to be a SaaS provider focusing on making easy to use interfaces for B2B use of private blockchains.

Simply said if Chainlink is the backend, This could potentially become the front end interface for businesses to use and customize easy to use interfaces for their own ledgers.

Seems legit.

>> No.10690554

>>10690404
>associate and partner mean the same thing
No sweetie that’s not how it works. Accord makes the distinction between the two for a reason, and they had to go out of their way to address your autism

>> No.10690555

The partnership with Zeppelin OS, an Ethereum dApp development framework with secure libraries makes me also bullish on the network effect of ChainLink. The ChainLink Community News website states that 95% of all Ethereum dApps were written via Zeppelin OS. Zeppelin may integrate ChainLink as standard oracle network what in my eyes already happened with the partnership. Thats also already a huge factor for the network effect before mainnet that people don't see

>> No.10690556

>>10690554
>Accord makes the distinction between the two
Well no they don't.
They all share the tab.

>> No.10690563

>>10690146
Eat a dick lazy cunt.

>> No.10690572
File: 342 KB, 658x627, 1524889370287.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690572

look at the medium article and this line:
>Our first integration with ChainLink will leverage our existing smart legal contracts to demonstrate the capabilities of this integration with ChainLink. Assets (cryptocurrencies, tokens, etc.) transferred on OpenLaw can now be denominated in U.S. dollars.

The key part is the opening words - "our first integration...".

These guys must have a fuck tonne of uses for LINK. And not just openlaw. the possibilities are endless.

LINK $342,847 eoy

>> No.10690582

>>10690188
As long as it CONTRIBUTES to the Growth of the network, who the fuck cares.

>> No.10690585
File: 2.80 MB, 465x254, true ladsmanship.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690585

LADS
WHAT'S BEST EXCHANGE TO BUY THIS SHIT FROM
I CAN FINALLY GET REVENGE ON MYSELF FOR NOT BUYING SHITCOIN AT 0.25 IN EARLY 2011
IT'S FUCKING HAPPENING, PLEASE ADVISE

>> No.10690587

>>10690507
That's what we like to hear boyo.

>> No.10690599

>>10690416
Top dog

>> No.10690604
File: 1.08 MB, 640x1136, CEAD64A1-58FF-41B3-8430-F65FB4F9E6B4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690604

This is so dope to wake up to

>> No.10690629

>>10690585
binance
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/chainlink/#markets

>> No.10690637

>>10690556
>this level of bagholder cope
That’s because the tab incorporates both partners and associates, sweetie. Chainlink is an associate. Any oracle service can contribute. It has no exclusivity. Mobius can contribute tomorrow if they want and if they did using your deluded definition they would be “partners” too. Try not to yell fibby wibbies to yourself.

>> No.10690639

>>10690585
DON'T buy the version on Binance, it's a fork and will be worthless sooner rather than later, you need to email Rory directly and send him a cheque in the post and he'll send you a parcel full of Linkies

hope this helps lad X

>> No.10690661

>>10690637
>That’s because the tab incorporates both partners and associates
That's what I said.

>Chainlink is an associate
Or a partner.
Doesn't matter which, they're on the same level. Hence why they share a tab.

You have been defeated. Sorry kid.

>> No.10690706

>>10690639
Shut up dude its over you got blown over...only a retarded monkey will believe you now lmfao shadow fork go stick that up your ass faggot

>> No.10690735

>>10690639
This.

Everyone holding link bought it from ico or messaged chainlink team directly. The token in binance is erc20 while the real link is erc225

>> No.10690746

>>10690706
cringe

>> No.10690753

>>10690637
Lol no one would really every spend time on a thread that doesnt involve their investment or potential investment. I can sense the fear in the fudders posting here. I know you are scared. You may still have time to accumulate. Better act fast..

>> No.10690755

>>10690735
At least you guys are creative.

>> No.10690765

>>10690661
Wrong, you said that they share the same tab because they’re the same thing. But the distinction Accord makes proves otherwise. If a nigger gets grouped with white people in a tab called “black people & white people”, does the nigger become a white person? No sweetie, you’ll still be a nigger. And Chainlink will always be just another associate.

>> No.10690790

>>10690753
>repeat this every day for the 8 months
>60% down
Life’s gotta suck for you

>> No.10690792

>>10690765
>you said that they share the same tab because they’re the same thing
No, I said they share the same tab because they're on the same level.

YOU are wrong. Better luck next time.

>> No.10690813

Another prediction came true. We had a big thread about openlaw just yesterday. Link research team always right. We gonna make it Boys.

>> No.10690817

>>10690790
Yeah fucking everything has been down for the past 8 months. You got something to say, or are you just talkin?

>> No.10690819

>>10690792
>on the same level
Wrong again sugarplum. “Associate” and “Partner” are definitely not on that same level. See my nigger example and enjoy the cognitive dissonance.

>> No.10690831

>>10690817
The bear market has another 5 months left in it faggot, enjoy the wojaks

>> No.10690832

>>10690819
>“Associate” and “Partner” are definitely not on that same level
Sure they are.
Hence why Accord puts them in the same tab.

You show promise, don't let this one crushing defeat get you down.

>> No.10690836

>>10690755
Nah, get a load of this guy:
>>10690765
Utter panic and/or hatred. I'm guessing someone who was "too smart" to "fall for it".
Probably went in on a sensible hold like vechain

>> No.10690839
File: 108 KB, 273x252, laughing slavs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690839

>>10690819
your mom and my dick are on the same level though you faggot
fucking btfo

>> No.10690844
File: 16 KB, 882x758, IMG_0535.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690844

>>10689459
LITERALLY, UNIRONICALLY FOMOING IN SOME TIME THIS WEEK

SORRY FOR ALL THE FUD THREADS LINKIES

>> No.10690846

>>10690813
I'm just sitting here lurking and have absolutely zero clue what any of this shit is or how to even research it properly, let alone buy in on anything.
>mfw I probably don't have enough money to anyways

>> No.10690850

>>10689430
https://twitter.com/Kaleido_io/status/1029404163183202305?s=19

>> No.10690855

>>10690813
What are some notable Openlaw connections?
(Other than the obvious consensys)

>> No.10690859

>>10690832
chainlink doesn't have "associates" or "partners"...

only customers. Only projects who need them and are willing to pay us >$1000 for a link.

>> No.10690866
File: 27 KB, 385x385, 1533498098579.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690866

>>10690706
Unbased and bluepilled, m8 I was just trying to help the lad out, and I get chastised for trying to be the righteous man? Wowwoo weewoo oh gees Im shaking right now

>> No.10690869

>>10690832
>a nigger and a white person are on the same level if they’re in a tab called “white people & niggers”
the kind of cope only a truly deluded stinky linky could fathom

>> No.10690879

Thread I made yesterday
Pay attention
>>/biz/thread/S10683579

>> No.10690881

>>10690859
The word "partner" can be a meme both ways.
In between those meme extremes is the true non-meme use: two parties working together.

>> No.10690883

I'm glad most of you fucks are linklets that'll be selling early because holy fuck you can't even comprehend the partnership between a startup founded by one of Ether's billionare cofounders with ChainLink's tech. Fuck off all of you

>> No.10690887
File: 139 KB, 942x942, LinkPeakPerformance.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690887

Gonna make it

>> No.10690893

>>10690869
>>a nigger and a white person are on the same level if they’re in a tab called “white people & niggers”
Well yes.
But who in their right mind would create such a tab?

>> No.10690895

>>10690554

>sweetie

cringe

>> No.10690900

We're not deluded after all are we? This is amazing biz. Keep up!!

>> No.10690911
File: 248 KB, 711x118, kaleido.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690911

>>10690850
>https://twitter.com/Kaleido_io/status/1029404163183202305?s=19

>> No.10690917

>>10689812
jesus christ its almost like these linktards get off on being humiliated

>> No.10690920

>>10690846
dude just google it

you want to get in soon before it moons

>> No.10690922

>>10690879
that's cool but what openlaw says chainlink is being used for is way to fucking in the weeds to come up in a high-level presentation like that.

>> No.10690931

>>10690887
imagine being so gay that your scale is also gay

>> No.10690936

>>10689737
>They called us Pajeets (partially true)
Kek

>> No.10690942

>>10690839
Can always tell a low iq brainlet from his reactionary “yuh mum” rebuke. I honestly wouldn’t expect anything less from an investor in this scamcoin shittoken

>> No.10690943

>>10690911
Mate that's some confido-tier pageet trying to ride the hype.

>> No.10690944

3cents EOY unironically

>> No.10690951

>>10690920
I did google it but there's a shit ton I still don't understand. I've been lurking for a while and usually end up with more questions than answers.

looking at getcrypto.info/chainlink/ right now

>> No.10690952

>>10690543
thanks for the work kid. looks like Kaleido just confirmed they're interested:

>https://twitter.com/Kaleido_io/status/1029404163183202305?s=19

Gonnna shill the shit outta LINK at this meeting. 2500 eoy!

>> No.10690965

>>10690931
Can you stop staring at my dick for a second? Thanks

>> No.10690979

>>10690893
holochain?

>> No.10690996

>>10690965
lol holy shit I thought that was just a beefy vagina

>> No.10691004

>>10690943
That's actually a consensys block chain as a service product.

>> No.10691017
File: 48 KB, 215x176, loli shiggy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10691017

>>10690942
yuh mum

>> No.10691019

>>10690952
Are you the same person who is tweeting@ Kaleido?

>> No.10691020

>>10690893
Anyone can create a group anytime and fill it with whoever they like you utter brainlet. All the group members don’t suddenly morph into the same thing. The fact I’m having to explain this to you is top tier cringe.

>> No.10691024 [DELETED] 

>>10689430
Been holding since October. It's about time we got some real news. $5k EOY.

>> No.10691026

>>10690951
Just do what most of us did and lurk Link breads for a while, you start to get ideas after some time, and soon after that you become indistinguishable from the rest of us; for once you stare into the abyss long enough, the abyss stares back

2500 eoy tho

>> No.10691030

>>10691020
>Anyone can create a group anytime and fill it with whoever they like
Exactly.
And Accord created a tab grouping together partners and associates, meaning accord believes they are on the same level, relatively.

>> No.10691035

>>10690996
Have you ever seen a vagina irl?

>> No.10691044

Link $1043 EOY

>> No.10691067

>>10689430
it is true, and it is also vaporhype.

>> No.10691075

>>10691004
Bullshit. It's some rando startup that couldn't even get a retweet.
They claim both consensys and AWS (!) as "partners". That alone is enough of a red flag for me to ignore them.
I thought they were just some literally whos, but now I'm thinking actual scam.

>> No.10691076

>>10691044
being this close

>> No.10691078

>>10690639
??? I have 10k binance links. Is this a meme

>> No.10691085

this palce is a chainlink circlejerk now.

i hold link, but this isnt a great thing. literally who? a random blockchain company. this is vechain tier in getting hyped over nothing.

>> No.10691087

>>10691026
Is buying link like buying shares? I know that's an absolutely fucking retarded question but I'm literally navigating in the dark here.
I don't even know how much this shit costs right now. Or if anything I'm reading from googling is even correct or trustworthy. It seems like I read shit elsewhere, then come here and everyone contradicts what I've just read.

>> No.10691101
File: 1.68 MB, 320x240, 650016BD-7C97-4B52-B523-A0CB9C1B5E07.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10691101

Anybody who buys into this stupid pump and dump shit coin deserves to have every penny of their hard work stolen from them

>> No.10691104

>>10690585
Buy eth on coinbase and transfer them over too binance to buy it.

>> No.10691106

>>10689617
Diamonds

>> No.10691120

I dont get it
how is this big news at all?

>> No.10691129

>>10691085
>literally who
Openlaw is a Consensys offshoot you absolute brainlet.

>> No.10691134

>>10691087

holy shit, its a fucking meme dipshit

>> No.10691142

>>10691120
Well it might be news to you that you're a retard; since you don't get this.

>> No.10691144

>>10690866
Shut up lol shadow fork lmao i bet that took 4 iq points to make up, try harder fag

>> No.10691148

>>10691087
its a meme retard

no one actually believes this shit

>> No.10691150

>>10691142
or maybe you're the retarded one for thinking this is something big?

>> No.10691151

>>10691129


again, who?

>> No.10691154

>>10691078
Yes, you own meme tokens

>> No.10691157

>>10691150
>>10691151
My point exactly.

>> No.10691163

>>10691078
>he actually bought binance LINK instead of ChainLink from chinkdex
How new are you, you'll never make it, the link on binance is a fork made by a famous bitcoin cash shill called Bizonacci to scam normies out of their money, we've been warning people about this for months now.

>> No.10691166

>>10691030
Um no, “associate” and “partner” are not on the same level because they don’t mean the same thing, especially in business and law. A partner is a part of the company. An associate is underneath the partner(s). If someone makes a tab called “Friends & Family”, friends and family are not on the same level. Blood is thicker than water. And your brain is deluded beyond repair.

>> No.10691173

>>10691101
that's what your mom looked like after i pumped and dumped her

>> No.10691178

>>10689430
FUUUUUCK

How am I going to FUD linkies now? I know I responsible for getting a handful of you to market sell but I was expecting to get the whole board to eventually.

>> No.10691181

>>10691166
>“associate” and “partner” are not on the same level because they don’t mean the same thing
That makes no sense.

>> No.10691199

>>10691181
Um sweetie, tell me why we have different words and different definitions for different things? Are you feeling ok?

>> No.10691203

>>10691044
OFF BY ONE OH LAWD
>>10691087
It's a token, not a coin; it isn't a currency so to speak, but it pays people who run the network that Link uses, and, of course the idea is it accumulates value as use of Chainlink grows. If you go to CoinMarketCap . com you will see a search box where you can find the Link token, right now it's about 0.25 USD.

Although it is Reddit, the r/linktrader sub may be a good place to find some more solid information, /biz/ threads often divulge into a fud and shill tug-of-war.

So in summary, no it isn't like shares, but does/will have value in relation to Link's network. Also official website is a good place to read up on the vision of the thing, etc.

Sorry if that's a ramble but good luck mate

>> No.10691212

Partner or associate, does it matter? The point is that the network is going to be used. See the bigger picture and you'll realize that it's much bigger than some announcement p&d.

>> No.10691218
File: 319 KB, 501x720, 1533758522427.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10691218

Literally who?
How do I short this shitcoin?

>> No.10691220

>>10691178


try harder. biz is retarded but not stupid enough to fall for this obvious revers shill. what is your Iq exactly?

>> No.10691224

>>10690790
You are 60% down? Must feel bad. Its ok though you will still make it. Good think I bought at 19 cents. Feels Comfy.

>> No.10691229

>>10689617
Hope you dreams will become reality.

>> No.10691230

>>10691203

acting like reddit link sub isnt just biz shilling it to make it look legit. you are cancer

>> No.10691233

>>10691163
Shut up go make up something better than shadow fork lmao like seriously thats all you got...shadow fork...wow good job buddy/fah

>> No.10691247

GOOD

>> No.10691253

>>10691233

>replying to an obvious bait. you realise you are just making linkies look stupid by taking that seriously right?

this is the intelligence of link holders..

>> No.10691271

>>10691203
Unlike most 4chan scum, I appreciate a good ramble.

>> No.10691276
File: 32 KB, 1303x411, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10691276

>>10691166
SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY MAN
WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TRYING TO ACHIEVE?

>> No.10691286

>>10691199
>things that aren't the same thing can't be on the same level
You tried.

>> No.10691346

>HURRRRR LITERALLY WHO??

1) Openlaw/Consensys is not "literally who"
2) ETH exploded because a sea of "literally whos" printed their tokens using ETH

Cope more, harder, and better.

>> No.10691412

does lose fomo exist too?

>> No.10691421

>>10691346

no. eth exploded because:

Bull market
had faster TPS in a time where there was MASSIVE internal struggle on BTC scaling(the main issue of Q1/2 2017)
ICOs

not because of the meme alliance. holy shit. your an idiot

>> No.10691425
File: 80 KB, 645x729, 1523290887414.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10691425

>>10691286
>friends are on the same level as family because they're in my "friends & family" tab
>a 1.0 magnitude Earthquake is on the same level as a category 5 hurricane cause both are in my "natural disasters" tab
>people who are actually part of the company are on the same level as those merely contributing to the company

>> No.10691426

>>10690257
stinky

>> No.10691445

>>10691421
You're fucking stupid. Why do you think there was a bull market in the first place? What made ICOs possible?

Now with chainlink, you have use cases that don't just magically go away because their devs want to cash out their ICO eth and buy lambos. It will dwarf the ETH run.

>> No.10691446

>>10690416
Top 300

>> No.10691457
File: 49 KB, 1303x411, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10691457

>>10691425
I even underlined it for you this time

>> No.10691456

>>10691421
>eth exploded because:
>Bull market
A bull market which ETH largely fuelled because of the thousands of ICOs it spawned.

>had faster TPS
So did fucking digibyte lmao.

There's only ONE reason ETH got to rank 2 on CMC, and that's the shittoken-dispensing smart contracts.

>> No.10691486

>>10691421
Lol you are such a moron. Eth mooning was about ICOs, nothing to do with TPS

>> No.10691497

>>10691445

did you just ignore bitcoin going from 150 dollars back to 800 dollars? thats the bull market idiot. it started in late 2015.

you think eth started it, lol.

>> No.10691498

>>10691425
There's a very simple concept of "on the same level but not the same".

It's one of the first things you learn after being born: dad and mom are not the same but on the same level called "parents".
Guess you were brought up by a pack of liberal lesbians.

>> No.10691518

>>10691456

ok i agree mostly. how is that relevant to this chainlink "partnership" some tarded anon is acting like this is capable of starting a bullrun kek

>> No.10691540
File: 128 KB, 1000x1000, 1522761565092.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10691540

>>10690951
You don't need to understand friend. Just put all your money in chainlink and sit tight. You'll be swimming in cashola. Thank me later... If you can find me on my mega yacht.
t.105k linklet.

>> No.10691542

>>10691276
>a business or firm owned and run by two or more partners
So you're telling me Chainlink owns and/or runs Accord now? Really m8? So when Mobius contributes to Accord it will own a piece of it too?

>> No.10691546

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>> No.10691553

>>10691518
The point is that even if Openlaw is a "literally who", it's still extremely good news since ETH got to rank 2 on a wave of literally whos.
And Openlaw/consensys is not literally who.

>> No.10691584

Copypasta FUD I found on reddit.

>> No.10691586

no sirs please do not listening and pls to be buying the mobius instead is partners with the "CloseLaw" is very more exclusive than the openedlaw who has many pajoots sirs

>> No.10691616

>>10691498
that's because mom and dad are both parents you fucking doofus. there isn't any other option or definition or "level" available in that context. holy shit youre dumb as a box of rocks.

>> No.10691617

>>10691542
first of all, you're probably autistic
and yes, SmartContract is part of the Accord Project, they're contributing with their tech, ChainLink

that's like saying Santander (or any other bank) owns SWIFT because they're partnered

do you have fun baiting people or are just plain stupid / incapable of accepting you're wrong

>> No.10691624

>>10691616
Feed me another (You).

>> No.10691647

>>10691542
also I assume it's bait because I fucking underlines it for you
>associate synonym: partner
>partnership synonym: association

you do know what a synonym is, right?

>> No.10691697
File: 1.10 MB, 989x595, 1525221414311.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10691697

>>10691166
>17 posts by this ID
motherfucker arguing about semantics
how fucking desperate are you? fuck off if you don't like it, no one invited or needs you lmao, fuck off and never come back

>> No.10691698

>>10691616
>that's because mom and dad are both parents
That’s literally what he said.

>> No.10691710

A big nothingBURGER

>> No.10691712

>>10691425
my favorite brainlet

>> No.10691718
File: 430 KB, 1021x2190, glbc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10691718

>> No.10691719

>>10689487
Hahaha fucking FAKE FUD chainlink is a discord group pump and dump scam, FUCK YOU ASSHOLES I almost bought before I looked into your fake ass twitter accounts now I’m all in on BTC NIGGERS

>> No.10691725
File: 220 KB, 724x483, 3 women laughing at you.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10691725

>>10691698
>he unironically just tried samefagging
get a better proxy next time pajeet

>> No.10691730

>>10691166
PLEASE FUCK OFF PLEASE

>> No.10691735

>>10691421
EEA was absolutely what caused ETH to explode you fucking mong. You probably got here in December stop acting like you know shit faggot. God dammit I hate biz.

>> No.10691754

>>10691725
*it

>> No.10691797

>>10689430
So how is this better than a normal contract between parties since "the blockchain" isn't going to be accepted as a legal or judicial authority, and disputes will have to be arbitrated in a court just like regular contracts anyway?

>> No.10691810

>>10691457
ignore them. they're just JIDF operators trying to keep the hordes of neon-nazis away from the one thing that will bring about the end of the israeli state i.e. LINK.

>> No.10691816

>>10691797
yes, don't buy chainlink, it's a scam
obviously the current state of things is the best for everyone, nothing can be upgraded with new technologies and laws aren't made everyday

>> No.10691832

https://twitter.com/Kaleido_io/following

>> No.10691865

>>10689430
who?

>> No.10691870

>>10691087
Unironically
NOW IS THE TIME
LINK will never be below current price.
>solves blockchain
>usecase all of
>first mover advantage

>> No.10691876

>>10691797
>"the blockchain" isn't going to be accepted as a legal or judicial authority
o boy:

https://legalconsortium.org/
>The world’s oldest and most established legal organizations realize the benefits of blockchain technology. However, without major intermediaries providing convenience and guidance, industries must band together to jointly develop standards and governance.

>> No.10691877

>>10691457
Hmm ok so now you're telling me "business" also unequivocally means the same thing as "partnership" because it's a synonym? And that "confederate" means the exact same thing as "associate"? Are you really that incapable of original thought?

>> No.10691885

>>10691735

lmao, no i wasnt. i experience the last bubble in full time, tahts why i know chanlink is going to 0.09$. i saw ripple faggots go through the same "much partnerships" and "muh usecase" and autistic dot connecting convinced they were not going down with the tide of the market. they did.

>> No.10691935

>>10691797
The whole point of the blockchain, decentralization, and smart contracts is you don't need trusted third parties like legal authorities, attorneys, notaries, ...
Your very question shows that you missed the whole point of crypto.

>> No.10691937
File: 167 KB, 600x500, 1449090657362.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10691937

>only 13k Link

I wish i had more, i did my best

>> No.10691951

>>10691101
why would someone even record that?

>> No.10691960

>>10691885
What do you mean "last time"? 8 months ago?
Lol

>> No.10691977

>>10691935
Except I think the state of crypto basically makes the case that you do in fact need all of those things.

>> No.10691994
File: 38 KB, 1357x615, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10691994

>>10691877
I'm just saying you're either really stupid and stubborn or enjoy trolling, which in my terms also means you're stupid

>> No.10691995

>>10691977
You have no idea what smart contracts and crypto are about.

>> No.10692075
File: 65 KB, 760x613, 1525741536589.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10692075

>>10690554
>>10690637

>> No.10692093

>>10690312
EPIC libtard TROLLING fellow kekistani!

>> No.10692114

>>10691937
Is that not a lot?

>> No.10692132

>>10691977
|
|>
|x
|
|

>> No.10692138

>>10690846
Thanks for the info you fucking faggot

>> No.10692146

>>10691885
Hard to say what you're getting at since you type like a fucking pajeet but a few things
>we've bounced off 6k 4 times now
>mainnet is near as evidenced by marketing director hire, partners being announced, etc
>price is holding steady in USD and quickly climbing CMC rankings during this bloodbath
>a lot of the breadcrumbs from the past few months are actually materializing
If you don't want to invest your rupees that's fine but don't act like you know shit faggot

>> No.10692174

>>10689430
DOWN 6% TODAY ON THIS EXCITING NEWS. HOLY SHIT BUY BUY BUY.

>> No.10692188

>>10689594
Was open law one of the better dots connected? Are their any other dots that are even more likely than openlaw that are potentially even better?

>> No.10692194

>>10691542
You are a fucking retard, but how big is your link bag?

>> No.10692197

Okay i've had it with you fucking cancer ass stinky linkys. Every day i come to 4chan biz and see this faggot ass threads about chainlink i literally am starting to get a fucking brain tumor. The filter is going on. But before i leave i will leave you a food of thought:

You see little retard faggot ass morons, i have already put a 90c alarm on my etherdelta. Get it? While you faggots research and find out how many cells there are in Sergeys fucking asshole, i just sit back and enjoy the ride by fucking hoes and doing coke. Now when 90c hits, i just buy some suicide insurance CHAINLINK's and i dont even care if you 4x or 5x your money. If this truly is the next fucking revolutionary crypto then going from 90c to 10$ is 10x right? And to 100$ its 100x. The point is im going to get rich as well anyways so it doesnt fucking matter. Wow you made a bit more but who cares. The point is that im not wasting my life on constantly posting shit like this and spamming hell out of this crypto. See you at 90c and yeah i dont care if i buy your bags. Im not an all-in brainlet in 1 coin retard.

Filter ON!

>> No.10692228

>>10692197
Damn, you know your shit.
I appreciate the research you've put into this, and thank you for sharing it. I hope others seriously consider your warning.

>> No.10692239

>>10692194
don't even need to ask, look how desperate that faggot is

>> No.10692242

>>10690416
Ranking are skewed because a lot of people probably have 20k in 4 different wallets

>> No.10692244

>>10692197
cool story bro

>> No.10692247

>>10689670
>https://docs.openlaw.io/markdown/index.html

<% #Smart Contract to Pay Employee
[[@Payment in Wei = Payment in Ether * 1000000000000000000]]

[[Pay Vendor:EthereumCall(
contract:"0xe532d1d1147ab40d0a245283f4457c733b5e3d41";
interface:[{"name":"makePayment", "type":"function","inputs": [{"name":"RecipientAddress", "type":"address"},{"type":"uint","name":"PaymentInWei"}],"outputs": []}];
function:"makePayment";
arguments:Recipient Ethereum Address,Payment in Wei;
startDate:Payment Start Date;
endDate:Payment End Date;
repeatEvery:"1 minute")]]

%>

This agreement is entered into by [[Party A]] and [[Party B]] on [[Effective Date: Date]].

**WHEREAS**, [[Party B]] seeks [[Party A]]'s programming services; and

**WHEREAS**, [[Party A]] seeks to be paid in ether;

**NOW, THEREFORE**, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows:

^ [[Party A]] agrees to pay [[Party B]] [[Payment in Ether: Number]] ether, every minute, starting on [[Payment Start Date: DateTime]] and ending on [[Payment End Date: DateTime]] for programming services.

^ Payment will be paid to [[Party B]]'s ethereum address located at [[Recipient Ethereum Address: EthAddress]], using the Ethereum smart contract found at "0xe532d1d1147ab40d0a245283f4457c733b5e3d41," which is incorporated by reference herein.

[[Pay Vendor]]

**[[Party A | Uppercase]]**

[[Party A Email: Identity | Signature]]
_________________________
(signature)

**[[Party B | Uppercase]]**

[[Party B Email: Identity | Signature]]
_________________________
(signature)

>> No.10692268

>>10692197
Nice. Good to know you'll be there to buy my bags at the top

>> No.10692292
File: 253 KB, 1554x677, lol.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10692292

>>10691994
mobius ccould become an accord "partner" any time it likes in your deluded terms since it can contribute just like chainlink does. but would it really be a partner though? i seriously hope it happens just to see your mega cope.

>> No.10692293

>>10692247
With this, a continuously reaffirmable consent-for-sex can be implementable on the blockchain using a kinda roastie undestandable contract language with some nice IoT device monitoring for biological markers

>> No.10692334

>>10692247
>Ohohohohooh muh missing curly brackets

>> No.10692354

>>10692292
Accord IS a community collaboaration
if chainlink is a collaborator it means they're associated
they're the ones to state it, they're the ones to have SmartContract listed as a partner

what's your point?

>> No.10692356

>>10692292
And if Mobius makes it to the "partners & associates" page of the Accord website, Mobius will have reason to celebrate.

>> No.10692387

At this point it's pure retardation not to put all your money into Chain Link,
it will go to $1k or maybe even $20k

>> No.10692411

>>10689430
>LINK partners with blockchain startup with 2 man team
>literally shaking

the absolute state of deluded linkies

>> No.10692459

>>10692354
yes and? theyre associated because chainlink is a contributor. and they clearly expressed the fact that anyone can become a contributor. a partner owns a piece of the company, which chainlink or any other oracle service, doesn't do. so instead of being some sort of exclusive partner which you make chainlink out to be, it's just one of an infinite amount of possible contributors. hardly has the same fucking ring to it does it m8?
>>10692356
not really since literally any shit tier oracle service can contribute and become an associate

>> No.10692582

>>10690555
Checked 1k EOY

>> No.10692613

>>10692459
yes, but there's only one oracle provider associated to Accord, and it's ChainLink / SmartContract
which was called a "leading provider of secure oracle services" by Accord on the partnership announcement

check it out yourself m8, not the first time they're called leaders in that space
https://medium.com/@accordhq/smart-legal-contracts-and-oracles-36d4eb538a92

>> No.10692639
File: 83 KB, 645x614, 5644845.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10692639

>>10692411
>using nearly year old fud

>> No.10692645

>>10692459
>not really since literally any shit tier oracle service can contribute and become an associate
And how many are listed on Accord's partners & associates page?

>> No.10692733

>>10692613
>but there's only one oracle provider associated to Accord
until literally any other oracle service deices to become associated. in other words it means jack shit. the "leaders of secure oracle providers" is just chainlink's cringey catchphrase.

>> No.10692749

>>10692645
A shit ton of literal who's are there.

>> No.10692859

jesus I don't get this shit
can you just buy link or do you have to first buy some other crypto to buy it with?

>> No.10692861

>>10692749
You are a literal who.

>> No.10693137

>>10692733
did you sell low?
what exactly are you trying to accomplish with this retardism?
or are you just butthurt because people are calling out on your stupidity?

seriously, "I was just pretending to be retarded" at full force going on here

>> No.10693179
File: 42 KB, 500x339, train-like-sergey.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10693179

>>10692859
Buy Ethereum on coinbase.
Open a binance.Com account.
Find your Ethereum adress in binance.
Withdraw your coinbase Ethereum to binance.
Buy link with your Ethereum in binance.
Keep it binance cos you sound like the kinda guy who would fuck up a wallet and storage.
Good luck anon

>> No.10693368

>>10693179
Literally the process I'm reading about right now.
I already created a wallet, though. So, I guess I'm gona fuck it up.

>> No.10693555

>>10692411
>consensys
>2 man team
Imagine being this clueless.

>> No.10693560

>>10693368

Buy a Ledger Nano S.

Learn how to use it properly.

Store everything there.

This is only if you are buying an amount above 1K LINK