[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 15 KB, 550x366, 714A10EE-24C6-46F2-9D2D-9588BC72156C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689006 No.10689006 [Reply] [Original]

Hahah did you guys really fall for the cryptocurrency scam?

The name itself should have raised red flags amongst those of you with any self awareness. Currency/money is defined as having three characteristics, a) a unit of accounts (yet everyone counts their crypto in dollars), b) a medium of exchange (pretty sure nobody uses crypto to buy anything) and c) a preserver of value (goes up 10x or down 90% in a year).

So if it’s not currency/money then what is it? Well it is a speculative asset, but cryptospeculativeasset doesn’t have the same ring to it. But even then let’s break it down further. Let’s of things are speculative assets, for example bonds, stocks, real estate, art, derivatives. There is nothing wrong with being a speculative assets. But most speculative assets have some sort of fundamentals to them: stocks have earnings and dividends, even perceived overvalued stocks like amazon generate tremendous cash flow from working capital ($20 billion a year); bonds have interest and coupons and real estate generate rent; even commodities like oil, steel and pork bellies which are driven by pure supply and demand with no cash flows are subject real fundamental usage and supply changes (such as bad weather creating a poor harvest, or suddenly people buying more cars thus using more oil).

So what is crypto? It is a speculative asset where supply and demand is not based on usage, but pure supply and demand by the investor, there are other assets like this such as art, collectibles, vintage cars. But even those things have scarcity. After all there is only so many Picasso’s and limited production Ferraris. While anyone can build a crypto, there is essentially no difference in the underlying technology except for the scale of adoption. The marginal cost of creating a new crypto is zero.

>> No.10689023
File: 408 KB, 3000x2000, 8ACDE737-F9A7-409B-BAFC-0E5C1252EF6A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689023

So now we have established it really is cryptospeculativeassetwithnofundamentalsorscarcity. Again this is all fine, but the question is how much it should be worth? For crypto to hit 10-20 trillion, which was required to make a 10x/20x January, how many of you knew what that really meant? At $15 trillion, crypto would be as big as all real estate in the United States. At $20 trillion, it would be as big as the entire US stock exchange, housing nearly all of the largest multinational companies in the world. If you had 20 trillion dollars, would you buy almost all the big companies in the world, generating trillions in profits and dividends or all of the real estate in the US, generating trillions in rental income, or buy crypto?

It was obviously a bubble even at $1 trillion, which it nearly hit. But you got greedy, inside your little mind, the delusion kept going. Digital Gold! Despite all the gold in the world being worth $7 trillion and having 5,000+ years of usage. And now you won’t let the delusion go, it is too painful and obvious in retrospect. So you’ll convince yourself it will come back anyday now, and baghold to zero.

>> No.10689035

>>10689006
Yes, so essentially, a speculative asset backed by nothing.
As one who doesn't own any I can't really say I fell for it, but I'm sure there are some who profited from it, scam or not (most of them are lying, but still).

>> No.10689051

Does Op get attention for long boring posts on Reddit

>> No.10689069

>>10689035
I've profited in both directions, it's the future of economies, I'm not reading what a Buffetcuck says ever.

>> No.10689139

the only function of fiat currency is paying taxes, so i'm divesting myself of that burden.
as for speculative assets, modern art is certainly a jew scam. i'd rather participate in crypto than seek to acquire a (((mark rothko))) painting, no matter how insistent shlomo shekelstein the art critic is that his works are worth hundreds of millions of dollars. you are free to do otherwise of course.

>> No.10689158

>>10689069
Yeah, I've made money via speculative assets as well. Tomorrow it's going to rain, I don't read anything by Neil Simon.

>> No.10689180

>>10689069

I've lost money and Buffett can suck a cock. He made all his money colluding with the government to make people obese and weak.

>> No.10689190

>>10689139

He doesn’t know expensive art is basically crypto for the rich.

>> No.10689237

>>10689006
december normie chillax

>> No.10689256

>While anyone can build a crypto, there is essentially no difference in the underlying technology except for the scale of adoption. The marginal cost of creating a new crypto is zero.

this is why proof of work coins have value but only once there are enough 51% attacks on poorly secured chains. whatever is the highest hashrate for a given hashing algorithm has proportional value to the cost to successfully attack.

>> No.10689350
File: 228 KB, 1200x1800, 1501533573085.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689350

>>10689006

So is paper money. What separates the men from the boys is confidence...

The whole thing is a trick of the mind anyway...

>> No.10689527

>>10689350
>so is paper money
Are cryptofags confirmed retarded now?